Butter prices soar 65%, driving food cost higher, new data shows
'Price increases for dairy products led the increases for April 2025,' Growden said.
'The average price for 500g of butter was $7.42 in April 2025. That's nearly $3 more expensive than this time last year,' Growden said.
The increase in the non-alcoholic beverages group was driven by higher prices for instant coffee, up 21.3% in the 12 months to April 2025.
'Instant coffee prices have increased $1.44 since this time last year. The average cost is now $8.21 per 100g,' Growden said.
Stats NZ's selected price indexes provide a monthly update on 46.5% of the goods and services in the total consumers price index (which is released quarterly).
It includes food, rent, travel and – for the first time this month – electricity prices.
Electricity prices increased 2.3% in April 2025 compared with March 2025, while gas prices increased 1.1%.
Prices for international airfares increased 24.7% in April 2025 compared with March 2025, while prices for domestic airfares increased 3.8%.
'The more expensive air travel costs coincided with school holidays and consecutive long weekends throughout April,' Growden said.
The increase in international airfares was driven by higher prices for flights to the Pacific Islands, Australia and Asia.
Rents rose 0.2% on a monthly basis and were up 3% annually, based on the stock measure.
The stock measure shows rental price changes across the whole rental population, including renters currently in tenancies.
'Selected Price Indexes (SPI) for April came in a touch stronger than our expectation,' said ANZ senior economist Miles Workman.
It was up 0.9% stronger ( month on month) than the flat read ANZ had pencilled in.
'But much of the surprise came from the volatile components,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Reserve Bank's statement a 'dovish pivot'
Photo: RNZ While the Reserve Bank's 25 basis point cut to the Official Cash Rate was in line with expectations, economists say the decision came with a "dovish pivot", prompting greater expectations for further rate cuts. The country's biggest bank, ANZ, now expects two further cuts to happen in October and November, compared to their previous forecast of November and February. "While a 25bp cut was universally expected, the forecasts and the tone of the discussion were much more dovish than we - or the market - had anticipated," ANZ chief economist Sharon Zollner said. "We thought this week would be too early for the RBNZ to pivot to our view of things, but that's precisely what happened," she said. Financial markets also viewed the RBNZ statement as dovish, with the New Zealand dollar falling sharply against its major trading partners after the announcement. "The RBNZ has today brought about a meaningful easing in monetary conditions that will help shore up the economic recovery," Zollner said. "With upside inflation risks looking contained, that's the appropriate strategy, in our view." Cotality chief property economist Kelvin Davidson said the housing market effects from Wednesday's decision were likely to be small. "If anything, the possibility of more falls in mortgage rates than previously thought could lift activity and house prices a bit," he said. "But those rate changes may be fairly minor." "And in the meantime, as the RBNZ has indicated, the economic and labour market outlook is still disappointing - which will tend to weigh on housing, as it's already doing." Davidson said concerns about job security may mean that existing borrowers shifting to lower interest rates might decide to save their extra cash or reduce the term of their loan, rather than spending it in the economy or the property market. Australian economist David Bassanese from Betashares said the RBNZ's decision was a "missed opportunity" for a 50 basis point cut. The decision by the RBNZ to reduce the OCR to 3 percent was split, with four members favouring a smaller 25 basis point cut, compared to the two members who wanted a 50 basis point cut. "The timid policy response in the face of a weak domestic economy does pose the risk of the economy tipping back into recession," Bassanese said. "Arguably, the RBNZ could have been justified in applying some shock therapy to the moribund economy with a larger-than-expected 0.5 percent rate cut today," he said. "In a sense, that was a missed opportunity."
1News
10 hours ago
- 1News
OCR: What rate cut is coming today? When will there be more?
Economists are united in their view that the Reserve Bank will cut the Official Cash Rate (OCR) by 0.25% later today, but several are forecasting more will be needed, and sooner, to pull the economy out of the funk. A 25-basis-point cut down to 3% has already been priced in by the big four banks, which cut interest rates for borrowers and savers last week. But later today, observers will be keeping a close eye on commentary and analysis from the Reserve Bank's monetary policy committee on how fast it thinks the OCR, and therefore interest rates, could fall over the next six to nine months. ANZ's Sharon Zollner said: "Even assuming the decision is a given, the Reserve Bank could nonetheless move the market considerably with both its OCR forecast and its words." Some are expecting rates to eventually fall a further 25 basis points, down to 2.75%, or even to 2.5%. The OCR is currently 3.25% after being held steady in July. ADVERTISEMENT Speaking to Breakfast this week, Infometrics principal economist Brad Olsen said a lacklustre economy in recent months had likely sealed the deal for today's decision to cut. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including teachers walk off the job, explosion at vet clinic caught on camera, and a diamond heist doesn't pay off. (Source: 1News) "Everyone can see the writing on the wall. The economy has not been going particularly well in the last couple of months," he said. He added: "With the higher unemployment rate and everything else, it looks like there is enough reason for the Reserve Bank to be able to cut interest rates back a bit more. The question is, how much further they might signal they are willing to go." * Follow live coverage of the OCR announcement on from 2pm. Finance and Mortgage Advisers Association managing director Peter White said home loan borrowers were considering whether to fix or continue with a variable rate. "Many are electing to split their loan between the two as part fixed and part variable, and this can be a good option right now as the expectation is that rates will continue to trend downwards into 2026." ADVERTISEMENT How many more cuts and how soon? But the question of when there might be more cuts after today, if at all, remains subject to debate. Some are pushing for the Reserve Bank to be more aggressive, arguing the central bank needs cuts to help lift the economy out of its current malaise. Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr has led calls for what he terms a "go for growth" approach, arguing the OCR needs to fall to 2.5% - below the neutral rate of around 3%. "A cash rate of 3% isn't stimulatory, and it isn't encouraging excessive behaviour or inflation. We need a stimulatory rate if we're going to encourage businesses to take on risk - either invest or hire," he said in a briefing note. Economist Brad Olsen said major banks had already pre-emptively dropped interest rates as "everyone can see the writing on the wall". (Source: Breakfast) Meanwhile, Westpac NZ's chief economist Kelly Eckhold still believes today's forecasted cut will likely be the last of this cycle, though he expects the Reserve Bank to leave the door open for one more 25-basis-point reduction later in the year. "Our forecast remains that [this] easing will most likely be the last for this cycle." Westpac economists said "further cuts from here will be more cautious while inflation remains high and the economic outlook unclear". They added: "Domestic inflation is likely to linger above historic averages due to continuing large increases in administered charges like council rates and electricity charges."
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
What will encourage NZers to have more babies?
New population data has confirmed that New Zealand will need to rely more on migration to offset an ageing population in the coming decades. Photo: RNZ More affordable and suitable housing is likely to be a better incentive to get people to have babies than "baby bonuses", economists say. New population data has confirmed that New Zealand will need to rely more on migration to offset an ageing population in the coming decades. Stats NZ said on Tuesday that the estimated population of New Zealand was 5.3 million as at 30 June. The median age of women was 39 and men 37.4. In the year, the population grew by 0.7 percent. The total fertility rate was 1.57 births per woman, marginally up from 1.55 a year earlier. The rate has been below the replacement rate of 2.1 since 2013. Treasury earlier warned that could cause problems as the cost of an ageing population would be covered by a smaller number of working taxpayers. In the 1970s, there were about seven people aged 15 to 64 for everyone aged 65 and over. Today there are four and in 50 years there will be about two. Infometrics lead demographer Nick Brunsdon said it was a situation that had been "in the mail" since the 1960s. "If the average level of migration is 30,000 a year over the next from now to eternity our population is still likely to start declining in probably the 2050s. "Migration is the only thing that can save us but it won't entirely save us over the long term. "We've already become much more reliant on migration than we used to be but we're going to become even more reliant on migration and even more prone to those wild swings that we get in migration." He said with most households needing two earners, having children was more challenging. "That's probably where the action is in terms of making it easier for people to leave and then re-enter the workforce - helping with that is much more effective than any kind of big cash payment, I think it would need to be quite a large cash payment to move the dial. "Other countries have tried throwing money around as a sort of Hail Mary on that front. But the flip side is it's cheaper to get migrants." The US has been reported to be looking at offering US$5000 "baby bonuses". South Korea was paying 2 million won. China offers 3600 yuan. But Brunsdon said that was unlikely to be the solution. "I don't think anyone's going to change their plans for $5000," Brunsdon said. "We can look and see other countries, there are plenty through Europe that are well below 1.5, China's at about 1.3 children per woman and no one's managed to really avert that in a substantial way." He said it was a question of managing the impact. "Net migration is really, really weak. Down below 20,000 and we have a net loss of population in the 20 to 34-year-old age group. More young Kiwis are deciding to leave than come here so the challenge is going to get more acute in the coming years because if you're losing the 20 to 34-year-olds they're not going to be here having kids." Westpac senior economist Michael Gordon said it would take some time before the population tipped into decline. He said there were "push and pull" factors for the falling birth rate. "We have seen birth rates dropping worldwide, it's not just in rich countries, either. "As countries get richer on average, they tend to have fewer children. That's something we see everywhere. But there is also an element of push vectors ... there is a reasonable amount of evidence that unaffordability of housing affects this as well. "It means that people form families later in life. It means they are having fewer children ... the short answer is to do things that improve the lives of everyone in the country and then population trends will change as a side effect of it." That could mean cheaper housing and an increased variety of options to meet different stages of life, he said. "More generally just making kind of housing development more family friendly - access to transport and things like that." That might not only help family size but also encourage people to stay in the country, Gordon said. "The thing is any kind of population policy will ultimately be thwarted by the fact that people can choose to leave. "If we do things to make it more attractive for people to stay. Then, as a byproduct to that, you will get more natural population growth. I mean, another way of putting it is there's no point paying people to have more children if half of them leave the country when they reach adulthood anyway." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
