logo
Small boats crisis risking community cohesion, Kemi Badenoch claims

Small boats crisis risking community cohesion, Kemi Badenoch claims

Yahoo05-08-2025
The failure to stop migrants crossing the Channel in small boats is putting community cohesion at risk, Kemi Badenoch has claimed.
The Conservative leader also hit out at the deal the Government has struck with France to return migrants across the English Channel and insisted the Tories could not be held accountable for continued backlogs in the asylum system.
The 'one-in, one out' agreement, which will begin operating on Wednesday, will see migrants ineligible to stay in the UK sent back to France, in exchange for taking those who have links to Britain.
As she visited a farm in her Saffron Walden constituency on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch was asked whether she believed descriptions of the small boats crisis as a 'tinderbox' were an appropriate part of the public debate around migration.
The Conservative leader told the PA news agency: 'If you were to speak to the mothers who were protesting outside the hotel in Epping, they will tell you that a crime had been committed and that's what they're protesting.'
Ministers should not be clamping down on those 'expressing legitimate concerns', she suggested, adding: 'We need to make sure that we address those concerns and what we're not seeing from the Government is any kind of addressing of those concerns.
'We need to stop the boats. It is not affordable, it is not good for community cohesion, it is not good for crime, it is costing us a lot of money. We need to get a grip on this issue as quickly as possible.'
Asked whether the Conservatives were partly to blame for the immigration and asylum situation, Mrs Badenoch told reporters: 'No I don't accept that at all, because what Labour are doing is just rubber-stamping all of the applications and saying they're processing.'
Labour scrapped 'the only deterrent that this country had, which was the Rwanda plan', she added.
The agreement with France is 'not going to make any difference whatsoever', Mrs Badenoch said, adding: '50, at best, migrants being swapped with France is not going to stop the boats.'
Earlier, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the deal with France will not stop the crossings on their own, but marked an important change of principle as migrants will be sent back across the Channel for the first time.
Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Ms Cooper said: 'We never claimed that there is a single silver bullet on this. So, this goes alongside the 28% increase in returns of failed asylum seekers that we have brought in.
'It goes alongside the change to those French maritime rules that I referred to which means France taking action in French waters to prevent boat crossings in the first place, and the much stronger law enforcement that we announced earlier this week with the additional National Crime Agency investigators and police to be able to go after the criminal gangs. We have to do all of these things.'
Ms Cooper said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount of Channel migrants that will be returned to France as she believed it could aid criminal gangs.
It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year.
She added: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that.'
Bruno Retailleau, France's interior minister, said the agreement 'establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs'.
The initial agreement will be in place until June 2026.
Mr Retailleau added it marked the 'first stage' of efforts by the whole of the European Union, sparked by the UK-EU summit in London in May.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Truth about asylum seekers in Birmingham and West Midlands amid protest fears
Truth about asylum seekers in Birmingham and West Midlands amid protest fears

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Truth about asylum seekers in Birmingham and West Midlands amid protest fears

The number of asylum seekers living in hotels and other properties in the West Midlands has gone up slightly this year to 8,828. While there has been an increase in small boat crossings that has driven up requests, the numbers involved still represents less than half a per cent of the local population. Latest Home Office data also reveals that only a quarter of those seeking asylum in the region are in hotels, despite those being a focal point for anti-migrant protests. The majority live in shared refuges, hostels and houses operated by Home Office contractors Serco. READ MORE: Police reveal dog walker update in urgent search for missing Birmingham man The new data, for the period up to the end of March, shows the real number of asylum seekers being housed in the region. It comes in the wake of damaging protests at hotel locations around the region and country, including at hotels in Sutton Coldfield, Solihull and Wolverhampton. One asylum seeker in Wolverhampton bravely shared his experience of being on the receiving end of protestors' chants and anger, describing it as 'very fearful'. 'Ibrahim' was speaking on BBC Newsnight. More protests are planned this weekend. As at March 2025, there were 8,828 asylum seekers being supported in hotels and other accommodation across the West Midlands. This is up around 5,000 since December 2024. Of those placed in the region, 3,306 were in hotel accommodation and the rest were living in homes, hostels and specialist provision. Birmingham: 1,018 living in hotels and 1,354 in dispersed accommodation. Sandwell: 277 in hotels and 1,367 in dispersed accommodation. Dudley: 35 in hotels, 630 in dispersed accommodation Solihull: 211 in hotels, 43 in dispersed accommodation Walsall: 0 in hotels, 687 in dispersed accommodation Coventry: 329 in hotels, 1,554 in dispersed accommodation Wolverhampton: 227 in hotels, 1,013 in dispersed accommodation In 2024, 53% of all asylum applications were refused at initial decision. Refugees have also been able to enter the UK through resettlement schemes. Between 2014 and March 2025, around 34,200 Afghans had been resettled under a government scheme. In 2022 two Ukrainian resettlement schemes were launched, triggering the biggest flow of people into the UK than at any time in recent history. By March 2025, some 223,000 people had arrived in the UK through these schemes. That represents more than the total number granted refuge via all other routes and countries. In 2024, a total of 108,100 applicants sought asylum, the highest annual number ever recorded. In that year, around 53% of applications were initially refused. The biggest nationality of origin was Pakistani, followed by Afghan, according to Home Office data.

Campaigners fighting Sizewell C granted hearing in the High Court
Campaigners fighting Sizewell C granted hearing in the High Court

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Campaigners fighting Sizewell C granted hearing in the High Court

Campaigners fighting the new Sizewell C nuclear power station have been granted a hearing in the High Court. Together Against Sizewell C (TASC) is seeking a judicial review into plans for additional sea defences as part of the project. The action group is calling for Sizewell C's development consent order, granted in 2022, to be revoked or varied. READ MORE: Suffolk: High Court rejects Sizewell legal challenge A judge at the High Court will hear TASC's representatives claim project developer, power firm EDF, kept plans for the flood barriers secret in order to avoid scrutiny. A decision would then be made on whether to grant a judicial review hearing, which would take place at a later date. A TASC spokesperson said: "Sizewell C's attempt to avoid scrutiny of these additional sea defences now means the project is proceeding without its full environmental impact having been assessed, this being in contravention of the UK Habitat Regulations. "Sizewell C clearly believe they can do as they see fit with our heritage coast, national landscape and designated wildlife sites irrespective of the damage they will cause – this government, the largest shareholder in Sizewell C, must be challenged on this." TASC believe that the barriers were omitted from the original planning application that was granted development consent and fear that their construction could disrupt nearby wildlife habitats. READ MORE: Sizewell C campaigners lose High Court challenge for Suffolk The campaigners would like less invasive flood barrier options to be pursued. TASC has lost previous judicial reviews into the new station, which is set to cost £38 billion, including in June 2023 when the High Court rejected a legal challenge over the disposal of nuclear waste and the provision of a water supply. In 2022, a similar legal challenge claiming the development was unlawful because of concerns about the maintenance of a water supply, was also rejected.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store