A Shock in New York's Mayoral Primary
To the Editor:
Re 'Mamdani Stuns Cuomo in New York Mayoral Primary' (nytimes.com, June 25):
Zohran Mamdani's upset showing against former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday is a monumental moment for New Yorkers to savor.
That a joyous 33-year-old democratic socialist from Queens electrified progressive voters and then stunned a well-funded, legendary and sometimes ruthless political player for mayor of the country's largest city sends a hope-filled message to young people that our country's political system is not as prohibitive and beholden to big money as it often seems.
Nonetheless, a brilliant campaign filled with costly promises does not make for a successful mayoral administration in a city as difficult as New York. Although Mr. Mamdani was not my first choice, I'm filled with a sense of cautious optimism about his prospects.
My hope, should he win in November, is that he fills his administration with sage individuals who remain true to his progressive values but offer guidance through the potentially perilous challenges the city is likely to face over the next few years.
Cody LyonBrooklyn
To the Editor:
Zohran Mamdani's commanding lead in the Democratic mayoral primary in New York bodes ill for Democrats nationally, as it is further evidence of a fractured party, one without a clear, unifying agenda or identity.
Mr. Mamdani's showing will undoubtedly be viewed as a positive development by Republicans nationally, and they will delight in using it to bolster their case that the Democrats are out of touch with the values and economic concerns of average Americans, who will be turned off by his socialist leanings.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
NATO's United Front Tested As Trump Hammers Spain
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. NATO, together, has an "ironclad commitment" to its collective defense. Or, at least, that's what a long-awaited, if brief, communique published by the alliance on Wednesday said, as it rounded off its biggest summit of the year. Article 5 — perhaps the ultimate sign of unity — is fully intact, the alliance said. Trump, a notorious NATO skeptic, has at several points heaped doubt on just how seriously he takes Article 5, including as he set off on his journey to The Hague. Article 5 is part of NATO's founding treaty, meaning if one country is attacked, all other nations must see it as an attack on the whole alliance and respond as they see fit. Trump has not been shy or reserved in his criticism of European allies and Canada, whom he deemed were not pulling their weight in NATO. The U.S.'s allies agreed, trying to present a united front for months by pledging to raise defense spending, partly to keep the Americans on side. But it was not Trump who cast doubt on NATO solidarity this week in The Hague and what he termed a "highly productive" summit in a "beautiful" country. It was Spain, whose prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, announced in the run-up to the summit that Madrid would not be raising its defense spending to 5 percent of GDP. This is the figure Trump and his senior officials have demanded. It is also the number that was considered completely unrealistic even a few months ago. Even during the Munich Security Conference in February, when Vice President JD Vance eviscerated European politicians from the stage in front of them, there was little indication that 5 percent could be deemed feasible in the near future. But NATO rubberstamped a commitment on Wednesday to dedicate 3.5 percent of GDP to the military, plus another 1.5 percent to defense-related areas like cyber or infrastructure. President Donald Trump meets NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday, June 25, 2025. President Donald Trump meets NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday, June 25, 2025. AP Photo/Alex Brandon "It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 percent!" NATO chief Mark Rutte said in screenshots of texts to Trump, posted by the president to social media on Tuesday. All but Spain. Madrid said again on Wednesday that it will be able to fulfil the new targets each country has been set without reaching 3.5 percent of GDP on core defense spending. Rutte told journalists on Monday the alliance was "absolutely convinced" it could not. Attendees at The Hague expressed a hope that Spain will eventually come around and increase its spending. If Madrid starts "lagging behind because they're not willing to spend enough, then there will be a serious discussion with Spain, and there will be much more pressure," retired Admiral Rob Bauer, who until last year served as the head of NATO's Military Committee, told Newsweek. Trump, meanwhile, appears to have opted for punishment of the U.S.'s ally. "They want to stay at 2 percent—I think it's terrible," Trump said during his press conference, which closed the summit on Wednesday. "I don't know what the problem is. I think it's too bad." Trump said he would "make them pay twice as much" in a trade deal currently being negotiated. Spain, as of 2024, did not meet the current 2 percent threshold each alliance member is, on paper, supposed to reach. It is not considered a major military powerhouse in Europe. "It doesn't really matter if Spain misses a target," one prominent attendee remarked. "It's a minor dent on an unimportant part of the vehicle." But the PR value does matter, at least to the U.S. Spain recusing itself from the 5 percent pledge is a "big problem," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Politico. "I don't think that the agreement that Spain has reached is sustainable, and frankly it puts them in a very tough spot with regards to their other allies and partners," he added. One of these allies could be Estonia, a country staring down Russia that committed to spending 5.4 percent on defense on average for the next four years — or an extra $3.2 billion. Tallinn would try to meet NATO's new capability targets "as quickly as possible," the government said as it announced the decision in April. Exact NATO capability targets, assigned to each country and decided in early June, are classified and separate from the spending goals. If Spain had said it would not meet the capability targets, this would have been a much bigger concern, Bauer said. "Of course, I would have been more happy that everybody's following exactly the same standards," said Margus Tsahkna, Estonia's foreign minister, when asked about Spain's defense spending. But "unity is important as well," Tsahkna added to Newsweek. Publicly, there were enthusiastic nods to unity. Photos featuring smiling NATO leaders nodded to it, said Jim Townsend, a former Pentagon official. But NATO "has had fractures, always," he told Newsweek. "There's never been a totally unified NATO to begin with." Even still, he added, "all the nations want to have unity here." "There's always something," said Bauer. Attendees in The Hague have framed the defense spending pledge and snappy communique as a response to the threat of Russia, not just the biting condemnation of the U.S. president. "The biggest change for me was not President Trump," said Bauer. "The biggest change was the development of the threat — which is Russia, which was terrorist organizations," he added. On the horizon, too, is China, the former military committee chief said. "Time is against us — the Russian threat is real," said Ulysse Ellian, a Dutch lawmaker from the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, previously led by Rutte. "For most of the allies, they do feel the sense of urgency," he told Newsweek. "It's natural some of them don't, and then we have to convince them." Even now, some countries still need cajoling, Tsahkna said. The countries forming the spine of NATO's eastern flank, brushing up against the Russian border, have surged defense spending far quicker than Western and Southern Europe. Spain, geographically far from Russia, looks south to Africa more than toward the north and east. Across most parts of NATO, though, there is a widespread feeling that defense spending across the board must rise, and rapidly. This year's concise communique, homing in on defense and tossing other topics to the wayside, "highlights that Europe's need to spend more on defense is one thing all Allies can agree on," said Rachel Rizzo, a non-resident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council's Europe Center. But now the hard work begins, Rizzo said. "It's a long road ahead."
New York Times
13 minutes ago
- New York Times
Young Muslims Loved Zohran Mamdani, and Their Parents Listened to Them
It was late in the afternoon on Tuesday, and Bilquees Akhtar was still at work as an assistant to the principal of EPIC High School North in Richmond Hill, Queens. Suddenly her phone exploded with text messages and DMs on Instagram and TikTok from her five adult children. Each of them had already cast a vote for Zohran Mamdani in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary. 'MOM, WHY ARE YOU STILL AT WORK?' Ms. Akhtar's 24-year-old son, Humza Mehfuz, wrote to her. 'YOU HAVE TO VOTE!' While Ms. Akhtar had previously supported Mr. Mamdani's main opponent, Andrew M. Cuomo, when he ran for governor and, years before that, had voted for his father, former Gov. Mario Cuomo, she told her children to calm down. After their relentless campaign of showing her TikTok videos of Mr. Mamdani — 'This kid is brilliant,' she had to admit, 'and so friendly!' — she had made her decision. 'All of Cuomo's ads tried to make Mamdani look like a terrorist,' said Ms. Akhtar, 56. 'But he's a New Yorker like me.' By Wednesday, Mr. Mamdani, a state assemblyman from Queens, had won 43 percent of votes counted, all but clinching perhaps the greatest political upset in New York City politics in a generation. (The final tally is not expected to be completed until next week, but Mr. Cuomo conceded the race on Tuesday night.) If Mr. Mamdani were to win the general election this fall, he would be the first Muslim mayor in the history of New York, and also the first mayor of South Asian descent. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
How perverse that the media can't accept Trump's stunning victory in the Middle East
President Donald Trump's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and the cease-fire he brokered soon after between Israel and Iran were awesome accomplishments, but much of the media hates him so much, they can only find fault in them. Indeed, they'd prefer he failed — even if Americans suffer as a result. Liberal news outlets, for example, pounced on a singular intelligence report that claims the strikes only set Iran's nuke program back a few months. Advertisement Prime-time coverage spent hours treating the report as gospel, and a horrible reflection on Trump. Yet an Israeli intelligence report substantiated Trump's claims that the sites suffered severe damage, and a UN watchdog said Iran's nuclear program was 'set back significantly.' Advertisement Meanwhile, a Washington Post article griped that Trump's actions 'largely sidestepped the traditional foreign policy establishment and the intelligence community,' and that the prez used social-media rather than 'diplomatic channels.' Does that make them any less successful? Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! As of Wednesday, MSNBC was still calling the cease-fire 'fragile' and 'delicate,' though both sides halted their attacks. Advertisement Many in the press focused on legality of the strikes — even floating another impeachment of Trump. The prez's bombing, they said, violated the War Powers Act and were 'a clear violation of international law.' Yet they lodged no such criticism of Presidents Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton when they engaged in military actions without congressional authorization. It's beyond sad that so many in the media hate the president so much they can't accept a clear and dramatic win for Americans — and rejoice in it.
