Vow to protect penalty rates for 2.6m workers
Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth will introduce the Bill on Thursday, and urged the Greens and Coalition to support the proposed legislation.
The law would prohibit the Fair Work Commission to reduce an overtime or penalty rate, or substitute the entitlements if it reduces the overall take-home pay a worker would otherwise receive.
An award would not be able to be altered if there was evidence that even a single worker would be worse off under an arrangement which traded an overtime or penalty entitlement.
Ms Rishworth said the change would protect about 2.6 million award-reliant workers.
'If you rely on the modern award safety net and work weekends, public holidays, early mornings or late nights, you deserve to have your wages protected,' she said.
'Millions of hardworking Australians rely on penalty rates and overtime rates to keep their heads above water, which is why this Bill is so critical and should receive the support of both the Opposition and the Greens.' Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth is set to introduce the legislation on Thursday. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
The election promise was prompted by a FWC review launched the Australian Retailers Association to allow senior management to take a 25 per cent wage increase above minimum award entitlements in exchange for overtime, weekend and public holiday penalty rates and rest breaks.
The move has been backed by the supermarket giants, plus beauty giant Mecca, as well as Kmart, Costco and 7-Eleven.
Prior to the election, then employment minister Murray Watt wrote to the FWC to stop large retailers from cutting the entitlements, in a rare act of government intervention.
Enshrining penalty rates was a key demand from the Australian Council of Trade Unions, with secretary Sally McManus previously arguing workers should be compensated for sacrificing their weekends. The proposed bill will override the FWC's ability to reduce penalty and overtime rates in modern awards, or substitute the entitlements if even a single worker is worse off. NewsWire/ Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire
However, the legislation will likely will likely be opposed by the Coalition, with industrial relations and employment spokesman Tim Wilson stating the independent FWC was already responsible for ensuring 'workers get the best arrangements possible for a fair days work'.
Instead he lashed Labor's proposed Bill as being politically motivated.
'There is no threat to penalty rates,' he said on Saturday.
'What there is, is a political focus of the Government that isn't focused towards improving the economic conditions to help small businesses grow, to enable them to go on and employ the next generation of workers, to give those first generation, those first jobs to young Australians so that they can be independent and be able to get on with their economic futures.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Labor vowed to crack down on consultants, but spending is going up
The Albanese government had more than $637 million worth of consulting contracts in the past six months, up more than $100 million on the previous half-year, despite repeated promises to cut back on external advisers. A biannual statement tabled in parliament on Tuesday revealed the government had 131 consultancy contracts valued at $2 million or more active for at least one day between January 1 and June 30, with some individual contracts worth $30 million alone. The high spend shows the challenge for Labor after it vowed to crack down on overreliance on private consultants following concerns about outsourcing and the 2023 PwC tax leaks scandal. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has previously said the Coalition gave core government work to consultants before Labor was elected in 2022, and pledged to restore the public service. 'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out with too much spending on contractors and consultants,' Chalmers said in April. Loading The publication of the data will also test Labor's pre-election pledge in April to save $6.4 billion in four years by reducing spending on consultants, contractors, labour hire and non-wage expenses like travel, hospitality and property. Multimillion dollar projects with descriptions such as 'industrial uplift strategy' and 'structural review services' from major firms such as McKinsey and BCG are some examples of department spending on consultancy services. Governments commonly give contracts to consulting firms because they claim to offer independent advice, have solved similar problems overseas or at a state level, and can provide access to experts with specialised knowledge.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Having kids shouldn't be a luxury. It's time we cut the cost of IVF
For most major milestones in life, the financial path towards achieving them is relatively straightforward. Whether it's buying your first car, taking a life-changing holiday, getting married or buying a home, the way to achieve it always the same: you set a budget and work towards it, slowly but surely seeing your savings grow until you have enough to pull the trigger. But a story published in this masthead this week really drove home that for a growing number of Australians, there's one area of our lives where the path isn't always linear, especially financially, and that's the journey to parenthood. News that a 32-year-old Melbourne man fathered 27 children by 15 different women via informal sperm donation was shocking, but illuminating. It revealed the growing number of people forgoing formal fertility routes such as IVF and choosing riskier options, in large part due to financial constraints. According to the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database, about 20,000 babies are born via IVF each year, while egg freezing has increased by as much as 1567 per cent in Australia over the past decade. In other words, this is a booming industry with no signs of slowing down. That in itself isn't inherently a bad thing. But we need to be realistic about the fact that it's a profit-driven industry worth over $6 billion, the process of IVF is prohibitively expensive, and people find themselves there when they are at their most vulnerable. Loading Depending on where you live and the specialist you see, the average IVF cycle costs between $9000 and $15,000. You might get some of this back via Medicare rebates, but the out-of-pocket costs are substantial. While some states like Victoria have begun rolling out IVF services via public healthcare, the wait times to see specialists are as long as two years. And as anyone who has had children, is thinking about one day having them, or is currently trying, knows: time is the cruel enemy of fertility. Hence, why most people will invariably end up in the private system. For context, a healthy woman with no pre-existing conditions in her 20s has a 25 to 30 per cent chance of falling pregnant naturally, but this starts to decline throughout her late 20s and early 30s. Once she reaches 35, this decline becomes swift, and by the time she's 40, the chance of falling pregnant naturally is roughly 5 per cent.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
The $1700 question: Is your super being paid correctly?
Real Money, a free weekly newsletter giving expert tips on how to save, invest and make the most of your money, is sent every Sunday. You're reading an excerpt − sign up to get the whole newsletter in your inbox. What about if you found out you'd been missing out on a free $1700 a year? Given that's enough to buy a return flight somewhere nice, cover the kids' sporting costs for a year, or buy more than 1000 bags of rolled oats, I can imagine you'd be pretty upset. What about if it was $30,000 instead? That's a lot of oats! While this is a little bit hyperbolic, $1700 is roughly how much each year affected workers are missing out on due to their bosses not paying their super properly. A recent study from the Super Members Council (SMC) found in 2022/23, 3.3 million Australians missed out on $5.7 billion in super due to their entitlements being unpaid or underpaid. By the time retirement rolls around, that $1700 can turn into upwards of $30,000, which is a massive deal when the average super balance at retirement age is between $300,000 to $400,000. Loading What's the problem? This amount is on the up too, with SMC estimating an additional $600 million in super has gone unpaid since last year. Thankfully, there are new laws on the way to help combat this, with the government planning to legislate payday super by next July. This will force employers to pay superannuation each time they pay their employees' regular wage, rather than quarterly as current legislation requires (though some employers choose to pay more frequently), with beefed-up penalties for employers who fail to pay within seven days of wages. It will also increase retirement savings, as more regular payments improves the effect of compounding interest. What you can do about it
