Energy retrofit measures to be carried out at 28 schools in five counties
Pupils in more than 20 schools, across five counties, will return to find
electric car
-charging points, as well as heat pumps, LED lighting and mechanical heat recovery ventilation systems after the summer holidays.
The 28 schools, in counties
Meath
,
Kildare
,
Wexford
,
Wicklow
and
Offaly
are to benefit from deep
retrofits
that will enhance the 'fabric and airtightness of the schools' and 'greatly enhance comfort and functionality ... while contributing to a lower carbon footprint and reduced energy costs,' said a statement from the
Department of Education
on Monday.
The schools will achieve a Building Energy Rating (BER) of 'at least B', says the Department.
The programme is funded by the REPowerEU Pathfinder Programme, funded by the
European Union
(EU). The programme is part of the EU's plan to rapidly reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels following the
war in Ukraine
.
READ MORE
[
The 'foot may be coming off the action pedal': Climate plan fails to build on ambition
Opens in new window
]
Minister of Education Helen McEntee said: 'With an overall investment of €86 million, this is a significant investment in schools through the REPowerEU Programme.
'Despite its scale and complexity, it has achieved remarkable progress in a very short time frame. From the appointment of design teams to reaching tender stage within just six months, the pace of delivery has been exceptional.'
She said 40 schools had participated in the planning and design stages of the programme.' Their participation has been essential to the success of the programme to date and we fully acknowledge the commitment and effort shown by each school community.'
A spokesman said: 'The Department will continue to work closely with the schools, project teams, contractors, and all stakeholders to ensure smooth and timely delivery of the retrofit works over the coming months.'
Applicant schools underwent 'a detailed, staged assessment process with final decisions based on key criteria including technical feasibility, value for money, alignment with programme timelines and compatibility with the overall funding envelope', he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Q&A: What is the pension payment error all about and can the money be recouped?
Unions and representatives of retired civil servants say they are awaiting detail of the errors made in relation to the pensions of their current or former members . However, there is concern that some of the issues could require legislation and that senior politicians could be impacted by any changes to the law. What has happened? On Tuesday the Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers said 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO), which employs about 850 people and handles payroll administration for all government departments. The belief is these errors have resulted in some retired civil servants being underpaid in their pensions; incorrect pension contributions having been deducted from current and previous ministers; and the wrong amount of tax being deducted from the lump sums paid to about 30 senior civil servants upon retirement. With a review of 13,000 retirees' positions under way, however, and an external audit of the NSSO to be undertaken, it is uncertain how the situation will develop. READ MORE What will happen in respect of people who owe or are owed money? Mr Chambers said he was committed to ensuring 'all monies owed to the State are fully recouped and monies owed to individuals are refunded'. The former is likely to create issues, however, especially in relation to the larger amounts, with one retiree said to owe €280,000. With Mr Chambers suggesting some ministers may be asked to repay more than €30,000, the tax issue could be considerable. Details of the time frame have not been clarified, but Ciaran Rohan of the Association of Higher Civil and Public Servants says recouping overpayments stretching back more than four years could leave retirees, or potentially some politicians, substantially out of pocket. This is because current legislation would only allow the reclaiming of the extra tax paid as a result of receiving the extra money for the past four years, even if the overpayments stretched further back. Could that be changed? Only by legislation, says employment lawyer Barry Kenny, who says the issue means 'the original error has financial implications beyond a simple repayment issue'. It also has the potential to make it a political one. How could the money be recouped? A government circular in 2018 sets out the various ways in which overpayments can be reclaimed but there is no provision for anything like a liability of €280,000. The intention should be to recoup all the money and ideally within a year, it suggests, usually by deductions from pay or pensions of up to 8 per cent of the gross amount the person is receiving. But these people can afford to repay, no? The largest figures relate to people who had pension funds on retirement worth more than €2 million. That would certainly suggest they are well off but coming up with the funds to repay a six-figure sum is likely to be regarded as an issue. Cloda Ryan of the Retired Civil and Public Servants Association (RCPSA), which has some 7,000 members, says the vast majority of amounts involved are likely to be far smaller but still have the potential to cause problems for the pensioners concerned. 'Contrary to public perception, the majority of Civil Service pensioners have moderate pensions, in many cases lower than they would receive under the social welfare State pension for which, in general, civil servants recruited before April 6th, 1995 do not qualify.' The organisation is seeking assurances 'that no recovery of pension overpayments would take place without consultation and agreement with each pensioner affected'. And if an agreement can't be reached? 'Any civil servant faced with a request to refund money, large or small, should take legal advice to clarify the legal basis for the demand to repay and whether the figures are accurate,' says Mr Kenny. He says where the validity is established, 'reasonable' deductions or instalments would need to be agreed.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on AI and Ireland: the future will not wait
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept confined to Silicon Valley or science fiction. It is here, now, reshaping economies, transforming industries and prompting governments to rethink everything from education and employment to ethics and regulation. The question Ireland must urgently confront is whether it is truly prepared for the scale and speed of change AI is set to unleash. There are reasons both for cautious optimism and concern. Ireland has long positioned itself as a European technology hub, hosting the headquarters of many of the world's leading tech firms. Government agencies are actively courting AI investment. Research centres in Irish universities are leaders in developing cutting-edge AI applications. The recent launch of an AI Skills programme by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment signals a growing recognition of the need to upskill the workforce. But the evidence of the last decade also suggests that Irish regulators struggle to come to terms with the challenges posed by US tech companies which are not slow to wield their considerable political influence. The establishment of an Oireachtas Committee on Artificial Intelligence, which met for the first time this week, marks a step in deepening political and legislative engagement with the issue. The committee has the potential to initiate a broader public and legislative debate on AI policy that balances innovation with the safeguarding of democratic values and public interest. But for this to succeed, it will need to act in constructive coordination with education, enterprise and civil society. Because readiness is about more than strategy documents, it must reach into the heart of how we educate, train, and govern. Schools, for example, are already grappling with how to prepare students for a new world in which traditional educational metrics are no longer credible. The reformed Leaving Certificate, with its increased emphasis on project work, now faces an unexpected challenge: how to assess students fairly in a world where generative AI can produce plausible essays and design projects at the click of a button. READ MORE Equally urgent are the labour market implications. AI is set to displace roles in sectors ranging from transport and customer support to software development and legal services. Without a serious, joined-up national response, Ireland could face widening inequality, social dislocation and a growing digital divide. Nimble policymaking and innovative thinking are imperative. But this moment also requires political will and public investment. AI is not just a technological leap. It is a societal transformation. If Ireland is to thrive in this new age, it must act with speed, coherence and purpose. The future will not wait.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland ‘silent' on watering down of European Union's sustainability rules for companies
The Government has been 'silent' on the watering down of EU legislation aimed at obliging big companies to stamp out human rights abuses and environmental harm 'despite many other member states speaking out', an Oireachtas committee has heard. Officials from Irish Coalition for Business and Human Rights (ICBHR) and business lobby group Ibec were before the Oireachtas Committee on Enterprise, Tourism and Employment on Wednesday to offer expert views on two pieces of European law. The EU's corporate sustainability due diligence directive requires large companies to investigate human rights and environmental abuses in their supply chain, while the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD) forces them to report on their impact on the environment and their exposure to climate risk. However, the European Commission published omnibus legislation in February that delayed the implementation of both laws, significantly watered down the proposals, and effectively reduced the number of businesses within the scope of the laws from about 50,000 to 10,000. READ MORE ICBHR policy and advocacy officer Ross Fitzpatrick said his group has met with Government officials on 'numerous occasions', but 'thus far the Irish Government hasn't outlined its position on this'. 'The only real position we have managed to elicit is that Ireland is in favour of the simplification agenda but they do not want to see human rights and environmental protection undone,' he said. 'If that is the case though, the time to speak up is now. Not in six months when this directive has been completely gutted at Brussels' level. What we've heard is that the Government has been silent despite many other member states speaking out.' Will rent reform make building apartments viable? Listen | 40:12 The ICBHR policy co-ordinator Evie Clarke said negotiations are ongoing at European Council level, but 'may be wrapped up within the next month or so'. Ibec head of EU policy Neil Willoughby said legislation 'should be practical' for companies to comply with and for national authorities to enforce, as well as being 'complementary and additive' to existing national laws in EU member states. 'It is clear the original legislation did not meet these criteria,' he said. 'The CSRD introduces significant new requirements and related costs for businesses of all sizes by putting sustainability reporting on a par with financial reporting. 'For all companies in scope, it represents a new departure in terms of the level of detailed information that must be reported and the corresponding increase in the number of resources that must be allocated.' He added that the cost to companies would be 'enormous'. Ibec head of skills and social policy Kara McGann said the laws would be 'challenging in terms of time, capital, and people' and that the reporting aspect itself 'can on occasion nearly divert from the actual need of addressing the particular risk'.
