logo
Sikh activist who died in UK could have been poisoned, says pathologist

Sikh activist who died in UK could have been poisoned, says pathologist

The Guardian2 days ago
The family of a Sikh activist who died suddenly in 2023 have made new calls for an inquest after a pathologist found the result of the postmortem exam 'does not mean that a poisoning can be completely excluded'.
Avtar Singh Khanda, 35, died in June 2023, four days after being admitted to a hospital in Birmingham feeling unwell. The official cause of death was acute myeloid leukaemia, a blood cancer.
In a letter to the West Midlands coroner Louise Hunt seen by the Guardian, Michael Polak, a barrister acting for Khanda's family, said samples were not tested for 'nerve agents, biological agents or nuclear agents', which could have brought about an aggressive cancer, and urged her to reverse the previous decision not to open an inquest into his death.
Khanda's death, which family and friends believe was suspicious, happened against the backdrop of India's alleged involvement in an international campaign of transnational repression targeting Sikh separatists, denied by India.
UK police had said there was no reason to suspect foul play in Khanda's case, but Polak's letter includes a witness statement from Jaswinder Singh, a friend of Khanda and an adviser to Sikh Federation UK, who said West Midlands police had confirmed in a 2024 meeting that the police investigation did not include 'reviewing (Khanda's) phones, laptop, talking to his friends, co-workers, searching his home address (or) considering information about attacks on Sikh activists around the world'.
Two activists, also linked to the separatist movement, were murdered within weeks of Khanda's death in Canada and Pakistan, while a third survived an attempt on his life in the US.
Polak's letter includes the report of consultant forensic pathologist, Dr Ashley Fegan-Earl, who was provided with Khanda's death certificate, hospital notes, and a toxicology report. 'Consideration should be given as to whether the deceased could have been exposed to substances that may result in the development of an acute leukaemia,' he said.
In his statement Fegan-Earl, who was commissioned by lawyers acting for Khanda's family, noted that 'toxicological analysis in hospital did not provide any unusual results' in Khanda's case, but said the 'limitations of such analysis must be borne in mind', before describing how 'not all poisons leave behind them a defined clinical signature' and how some toxins required specialist testing to detect.
He added: 'I make no criticism of the toxicology that has been carried out in this case, but hope that the above highlights that a negative drug screen does not mean that a poisoning can be completely excluded, particularly with the use of more exotic substances that are not frequently encountered.'
Fegan-Earl added: 'I have been involved with a number of cases where there has been suspicion of poisoning by unusual agents. One case … required extremely specialised testing at Kew Gardens … two other cases involved potential poisoning by foreign powers.
'These involved the use of multiple experts above and beyond the normal expertise of toxicologists, including expertise from Porton Down. There are some poisons that can only be identified if they are suspected.'
Khanda applied for asylum in the UK in 2016, saying his life was at risk from Indian authorities. His father and uncle were reportedly murdered in extrajudicial killings after advocating for a Sikh homeland, Khalistan, in the 1990s, and from 2015 onwards, it is understood Khanda was on Indian authorities' radar, against a backdrop of unrest in his native Punjab.
Singh said in the weeks before his death, Khanda feared he was being followed, while his mother and sister had been detained by authorities searching for the Sikh separatist leader Amritpal Singh Sandhu.
Meanwhile, in the letter to the coroner, Polak said Khanda had received 'threats to his life' after a 'wide-ranging campaign' in which he was falsely accused in Indian media of tearing down the Indian flag outside the Indian High Commission in London during March 2023 protests.
The protests became a diplomatic incident, making Khanda, a 'chap who delivered parcels in Birmingham, public enemy number one of a superpower', Jaswinder Singh said.
'His funeral was attended by over 5,000 people,' Singh added. 'And not one person has said '(Khanda) told me he was ill, or knew he was ill'. The loss to the community is huge. He'd be the main fixture, the main speaker in every gurdwara. Every weekend, he'd be speaking somewhere. His mum and sister are distraught – there is no closure for them.'
Jagjit Singh, Khanda's next of kin in the UK, said: 'We want answers. How did Avatar die amidst all these threats? If it was Russia or Iran involved rather than India, this investigation would have been a whole different scale. Too many questions remain unanswered.'
West Midlands police was approached for comment. Birmingham and Solihull coroners office said they were 'unable to comment on specific cases'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No evidence of stolen data in Glasgow cyber attack
No evidence of stolen data in Glasgow cyber attack

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

No evidence of stolen data in Glasgow cyber attack

Glasgow City Council has found no evidence of any data being stolen in a cyber attack that took a number of services offline in local authority also says there has been no sign of any data being leaked or misused after the incident, but advised people to remain services supplier CGI discovered malicious activity on servers managed by a third-party supplier on 19 June.A number of online services, including paying penalty charges and reporting school absences, became unavailable due to the council taking servers offline. No financial systems were affected by the attack and no details of bank accounts or credit/debit cards processed by those systems were compromised.A spokesperson for the council said: "As part of our investigation, experts are monitoring online activity and, to date, there has been no evidence of any data being leaked or misused."However, until forensic examinations of the affected servers are complete - and we can be confident whether any data has been stolen - we are advising anyone who has used any of the affected forms to be particularly cautious about contact claiming to be from Glasgow City Council."Some services, such as public freedom of information requests, can be accessed again while workarounds are being developed for other affected Scotland are involved in investigating the incident, along with the council, the Scottish Cyber Co-ordination Centre and the National Cyber Security Centre.A number of Scottish public bodies have been hit by cyber attacks in recent months, including a ransomware group targeting NHS Dumfries and Galloway last year which saw stolen files published online.

London Pride celebrations to have ‘significant policing presence'
London Pride celebrations to have ‘significant policing presence'

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

London Pride celebrations to have ‘significant policing presence'

There will be a 'significant policing presence' in London for Pride celebrations on Saturday with more than a million people expected to head into the capital. The Metropolitan Police said it had been working closely with event organisers and other emergency services 'for many months in preparation for the event'. It added that there would be 'no tolerance of hate crime' at the celebrations. The parade, which will go from Hyde Park Corner to Whitehall Place via Piccadilly, will see hundreds of groups taking part. Among them will be contingents from the emergency services, including the Met, as well as other public bodies. The Met contingent will be made up of officers and staff from the Met LGBT+ Network and allies. The officers, who will not be in uniform, will be off-duty and not part of the policing operation on the day. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Dr Alison Heydari, who is leading the policing operation for Pride in London, said: 'The public can expect to see a significant policing presence in central London. Officers are there to ensure everyone taking part in the celebrations can do so in safety and security. 'Our primary role is to provide a reassuring presence while being able to respond swiftly and effectively to any incidents. 'Pride is a celebration of the LGBT+ community and those attending should be able to do so free from discrimination, abuse or fear. There will be no tolerance of hate crime – we would urge anyone who is a victim of it to speak to an officer immediately so we can take action. 'Any of our officers are able to help and support, but we will also have specialist LGBT+ community liaison officers deployed as part of the policing operation to assist where particular expertise is required. 'The areas around the parade and the various stages will be extremely busy, with Soho in particular likely to be very crowded. Please plan your travel to and from the event in advance, look out for each other and ask for help if you need it. 'As with any large public event, we would urge people attending to be alert and keep their eyes open. If you see something that doesn't look or feel right, please trust your instincts and bring it to the attention of an officer or a steward. In an emergency, always call 999.' The Pride in London celebrations will include a parade and a number of entertainment stages. Seven entertainment stages will be running, at Trafalgar Square, Leicester Square, Golden Square, Soho Square, Dean Street and Victoria Embankment Gardens. Police said pubs and bars across Westminster will be open as usual and are 'expected to be very busy'.

Man broke police officer's nose in airport attack, court hears
Man broke police officer's nose in airport attack, court hears

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Man broke police officer's nose in airport attack, court hears

Two brothers used a 'high level of violence' in assaulting police officers at Manchester Airport, a court has heard. Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, and Muhammad Amaad, 26, are said to have struck out after police were called to respond to an earlier incident at the Starbucks cafe in the Terminal 2 building on 23 July 2024. Amaaz delivered a headbutt to the face of a member of the public and punched him in Starbucks, Liverpool Crown Court heard. Opening the prosecution case on Friday, Paul Greaney KC said officers who were already in the airport later traced the brothers to the terminal's car park payment area. Three officers, Pc Zachary Marsden and Pc Ellie Cook – both armed – and Pc Lydia Ward, unarmed, approached the defendants, he said. Mr Greaney went on: 'The officers attempted to move Mohammed Fahir Amaaz away from a payment machine in order to arrest him, but he resisted, and his brother Muhammad Amaad intervened. 'Both defendants assaulted Pc Marsden. 'In the moments that followed, the first defendant also assaulted Pc Cook and then Pc Ward too, breaking her nose. 'The defendants used a high level of violence.' Amaaz is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden and Pc Ward, causing them actual bodily harm. He is also accused of the assault of Pc Cook and the earlier assault of Abdulkareem Ismaeil at Starbucks. Amaad, 26, is alleged to have assaulted Pc Marsden, causing actual bodily harm. Both men, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, deny the allegations. Mr Greaney said the defendants had travelled to the airport with their young nephew to collect their mother who was due to arrive back on a flight from Qatar. The prosecutor said: 'A man named Abdulkareem Ismaeil was on the same flight as the defendants' mother. He was travelling with his wife and three young children. 'It is clear that on the flight and/or shortly after it landed, something happened between the defendants' mother and Abdulkareem Ismaeil that made the defendants' mother unhappy. 'The defendants met their mother in the arrivals area of Terminal 2 and began to walk to the car park with her and the child that was with them. As they did so, they passed a Starbucks coffee house. 'Abdulkareem Ismaeil was in there with his wife and children. The defendants' mother spotted Abdulkareem Ismaeil and pointed him out to her sons. 'At just after 8.20pm, the defendants entered Starbucks and confronted Abdulkareem Ismaeil. During that confrontation, Mohammed Fahir Amaaz delivered a headbutt to the face of Abdulkareem Ismaeil and punched him, then attempted to deliver other blows, all in front of a number of children. 'The prosecution case is that this was obviously unlawful conduct.' Mr Greaney told jurors the prosecution's position was this was 'not a complicated case'. He said: 'The events you are concerned with were captured by CCTV cameras and, in relation to the events in the payment area on the body-worn cameras of police officers as well. 'So you will not have to depend only on the recollections of witnesses. You will also be able to see with your own eyes what happened. 'The two defendants assert, as we understand it, that at all stages they were acting in lawful self-defence or in defence of the other. 'Our prediction is that you will readily conclude that the defendants were not acting in lawful self-defence and that their conduct was unlawful.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store