
Pakistan wanted a 48-hour operation, we shut it down in 8: CDS Anil Chauhan on how India foiled Pak's plan
Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan on Tuesday revealed that Pakistan's military was aiming to cripple India within 48 hours through escalated
cross-border strikes
during
Operation Sindoor
. However, India's swift and targeted response forced Islamabad to seek de-escalation within just eight hours.
'On the 10th of May, at about 1 am, their (Pakistan's) aim was to get India to its knees in 48 hours,' Chauhan said during a lecture at a university in Pune. 'Multiple attacks were launched and in some manner, they have escalated this conflict, which we had actually hit only terror targets... Operations which they thought would continue for 48 hours, folded up in about 8 hours and then they picked up the telephone and said they wanted to talk,' he added.
General Chauhan underlined that the mindset behind Pakistan's actions was not new. He traced it back to 1965 when
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
, Pakistan's former Prime Minister and President, told the United Nations Security Council that his country would wage a 'thousand-year war' against India.
'In a 1965 speech to the UN Security Council, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto declared a thousand-year war against India,' the CDS said. 'Recent remarks made by Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir were reminiscent of those previously propagated against India by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto,' he added.
Also read:
Pakistan follows a 1000-year war policy against India, says CDS Anil Chauhan
Live Events
Asim Munir's playbook inspired by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
CDS Chauhan also accused Munir of 'spewing venom against India' just days before the massacre in Pahalgam, where 26 civilians were shot dead in cold blood.
Describing the April 22
Pahalgam massacre
, General Chauhan said, 'What happened in Pahalgam was profound cruelty towards the victims because all of them were killed with head shots in front of their families and their children and they were shot in the name of religion... which is kind of unacceptable to this modern world.'
He said the incident triggered 'huge revulsion' in society and revived memories of past terror attacks India has endured. 'This was not a single act of terror against India. Western nations may have had one or two acts of terror… India has been a victim of maximum terror acts, almost 20,000 people have been killed,' the CDS stated.
He added that the core principle behind Operation Sindoor, which followed the Pahalgam killings, was that 'state-sponsored terrorism from Pakistan has to stop.'
Indian forces remain unfazed and ready
General Chauhan emphasised that India's armed forces remained unfazed despite the initial setbacks in the operation. 'India's professional forces have not been impacted by losses,' he said.
He explained that both India and Pakistan had built significant new capabilities, but not all had been tested in real combat scenarios. 'There is always an element of risk into it, but as they say, you cannot succeed if you don't take that type of risk. We knew that we have a better counter-drone system.'
India did suffer early losses in the air campaign, including fighter jets, Chauhan confirmed over the weekend. 'What I can say is on May 7, in the initial stages, there were losses,' he told Reuters TV — the first official confirmation from a senior defence leader.
While Pakistan claimed it had downed six Indian aircraft, including three Rafales, General Chauhan categorically denied this. 'That is absolutely incorrect,' he said in interviews to Reuters TV and Bloomberg TV during the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore.
He did not disclose the number of jets lost but said the
Indian Air Force
learned from early mistakes. 'The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets again, targeting at long range.'
By connecting the current crisis to Bhutto's decades-old vow at the UN, General Chauhan painted a picture of continuity in Pakistan's strategy toward India — a long-term, ideological hostility built around state-backed terror and military provocation.
But with Operation Sindoor, Chauhan said India had sent a clear message that such provocations would meet with swift and strategic retaliation — even in the face of risk.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sikh groups plan protests during PM Modi's G7 visit to Canada
LONDON: Sikh groups tied to the Khalistan movement are preparing a wave of protests against PM Narendra Modi during his visit to Canada for the G7 summit at Kananaskis in Alberta from June 15 to 17. Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a banned outfit leading an unofficial global Khalistan referendum, released a video vowing to 'ambush Modi politics from landing to take-off'. SFJ's general counsel Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, designated a terrorist by India, accused Modi of exporting 'transnational terrorism from Pakistan to Canada'. 'I want to thank Mark Carney — more of a businessman than a Canadian PM — for giving pro-Khalistan Sikhs a historic opportunity to ambush Modi's politics right in front of G7 nations,' Pannun said in the video. SFJ claimed the protests aim to force G7 nations to hold Modi accountable for the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen and Khalistan advocate killed last June, as well as an alleged 'murder-for-hire' plot targeting referendum organisers. Pannun also accused India of unleashing Operation Sindoor, which he described using Pakistani terminology as a 'terror attack on Pakistan targeting masjids'. India conducted precision airstrikes under Operation Sindoor on sites tied to Pakistan-backed terrorism, a fortnight after the April 22 terrorist attack in J&K's Pahalgam that claimed 26 lives — all men, mostly tourists. Sikh Federation Canada also condemned Modi's invitation, urging Ottawa to rescind it unless New Delhi cooperates with criminal probes linked to Nijjar's killing and other alleged transnational plots. The group demanded targeted sanctions on Indian brass, including Union home minister Amit Shah. It further called on Canada to 'publicly reaffirm that it will demand accountability from India for documented interference, violence, and assassination plots in Canada'. Canadian govt has yet to respond to the protest calls or the demand to revoke Modi's G7 invitation.


The Print
40 minutes ago
- The Print
Rahul slams EC's ‘unsigned' rebuttal of his Maharashtra poll rigging charge—'show voter rolls'
Earlier in April this year, ECI sources termed similar claims made by Rahul in the United States—first, in his address before the Indian diaspora in Boston, and second, at Brown University—as 'absurd'. In a social media post, the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) retorted that responses to 'serious questions' through 'unsigned, evasive notes' were unbecoming for a constitutional body such as ECI. 'Evasion won't protect your credibility. Telling the truth will,' Rahul posted on X. New Delhi: Not for the first time, Rahul Gandhi clashed with the Election Commission of India (ECI) Saturday over his allegation of 'industrial scale-rigging' during the Maharashtra assembly elections. The ECI indirectly clapped back at the Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition, reiterating that his charges were 'absurd', on the same day. However, this time, Rahul countered on X, saying: 'If you have nothing to hide, answer the questions in my article and prove it by: Publishing consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra.' He also demanded the release of CCTV footage from inside the polling booths recorded from 5 pm on the counting day before the Maharashtra assembly election results. But, ECI is not required to do what he says under the law. In December 2024, the Centre amended the Conduct of Election Rules, effectively removing electronic footage—earlier open to public inspection—from the polling process by stamping it out from the definition of 'election papers'. On earlier occasions, Rahul Gandhi has represented the amendment as indicative of the ECI becoming 'compromised'. In opinion pieces published in different languages in different newspapers, the LoP Saturday repeated the allegations he has been making against the ECI for some time now. Rahul laid out a 'step-by-step' playbook of election rigging in his pieces. 'Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission. Step 2: Add fake voters to the roll. Step 3: Inflate voter turnout. Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where BJP needs to win. Step 5: Hide the evidence,' he wrote. Sharing his write-up on X, Rahul also appealed to people to go through the 'evidence', judge for themselves, and demand answers. 'Because the match-fixing of Maharashtra will come to Bihar next, and then anywhere, the BJP is losing.' Assembly elections are due in Bihar later this year. The LoP, through his writing, also sought to substantiate his allegation of rigging in the Maharashtra assembly polls by raising questions on the increase in registered electors in the state from 9.29 crore during the LS polls to 9.70 crore during the assembly polls. 'A crawl of 31 lakh in five years, then a leap of 41 lakh in just five months,' Rahul wrote. 'So incredible was this leap that the registered voter total of 9.70 crore was even greater than the 9.54 crore adults in Maharashtra according to the government's own estimates.' He also raised suspicions about the rise in total voter turnout between 5 pm and the final figures released by ECI, calling the huge difference a major red flag. 'The polling turnout at 5 pm was 58.22 percent. Even after voting closed, however, [the] turnout kept increasing more and more. The final turnout was reported only the next morning to be 66.05 percent … The unprecedented 7.83 percentage point increase is equivalent to 76 lakh voters—much higher than previous Vidhan Sabha elections in Maharashtra,' Rahul stated. Hours after the piece came out, the ECI, without naming anyone, relayed through its sources that 'defaming the poll panel after receiving an unfavourable verdict from the voters is absolutely absurd'. The ECI sources said the rise in total voter turnout is not abnormal in the slightest way and that Rahul's allegations about the electoral rolls had no substance. 'After the finalisation of the electoral rolls for the Maharashtra election, as against the 9,77,90,752 (over 9.77 crore) electors, only 89 appeals were filed before the first appellate authority—the district magistrate concerned—and only one was filed before the second appellate authority—the state chief electoral officer,' according to the sources. Therefore, the ECI sources added, it was amply clear that the Congress or any other political party had no grievance before the Maharashtra assembly elections, which it supervised in 2024. Asserting that the ECI has replied to all the allegations levelled by the Congress earlier on 24 December 2024, the ECI sources added that over one lakh booth-level officers of Maharashtra are waiting for the 'wild allegations' to turn into 'at least one single real appeal before district magistrates' in line with the election laws that exist to avoid discrepancies in the list of electors. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: Time to 'retire lame horse'—Rahul Gandhi hints at massive revamp of MP Congress unit


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Bengal: ‘How can PM take credit for Operation Sindoor' — Hakim's remarks spark row, BJP says ‘insult'
KOLKATA MAYOR and State Urban Development and Municipal Affairs minister Firhad Hakim sparked a controversy on Saturday after his remarks targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi in connection with Operation Sindoor. The BJP reacted sharply, alleging that the TMC leader 'insulted' the PM and tried to 'downplay' Operation Sindoor. The TMC did not immediately respond to Hakim's remarks. While speaking to mediapersons, Hakim claimed, 'The Indian armed forces gave a befitting answer to Pakistan. How can the PM claim that he has done anything big? How can he take credit for Operation Sindoor?' In a post on X later on Saturday, the BJP wrote, 'Firhad Hakim — Mamata's loudest mouthpiece and the same man who once called parts of Kolkata 'mini Pakistan' — has now crossed every line. He downplayed Operation Sindoor, insulted PM Modi…this isn't political opposition — this is verbal treason. And Mamata Banerjee? Silent…' The BJP's state president Sukanta Majumdar said, 'Basically, Hakim has never taken a stance against Pakistan. During the erstwhile UPA government's tenure, no such steps were taken against Pakistan. That is why Hakim and some others are now finding it tough to accept that it was done.' Attaching a video of Hakim's purported remarks, BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya accused the senior TMC leader of making a 'disgraceful attack' on the PM. Atri Mitra is a Special Correspondent of The Indian Express with more than 20 years of experience in reporting from West Bengal, Bihar and the North-East. He has been covering administration and political news for more than ten years and has a keen interest in political development in West Bengal. Atri holds a Master degree in Economics from Rabindrabharati University and Bachelor's degree from Calcutta University. He is also an alumnus of St. Xavier's, Kolkata and Ramakrishna Mission Asrama, Narendrapur. He started his career with leading vernacular daily the Anandabazar Patrika, and worked there for more than fifteen years. He worked as Bihar correspondent for more than three years for Anandabazar Patrika. He covered the 2009 Lok Sabha election and 2010 assembly elections. He also worked with News18-Bangla and covered the Bihar Lok Sabha election in 2019. ... Read More