Trump signs order targeting law firm that employed Mueller team prosecutor
President Trump on Tuesday signed an order targeting a law firm that previously employed Andrew Weissman, a former federal prosecutor who worked on then-special counsel Robert Mueller's team.
The order, which targets the law firm Jenner and Block, is the latest move from Trump to punish major firms with ties to critics and individuals he holds grudges against.
White House staff secretary Will Scharf alleged the firm had engaged in 'weaponization of the legal system against American principles and values.'
'And Andrew Weissman is the main culprit with respect to this firm?' Trump asked, calling Weissman a 'bad guy.'
Scharf said Weissman was 'one of a number of reasons' the order was being issued.
'Jenner & Block has had a long history representing clients, paid and pro bono, in their most difficult matters since 1914,' a spokesperson for the law firm said in a statement. 'Today, we have been named in an Executive Order similar to one which has already been declared unconstitutional by a federal court. We remain focused on serving and safeguarding our clients' interests with the dedication, integrity, and expertise that has defined our firm for more than one hundred years and will pursue all appropriate remedies.'
The order Trump signed Tuesday is similar to others he has signed in recent weeks targeting security clearances, government contracts and access to government buildings for major law firms with ties to lawyers who represented Democrats or worked on cases involving Trump.
One previous order targeted Covington & Burling, which is providing pro bono services to represent former special counsel Jack Smith in his personal capacity. Smith oversaw two federal criminal cases against Trump involving the alleged mishandling of classified documents and his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot.
Another targeted Perkins Coie, which worked for the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016 and worked for a political opposition research company that dug into Trump during his first run for president.
A federal judge temporarily blocked the portion of Trump's order denying Perkins Coie attorneys entry to federal buildings.
Trump also targeted the Paul Weiss law firm, but the firm later reached a deal with the administration to have it rescinded. As part of the agreement, the law firm agreed to provide the equivalent of $40 million in pro bono legal services to support the Trump administration's initiatives.
Updated: 4:55 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democratic-led states sue Trump administration over funding cuts
A group of 21 Democratic-led states filed a Tuesday lawsuit against the Trump administration for arbitrarily cutting grants allegedly misaligned with an agency's goals. Plaintiffs, which include New York, Illinois and California, said federal agencies have taken on a nationwide 'slash-and-burn campaign' to unlawfully revoke previously awarded funds through a subclause in federal regulations. States' attorneys general allege a clause permitting federal agencies to terminate grants 'pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Federal award, including, to the extent authorized by law, if an award no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities' is being misused by the Trump administration. The states said congressionally mandated funds cannot be 'stripped away' to punish jurisdictions that enforce policies disliked by the current administration. States with sanctuary cities, research projects related to environmental protection standards and other measures have lost federal dollars in recent months. 'With the stroke of a pen, federal agencies have deprived States of critical funding they rely on to combat violent crime and protect public safety, equip law enforcement, educate students, safeguard public health, protect clean drinking water, conduct life-saving medical and scientific research, address food insecurity experienced by students in school, ensure access to unemployment benefits for workers who lose their jobs, and much more,' plaintiffs wrote in the lawsuit. 'Federal agencies have done all of this without any advance notice, without any explanation to the State recipients, and in direct contravention of the will of Congress,' they added. 'The State recipients' sole offense has been that they used the grant funding precisely how they had promised in the grant applications—and as they were instructed by the agencies at the time of the grant award.' 'Leftist AGs and governors who would rather spend their days drafting toothless letters in an attempt to 'stick it to Trump' continue to miss the mark while failing to address real issues impacting their states,' White House principal deputy press secretary Harrison Fields told The Hill. 'Every one of these elected officials should focus on serving their constituents, not their party bosses, and work with the President and this administration to enact the agenda the American people overwhelmingly supported.' The lawsuit follows a federal judge's Thursday ruling rejecting the Department of Transportation's attempts to tie state funding to immigration enforcement operations.
The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump border czar Homan, wife ‘living separately' because of death threats
President Trump's border czar Tom Homan said in a new interview that he and his wife are not currently living together because of death threats he has received for enforcing Trump's immigration crackdown and the amount of time he spends working. 'My wife's living separately from me right now, mainly because I worked for many hours, but mostly because of the death threats against me,' Homan told New York Post columnist Miranda Devine on Wednesday's episode of her 'Pod Force One' podcast. 'I see her as much as I can, but the death threats against me and my family are outrageous.' Homan, who holds the formal title White House executive associate director of enforcement and removal operations, was a top immigration aide to Trump during his first presidency but moved to the private sector and worked as an immigration policy pundit over the past four years. 'Even my wife said, 'You know, it's a huge pay cut,' because I'm doing good in the private sector,' he said of receiving Trump's call to join the new administration while the couple was having dinner one night. 'She's in the middle of remodeling — months of stuff — and all that stopped because I'm leaving the private sector, going back to a government paycheck.' He said she urged him to do it anyway. 'She said, 'You need to go back or we'll get divorced … because if you don't go back, you'll be waking up every day, pissed off that you didn't go back, and I've gotta live with four more years of you being pissed off, so go back and do the job,'' Homan recalled, chuckling. Homan told Devine he didn't hesitate at the chance to join Trump's second administration this year and doesn't regret the decision, despite personal sacrifices. 'I'm not going anywhere,' he said. 'I mean, I had a thousand protestors at my house in Upstate New York, my lake house.' 'I'm not going away, 'cause I know how important it is to secure our border,' he added. Homan defended Immigrations and Customs Enforcement activity in Los Angeles, which sparked mass anti-ICE protests that prompted Trump to deploy thousands of National Guardsmen and Marines to guard federal buildings and workers. 'We were serving three criminal arrest warrants … it was a criminal investigation that happened to deal with money laundering, tax evasion and customs fraud,' Homan said. 'We know that in the Garment District, there is strong suspicion that some of that funding is sent to Mexico and Colombia to fund cartel activity, so it was a criminal investigation.' 'Right away, the left went nuts, saying 'ICE is doing an immigration raid,' and they came out in force,' he added. Over the course of the nearly hourlong interview with Devine, Homan praised New York Mayor Eric Adams (D), saying he believes Adams cares about public safety, and derided other Democrats whom he accused of using immigration as a political ploy. 'Every Democrat I ask these questions to, they can't answer me: What's the downside of less drugs coming across? What's the downside of less sex trafficking of women and children? What's the downside of less people in terrorist organizations coming across? What's the downside of less gang members and criminals coming across?' Homan said. 'What's the downside of a secure border?' 'They'll never admit it, but they know that they see a future political benefit,' he added.
New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
A Shock in New York's Mayoral Primary
To the Editor: Re 'Mamdani Stuns Cuomo in New York Mayoral Primary' ( June 25): Zohran Mamdani's upset showing against former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday is a monumental moment for New Yorkers to savor. That a joyous 33-year-old democratic socialist from Queens electrified progressive voters and then stunned a well-funded, legendary and sometimes ruthless political player for mayor of the country's largest city sends a hope-filled message to young people that our country's political system is not as prohibitive and beholden to big money as it often seems. Nonetheless, a brilliant campaign filled with costly promises does not make for a successful mayoral administration in a city as difficult as New York. Although Mr. Mamdani was not my first choice, I'm filled with a sense of cautious optimism about his prospects. My hope, should he win in November, is that he fills his administration with sage individuals who remain true to his progressive values but offer guidance through the potentially perilous challenges the city is likely to face over the next few years. Cody LyonBrooklyn To the Editor: Zohran Mamdani's commanding lead in the Democratic mayoral primary in New York bodes ill for Democrats nationally, as it is further evidence of a fractured party, one without a clear, unifying agenda or identity. Mr. Mamdani's showing will undoubtedly be viewed as a positive development by Republicans nationally, and they will delight in using it to bolster their case that the Democrats are out of touch with the values and economic concerns of average Americans, who will be turned off by his socialist leanings. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
