logo
Liver King Accused of Breaking Blood-Bound Contract He Insisted Upon

Liver King Accused of Breaking Blood-Bound Contract He Insisted Upon

Gizmodo2 days ago
Liver King, the very red gentleman who receives what is perhaps the most liberal interpretation of the title 'health and fitness influencer,' is in the middle of what can mostly be described as an extremely petty and deeply stupid lawsuit over a supplement. And while the case itself might not be super noteworthy simply because the guy has been in court a lot lately, it has produced this incredible detail: The Liver King had his partners sign a contract in blood.
According to a complaint filed by Brad Kearns, another self-styled health influencer who claims to hold the Guinness World Record for speedgolfing, he and Liver King Brian Johnson talked about a new supplement for men that would be called 'Male Optimization Formula with Organs' or MOFO. Quick note: It's always good to come up with the name first, especially as it relates to a health product. According to Kearns, to christen their agreed-upon partnership, they drew up a one-page agreement (smart, keep it simple, no need for legal details). 'At Johnson's insistence, the Agreement was signed in blood,' the complaint said.
In a response to the complaint, the Liver King and his legal team refuted many of the details put forth by Kearns. They insist that they have never heard an official pitch from Kearns on a supplement. They denied having 'any interest in the name MOFO.' (A little hard to believe that one, considering Liver King's company, Ancestral Supplements, literally sells a product called MOFO.) But what they do not deny is that they drew up an agreement and put their blood on it. 'Plaintiffs admit the Agreement was signed and includes marking by blood.'
Not that it really matters that much, because these do not appear to be serious people operating in any sort of good faith, but blood oaths don't actually mean anything—and there is actual legal precedent to prove it. In 2009, a California court ruled that a contract written in blood is not binding and lacks legal standing. At most, marking a contract with blood is a symbolic gesture. And clearly it didn't mean as much to the Liver King as he might have suggested, considering he's the one who is accused of breaking it.
It probably shouldn't be shocking that the Liver King does not appear to be a man of his word or his blood, considering he already faces a class action lawsuit from fans who accuse him of misleading them about his 'ancestral' diet and its effect on his body after it was revealed that he uses steroids. Maybe he can have his supplement company whip him up a chill pill and take the edge off a bit.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 of the best fitness trackers without a paid-for subscription tier – which means no Garmins or Fitbits
3 of the best fitness trackers without a paid-for subscription tier – which means no Garmins or Fitbits

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

3 of the best fitness trackers without a paid-for subscription tier – which means no Garmins or Fitbits

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Anyone who's interested in getting a fitness tracker could probably tell you how tough it is to pick one at the moment. Choosing one of the best fitness trackers or best smartwatches means doing a lot of research – for example, which devices will work with your phone? Out of those devices, which are best-suited to track your favorite exercises? How do you avoid overpaying, and why do you need to pay for a subscription after buying a watch? Many people buy a fitness tracker or watch not realizing they're only buying partial access to their data. While most fitness trackers come with a certain amount of free features, you can often unlock more comprehensive analysis or new tools via one of those monthly subscriptions. Don't get me wrong: Fitbit Premium is a first-rate app, and we gave it 4.5 stars in our official review. Likewise, Whoop, a fitness tracker that is only available as part of an ongoing premium subscription, is extremely comprehensive (and for many people, worth the high price paid in perpetuity). Oura, one of the best smart rings, has a membership program that allows you to get the best of its features, including an AI-powered Advisor service. However, Garmin introduced its new Garmin Connect Plus premium tier, and that certainly didn't go down well with its users. Storing data is expensive, especially in the age of AI, and I can understand why smart tech companies would like an additional revenue stream. But there are plenty of users who don't want access to their own data sold back to them, and instead wish for a device that works as advertised at the point of purchase. That's why below, I'm recommending a trio of fitness trackers that I really like, and have personally used, without a subscription tier. Whether you're after a cheap, mid-tier or premium fitness tracking option, picking up one of these will ensure you only need to pay once for a top-notch tracking experience. 1. Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 By far the cheapest fitness tracker on our list at $59 / £49 / AU$139, the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is an impressive Fitbit alternative: it's cheaper, packs in loads of features, and Samsung Health requires no subscription. Fitbit, on the other hand, has a free app, but you only unlock all the features with a monthly or yearly payment. We gave the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 four stars out of five in our review, citing its "simply brilliant value, though, with a lovely screen, clear stats and encouraging insights to help you improve your everyday health". It's worth noting there's no GPS here, so might not be the best option for dedicated runners. It's also worth noting Samsung Health's subscription-free status also applies to all the best Samsung watches and the Samsung Galaxy Ring, so if you're looking for a smartwatch or smart ring, you have subscription-free options there too! 2. Coros Pace 3 While its closest competitor Polar has recently introduced a subscription-based Fitness Program, Coros continues to fly the 'pay once and be done with it' flag. There are plenty of outstanding Coros devices available, from seriously chunky adventure watches like the Vertix 2 to arm-mounted heart rate monitors, but my personal favorite is the Coros Pace 3, which we named our best cheap running watch and has continued strong in this capacity for nearly two years. It represents outstanding value as a low-power fitness tracker, with an extremely light weight, comprehensive running and recovery metrics, and a staggering 24-day battery life. It's not really a lifestyle smartwatch, but as a fitness tracker for runners, it's devilishly hard to beat in terms of value at $229 / £219 / AU$399. 3. Apple Watch Ultra 2 The cream of the crop: one of the best smartwatches in recent memory, and our top choice for the best Apple Watch overall. While Apple does have a subscription in Apple Fitness+, that is purely to access its library of follow-along workout content on your phone or smart TV: when it comes to analyzing your data, or creating new on-watch features, Apple has kept its Health and Fitness apps completely subscription-free. Of course, that also apples to the more affordable Apple Watch SE 2 and Apple Watch Series 10 watches too, which in addition to the Ultra make up Apple's current wearables line-up. However, in keeping with the theme of cheap-to-middle-to-premium, if you want the best, you need the Watch Ultra 2. While the battery might not be much to write home about, its wealth of features, slick-to-use operating system, the ability to add the watch to your data plan, and its smorgasbord of third-party fitness apps and integrations make it an obvious premium pick. You might also like... I review fitness trackers for a living – here's the best one I've tried in 2025 My biggest marathon regret was not paying attention to my training plan, and it cost me my time – twice Do you struggle on hikes? Here are 5 essential gym moves to strengthen your legs, glutes and core

Mother sues Florida dairy farm, claiming she lost fetus and almost died after drinking infected raw milk
Mother sues Florida dairy farm, claiming she lost fetus and almost died after drinking infected raw milk

CBS News

time9 hours ago

  • CBS News

Mother sues Florida dairy farm, claiming she lost fetus and almost died after drinking infected raw milk

A Florida dairy farm was named in a lawsuit filed by a woman who claims she lost her fetus after getting sick while caring for her toddler, who also got sick after drinking raw milk. According to WKMG, the CBS affiliate in Orlando, Rachel Maddox is suing Keely Farms Dairy, a New Smyrna Beach dairy farm, which state health officials have tied to at least 21 cases of E. coli and Campylobacter bacteria sickness from raw milk consumption. Six of the 21 patients were children under the age of 10, seven were hospitalized and at least two cases have resulted in severe complications, according to the state-issued warning. Maddox's filing demands a jury trial on compensatory damages for permanent physical and mental injuries incurred "as a direct and proximate result of Defendants' conduct," the lawsuit states. The lawsuit, which also names the market where Maddox allegedly bought the milk, was filed Wednesday in Seminole County and claims that Keely Farms shipped milk that contained the bacteria, WKMG reported. "I became very ill and I mean the sickest I've ever been in my life," Maddox told WKMG. "I came really close to dying and our [unborn] son did die. The doctors told me that I was lucky to be alive." According to the lawsuit, Maddox was allegedly unaware of any potential dangers while purchasing the milk in June from an organix, natural food store. When she asked about the packaging's label that "said something to the effect [of] 'for consumption by animals,'" she was allegedly told "that was a technical requirement to sell 'farm milk,'" the lawsuit claims. Maddox told WKMG she had bought the raw milk on and off for months, and while she never drank it, her toddler and other family members had before without any issues. It wasn't until Maddox's toddler drank the milk on June 8 and soon experienced "diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, chills, and resultant dehydration," prompting Maddox to take the child to a hospital the next day in what the lawsuit calls "the first of what would be three emergency room visits and hospitalizations in the next several weeks," WKMG reported. About five days later, Maddox sought medical treatment for "ongoing diarrhea, vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, and chills that led to septic shock and severe dehydration," the lawsuit stated. According to the lawsuit, tests returned positive for Campylobacter, which she was told was contracted while caring for her toddler. "I contracted the bacteria from cleaning up the diarrhea and vomiting," Maddox told WKMG. "As a mom, you get a lot of stuff on you when your kid is sick, and I became ill by contracting the bacteria that way." According to the lawsuit, Maddox's 20-week-old fetus died on June 18 and she was readmitted to the hospital with sepsis, going on to leave and return to hospitals multiple times in the coming days for ongoing medical treatment. Maddox has hired Ron Simon & Associates, which describes itself as a national food poisoning law firm, as well as Newsome Law, WKMG reported. WKMG reached out to Keely Farms Dairy last week for a response, but its representatives did not want to comment beyond stating that their milk is not made for human consumption. When WKMG visited Keely Farms' Facebook page earlier, a description allegedly stated in part that "Raw milk is sold 'Not for human consumption' and as 'animal feed.'" A post made on the page on Wednesday also included images depicting what Keely Farms allegedly described as "Last week's milk test results from 2 labs." That post has since been deleted when CBS News Miami visited the page on Sunday. In an X post shared Tuesday by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, he said that "Floridians have the freedom to make informed health choices," while sharing links to the state's warnings. "I support the decision to consume raw milk when sought for potential health benefits and protective factors," he said. "Be aware of your source and know the risks." Although it is illegal to sell raw milk for human consumption in Florida, it can be sold in the state if it's labeled as a pet food. Raw milk has been promoted by online wellness influencers and raw food advocates, boosting sales in recent years, but public health officials say it can be risky. The Florida Department of Health noted in its statement that "many people consume raw milk safely." But it also advised, "Floridians should be aware of potential risks associated with consumption, which may vary depending on the source of milk. The producer's handling of raw milk and milking procedures are vital in prevention of contamination." The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) say raw milk can carry life-threatening bacteria, such as E. coli, campylobacter, listeria or salmonella. These can cause symptoms including diarrhea, vomiting and stomach cramps. Severe cases can result in a condition called hemolytic uremic syndrome, or HUS, which can lead to kidney failure. Since 1987, 143 outbreaks have been linked to raw milk or raw milk products, some involving miscarriages, stillbirths, kidney failure and even deaths, according to the FDA. Pasteurization — a process of heating the milk — kills these bacteria. Pasteurization is required by federal law for any milk sold across state lines. Some individual states also restrict or ban the sale of raw milk, but others allow it. In an interview with CBS News Miami earlier this year, Mark McAfee, founder of one of the world's largest raw milk producers and head of an advocacy group called the Raw Milk Institute, claimed raw milk offers health benefits such as bioactives that boost the immune system. McAfee sells his raw milk legally in California, where no state law prohibits its sale. But the CDC says such claims are unfounded. "Pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits without the risks of raw milk consumption," the agency Gonzalez contributed to this report.

The 7 dietitian-backed foods to eat for a balanced breakfast
The 7 dietitian-backed foods to eat for a balanced breakfast

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The 7 dietitian-backed foods to eat for a balanced breakfast

Your mornings are busy enough without having to spend the time to decide what to make – and then having to actually make – a healthy, well-balanced breakfast. That's further complicated by the fact "healthy" can mean different things to different people. Some may be trying to lose weight. Some may be trying to gain weight. Some may be trying to increase the amount of nutritious food they eat in a day. Some may just need to grab anything they can get their hands on to make sure there's something in their stomach before running out the door. Marisa Moore, MBA, RDN, LD, a registered dietitian nutritionist and author of "The Plant Love Kitchen," breaks down everything you need to know about best breakfast nutrition practices. Looking for a healthy breakfast? Here's what to eat in the morning for a nutritious meal. How many calories should I eat for breakfast? The amount of calories someone should eat in a given meal can depend on several factors, including age, sex, height, weight, physical activity, pregnancy or lactation status and individual goals. For example, the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends that a moderately active (defined as the equivalent to walking between 1.5 and 3 miles per day at 3 to 4 miles per hour) 35-year-old man should be consuming about 2,600 calories a day, while a moderately active 35-year old woman needs about 2,000. Women generally need fewer calories than men, and older adults generally need fewer calories than younger ones. These recommendations can also vary depending on whether a person is trying to lose, maintain or gain weight, too. Rather than focusing on how many calories someone should be eating at breakfast, nutrition experts suggest paying more attention to the variety of macronutrients you're serving yourself. "Start the day with a protein- and carbohydrate-rich meal for sustained energy until lunch time," Moore suggests. Adding healthy fats, such as chia seeds, walnuts, olive oil, avocado or full-fat yogurt to the equation is helpful. What is meal sequencing? Health experts explain whether the rising diet trend works. What should I eat for breakfast? Your morning menu doesn't have to be boring. These balanced breakfast options will give you the energy you need to get through the day. Vegetable-packed omelet with a side of fruit (pick your favorites!) Protein-rich Greek yogurt with walnuts and berries (a quick, no-cook option that Moore says will keep you full "for hours"). Oatmeal with a creamy nut or seed butter with a handful of berries (this one's vegan, if that's something you're looking for in a recipe). Leftover beans and rice or roasted broccoli with scrambled eggs or tofu ("Remember that breakfast can be anything you want it to be," Moore says). The U.S. Department of Agriculture's MyPlate (which in 2011 replaced the food pyramid you might be more familiar with) also offers dozens of healthy breakfast recipes, including apple oatmeal muffins, black bean burritos and Spanish omelets. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What to eat for breakfast, according to a dietitian

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store