logo
US merit board judge certifies class of fired Interior Department workers

US merit board judge certifies class of fired Interior Department workers

Reuters18-07-2025
July 18 (Reuters) - A U.S. civil service board judge has ruled that hundreds of U.S. Department of Interior employees who were fired and then reinstated amid the Trump administration's purge of the federal workforce can pursue claims that their terminations were illegal as a group.
Chief Administrative Judge Sara Snyder of the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board in a decision on Thursday, opens new tab said the validity of the February mass firing of 1,712 probationary employees at the Interior Department posed a common question that would best be addressed in a class action.
Probationary workers typically have less than one year of service in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees in new jobs, and they are generally easier to fire than career government workers.
About 20 similar cases involving different federal agencies are pending at the merit board, collectively challenging the Trump administration's mass firings of roughly 25,000 probationary workers in February. Snyder in May certified a class, opens new tab in a case involving the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
But the fate of the cases is uncertain because the board, which must review administrative judges' decisions before they can be enforced, does not have a quorum that can issue rulings.
Unions and nonprofits also sued in federal court over the mass firings, and many of the probationary workers were reinstated after judges said the terminations were likely illegal. Higher courts paused those decisions pending appeals.
Many workers were returned to full duty while some were placed indefinitely on paid administrative leave. At the Interior Department, nearly 1,000 probationary workers were returned to full duty, 274 remain on leave, and nearly 600 resigned or accepted buyouts to quit, according to Snyder's decision.
The class certified by Snyder does not include 323 workers who accepted buyouts, or an unidentified number who have completed their one-year probationary periods or were fired over their individual conduct or performance.
The White House and the Interior Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The department manages and conserves federal and tribal lands, including national parks, and their natural resources.
Danny Rosenthal, a lawyer for the workers who filed the complaint, said the decision was a critical milestone in the case.
"Practically speaking, this means that workers will have the opportunity to bring their claims forward together, giving more people a real chance to seek justice for their firings," Rosenthal said in a statement.
The plaintiffs in all of the pending cases claim the mass terminations of probationary employees amounted to layoffs that are supposed to be guided by complex civil service rules. They are seeking to have the terminations removed from their personnel files.
Probationary workers have limited legal protections compared with other civil servants, but agencies are still required to explain why they are being fired and give them advance notice of mass layoffs.
President Donald Trump fired Cathy Harris, a Democrat on the three-member merit board in January and the term of another Democratic board member expired in February, leaving the board with a single Republican member and no quorom to decide workers' appeals.
The U.S. Supreme Court in May allowed Harris to be removed while her lawsuit challenging her termination plays out. It could set important precedent on Trump's powers to remove officials from agencies designed to be independent from the White House.
The merit board's resources are likely to be strained by an influx of new cases when a quorum is restored. About 10,800 appeals have been filed with the board since Trump took office in January.
The case is Interior Probationary Employees Class v. Department of the Interior, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. DC-0752-25-1550-I-1.
For the class: Danny Rosenthal of James & Hoffman
For the Interior Department: Not available
Read more:
US federal workers hit back at Trump mass firings with class action complaints
US Supreme Court halts reinstatement of fired federal employees
US Supreme Court lets Trump keep labor board members sidelined for now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What does Texas redrawing its voting maps mean and why have Democrats left the state? Explained
What does Texas redrawing its voting maps mean and why have Democrats left the state? Explained

The Guardian

timea minute ago

  • The Guardian

What does Texas redrawing its voting maps mean and why have Democrats left the state? Explained

At the insistence of Donald Trump, Republicans in Texas are pushing ahead with an effort to redraw their congressional map to pick up as many as five additional Republican seats. The decision has set off a cascading legal battle. State lawmakers have fled Texas as part of an effort to stop Republicans from passing the map. Democrats in other states have said they will retaliate, setting the stage for a nasty and prolonged redistricting tit-for-tat that could last for years. After a nationwide census every 10 years, all 50 US states are required to redraw their congressional districts to account for population shifts. The US constitution entrusts the power to draw congressional lines to the state legislatures in each state. Since the 18th century, politicians have tried to use this line drawing power to punish their political rivals. In the 19th century, the practice of manipulating district lines for political lines became known as gerrymandering. While states are required to redistrict every 10 years, the constitution contains no explicit ban on redrawing boundaries before the decade is up. Republicans currently hold an extremely slim 219-212 majority in the US House (there are four vacancies, three of which are seats previously held by Democrats). Republicans know they will probably lose seats in next year's mid-term elections, when all members of the US House will stand for re-election and the sitting president's party typically does not perform well. Republicans have complete control of state government in Texas, which has 38 US House seats (second only to California's 52 seats). Republicans currently hold 25 of those seats. Seeking to shore up the Republican advantage in the US House, Trump urged the Texas governor Greg Abbott to redraw the state's lines to add additional Republican-friendly districts. Abbott called a special session to draw the districts last month. Last week, Republicans unveiled a map in which they could pick up five additional seats, giving them a 30-8 advantage in the state's delegation. Texas also undertook a mid-decade redistricting in 2003. In 2006, the US supreme court said that nothing in the US constitution prohibited Texas from redrawing its district mid-decade. The US supreme court has also given states virtually unlimited leeway to gerrymander districts for partisan gain. In a 5-4 decision in 2019, it said that federal courts could not do anything to stop the drawing of districts for partisan advantage, no matter how severe. There are still legal protections that prohibit states from diluting the influence of minority voters when they draw districts or explicitly sorting them based on their race. But the supreme court has made those cases extremely difficult to win and they can take years to resolve in court. Democrats are in the minority in the Texas state legislature. But the body's bylaws require the presence of two-thirds of its lawmakers to conduct business. There are 150 members of the Texas house of representatives, 62 of whom are Democrats. More than 51 fled the state on Sunday to Illinois, Massachusetts and New York to deny that quorum, halting the legislature from moving forward on the maps. This isn't the first time Democrats have fled the state to break quorum to try to stop Republicans from passing legislation. In 2021, Democrats fled to Washington DC as Republicans were poised to pass sweeping new voting restrictions. That standoff lasted several weeks, but Democrats eventually returned to the state and the legislation passed. Democrats also fled the state in 2003 to try and stop mid-decade redistricting. The Texas house voted on Monday to authorize arrest warrants for the members who fled the state. Such warrants are unlikely to be enforced while the members are out of the state. Abbott and the Texas attorney general Ken Paxton have pledged to aggressively pursue the Democrats. Abbott has cited a 2021 non-binding opinion from Paxton's office to suggest that the lawmakers who broke quorum could be removed from office. But such an extraordinary action would need to go through the Texas courts and would likely be tied up in state court for some time. Rules enacted by the House in 2023 subject state lawmakers to a $500 daily fine for each day they are absent. Lawmakers are paid about $600 a month. While the rules prohibit lawmakers from using campaign funds to pay the fines, there are loopholes Democrats can use to have someone else cover them. The current special legislative session runs through 19 August but Abbott can continue to call more sessions, and it's unclear how long Democrats are willing to wait out returning. As Texas has moved ahead with its effort to implement a new map, Democrats have threatened to retaliate by redrawing districts in states where they have complete control. Most notably, California Governor Gavin Newsom is leading an effort to redraw California's 52 districts to drastically reduce the number of Republican seats (Democrats already hold 43 seats). Democratic governors in Illinois and New York have also pledged to retaliate. Democrats face significant legal obstacles to achieving this goal. In California, voters approved a referendum in 2010 that strips lawmakers of their redistricting power and instead hands it to a bipartisan and independent citizens commission. Newsom and California Democrats are reportedly moving ahead with a plan to have voters approve a new map through a referendum this fall. In New York, the state constitution bars mid-decade redistricting absent a court order, but Democrats are reportedly considering putting a constitutional amendment on the ballot that would allow them to redistrict later in the decade. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back,' Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, said on Wednesday. Trump is reportedly urging Republicans in Missouri to redraw their congressional map to pick up an additional GOP seat. Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor, has also suggested that his state, where Republicans hold 20 of 28 seats, should redraw districts, which would likely lead to additional GOP gains. Ohio, where Republicans hold 10 of 15 seats, is required to redraw its map this year because of a unique state law. That is likely to also lead to additional Republican seats.

Outrage as PEDOPHILE announces run to replace Kristi Noem as Governor of South Dakota
Outrage as PEDOPHILE announces run to replace Kristi Noem as Governor of South Dakota

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Outrage as PEDOPHILE announces run to replace Kristi Noem as Governor of South Dakota

A convicted pedophile has announced a bid to run for South Dakota governor after Kristi Noem moved on to the Department of Homeland Security. Terry Gleason, a 44-year-old registered Republican, is running as an independent in next year's governor race. He was convicted of raping a 15-year-old girl in 2000, but told KELOLAND News he is innocent and that his status as a sex offender should not keep people from voting for him. When reached by Daily Mail on Tuesday, Gleason admitted he was dating the 15-year-old when he was 19 years old and spent eight years in prison for it. 'The worst I did is that I did date the girl, we [had a] four years difference and the police thought I was doing something with her cause we were dating,' the gubernatorial candidate said on the phone. 'I pleaded guilty to it, that's why I'm on the registry, but I did not actually commit the offence.' Gleason claimed he and the teen girl actually came up with a scheme for him to be sent to prison after he was diagnosed with lung cancer and could not afford treatment. Daily Mail could not independently corroborate Gleason's claims. The aspiring politician said that he was prepared for his child sexual assaults conviction to emerge when he signed up to run for governor. 'It makes it difficult... I knew it would,' he admitted, before adding that he does not regret going to prison. 'I know it looks bad but one thing is I actually don't regret going to prison, even though I was sent there on a crime I didn't commit, because it changed my life and it also gave me insight on the problems that are going on in the prison.' Gleason said that he wanted to run for governor to serve as an example to others to follow their dreams. 'To show my kids that even though an independent has little chance to actually win in the state, go for it,' Gleason told KELOLAND News. 'If you have a dream, go for it.' Gleason's website described him as having a background in community service and being a 'former manager.' He said that if elected, he will focus on inclusivity and tackle drug trafficking. 'We should all have the same rights,' Gleason said. 'We're all human. We're all South Dakotans and just wanting to live our life happy. That's one of my biggest deals.' South Dakota's governor race next year will be the first since Noem left the office to lead the Department of Homeland Security. The office has been filled since January by current governor Larry Rhoden, who was Noem's Lieutenant governor.

Ghislaine Maxwell makes blistering rebuttal after Trump demands release of secret Epstein grand jury transcripts
Ghislaine Maxwell makes blistering rebuttal after Trump demands release of secret Epstein grand jury transcripts

Daily Mail​

timea minute ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ghislaine Maxwell makes blistering rebuttal after Trump demands release of secret Epstein grand jury transcripts

Longtime Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell does not want the grand jury testimony from her case unsealed. The disgraced British socialite is currently asking the Supreme Court to review her original sentencing and is cooperating with federal investigators in the case. She spoke for two days with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month. Additionally, Maxwell's attorneys are angling for a pardon for their client, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence. The Southern District of New York denied Maxwell's request to review the grand jury material to assess whether her counsel wanted to object to its release. 'Ghislaine Maxwell has not seen the material and cannot take an informed position,' her lawyers wrote in a Tuesday filing. 'Given that she is actively litigating her case and does not know what is in the grand jury record, she has no choice but to respectfully oppose the government's motion to unseal it,' they concluded. This story is breaking and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store