US states redefine gas as green energy
Louisiana is the latest US state to redefine natural gas as green energy under a new law - even though it's a fossil fuel that emits planet-warming greenhouse gases.
Three other states led by Republicans— Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee— have passed similar legislation.
In some Democratic-led states, there have been efforts to phase out natural gas. Cities in New York and California have moved to ban natural gas hook-ups in new buildings, though some of these policies have been successfully challenged in court.
President Donald Trump has signed a spate of executive orders promoting oil, gas and coal, which all warm the planet when burned to produce electricity.
Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, a major booster of the state's petrochemical industry, says the new law "sets the tone for the future" and will help the state "pursue energy independence and dominance."
Environmental groups say these new laws are part of a broader push by petrochemical industry-backed groups to rebrand fossil fuel as climate friendly and head off efforts to shift electric grids to renewables, such as solar and wind. It's "pure Orwellian greenwashing," said Tim Donaghy, research director of Greenpeace USA.
Globally, the term green energy is used to refer to energy derived from natural sources that do not pollute — solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal energy. Louisiana's law could enable funds slated for state clean energy initiatives to be used to support natural gas.
Natural gas has been the top source of electricity generation in the United States for about a decade, since surpassing coal.
Apart from coal, everything else is better than gas for the planet, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford University climate scientist. Building new gas plants locks in fossil fuel emissions for decades, he added.
The law's author, Republican Jacob Landry, runs an oil and gas industry consulting firm.
"I don't think it's anything crippling to wind or solar, but you got to realise the wind don't blow all the time and the sun don't shine every day," Landry said. The legislation "is saying we need to prioritise what keeps the grid energised," he added.
According to Dave Anderson, policy and communications manager for the Energy and Policy Institute, these laws are part of a long-running disinformation campaign by the gas industry to cast their product as clean to protect their businesses and prevent a shift to renewable energy sources that will address the climate crisis.
"The goal is to elbow out competition from renewables from wind and solar, and in some cases preempt localities' ability to choose to pursue 100 per cent truly clean energy," Anderson said.
The European Union has previously designated natural gas and nuclear as sustainable, a move that Greenpeace and the Austrian government are suing over.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
12 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
PM urged to hedge bets by boosting defence spending
Anthony Albanese is digging his heels in on lifting defence spending as the US heaps more pressure on its allies to increase their share. NATO members agreed to spend five per cent of their economic output on defence and security, after calls by US President Donald Trump. The boost has led to more pressure on Washington's Indo-Pacific allies to do the same, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying countries such as Australia should follow suit. "If our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do that, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well," she said. Analyst Andrew Carr said defence spending was a "hedge against a potential future" that could result in money being wasted or a nation harmed without the extra resources during wartime. "Given where we are now in the kind of worsening strategic environment, including in our region, there's probably a good reason for increasing spending faster even than it was proposed in 2023," the ANU Strategic and Defence Studies Centre senior lecturer said. The defence strategic review, released two years ago, found more funding will be required and must match the strategic circumstances Australia faces. Dr Carr said Australia had made a significant investment over the past 14 years in defence that amounted to a "near doubling" of spending in real terms. NATO nations will be expected to spend 3.5 per cent of their gross domestic product on core defence and a further 1.5 per cent on broader security. This includes adapting infrastructure for military use and protecting energy sources. Australia's defence spending is set to rise from two per cent of GDP now to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. Appearing frustrated by repeated questions on whether Australia should increase its defence budget, the prime minster said the plan - which was taken to the federal election - will be followed through. "What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need. That's what we're investing in," he told reporters in Sydney on Friday. "We've increased it by $57 billion over the medium term and by more than $10 billion in the short term as well." Spain objected to the spending pledge and flagged it did not intend to meet the five per cent target. Mr Trump warned the European nation its exports could be slapped with fresh tariffs by the US if it did no commit to the alliance's commitment on defence spending. Asked if he was concerned Australia could face a similar threat from the US president, Mr Albanese played down the prospect. "I'm not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is is to look after Australia's national interest, that includes our defence and security interests," he said. Foreign Minister Penny Wong is preparing to fly to the US for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The meeting with Mr Rubio will be part of discussions between the foreign ministers of Quad alliance nations, which includes Japan and India. Quad foreign ministers previously met in January, with the alliance focusing on issues in the Indo-Pacific. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said boosting spending levels was not about doing what the US wanted. "This is not about being bullied," he said. "This is about being doing the right thing for our great country, and that's what we want to see." Anthony Albanese is digging his heels in on lifting defence spending as the US heaps more pressure on its allies to increase their share. NATO members agreed to spend five per cent of their economic output on defence and security, after calls by US President Donald Trump. The boost has led to more pressure on Washington's Indo-Pacific allies to do the same, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying countries such as Australia should follow suit. "If our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do that, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well," she said. Analyst Andrew Carr said defence spending was a "hedge against a potential future" that could result in money being wasted or a nation harmed without the extra resources during wartime. "Given where we are now in the kind of worsening strategic environment, including in our region, there's probably a good reason for increasing spending faster even than it was proposed in 2023," the ANU Strategic and Defence Studies Centre senior lecturer said. The defence strategic review, released two years ago, found more funding will be required and must match the strategic circumstances Australia faces. Dr Carr said Australia had made a significant investment over the past 14 years in defence that amounted to a "near doubling" of spending in real terms. NATO nations will be expected to spend 3.5 per cent of their gross domestic product on core defence and a further 1.5 per cent on broader security. This includes adapting infrastructure for military use and protecting energy sources. Australia's defence spending is set to rise from two per cent of GDP now to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. Appearing frustrated by repeated questions on whether Australia should increase its defence budget, the prime minster said the plan - which was taken to the federal election - will be followed through. "What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need. That's what we're investing in," he told reporters in Sydney on Friday. "We've increased it by $57 billion over the medium term and by more than $10 billion in the short term as well." Spain objected to the spending pledge and flagged it did not intend to meet the five per cent target. Mr Trump warned the European nation its exports could be slapped with fresh tariffs by the US if it did no commit to the alliance's commitment on defence spending. Asked if he was concerned Australia could face a similar threat from the US president, Mr Albanese played down the prospect. "I'm not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is is to look after Australia's national interest, that includes our defence and security interests," he said. Foreign Minister Penny Wong is preparing to fly to the US for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The meeting with Mr Rubio will be part of discussions between the foreign ministers of Quad alliance nations, which includes Japan and India. Quad foreign ministers previously met in January, with the alliance focusing on issues in the Indo-Pacific. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said boosting spending levels was not about doing what the US wanted. "This is not about being bullied," he said. "This is about being doing the right thing for our great country, and that's what we want to see." Anthony Albanese is digging his heels in on lifting defence spending as the US heaps more pressure on its allies to increase their share. NATO members agreed to spend five per cent of their economic output on defence and security, after calls by US President Donald Trump. The boost has led to more pressure on Washington's Indo-Pacific allies to do the same, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying countries such as Australia should follow suit. "If our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do that, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well," she said. Analyst Andrew Carr said defence spending was a "hedge against a potential future" that could result in money being wasted or a nation harmed without the extra resources during wartime. "Given where we are now in the kind of worsening strategic environment, including in our region, there's probably a good reason for increasing spending faster even than it was proposed in 2023," the ANU Strategic and Defence Studies Centre senior lecturer said. The defence strategic review, released two years ago, found more funding will be required and must match the strategic circumstances Australia faces. Dr Carr said Australia had made a significant investment over the past 14 years in defence that amounted to a "near doubling" of spending in real terms. NATO nations will be expected to spend 3.5 per cent of their gross domestic product on core defence and a further 1.5 per cent on broader security. This includes adapting infrastructure for military use and protecting energy sources. Australia's defence spending is set to rise from two per cent of GDP now to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. Appearing frustrated by repeated questions on whether Australia should increase its defence budget, the prime minster said the plan - which was taken to the federal election - will be followed through. "What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need. That's what we're investing in," he told reporters in Sydney on Friday. "We've increased it by $57 billion over the medium term and by more than $10 billion in the short term as well." Spain objected to the spending pledge and flagged it did not intend to meet the five per cent target. Mr Trump warned the European nation its exports could be slapped with fresh tariffs by the US if it did no commit to the alliance's commitment on defence spending. Asked if he was concerned Australia could face a similar threat from the US president, Mr Albanese played down the prospect. "I'm not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is is to look after Australia's national interest, that includes our defence and security interests," he said. Foreign Minister Penny Wong is preparing to fly to the US for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The meeting with Mr Rubio will be part of discussions between the foreign ministers of Quad alliance nations, which includes Japan and India. Quad foreign ministers previously met in January, with the alliance focusing on issues in the Indo-Pacific. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said boosting spending levels was not about doing what the US wanted. "This is not about being bullied," he said. "This is about being doing the right thing for our great country, and that's what we want to see." Anthony Albanese is digging his heels in on lifting defence spending as the US heaps more pressure on its allies to increase their share. NATO members agreed to spend five per cent of their economic output on defence and security, after calls by US President Donald Trump. The boost has led to more pressure on Washington's Indo-Pacific allies to do the same, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying countries such as Australia should follow suit. "If our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do that, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well," she said. Analyst Andrew Carr said defence spending was a "hedge against a potential future" that could result in money being wasted or a nation harmed without the extra resources during wartime. "Given where we are now in the kind of worsening strategic environment, including in our region, there's probably a good reason for increasing spending faster even than it was proposed in 2023," the ANU Strategic and Defence Studies Centre senior lecturer said. The defence strategic review, released two years ago, found more funding will be required and must match the strategic circumstances Australia faces. Dr Carr said Australia had made a significant investment over the past 14 years in defence that amounted to a "near doubling" of spending in real terms. NATO nations will be expected to spend 3.5 per cent of their gross domestic product on core defence and a further 1.5 per cent on broader security. This includes adapting infrastructure for military use and protecting energy sources. Australia's defence spending is set to rise from two per cent of GDP now to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. Appearing frustrated by repeated questions on whether Australia should increase its defence budget, the prime minster said the plan - which was taken to the federal election - will be followed through. "What we're doing is making sure that Australia has the capability that we need. That's what we're investing in," he told reporters in Sydney on Friday. "We've increased it by $57 billion over the medium term and by more than $10 billion in the short term as well." Spain objected to the spending pledge and flagged it did not intend to meet the five per cent target. Mr Trump warned the European nation its exports could be slapped with fresh tariffs by the US if it did no commit to the alliance's commitment on defence spending. Asked if he was concerned Australia could face a similar threat from the US president, Mr Albanese played down the prospect. "I'm not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is is to look after Australia's national interest, that includes our defence and security interests," he said. Foreign Minister Penny Wong is preparing to fly to the US for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The meeting with Mr Rubio will be part of discussions between the foreign ministers of Quad alliance nations, which includes Japan and India. Quad foreign ministers previously met in January, with the alliance focusing on issues in the Indo-Pacific. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said boosting spending levels was not about doing what the US wanted. "This is not about being bullied," he said. "This is about being doing the right thing for our great country, and that's what we want to see."
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Trashing our economy': Tehan maintains rage over Labor's green agenda
Dan Tehan, the new opposition spokesman for energy, is determined to continue Peter Dutton's attacks on the Albanese government's vision for a vast expansion of renewable energy, warning it will trash the economy and hurt homes and businesses. Tehan has signalled the Sussan Ley-led opposition will pressure Labor over the cost and risks of its plan for a grid almost entirely powered by renewables. 'They're happy to trash our economy, trash our energy security, put enormous pressure on households while they're seeking to achieve this target,' Tehan said, in referencing years of rising power bills under the Albanese government. Voters decisively rejecting the Coalition's plan to slow the rollout of wind and solar farms in favour of building state-owned nuclear power stations and Tehan's job in reshaping energy policy will not be made any easier by the Nationals. Loading The junior Coalition partner has kicked off its own internal review of the nation's net zero by 2050 target, pushed by noted critic of the policy Matt Canavan. Australia's commitment to net zero has been contentious for the conservative parties since the Abbott government signed Australia up to the Paris Agreement in 2015. The goal is a centrepiece of the deal agreed to by 195 countries. It aims to restrict global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels and limit the worst impacts of climate change. The Dutton Coalition remained committed to the goal at the past election, fearing a voter backlash. But speculation is mounting that the Nationals party room will vote to ditch net zero, and in doing so embolden right-wing Liberal MPs to call for their party to follow suit.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Trashing our economy': Tehan maintains rage over Labor's green agenda
Dan Tehan, the new opposition spokesman for energy, is determined to continue Peter Dutton's attacks on the Albanese government's vision for a vast expansion of renewable energy, warning it will trash the economy and hurt homes and businesses. Tehan has signalled the Sussan Ley-led opposition will pressure Labor over the cost and risks of its plan for a grid almost entirely powered by renewables. 'They're happy to trash our economy, trash our energy security, put enormous pressure on households while they're seeking to achieve this target,' Tehan said, in referencing years of rising power bills under the Albanese government. Voters decisively rejecting the Coalition's plan to slow the rollout of wind and solar farms in favour of building state-owned nuclear power stations and Tehan's job in reshaping energy policy will not be made any easier by the Nationals. Loading The junior Coalition partner has kicked off its own internal review of the nation's net zero by 2050 target, pushed by noted critic of the policy Matt Canavan. Australia's commitment to net zero has been contentious for the conservative parties since the Abbott government signed Australia up to the Paris Agreement in 2015. The goal is a centrepiece of the deal agreed to by 195 countries. It aims to restrict global warming to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels and limit the worst impacts of climate change. The Dutton Coalition remained committed to the goal at the past election, fearing a voter backlash. But speculation is mounting that the Nationals party room will vote to ditch net zero, and in doing so embolden right-wing Liberal MPs to call for their party to follow suit.
