logo
Single-teacher schools are failing India's children. Here's what must change

Single-teacher schools are failing India's children. Here's what must change

India Today7 hours ago
On paper, the Right to Education Act is clear: every primary school must have at least two teachers and one for every 30 students. Yet, travel into the heartlands of India, especially to states like Jharkhand, and you'll find a very different reality. Nearly one in three government primary schools there is run by a single teacher.In some states, that lone teacher is expected to handle 70, even 90 children. And more often than not, these schools are tucked away in remote tribal villages or Dalit hamlets -- places that desperately need education the most.advertisementSometimes, there's no teacher at all.
Economist and activist Jean Dreze, who has long worked on rural education in India, calls this 'a stark symptom of a larger failure to enforce RTE norms.' And the data backs him.According to the UDISE 2021-22 data on single-teacher schools from the education ministry, Jharkhand isn't alone. States like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Karnataka also report worryingly high numbers of single-teacher schools. But in Jharkhand, the problem runs deeper -- and longer.ALARMING NUMBERS IN JHARKHAND AND OTHER STATESJharkhand hasn't hired new teachers since 2016. In the years since, many have retired or passed away, creating a gaping hole in the teaching force.'Even at that time, there were massive teacher shortages,' Dreze points out. 'Meanwhile, many teachers have retired or died, intensifying the shortage.'Dreze has even co-filed a PIL in the Jharkhand High Court in 2023 demanding appointments of 26,000 teachers. He says the state's crisis is rooted in years of neglect.
(Representative image)
According to 2021-22 UDISE data, Jharkhand has the highest proportion of single-teacher schools among all major Indian states -- 30.9% of its government primary schools. Even worse, these schools serve an average of 46 students each, far above what any one teacher can manage.For comparison, Andhra Pradesh (33.9%), Telangana (30.3%), Karnataka (29%), Rajasthan (27.2%) and Himachal Pradesh (28.2%) also report high proportions of single-teacher schools.In Bihar, only 9.7% of schools are single-teacher, but they serve a staggering 96 students on average. Uttar Pradesh, despite its size, has only 2.5% single-teacher schools -- but each of these has around 70 pupils.At the other end of the spectrum, Kerala stands out, with just 4% single-teacher schools and only 10 pupils per school.And this is where we need to differentiate between the issue of single-teacher schools and that of mini schools.'MINI-SCHOOLS' AREN'T THE PROBLEM -- BAD POLICY ISadvertisementSome officials casually label all single-teacher schools as 'mini-schools.' Before the Right to Education (RTE) Act came in, mini-schools were a quick-fix way to reach remote habitations where enrolment would be very low anyway.But once the RTE norms kicked in -- demanding minimum infrastructure and at least two teachers per school -- the system was supposed to upgrade. It didn't.Dr Jean Dreze explains it simply: 'Mini-schools are easy to identify. There are some in most states, but not many. But the problem of single-teacher schools is much larger, certainly in Jharkhand.'While Kerala or Himachal might post one teacher to handle 10-15 kids in a remote hill or forest village, Jharkhand averages 46 students per single-teacher school. In Bihar, it's 96. These aren't "mini" -- they're overcrowded, neglected, and barely functional.So when some policymakers try to lump all single-teacher setups under the 'mini-school' banner to justify the lack of staffing, it's dangerous. It's just bad policy.
(AI-generated image)
advertisementTHE CASTE QUESTIONThe problem isn't limited to teacher shortages. It's also about where teachers are posted. It's no coincidence that the worst-hit areas are largely inhabited by Dalits and Adivasis.Urban and easily accessible villages tend to receive more teachers. Remote Adivasi and Dalit villages -- where parents are often first-generation learners -- are left with barely one, or sometimes none.'Discrimination is very much part of the problem,' says Derze. Teachers are often reluctant to take up posts in these communities.'Teacher placement discriminates against remote villages inhabited by marginalised communities,' Dreze says. 'Children who needed the best schooling facilities, because their communities have been excluded from education for centuries, end up getting the worst.'The government, too, appears to have deprioritised these schools when it comes to allocation and oversight.WHEN A SCHOOL IS JUST A MEAL CENTREThis single-teacher school crisis in Jharkhand was laid bare at a public hearing held in June 2025 in Manika block of Latehar district, based on a survey of 40 single-teacher schools in the area. Villagers gathered to share what daily schooling actually looks like.'Once food is served, the school closes,' said Salmani Devi from Ambatikar village. 'When we ask officials about this, they say -- 'What will village children study?''advertisementJamuna village's Chinta Devi described how their school technically has two teachers, but one is always absent and the other is too busy with paperwork.For Kavita Devi from Karmahi village, it's not just a learning issue -- it's a matter of her children's future. 'I don't want them to become daily wage workers like me,' she said.Mayawati Devi, also from Karmahi, added that when they confront teachers about the poor quality of education, the teachers simply blame the government.Geeta Devi from Chatra village pointed out how the system seems more invested in feeding children than educating them. 'Everyone asks what food was served in school, but no one asks what was taught,' she said.
From the public hearing on single-teacher schools in Jharkhand in June 2025
And when it comes to basic schemes? Phuliya Devi noted that 'Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao' isn't implemented in her village at all.Even corruption plays a role. Kunti Devi, a School Management Committee member, said that the headmaster demanded Rs 150 from each student for school uniforms. 'Because I couldn't pay, my child didn't get one,' she said.advertisementWhen the matter was raised with Block Education Officer Rajshree Puri, she responded by suggesting that anyone in the village who has passed Class 12 can teach voluntarily -- even without pay.This, Dreze says, is part of a larger policy. 'Jharkhand has a policy of allowing volunteers with education above Class 12 to take classes in government schools on an honorary basis,' he acknowledges.But he warns that such ad-hoc arrangements can be dangerous, especially if they are used as a substitute for actual teachers.Dreze warns that such stop-gap measures are not only ineffective but dangerous. 'The danger is that such classes will substitute for teacher time, or act as an entry point for cranks and crooks,' he says. 'But these classes rarely happen in any case.'Here's the data on single-teacher schools as per the UDISE 2021-22 report:StateProportion of schools with a single teacher (%)Proportion of children enrolled in single-teacher schools (%)Average number of pupils in single-teacher schoolsJharkhand30.924.946Karnataka29.021.223Rajasthan27.218.930Himachal Pradesh28.218.619Madhya Pradesh21.317.339Andhra Pradesh33.915.524Jammu & Kashmir19.013.915Uttarakhand27.911.915Telangana30.310.721Chhattisgarh15.38.734Punjab18.27.132Bihar9.77.196All major States14.76.933Odisha8.66.637Gujarat7.24.634Assam8.74.333Maharashtra11.74.220Tamil Nadu8.34.132Haryana7.22.848West Bengal5.21.829Uttar Pradesh2.51.570Kerala4.00.310WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?The RTE norms are over a decade old. Why haven't they been enforced?According to Dreze, the buck stops with both political leadership and the education bureaucracy. 'The irresponsibility of the bureaucrats and functionaries is also staggering,' he says. 'They care mostly about finance and records, without much concern for children.'The silence from the political class is equally deafening. 'In Jharkhand, the schooling system is a disaster but one rarely hears about this in parliamentary debates, media reports, public discussions or electoral campaigns,' he says.Even the courts -- though recently helpful -- can only do so much. A PIL filed by Dreze and others led the Jharkhand High Court to order the appointment of 26,000 new teachers.But as Dreze says, "Judicial activism is certainly not enough. This failure is first and foremost a political failure.'Filling the 26,000 teacher vacancies in Jharkhand are just the beginning. According to petitioners in the Jharkhand High Court case, the state needs over 60,000 more primary school teachers to meet RTE norms.'
(Representative image)
CAN THE PEOPLE TURN THIS AROUND?Interestingly, while the government looks away, parents haven't stopped caring. At the public hearing in Jharkhand's Latehar, many took a day off from mahua collection -- a crucial seasonal income source -- to attend.It may not seem like much, but it shows that the demand for education is there, especially from parents. It just hasn't found political voice yet.Dreze believes a 'second wave' of the education rights movement is needed. 'Most Indian parents care a lot about their children's education, but collective action on this is rare,' he says. "One reason is that the influential classes have deserted government schools in favour of private schools. The rest feel that there is little they can do.'But this frustration can be harnessed. 'Their strong desire for quality education can probably be turned into a positive energy for public mobilisation,' he adds.And the RTE Act, despite being ignored today, 'includes many useful provisions that are worth fighting for.'THE WAY FORWARDSo what needs to be done? First, appoint teachers -- and appoint them where they're needed. Ensure that no school is left with just one teacher, especially if it's serving a large number of children.Build mechanisms that hold the bureaucracy accountable. And above all, bring the issue back into public conversation.Because at the end of the day, no child should grow up believing that school is just a place to eat rice and leave. They deserve classrooms that function, teachers who show up, and a system that believes they matter. Otherwise, it's not just a schooling failure. It's a national one.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can't allow weaponisation of critical minerals: PM Modi at Brics
Can't allow weaponisation of critical minerals: PM Modi at Brics

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Can't allow weaponisation of critical minerals: PM Modi at Brics

PM Modi at Brics NEW DELHI: Brics countries should work to make supply chains for critical minerals and technology secure and reliable, so that no country can use these resources for its own "selfish gain or as a weapon" against others, said PM Narendra Modi at the Rio summit. The remarks are significant as they come at a time the global community is grappling with China's dominance of critical minerals. Quad recently announced a critical minerals initiative to secure and diversify supply chains to prevent any economic coercion or price manipulation. Modi was speaking in the presence of Premier Li Qiang who represented China at the summit in the absence of President Xi Jinping . In April this year, amid a raging trade war with the US, China suspended export of some rare earth minerals sparking global concerns about its impact on advanced technology and security industries. The call for ensuring secure and reliable supply chains was one of the suggestions the PM made at the Brics session on strengthening multilateralism, economic issues and AI to turn the grouping into a guide for the multipolar world in the future. He said Brics' diversity and multipolarity is its greatest strength. Strengthening internal systems like the Brics New Development Bank (NDB) that would lend more credibility to the call for reformed multilateralism, collaboration in agricultural research for the benefit of Global South, creation of a Brics Science and Research Repository, and ensuring responsible AI were some of the other suggestions made by Modi in his address. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo The PM underlined that the NDB must follow demand "driven principle and long-term sustainability" for granting projects. "Global standards must be created that can verify the authenticity of digital content, so that we can identify the source of the content and maintain transparency and prevent misuse," said Modi, adding that India will organise an AI Impact Summit next year for improved cooperation between all countries. Modi said at a time when the global community faced uncertainty and challenges, the relevance of Brics was evident. "Global South has many hopes from us. To fulfil them, we must follow the principle of 'Lead by Example'. India is fully committed to working shoulder-to-shoulder with all our partners to achieve our common goals," Modi said. Addressing another session on climate, Modi said that under India's Brics presidency next year, the Indian govt will work to define Brics in a new form. "Brics will mean - Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability," he said, adding that for India, climate justice is no alternative but a moral duty. He underscored India's position that without tech transfer and affordable financing for countries in need, climate action will remain confined merely to climate talks.

Under India's presidency, we will work on redefining Brics, says Modi at summit
Under India's presidency, we will work on redefining Brics, says Modi at summit

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Under India's presidency, we will work on redefining Brics, says Modi at summit

NEW DELHI: India's presidency of the Brics grouping next year will focus on building resilience and using innovation for sustainability while simultaneously giving priority to the issues of the Global South, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said at the Brics Summit in Rio de Janeiro on Monday. In this image via PMO on July 7, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi attends a session during the 17th annual BRICS Summit in Brazil. (PMO) Addressing a session of the summit devoted to the environment and global health, Modi said India will adopt a people-centric approach to redefine Brics and widen the agenda of the grouping, just as it had done while chairing the G20 in 2023. The session was attended by leaders of the 10 member states of Brics, including Brazil, China, Indonesia and South Africa, and representatives of partner countries. 'Under India's Brics chairmanship, we will work on redefining Brics. Brics will mean 'Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability',' he said, speaking in Hindi. 'Just as during our presidency, we gave breadth to the G20 and gave priority to issues of the Global South in the agenda, similarly, during our presidency of Brics, we will take this forum forward in the spirit of people-centricity and humanity first.' Modi's remarks came hours after US President Donald Trump threatened to slap additional tariffs on countries that align themselves with the policies of the Brics grouping. There was no official response from the Indian side to Trump's threat made in a social media post. 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,' Trump said, without specifying which policies he was referring to. The leaders' declaration adopted at the Brics Summit on Sunday had — without directly referring to the US — said indiscriminate and unilateral tariffs are reducing global trade, disrupting supply chains and introducing uncertainty into international trade activities. The declaration had also condemned last month's military strikes against Iran. Modi emphasised the need for collective global action to tackle pressing issues such as sustainable development and climate transition and highlighted the steps taken by India during its G20 presidency to tackle such matters. 'During India's G20 presidency, we had emphasised sustainable development and reducing the North-South gap,' he said pointing to the Green Development Pact and the Green Credits Initiative. 'For India, climate justice is not an option but a moral duty. India believes that without technology transfer and affordable financing to countries in need, climate action will remain limited to climate talks.' Developed countries, Modi said, have a special responsibility in reducing the gap between climate ambition and financing. 'We have to take along all those countries which are facing food, fuel, fertiliser and financial crises due to various stresses…Sustainable and inclusive development of humanity is not possible without any kind of double standards,' he said. Modi said the health of the planet and humans are interconnected and India has increased cooperation with all countries with the motto of 'One Earth, One Health'. He offered to share India's expertise in areas such as the world's largest insurance scheme or Ayushman Bharat and digital health services. 'The Covid pandemic has taught us that viruses do not come with visas and solutions are not chosen based on passports. Common challenges can only be solved through joint efforts,' he said. The Brics leaders' statement on a partnership for elimination of socially determined diseases, issued on Monday, will provide new impetus to strengthen cooperation on health. Dammu Ravi, secretary (economic relations) in the external affairs ministry, told a media briefing that India's presidency of Brics will be an opportunity to press for the reform of global institutions such as the UN Security Council. 'This is what everybody is saying…that [the voice of the] Global South…should be amplified and adequately captured in the multilateral discourse and decision-making,' he said. India's presidency of Brics will also help put the issues of the Global South at the forefront of global discussions, Ravi said. 'We are already thinking about an agenda in terms of sustainability [and] resilience. These are again very important because in a disruptive world today, both in terms of trade…geopolitical tensions, the supply chain disruptions, you need to have resilience [and] sustainability,' he said. 'You will see a momentum and continuity in the way the Brics will evolve in terms of [taking] up the issues of the Global South,' Ravi said.

A step away from transparency
A step away from transparency

The Hindu

time41 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

A step away from transparency

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has introduced some new rules and revisions, including a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar before the Assembly polls. This exercise will then take place across the country. In Bihar, the SIR exercise, aimed at removing duplicate entries in electoral rolls, started on June 25. It uses the 2003 electoral rolls as the base. The process includes door-to-door verification and new documentation requirements. The ECI aims to publish the final voters' list by September 30. As part of the process, voters listed in the 2003 electoral rolls — the last time that an intensive revision was done in Bihar — do not have to submit documents unless they are asked. However, those who were not on the rolls in 2003 and new applicants will have to provide proof of date and/or proof of place of birth of self if they were born before July 1, 1987; proof of date and/or proof of place of birth of self and of one parent if they were born between July 1, 1987 and December 2, 2004; and proof of date and/or proof of place of birth of self and both parents if they were born after December 2, 2004. On the surface, this seems aligned with the ECI's broader goal of cleaning the electoral rolls and eliminating ghost voters from the voters' list and ensuring that only eligible Indian citizens exercise their franchise, which is fundamental to a free and fair democratic process. However, there are several concerns. First, many individuals/families from poor, Dalit, Muslim, tribal, and migrant communities often lack formal birth certificates. Second, many others will struggle to produce documents for verifying their parents' place of birth, largely due to historical gaps in State documentation. Third, there may be lack of awareness and clarity around the new requirements. Many voters, especially in rural areas, may not fully understand which documents are needed, how to fill out forms, or where and when to submit them. With limited public outreach, complex paperwork required, and a tight timeline leading up to the final publication of the electoral rolls by September 30, there is a high risk of confusion, errors, and unintentional exclusions, particularly of those already on the margins of the system. Fourth, the process relies heavily on field-level officials (booth level officers and electoral registration officers), who hold discretionary power. While the framework allows for claims, objections, and appeals, the initial verification and decision-making are in the hands of local officers. This may lead to inconsistencies, delays, or biased judgment, especially in areas with limited oversight. Fifth, the ECI has neither committed to publishing the list of names being removed from the electoral rolls, nor has it provided a clear, accessible system for applicants to track the status of their submissions. This makes it difficult for citizens, civil society, and the media to monitor the process, identify errors, or challenge wrongful exclusions, raising serious questions about accountability. The Lokniti-Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) post-poll survey of the National Election Study 2024 revealed a concerning trend. When respondents were asked whether they trust the ECI, 12% reported 'not much' and 7% reported 'no trust at all'. In this atmosphere of suspicion, the ECI has now published a circular directing that all photos, videos, CCTV footage, and webcasts from polling stations be deleted within 45 days of the election results, unless an election petition is filed within that period. Earlier, footage and photos were retained for three months to one year, depending on the stage of polling. This new measure not only limits the time to scrutinise the material, but also shuts off avenues for transparency that existed earlier. While steps such as the EPIC clean up and voter turnout upgrade suggest that the ECI is pushing for efficiency, actions such as deleting polling station footage prematurely, implementing new documentation rules without sufficient public awareness, and failing to disclose names removed from electoral rolls contribute to the prevailing atmosphere of uncertainty and suspicion. At a time when public trust in institutions is under strain, the ECI cannot afford to be so opaque. Krishangi Sinha is a Researcher with Lokniti-CSDS; Sanjay Kumar is Co-Director of Lokniti, and Professor at CSDS. Views are personal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store