Labour taking Reform threat in Wales ‘seriously', says Eluned Morgan
Eluned Morgan MS told Sky News voters in Wales needed to understand Reform as a 'threat', warning that 'things that they're used to' such as free prescriptions and free school meals for primary school children 'could be snatched away'.
She said: 'We're taking it very seriously, and we think the threat from Reform is a very serious threat.'
Her interview comes as polling by More In Common on behalf of Sky News found 28% of people in Wales would back Reform at the Senedd elections in 2026, putting the party in first place.
Mr Farage's party is targeting the Senedd as it looks to build on its success at the English local elections earlier this year, and unveiled former Wales secretary David Jones as another ex-Tory defector on Monday as part of its push.
The poll, published on Tuesday, showed Plaid Cymru in second place on 26% and Labour in third place on 23%, before a long drop to the Conservatives on 10% and the Liberal Democrats on 7%.
If the results were replicated next year, it could mean the end of Labour's 26 years of domination in Wales, where it has held power since devolution.
Ms Morgan acknowledged there was 'a possibility' that Reform could become the largest party in the Senedd, saying it was 'really concerning', but added it would be 'difficult for them to rule by themselves'.
But she ruled out entering a coalition with the party, saying: 'I wouldn't touch Reform with a bargepole.'
The First Minister also insisted that Labour would be able to win voters back by being 'authentic' and 'clear with people about what we stand for', rather than trying to 'out-Reform Reform'.
She said: 'I think we've got to lead with our values. We're about bringing communities together, not dividing them, and I do think that what Reform is interested in is dividing people and people do need to make choices on things like that.
'So, what I won't be doing in Wales is chasing Reform down a path where we can try and out-Reform Reform. I'm not interested in that, because those aren't my values."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Patriotism ‘always important' to Starmer, says No 10 amid flag row
Flags have been taken down in Tower Hamlets in east London as well as Birmingham. On Monday, St George's cross flags were pictured on the A1206 on the Isle of Dogs in the east of the capital, after campaigners attached them following an online movement called 'Operation Raise the Colours'. BirminghamLive also reported flags that have been flown in areas of the city have been removed by the local council. Asked what the Prime Minister's view is on the councils that have removed the flags, Sir Keir's official spokesman said on Monday: 'I think the PM has always talked about his pride of being British, the patriotism he feels. Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance Tower Hamlets Council 'I think he's talked about that previously […] not least recently in relation to the Lionesses' successful campaign in the Euros. 'Patriotism will always be an important thing to him.' Asked if Sir Keir is supportive of people who put up English flags, the spokesman said: 'Absolutely, patriotism, putting up English flags. 'We put up English flags all around Downing Street every time the English football team – women's and men's – are out trying to win games for us.' Residents saw Manchester Road in Tower Hamlets, east London, lined with St George's flags over the weekend but only a few remained by Monday. Walking along the busy inner city street on Monday lunchtime, one local resident who did not want to give his name said: 'They were all along the street, lots of them. It looked nice really. It was very colourful. 'I saw them late on Saturday. They just appeared and only noticed they have all gone now.' His neighbour said: 'They all went up at the weekend and have come down now.' She added that she did not feel threatened or scared, but it was definitely a 'very pointed act'. The local resident, who did not want to be named, said: 'It was right they should come down as I think it was after the demonstration about asylum.' She said 'it was not about community', adding that normally when you see flags go up it is around a celebration or about bringing people together. A St George's Cross flag near the A1206 in the Isle of Dogs (Jordan Pettitt/PA) 'There was no noise or trouble about it. They just went up and I did not see anyone take them down.' She added: 'It was OK. I know a lot of people like it and it was bright.' Another resident said: 'It was all along the road. It was nice. There was nothing wrong with it. 'It went all along to the Britannia Hotel.' He added it was 'good to see' because 'so much today is about division and I am just proud of being English'. The Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf has been at the centre of protests over asylum seekers in recent weeks. Tower Hamlets Council said it has a 'policy setting out which flags are flown from council buildings and on which occasions'. In a statement, the council added: 'We are aware members of the public have been putting up St George flags on various structures. 'While we recognise people wish to express their views, we have a responsibility to monitor and maintain council infrastructure. 'Where flags are attached to council-owned infrastructure without permission, they may be removed as part of routine maintenance.' A Birmingham City Council spokesperson said: 'We proudly fly the Union flag outside the Council House every day and recognise the importance of the Union flag and flag of St George as symbols of national pride. 'Brummies are proud to be British and proud that this is a welcoming city celebrating many different cultures. 'When it comes to items attached to lamp posts, it is normal council procedure for these to be removed on a regular basis, in line with our health and safety obligations. 'As has always been the case, people are free to fly or hang flags from their homes or gardens, but we ask that they are not attached to street furniture.'
Daily Mirror
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Nigel Farage is right - there IS two-tier justice. White people can get away with it'
Nigel Farage has called for police to release the ethnicity of suspects. Fleet Street Fox says one look at the statistics shows minorities get the rough end of the justice system If ever you needed proof that Nigel Farage is on a one-man mission to raise the nation's blood pressure over the embolism threshold, then his call to release the ethnicity of criminal suspects must surely fit the bill. If you really believe there's a two-tier justice system in which people get let off, or worse encouraged in criminality, then you'll pop a gasket just by his question appearing to confirm it. And if you suspect it's a finely-tuned dog-whistle more likely to jerk the nation's knee than a kick in the scrotum, you'll spit tacks that police have been advised to do as he asks. And if you've actually worked in the justice system, you may know that Michael Weston King's opinion on the matter got less attention than Nigel's, but was a damned sight more accurate. The grandfather of Bebe King, murdered in Southport at a summer dance school in a triple murder which sparked Far Right riots and misinformation, said: "The ethnicity of any perpetrator, or indeed their immigration status, is completely irrelevant. Mental health issues, and the propensity to commit crime, happens in any ethnicity, nationality or race." He pointed out the failures of education and social care which enabled the murders to take place, and he could have said the same about the vast majority of people who were attracted to those riots like moths to a flame. When angry white people were arrested in their hundreds at the direct instruction of the Prime Minister, they claimed to be victims of 'two-tier Keir'. In fact, the evidence shows they are the beneficiaries of a justice system stacked in their favour. If the justice system were entirely fair, 84% of suspects, arrests and convictions would be white. Instead at every stage the proportion of white suspects is lower, and the number of ethnic minorities is greater. To Nigel, and any passing eugenicist, this is because people of colour are pre-destined to criminality. And perhaps they are, in a way. For a third of teenage murder victims are black, compared to the 13% who are white. Between 2018 and 2022, white defendants served an average sentence of 21 months in jail, compared to 30 months for Asian offenders, and 28 months for black prisoners. If you're black, you will probably serve 68% of your sentence in custody, compared to 64% if you're white. And yes, that includes serious offences like rape and murder. Minorities are disproportionately more likely to be searched, to be prosecuted, to be a child who is prosecuted, and to reoffend. And get this: prison surveys show white prisoners feel more respected, less victimised by staff, and even get better access to showers. And we know this means the justice system is racist because of one more, literally-kills-people fact: the white people who are cautioned or sentenced have the lowest educational attainment of all ethnic groups. Doing badly at school increases everyone's risk of jail, but white people have to do REALLY badly at school. Even then, they are less likely to be jailed, are imprisoned for shorter periods, and enjoy it more. Nigel is not trying to fix a great criminal injustice, because we already know what the data shows. What he's calling for is more evidence that people of colour are more likely to have a lifetime of crap thrown at them, often by privately-educated ex-City traders in yellow trousers whose voices travel a lot further than their brains. But then, fixing it is not actually the point: all Nigel wants to do is normalise a trope, and blame behaviour on skin colour. The real two-tier system in this country is about class, education, and opportunity. About being able to see the shiny palaces of power, but not the route by which you could get there. There are no stepping stones between the social housing estates and the skyscrapers that tower over them, and it's the inability to migrate that is the real root of half this nation's problems. The other half are all down to the refusal to notice. According to the Ministry of Justice, offenders from all ethnic groups are more likely to have been on free school meals than the general population. The people who fill our prisons are not a rainbow coalition of minorities. It's the kids who were excluded, who fell through the cracks of a safety net which after years of Treasury cutbacks is now the kind of rope bridge even Indiana Jones would hesitate to trust. Yet Nigel is getting his way, with a handful of MPs and the combined professionalism of Del Boy Trotter and his pals on a coach trip to Margate. Police have been issued guidelines, welcomed by the Home Secretary, that they should 'consider' releasing the ethnicity of suspects. Presumably they think it will both show up and shut up Nigel, but neither seems likely. To admit that crime is driven by poverty, trauma and poor education means spending money, changing policies, and admitting failures, which is why all previous governments have shrunk from it. They left a void which racists can populate with a bogeyman, and if he happens to be black, well, black people are more likely to go to prison, innit? It would make more sense for police to publish a suspect's school report: the colour of a person's childhood matters more than that of their skin. And if you want proof, look no further than the talentless, persistently-absent, achievement-free, gobby pub-bore grifter Nigel Farage, who wouldn't be invited on Question Time quite so often if he was black, and from Hulme, and actually knew what he was talking about.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Raising VAT rates would let Rachel Reeves fill budget black hole and enable growth
Tax rises appear increasingly likely. Polly Toynbee discusses some possible tax changes, including VAT (Both left and right agree taxes must rise. Time for Labour to get creative, 12 August). My view is that a 2.5 percentage point rise in the average VAT rate is the most viable option to raise sufficient revenue without reducing growth. Toynbee also discusses possible changes to inheritance tax and the introduction of a wealth tax. These policies may be redistributive but are unlikely to raise substantial revenue. As an example, Norway currently imposes a wealth tax that raises less than 3% of its non-petroleum tax revenue. Given the urgent need for revenue, a VAT raise is likely to be the UK's best option. First, VAT raises significant revenue, at about 17% of total UK tax revenue. This means that a 2.5 percentage point increase may raise as much as £21bn yearly. This is roughly five times more than what it is expected the government will raise from the stricter taxation of non-domiciles. Second, VAT poses limited harm to growth. Since it also applies to people who are outside the labour market, it dampens work incentives less than income taxes do. A VAT rise may partially replace the government's failure to reform disability benefits. In addition, increases in VAT do not reduce incentives to save, as costs go up by the same ratio today and in the future. And third, VAT can be quite progressive. While new savings are unaffected, old savings that people spend in the future are subject to VAT increases. Most importantly, while the VAT rate is flat, using the revenue to support public services disproportionally benefits the poor. This means that raising sufficient revenue may be most important for BergLecturer, Trinity College, University of Cambridge Anent Polly Toynbee's tax suggestions for Labour, if it regains its heart, may I add two. The best taxes not only raise money but also do societal good. So why not use one to address climate, inequity and safety issues, by taxing cars by their weight and annual mileage as reported at the MOT test? Both relate directly to their energy SeatonEmeritus professor of environmental medicine, University of Aberdeen
