Syrian intelligence documents confirm Austin Tice imprisoned by Assad regime
The intelligence files unearthed by the BBC are the first evidence to surface of the Assad regime's detention of Austin Tice, who disappeared near Damascus in 2012.
Missing American journalist Austin Tice was imprisoned by the Assad regime and questioned by a Syrian intelligence officer, the BBC reported on Monday, citing uncovered intelligence files from the former government.
BBC said that the authenticity of the files had been verified by the news organization and by law enforcement.
Syrian officials from the former Assad regime also confirmed to the BBC that the regime had detained Tice.
The US government previously said that it believed the Syrian government held Tice, but the Assad regime denied the claim.
Tice, who worked as a freelance journalist, disappeared near Damascus in August 2012. According to the BBC, seven weeks after his disappearance, a video was posted online showing Tice blindfolded and his hands bound, being forced to recite an Islamic declaration of faith by a group of armed men.
However, US officials and analysts questioned the validity of the video, saying it "may have been staged."
No government or group claimed responsibility for Tice's disappearance, and he had not been heard from since.
The intelligence files unearthed by the BBC are allegedly the first evidence to surface of the Assad regime's detention of Tice, since efforts to locate him began following the fall of Assad's regime in December 2024.
According to the BBC, the files labelled "Austin Tice" included communications from different branches of Syrian intelligence.
One file, marked "top secret," showed that Tice was detained in a facility in Damascus in 2012, with sources confirming to the BBC that he was held by a paramilitary group loyal to the Assad regime.
A Syrian official told the BBC that Tice was held in Damascus by the paramilitary group until February 2013, and at that time, Tice developed stomach issues and was treated by a doctor twice. Blood tests reportedly revealed that he suffered from a viral infection, the BBC wrote.
A man who visited the facility where Tice was held told the BBC that Tice was treated better than the Syrian detainees, but that he looked "sad" and that the "joy had gone from his face."
A former member of the Assad loyalist group NDF with knowledge of Tice's detention told the BBC that Tice was a "card" for diplomatic negotiations with the US.
Tice was reported to have briefly escaped from captivity through a window in his cell, but was recaptured and interrogated by a Syrian government intelligence officer sometime between late 2012 and early 2013.
After the fall of the Assad regime, former US president Joe Biden said he believed Tice was alive, and Tice's parents said they heard from a "significant source" that Tice was indeed alive and being "treated well."
However, when prisons emptied after the fall of the regime, there was no sign of Tice, and his whereabouts are still unknown.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls Trump's tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has hit out at President Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill, describing it as a "disgusting abomination", in a widening rift between the two. The tech billionaire posted on X that the bill would add to the US budget deficit and saddle Americans with "crushing" debt. The budget, which includes huge tax breaks and more defence spending, was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being considered by senators. "Shame on those who voted for it," said Musk, hinting that he may try to unseat the politicians responsible at next year's midterm elections. The bill has the backing of President Donald Trump and would be the legislative linchpin of his second-term agenda if it passes Congress. Musk left the administration abruptly last week after 129 days working to cut costs with his team, known as Doge. The comments mark his first public disagreement with Trump since leaving government, after having previously called the plan "disappointing". The South African-born tech billionaire's time in the Trump administration came to an end on 31 May, although Trump said that "he will, always, be with us, helping all the way". In its current form, the bill - which Trump refers to as the "big beautiful bill" - has been estimated to increase the budget deficit - the difference between what the government spends and the revenue it receives - by about $600bn (£444bn) in the next fiscal year. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? In a series of posts on X on Tuesday, Musk said that the "outrageous, pork-filled" spending bill will "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". In American politics "pork" refers to spending on projects in lawmakers' constituencies. Musk has previously vowed to fund campaign challenges against any Republican that votes against Trump's agenda. But on Tuesday he fired a warning to those who backed the bill. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," he wrote. Asked about Musk's comments soon after the first post, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said "the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill". "This is one, big, beautiful bill," she added. "And he's sticking to it." The legislation also pledges to extend soon-to-expire tax cuts passed during the first Trump administration in 2017, as well as an influx of funds for defence spending and to fund the administration's mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. To the dismay of fiscal conservatives, it would lift the limit on the amount of money the government can borrow, known as the debt ceiling, to $4tn. The comments from Musk reflect wider tensions among Republicans over the plan, which faced stiff opposition from different wings of the party as it worked its way through the House. The Senate has now taken it up, and divisions are already emerging in that chamber, which is also narrowly controlled by Republicans. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has said over the last few days he will not support the bill if it raises the debt ceiling. "The GOP [the Republican Party] will own the debt once they vote for this," he told CBS News, the BBC's US partner, over the weekend. Trump responded to Paul with a series of social media posts, accusing him of having "very little understanding of the bill" and saying that the "people of Kentucky can't stand him". "His ideas are actually crazy," Trump wrote. Republican lawmakers pushed back on Musk's comments, with Senate majority leader John Thune telling reporters the party plans to "proceed full speed ahead" despite "a difference of opinion". "We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president," he said. Mike Johnson - the Republican Speaker who has ushered the legislation through the House - told reporters on Capitol Hill that "my friend Elon is terribly wrong". "It's a very important first start. Elon is missing it," Johnson said. Johnson said he had a 20-minute phone call with the tycoon about the bill on Monday, adding that its phasing out of electric vehicle tax credits could "have an effect" on Tesla, Musk's firm. "I lament that," Johnson said, expressing surprise that Musk criticised the bill despite their call. "I just deeply regret he's made this mistake.' Among the issues that upset Musk involved air traffic control at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), according to Axios. Musk was hoping it would be run on his Starlink satellite system, but he was denied because of issues relating to the technology and the appearance of a conflict of interest, the political outlet reported. Some Democrats welcomed Musk's comments despite their previous criticism of him and the work of Doge. "Even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process, and is one of Trump's buddies, said the bill is bad," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "We can imagine how bad this bill is." Trump and Republicans in Congress have set a deadline of 4 July to get the measure passed and signed into law. Musk supported Trump in last year's November election with donations of more than $250m. To make peace with spending hawks, Trump is also asking Congress to pass a plan that would reduce current spending by $9.4bn, a figure derived from Doge's work. It would mainly slash funding for foreign aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and for broadcasters NPR and PBS. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? Elon Musk plans to cut back political spending Musk 'disappointed' by Trump's tax and spending bill Follow the twists and turns of Trump's second term with North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher's weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is This the Best the Democrats Can Do?
On Tuesday, the Democratic National Committee served tacos outside the Republican National Committee's headquarters—a nod to a trendy new acronym spelling out 'Trump always chickens out.' If the point was to push a slogan that works perfectly in one area (tariffs, where the president is constantly ramping up and backing down) and less perfectly in several others (immigration and general authoritarianism, where the president is running roughshod over the rule of law), then perhaps it was mildly successful. Still, the endeavor was most notable because of a comment from Vice President JD Vance: 'We have,' he tweeted, 'the lamest opposition in American history.' On this—and perhaps this alone—it's hard to disagree with the vice president. Handing free food to fascists outside their offices might be the high-water mark for the pugilism Beltway Democrats. Two days earlier, Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries appeared on CNN to weigh in on the recent fascistic detention of an aide to Democratic Representative Jerry Nadler by ICE agents to make it clear that this aggression will not stand. 'In terms of how we will respond to what Trump and the administration has endeavored to do, we will make that decision in a time, place, and manner of our choosing. But the response will be continuous, and it will meet the moment that is required,' he said. Bash, understandably, was perplexed by the answer. 'What exactly does that mean? Have you not decided how to respond?' Jeffries, having apparently not realized that he had not said anything of substance at all, stared blankly ahead for a few seconds—his signature move—before repeating the line he had clearly decided was a slam dunk: 'We will respond in a time, place, and manner of our choosing if this continues to happen.' To which I say, what exactly does that mean? His counterpart in the Senate only did slightly better—or perhaps slightly worse, depending on your perspective—on Monday. Responding to reports that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff were reportedly close to reaching a nuclear deal with Iran that was reportedly more or less identical to the landmark one forged by Barack Obama in 2015, Schumer returned to the TACO moniker. 'If TACO Trump is already folding on Iran, the American people need to know about it. No side deals,' Schumer said. 'What kind of bull is this? They're going to sound tough in public and then have a side deal that lets Iran get away with everything? That's outrageous,' he added. 'We need to make that side deal public. Any side deal should be before Congress and, most importantly, the American people.' Schumer's rhetoric was more or less identical to the way Republicans attacked the Iran deal wrought by President Barack Obama. Here you have it: The Democrats! One says he has a response but can't say what it is or when he'll use it, and the other one is pushing a 10-year-old Republican talking point. America has never needed an effective opposition party as badly as it needs one now; instead we have the most feckless Democratic leaders of the past 100 years. The best thing that can be said is that Schumer and Jeffries are finally clearing the lowest of bars in their approach to Trump. For the first few months of the administration, they were guided by the belief that the iron law of political gravity would simply bring him down on its own. It had before, after all. To their minds, after being subjected to a daily barrage of crude tweets and fascism, ordinary people would finally wake up and realize that the Democrats were the only responsible, grown-up party. You know, the party that wasn't really doing much. To be fair to Schumer and Jeffries, this was born out of the unfortunate reality that there wasn't much that they could do—at least in their functions as party leaders. The Democrats were out of power in the House and the Senate, and Republicans had stacked the Supreme Court despite having only won the popular vote in three presidential elections in the last 40 years. But politics can take many forms beyond legislative maneuvers and parliamentary tricks. Donald Trump's rise is proof of this. Resistance is not solely built around investigations and legislative obstinance. One important part of politics is highlighting abuses and exploiting them. As The New Republic's editor, Michael Tomasky, pointed out back in March, these are tasks to which Schumer and Jeffries are ill suited. And Democrats, to their regret, have not empowered those who might more deftly serve as attack dogs to take up the fight. It's worth taking a second to return to the matter to which Jeffries was responding. Last week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents entered Nadler's office, accused one of his aides of 'harboring rioters,' and handcuffed her while she wept and pleaded her innocence. Nadler was unmistakably clear about what happened: 'They're behaving like fascists,' he said. 'We have to fight them.' Is this what fighting them looks like? Schumer was a vocal opponent of the deal with Iran struck by Obama: His criticism of the one Trump is nearing is not hypocrisy. It is principled opposition. But part of being the leader of an opposition party is choosing which principles to emphasize. It's good to push back, even if the whole 'TACO' thing isn't quite the political winner a lot of Democrats think it is. But to go after the administration for continuing a policy—one of the defining foreign policies—of a beloved Democratic president at a moment when the party's approval rating is in the toilet is simple political malpractice. Again: You have ICE agents cuffing Democratic staffers! Read the room (it's full of fascists). It's clear that Jeffries and Schumer can read the room. They know that their voters want them to do more. To do something. They want a response that is continuous and that will meet the moment. What's also clear is that they haven't the foggiest idea what that might look like. For years, Schumer has said that he's viewed important political decisions through the prism of an imaginary family named 'The Baileys' to better guide his decisions. Perhaps it's time for him and his fellow Democratic leaders to get real.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CBS anchor Margaret Brennan's latest dust-up with administration official adds to Trump lawsuit drama
"Face the Nation" moderator Margaret Brennan has repeatedly been shamed on-air by Republicans, generating negative attention for CBS as the company deals with a litany of other significant issues. Shari Redstone, CBS parent Paramount's controlling shareholder, has done everything in her power to clear a path for the Trump administration's FCC to approve a multibillion-dollar planned merger with Skydance Media. Redstone has given lawyers the green light to settle President Donald Trump's election interference lawsuit, although a deal has not been made, and has kept tabs on CBS News' reporting on the administration. But if Redstone wants CBS News journalists to avoid irking Trump officials ahead of the high-stakes merger, "Face the Nation" anchor Margaret Brennan appears to have missed the memo. Trump Rejects Paramount's $15 Million Offer To Settle Cbs News Lawsuit, Demands Apology On Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called out Brennan for warning in March that Trump administration tariffs on imported goods would raise prices for American consumers after inflation cooled to a four-year low in April. "Margaret, when we were here in March, you said there was going to be big inflation. There hasn't been any inflation. Actually, the inflation numbers are the best in four years. So why don't we stop trying to say this could happen and wait and see what does happen," Bessent told Brennan in her latest viral clash with a Republican. Read On The Fox News App Brennan tussled with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in February after she suggested that free speech had been "weaponized" to bring about the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. After Vice President JD Vance criticized European allies for adopting a "soviet"-style approach to censorship at the Munich Security Conference in Germany, Brennan made nefarious inferences. "[Vance] was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide," Brennan said to Rubio. "He met with the head of a political party that has far-right views and some historic ties to extreme groups. The context of that was changing the tone of it. And you know that." "Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide. The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews, and they hated minorities, and they had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews," Rubio told Brennan. The "Face the Nation" anchor also had a testy exchange with Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., over then-FBI director nominee Kash Patel on the day before Trump's inauguration. She clashed with Vance in January over unvetted refugees in the country. She specifically asked whether he stood by his past comments that the U.S. should not "abandon anybody who's been properly vetted." "Well, Margaret, I don't agree that all these immigrants, or all these refugees have been properly vetted," Vance said. "In fact, we know that there are cases of people who allegedly were properly vetted and then were literally planning terrorist attacks in our country. That happened during the campaign, if you may remember. So, clearly, not all of these foreign nationals have been properly vetted." Cbs Host Blasted For 'Bonkers' Claim Nazi Germany 'Weaponized' Free Speech In March, Trump sat down with The Spectator's Ben Domenech for a wide-ranging interview and was asked about the exchange Brennan had with Rubio. "I call it 'Deface the Nation,'" Trump said. "Brennan is like anybody on the street that you could take and say, 'Go in and ask a few questions,'" Trump added. "That was so bad, I don't get how you hire some of these people." While Brennan continues to irk Trump and his allies, her corporate overlords are looking to strike a deal with the president. Fox News Digital confirmed last week that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit. The talks are ongoing, but the president's legal team is demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. The ordeal began last October when Trump sued CBS News and Paramount over allegations of election interference involving the "60 Minutes" interview of then-Vice President Kamala Harris that aired weeks before the presidential election. The lawsuit alleges CBS News deceitfully edited an exchange Harris had with "60 Minutes" correspondent Bill Whitaker. Redstone, who recused herself from settlement discussions in February, isn't thrilled with being tied up in litigation with the sitting president and wants to get things resolved. But not everyone from CBS News is on the same page. "60 Minutes" executive producer Bill Owens abruptly resigned in April, saying he no longer had sufficient independence to run the program how he wanted. Last month, CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon followed Owens out the door, citing tensions within the company. McMahon's resignation fueled speculation that a settlement with Trump was looming, as she and Owens were both known to object to apologizing for what many media observers consider a typical editing decision at the heart of the lawsuit. Cbs News Staffers Rattled By Ceo's Abrupt Exit As Trump Lawsuit Looms Over Network "60 Minutes" correspondents have been speaking out, adding to the ongoing headache for Paramount Global. Scott Pelley took a not-so-subtle shot at Trump last month during a commencement address at Wake Forest University. "Why attack universities? Why attack journalism? Because ignorance works for power," Pelley told Wake Forest graduates. "First, make the truth seekers live in fear, sue the journalists and their companies for nothing. Then, send masked agents to abduct a college student who wrote an editorial in her college paper defending Palestinian rights and send her to a prison in Louisiana charged with nothing. Then move to destroy the law firms that stand up for the rights of others." On Friday, Lesley Stahl admitted she was bothered by the situation. "To have a news organization come under corporate pressure—to have a news organization told by a corporation, 'do this, do that with your story, change this, change that, don't run that piece.' I mean, it steps on the First Amendment, it steps on the freedom of the press," Stahl said. Paramount Facing Mounting Pressure From Cbs Stars, Dem Lawmakers As Company Mulls Settling Trump Lawsuit "It steps on what we stand for. It makes me question whether any corporation should own a news operation," she continued. "It is very disconcerting." Meanwhile, Redstone is set for a significant windfall if she's able to flip Paramount to Skydance. Bloomberg reported last year that she would receive $180 million in severance on top of the roughly $350 million she would pocket from the merger. Skydance Media CEO David Ellison, the son of billionaire Larry Ellison, would take control of CBS as head of the newly formed Paramount Skydance Corp. once Redstone exits. He would also inherit Brennan, whom Newsweek referred to as "MAGA's favorite punching bag" in article source: CBS anchor Margaret Brennan's latest dust-up with administration official adds to Trump lawsuit drama