logo
Appellate court okays cancellation of 9/11 plotters' plea deals

Appellate court okays cancellation of 9/11 plotters' plea deals

UPI3 days ago
A federal appellate court on Friday affirmed former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had the authority to cancel plea agreements for three defendants accused of plotting the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Photo by Activedia/Pixabay
July 12 (UPI) -- A divided federal appellate court panel canceled plea deals for three defendants who are accused to plotting the 9/11 terrorist attacks that killed 2,976 in 2001.
A three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed by a 2-1 decision that former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin legally rescinded existing plea deals with the three defendants.
The defendants include alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, NPR reported on Friday.
The three defendants are being held at the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where a military court last summer announced the plea deals last summer.
Austin withdrew the plea agreements two days later, which raised the question of whether or not he had the authority to do so.
The plea agreement would have spared the three men from execution and instead would have sentenced each to life in prison.
Austin wanted the case to continue with a trial that included the potential for the death penalty.
The cases against the three men have been ongoing for more than 20 years amid a slew of pretrial hearings.
Military prosecutors determined a plea deal was the best way to resolve the matter.
A U.S. military court had okayed the plea agreements, and defense attorneys argued Austin lacked the authority to negate them because he didn't like the terms.
The federal appellate court on Friday ruled Austin had the authority to terminate the plea agreements.
Defense attorneys have the option of appealing the decision to a full panel of the federal appellate court in the nation's capital or the Supreme Court.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

9/11 terrorists can be charged with death penalty, appeals court rules
9/11 terrorists can be charged with death penalty, appeals court rules

American Military News

time18 minutes ago

  • American Military News

9/11 terrorists can be charged with death penalty, appeals court rules

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled on Friday that the secretary of the Department of Defense 'indisputably' has the authority to withdraw from plea deal agreements with three terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks against the United States, clearing the way for the terrorists to potentially be sentenced to the death penalty. In a 2-1 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit determined that the Department of Defense has the authority to reverse the plea deals made last July by former President Joe Biden's administration with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Bin Attash, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. According to Fox News, under the plea deals that were approved by senior Pentagon officials and military lawyers, the three terrorists would have been sentenced to life without parole but would have potentially been protected from the death penalty; however, Friday's ruling allows the Department of Defense to withdraw from the agreements. Last August, former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin issued a memorandum, saying, 'I have determined that, in light of the significance of the decision to enter into pre-trial agreements with the accused in the above-referenced case, responsibility for such a decision should rest with me as the superior convening authority under the Military Commissions Act of 2009.' READ MORE: Bill blocking Biden from giving 9/11 terrorists plea deals introduced by GOP lawmakers The former defense secretary added, 'Effective immediately, in the exercise of my authority, I hereby withdraw from the three pretrial agreements that you signed on July 31, 2024.' According to CNN, a military judge ruled in November that the Biden administration's plea deal agreements with the three 9/11 terrorists were 'valid and enforceable.' The outlet noted that a military appeals court also ruled against Austin's attempt to withdraw from the plea deals in December. The Post Millennial reported that President Donald Trump's administration chose to continue pushing for the plea deals to be withdrawn following the start of Trump's second term in office in January. In Friday's opinion, Judge Patricia Millett and Judge Neomi Rao wrote, 'The Secretary of Defense indisputably had legal authority to withdraw from the agreements.' 'Having properly assumed the convening authority, the Secretary determined that the families and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commission trials carried out,' the judges added. 'The Secretary acted within the bounds of his legal authority, and we decline to second-guess his judgment.'

Israeli strikes hit eastern Lebanon, kill 12 people
Israeli strikes hit eastern Lebanon, kill 12 people

UPI

time35 minutes ago

  • UPI

Israeli strikes hit eastern Lebanon, kill 12 people

Supporters of Hezbollah carry pictures of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as they watch a televised address by Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem during Ashura Day celebrations in southern Beirut, Lebanon, on July 6. BEIRUT, Lebanon, July 15 (UPI) -- Twelve people, including five Hezbollah fighters, were killed and eight others wounded Tuesday in Israeli strikes on the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon, security sources and the official news agency reported. Israeli warplanes carried out a series of strikes on areas near the city of Baalbeck in the northern Bekaa, sending thick plumes of black smoke into the sky. The official Lebanese news agency reported that the strikes targeted Wadi Faraa, where a camp for Syrian refugees was hit. The agency said 12 people, including seven Syrians, were killed and eight others injured. Among the killed were five Hezbollah fighters, according to security reports. Tuesday's attack was the deadliest since the Nov. 27 truce accord ended 14 months of a devastating war between Israel and Hezbollah. Israel has kept on striking southern Lebanon and other Lebanese areas, including Beirut's southern suburbs, since the cease-fire went into effect Feb. 18, killing more than 200 Hezbollah mid-level commanders and followers, as well as civilians. Hezbollah denounced in a statement the "horrific massacre committed today by the Zionist enemy" in Wadi Faara, saying the air strike targeted "a water well drilling rig and claimed the lives of Lebanese and Syrian civilians." The Israeli English-language Ynet website confirmed the "unusually extensive wave of airstrikes" deep inside Lebanon and quoted an Israeli Army spokesman as saying that they targeted Hezbollah's elite Radwan Forces in the Bekaa Valley. The spokesman said the strikes focused on weapons depots and military camps used by Hezbollah for "conducting training and preparation of terrorists," with the aim of blocking the group's attempts to rebuild. The Israeli Army said in a statement that the storage of weapons and Hezbollah's activities at these sites "constitute a blatant violation of the understandings" between Israel and Lebanon and "a future threat" to Israel. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said that strikes were "a clear message to Hezbollah, which is plotting to rebuild Radwan Force's raiding capabilities against Israel." Katz said it also was a message to the Lebanese government that Israel will "thwart any threat" and "will respond with maximum force" against any Hezbollah attempt to rebuild its capabilities. In line with the cease-fire agreement brokered by the United States and France, the Lebanese Army has taken control of most of Hezbollah's positions and military facilities, pushing the militant group away from the border with Israel and preventing it from having a military presence south of the Litani River. Israel insists on fully disarming Hezbollah, which has refrained from retaliating to Israel's continued aggressions and violations of the cease-fire accord. In a separate development, Lebanon's central bank has issued a directive prohibiting banks, financial institutions and investment entities from dealing directly or indirectly with a number of unlicensed and internationally sanctioned organizations, including Hezbollah's financial institution, Al Qard al-Hassan. Al Qard al-Hassan was founded in 1983 as a charitable organization, with the stated aim of providing interest-free loans and social financial services to the Shiite community in Lebanon, particularly in underserved areas. It is, however, not licensed by the central bank and functions outside the formal banking system. The association, which has grown significantly over the years, has been sanctioned by the United States and other international bodies for allegedly supporting Hezbollah's activities, including money laundering and terrorism financing. Hezbollah has denied the charges. Despite international pressure, Al Ward al-Hassan continues to operate openly in Lebanon. In November, several of its branches were targeted by Israeli strikes as part of the war against Hezbollah. The Central Bank's directive, issued Monday, comes as part of Lebanon's efforts to tighten financial controls and address international concerns over illicit financial activity. It was also an indication of Hezbollah's reduced influence over state institutions since its devastating war with Israel. According to the directive, the ban covers financial services, money transfers, leasing, lending and any activity that facilitates access to the Lebanese banking system in any currency. It warned that "dealing with unlicensed and sanctioned entities exposes the licensed sector to significant legal and reputational risks." The decision was seen as a direct response to Lebanon's inclusion on the Financial Action Task Force gray list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring. The central Bank warned that entities violating the new directive will face harsh penalties, including suspension or withdrawal of their operating license, freezing of their accounts and assets, and referral to the Special Investigation Commission.

Amazon deforestation worsens in Brazil, Peru, data show
Amazon deforestation worsens in Brazil, Peru, data show

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Amazon deforestation worsens in Brazil, Peru, data show

Activists protest in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in October in front of a mural painted with ashes from the fires ravaging the country. The mural, by Brazilian artist Mundano, was unveiled with a demand that agricultural companies stop deforestation in the Amazon. File photo by Isaac Fontana/EPA July 15 (UPI) -- The Amazon rainforest -- considered one of the world's most important climate regulators -- continues to face serious threats in 2025. New data show that pressure on the ecosystem has intensified in Brazil and Peru during the first half of the year, while Colombia reports progress in curbing deforestation. In Brazil, the National Institute for Space Research reported that 807 square miles of forest were lost between January and June -- a 27% increase compared to the same period in 2024. The spike was especially pronounced between April and June, coinciding with the dry season and a rise in illegal activities, such as large-scale cattle ranching. In May, the deforested area increased by a record 51% compared to the same month last year. "The loss of forest in May 2025 was largely due to wildfires. ... We are beginning to see a shift that confirms the warnings ... that the rainforest is being severely impacted by climate change," said João Paulo Capobianco, executive secretary of Brazil's Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. The trend threatens to reverse the gains made in 2023 and 2024, when deforestation fell to its lowest level in nearly a decade, driven by stronger enforcement and improved monitoring. In Peru, while official figures for the first half of 2025 have not yet been released, the Monitoring of the Andean Amazon Project warns of ongoing primary forest loss in regions such as Ucayali and Madre de Dios, where illegal mining and wildfires have caused significant damage. Peru lost more than 140,000 hectares, or 346,000 acres, of forest in 2024, and active hot spots detected in early 2025 suggest the trend is continuing. According to the country's Ministry of Environment, deforestation in the first quarter of the year totaled 27,000 hectares, or about 67,000 acres -- a 33% decrease compared to the same period in 2024. The drop was even more pronounced in Amazonian national parks, where forest clearing fell by 54%. The reduction was driven by a government-led multisector strategy that combined satellite monitoring, community agreements and joint operations that involve the military, environmental agencies and prosecutors. However, a separate report by the Office of the Inspector General warned that forest clearing continues in remote areas, with more than 88,000 hectares, or 217,000 acres, affected between October 2024 and March. The upcoming COP30 summit, scheduled for November 2025 in Belém do Pará, Brazil, could be critical for setting commitments and securing concrete funding to protect the Amazon, which is essential for maintaining climate stability, not only for South America, but for the entire planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store