PM Anwar launches National Month and Jalur Gemilang campaign in Muar
Deputy Prime Ministers Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof, along with Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil and Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi, are expected to attend.
Anwar will also flag off the 2025 Jalur Gemilang Merdeka Expedition Convoy, a nationwide tour spreading messages of unity.
Pre-launch activities began last Friday, featuring family-friendly events such as colouring and singing competitions (Bintang Suara MADANI), cultural performances, and local showcases. Popular attractions included the MADANI Community entrepreneur booths, highlighting micro and small businesses, and government-private agency service booths offering public services.
Free health and dental check-ups, JPJ driver's licence renewals, NRD and EPF services, women's health screenings, and a 30% discount on PDRM traffic summonses were among the services provided.
Today's main events include the Merdeka 6.8km Fun Run & Walk and a convoy performance showcasing land and water assets. Organisers anticipate over 10,000 attendees, fostering national pride ahead of the upcoming celebrations. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Kampung Angkat Madani initiative boosts rural growth
PETALING JAYA: The government's Kampung Angkat Madani programme has helped close the development gap between rural and urban areas through a community-focused approach, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. In a written parliamentary reply, he said RM1 million had been channelled to each village involved in the initiative, with an additional RM200,000 allocated for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) projects. These cover both physical and non-physical components. 'For physical projects, the focus was on building basic infrastructure such as roads, street lighting, internet access and water supply. 'The non-physical projects include health screening, on-site verification of assistance and educational guidance for children who have dropped out of school,' he said in reply to Dr Mohammed Taufiq Johari (PH–Sungai Petani). Mohammed Taufiq had asked how the ministry was monitoring the programme's effectiveness in bridging the rural-urban gap in 2025. Anwar said the programme is monitored through the Madani Adopted Programme dashboard, a centralised platform where leadership teams track progress and submit monthly reports to the Implementation Coordination Unit of the Prime Minister's Department for follow-up action. He said the initiative had accelerated development in rural areas, ensured projects met local needs and delivered a broader impact to village communities. Overall, the programme is expected to directly improve the quality of life and socio-economic status of residents.
Borneo Post
3 hours ago
- Borneo Post
The South China Sea Code
Photo shows a chain of islands in the South China Sea. — AFP photo FIRST of all, I wish to join other Malaysians in congratulating Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, our Prime Minister, for his recent success in securing the agreement of Thailand and Cambodia to stop fighting, For a while, anyway. At the time of writing this article, the ceasefire appeared to be holding. Secondly, I think there is a job that Malaysia should also attempt, as Chairman of Asean. The success in the peace-making is no mean achievement for our country, showing the relevance of Malaysia's role in international diplomacy. All this success at diplomacy should embolden our diplomats to think about embarking on another task – tuning the text of the South China Sea Code of Conduct (COC). Asean leaders have been talking about this Code for the past 20 years or so, but have not been able to produce it for reasons only the diplomatic fraternity would talk about, out of hearing of the journalists. The COC is a mechanism for managing internal disputes among the littoral countries of Asean, namely the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, Vietnam and China. China's active participation in the discussion on the Code is crucial because all decisions reached at meetings will be binding on the countries concerned. Good relations and rapport between China and the Asean member countries are urgent because these Asean member countries lie inside the loop of the so-called 'Nine-Dash Line'; they must be set free as soon as possible. Asian and China's statesmen in the past wanted this region of the world to be classified as a Zone of Peace and Neutrality (ZOPAN). Why cannot it remain such for all times? The current leaders of the countries and China must show statesmanship if they want history to be kind to their leadership when they disappear from the scene. By 2018, the soft copy of the Code was put on the backburner until Singapore assumed the Asean Chair. According to a report by Reuters, quoted by The Borneo Post on Feb 8, 2018, the move to 'expedite negotiations on a code of conduct on China for the disputed South China Sea' had hit a snag. But this was eventually solved after China and Asean had decided on a negotiating framework. In fact, the parties had begun preliminary discussions on the Code itself. Unfortunately, the substantive discussions petered out. I don't know why. Meanwhile, China's activities in terms of building more and more islands/land reclamations in parts of the Sea, threats about an imminent invasion of Taiwan by China, and about the use of water cannons on Filipino fishers by Chinese patrol boats, made the littoral states nervous. To compound the anxiety, there has been intense competition for hegemony between China and the USA, the 'Big Boys'. More worries for the peoples of the Asean block. Hence the urgency for a rule to govern relations. We were relieved for a short time only when in 2016 the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled that 'China's Nine-Dash Line had no legal basis', referring to a judgment in a case brought by the Philippines against China. But China simply rejected the ruling. Malaysia, if given the chance to handle the fine-tuning of the Code, has to be careful about making too much noise (fishing in troubled waters). We must avoid getting into trouble with China, or be seen as siding with other major powers. But the job is of such importance that the Chairman of Asean is expected to handle it, however difficult the task will be. The idea of the COC was seriously discussed in August of 2018. It should be a mechanism by which disputes would be managed, peace and stability be promoted among all the littoral states around the South China Sea. Reuters reported that 'China and the 10- member Asean block adopted a negotiating framework on the code and had commenced talks on the code itself'. That was seven years ago. It is a difficult issue to solve indeed but Malaysia, given another chance at diplomacy, has nothing to lose by trying! Try it we must for a reason – a good reason. The federal government of Malaysia might lose some credibility on the home front should Malaysia's national interests in Sarawak, now at stake, be relegated to the backburner – or worse, ignored. Don't forget that Sarawak and Sabah, with long shorelines facing the South China Sea, are well within the sights of any power that might want to enforce a Nine-Dash-Line! When Malaysia was about to assume the chairmanship of Asean, many people in Sarawak were wondering if the federal government had forgotten about the state's interests. These interests were subject to dispute by China, referring to the famous Nine-Dash-Line again. The preservation and protection of this nation's rights and interests over the territorial waters off Sarawak are fundamental to the future of the Federation itself. That's not just headline fodder, obviously Sarawak can't be expected to defend its own territory against possible attacks from the sea! It is essential that all the Asean countries, where the territorial waters are inside that Nine-Dash-Line, to come together and, in one voice, talk to China about mutual respect for each other's right to own property within one's boundary. * The opinions expressed in this article are the columnist's own and do not reflect the view of the newspaper. asean China nine-dash line south china sea
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Beyond disputes: Turning Ambalat and Pedra Branca into platforms for maritime cooperation
THE maritime disputes over Ambalat and Batu Puteh are complex. Ambalat, located in the resource-rich Sulawesi Sea, is claimed by Malaysia and Indonesia since the early 2000s. The area is believed to contain significant hydrocarbon reserves, and both countries have issued oil exploration licences that have led to diplomatic protests and naval stand-offs. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim recently emphasised the role of Sabah — which is the Malaysian state closest to the area — in ensuring that any joint development has equitable outcomes for border communities. Meanwhile, the dispute over Batu Puteh was partially resolved in 2008 when the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarded sovereignty over it to Singapore. In the same judgment, the ICJ ruled that Middle Rocks belonged to Malaysia, while sovereignty over South Ledge would rest with the state in whose territorial waters it is located. As the ICJ did not delimit maritime boundaries, South Ledge's status is unresolved. In recent years, bilateral efforts have intensified to resolve outstanding maritime issues. At the 11th Malaysia-Singapore Leaders' Retreat in January, both governments agreed to begin technical work to delimit maritime boundaries in the Johor Strait, using the 1927 Territorial Waters Agreement as a legal basis. Singapore's continued engagement through the Joint Technical Committee reflects its commitment to resolve maritime issues through dialogue and legal frameworks. These disputes reflect deeper questions of sovereignty, historical memory and control over vital sea lanes. But they also present an opportunity to transform contested maritime zones into shared spaces of cooperation. Malaysia and Indonesia should consider establishing a joint development authority (JDA) to manage resources and reduce tensions over Ambalat. Similarly, Malaysia and Singapore could explore cooperative arrangements around Middle Rocks and South Ledge, focusing on maritime safety, environmental stewardship and scientific research. Such frameworks — already proven in the Malaysia-Thailand JDA in the Gulf of Thailand — would allow all parties to benefit economically while preserving their legal positions. Importantly, joint development does not require any party to relinquish its claims. Under Article 83 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea , states are encouraged to reach provisional arrangements pending final delimitation. Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore have played pivotal roles in Asean's evolution and have consistently advocated for peaceful dispute resolution and regional stability. Their cooperation on Ambalat and Batu Puteh could serve as a model for other maritime disputes in Southeast Asia, including in the South China Sea. A coordinated initiative involving Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore — each addressing their respective maritime disputes — could serve as a model for broader governance reforms within Asean, strengthening its commitment to pragmatic diplomacy and peaceful resolution. Public discourse in all three countries must focus on collaboration. Parliamentarians, diplomats and civil society leaders should advocate for open dialogue, confidence-building measures and creative legal solutions. The media should frame these disputes as opportunities for partnership. Ambalat and Batu Puteh should be reimagined as foundations for a shared maritime future — where sovereignty concerns are balanced with economic pragmatism and regional solidarity. The establishment of JDAs would not only unlock resource potential but also signal that Southeast Asia is capable of resolving disputes through diplomacy and innovation. During the recent Malaysia-Indonesia Annual Consultation, President Prabowo Subianto reaffirmed Indonesia's commitment to resolving the Ambalat dispute through peaceful means. Both leaders agreed to explore joint development initiatives as they recognise that legal processes may take years. This bilateral momentum reflects a pragmatic approach to diplomacy. On the Batu Puteh front, Singapore has likewise shown its willingness to cooperate. These parallel bilateral engagements — Malaysia with Indonesia over Ambalat, and Malaysia with Singapore over Batu Puteh — signal a commitment to regional stability, peaceful dispute resolution and collaborative maritime governance.
