Taiwan's Starlux Eyes More Large Airbus Jets in Paris Show Deal
Save
Taiwan's Starlux Airlines Co. is nearing an order for almost a dozen Airbus SE widebody jets in a deal worth around $4 billion as it seeks to cement its push into long haul services, according to people familiar with the matter.
The carrier is leaning toward a top-up order for Airbus's A350-1000, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is private. Starlux could make an announcement during this week's Paris Air Show. The airline didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Paris Saint-Germain opens the door for Donnarumma's departure
Departure from Paris is accompanied by clear English interest. Paris Saint-Germain opens the door for Donnarumma's departure Paris Saint-Germain and Donnarumma: It seems the story that began in 2021 is about to end because the player has not reached a suitable new contract agreement with the French club, according to reliable source Nicolo Schira. Paris Saint-Germain have proactively placed their 26-year-old Italian international goalkeeper on the transfer market, despite his contract running until 2026. Club officials aim to secure a €30 million fee this summer rather than risk losing him for free later. English outlets report the shot-stopper favors a Premier League move, with Manchester United emerging as his preferred destination. This interest persists despite the Red Devils' recent struggles, demonstrating the keeper's belief in the project at Old Trafford. The former AC Milan goalkeeper was a key factor in the French team's success last season, when they won the Champions League,Ligue 1, and the French Cup.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump team pushes for ouster of top IEA official
The Trump administration is aiming to replace a top-ranking official at the International Energy Agency, amid a ratcheted-up U.S. pressure campaign on the Paris-based body, multiple energy industry insiders and former U.S. officials with knowledge of the situation told POLITICO's E&E News. The agency's second-in-command, a retired State Department official named Mary Warlick, is the main target for replacement, said the insiders, who were granted anonymity to speak freely. The pressure follows months of public frustrations with the IEA from top Trump administration officials, most notably Energy Secretary Chris Wright, who has vowed to make changes at the body or withdraw U.S. support. Some Republicans say the IEA has discouraged investment in fossil fuels by publishing analyses that show near-term peaks in global demand for oil and gas. 'The product that the IEA produces is not generally accepted by everybody. It's just not,' said Mark Menezes, who served as deputy Energy secretary during Trump's first term. 'And the political context has changed.' The Trump administration is aiming to push changes internally, according to a Republican energy lobbyist with close ties to the Department of Energy. 'They want to get operatives in there, whether they're career or political, who can actually move the needle,' said the lobbyist. 'They're going to get someone they trust and that person is going to fight from the inside out.' He added of the U.S. pressure campaign on the IEA, 'The fact that Wright is out there now talking about it publicly shows that it's elevated.' The White House, meanwhile, is championing fossil fuels as more reliable and often cheaper than wind, solar, and other clean energy sources, despite analysis that suggests renewable power is cheaper and faster to deploy. Now, House lawmakers are threatening to withdraw U.S. funding for the IEA in the fiscal 2026 budget process — after passing a recissions package that cuts funding for United Nations agencies and other international organizations. Wright has criticized the IEA for its projection that oil demand will peak this decade, calling it 'nonsensical' in a Breitbart interview in June. Republicans also bristled at the Biden administration's use of IEA analysis in 2024 to justify a U.S. decision to pause consideration of new liquefied natural gas export permits. In testimony at a Senate hearing last year, David Turk, deputy energy secretary under Biden, cited IEA findings that showed global gas demand on the decline. Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and then-Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), now retired from Congress, wrote a letter to IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol last March saying the IEA has strayed from its mission and become a 'cheerleader' for the energy transition. Birol, for his part, has defended the organization's commitment to energy security while acknowledging that its mission has broadened. Meanwhile, Trump ordered the State Department in February to do a six-month review of U.S. participation in international organizations and treaties and recommend leaving those that don't serve his priorities. IEA officials are pledging to resurrect a 'Current Policy Scenario' in the IEA's World Energy Outlook later this year. In 2020, the IEA abandoned that analysis, which analyzed the global energy picture based on existing national energy policies. U.S. officials have criticized the IEA for replacing the current policy analysis with a 'Stated Policies Scenario,' which multiple Republicans and fossil fuel supporters say is based on policies that aren't being implemented. The critics say it paints a rosier picture of global trends toward lower-carbon energy sources. 'As ever, the forthcoming World Energy Outlook 2025 will contain multiple scenarios reflecting the wide spectrum of possible outcomes that today's market conditions and policies imply,' an IEA spokesperson told E&E News. 'This year's edition will include the Current Policies Scenario, which will illustrate the implications of a continuation of policies and measures currently in place.' Leaving the IEA would deprive the United States of any influence or input at the organization and could leave it isolated. The U.S. helped establish the organization following the 1973 Arab oil embargo to focus on energy security. Today, it publishes influential energy market forecasts and data that guide major investments and government policies. The U.S. is just one of 32 members of the IEA. That means it can't unilaterally set the organization's agenda. But it does have a large amount of influence and has historically been able to work with other member governments to advance the agency, said Jonathan Elkind, former assistant secretary for international affairs at DOE during the Obama administration. 'There are going to be certain elements of policy that the current U.S. administration really disagrees with other member countries on, and the U.S. administration is entirely within its rights to advocate for adjustments in the agenda of the IEA,' Elkind said. 'The U.S. does not have the right to simply insist that everybody will change as a consequence of what the U.S. has done.' The White House did not respond for comment, and a DOE spokesperson did not respond directly to questions posed by E&E. The IEA's second-ranking position has traditionally been filled by an American. In 2021 that post went to Warlick, a former career diplomat who served as ambassador to Serbia from 2010 to 2012 and previously sat on the National Security Council as the senior director for Russia. From 2014 to 2017, Warlick was the State Department's principal deputy assistant secretary at the Bureau of Energy Resources and represented the U.S. on the IEA governing board. Officials in DOE's Office of International Affairs, which is led by acting Assistant Secretary Tommy Joyce, tried to strong-arm the State Department into signing off on pushing Warlick out back in March, according to a former State Department official. At the time, State provided a backstop to Warlick's ouster but since then a broad reorganization of the department has eliminated the Bureau of Energy Resources and most of the officials there who worked closely with the IEA. That could mean DOE would face little resistance if it tries again. In recent IEA meetings, U.S. officials have pushed for the organization to stop publishing data that they argue promotes the shift to clean power over fossil fuels. A former U.S. official who worked closely with the IEA called Warlick a 'hardworking, serious, diligent and capable professional' who does her work in a way that is consistent with guidance from the executive director and with guidance from the member countries. Just how the U.S. would force a replacement isn't entirely clear. Warlick is on a limited contract and while the U.S. is an important member, providing around 14 percent of the organization's budget in recent years, it isn't the only one. Warlick rarely speaks publicly. At an Atlantic Council event in 2022, she said that the clean energy investment caused 'geopolitical fragmentation' in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 'Such investment is still well below the level needed to bring emissions down if we are to keep net-zero and sustainable development goals in sight,' Warlick said. 'Massive investment in clean energy is the best guarantee of energy security in the future, and it will also drive down harmful greenhouse gas emissions.' This story also appears in Energywire.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why Joby Aviation Stock Flew Higher in July
Key Points Joby Aviation is leading the race to Federal Aviation Administration certification. The company's vertically integrated business model means that expanding its manufacturing capacity is even more critical to investors. Joby has the backing of key companies that will enhance its prospects of offering its air taxi services while running its fleet. 10 stocks we like better than Joby Aviation › Shares in electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) company Joby Aviation (NYSE: JOBY) soared by 57.9% in July, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence. The move came largely after the news broke that Joby announced the expansion of its manufacturing site in California and, in doing so, doubled its aircraft production capacity. In addition, Joby expanded a facility in Ohio that will manufacture and test components. It's an important development for two main reasons. Joby Aviation expands manufacturing capacity First, it's a sign of growing confidence in its ongoing certification process. The latest news on that front came from the recent announcement that Joby is "preparing for final assembly of its first conforming aircraft intended for Type Inspection Authorization (TIA) flight tests" with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Management expects to complete its first TIA flight this year as it moves toward final certification. Second, the news is particularly important for the company because of its vertical integration strategy. In this case, "vertical" means management is primarily designing and manufacturing its eVTOL components in-house. This differentiates it from eVTOL competitors like Archer Aviation or Vertical Aerospace, which have technology partners. As such, Archer and Vertical Aerospace both believe their business models should result in a quicker certification process and with less risk attached. However, it seems Joby is leading the field in terms of FAA certification, and expanding its manufacturing capacity helps de-risk the stock from one of investors' most significant fears: the possibility that its vertically integrated model will create manufacturing issues for a young company. Toyota's and Uber's involvement is key While Joby has a vertically integrated model, it also has investment from and a manufacturing alliance with Toyota. The Japanese car company has invested $894 million in Joby, and Toyota is working with Joby to help optimize its manufacturing processes. In addition, Uber has invested $125 million in Joby so far, with the eVTOL company acquiring Uber Elevate. This is a key part of Joby's overall business model, which involves owning and operating its own fleet of aircraft and offering transportation services (air taxis) itself rather than selling aircraft to other operators. Moreover, Delta Air Lines is on track to invest $200 million in Joby, with the intent to deliver a service to Delta customers traveling to and from airports. Joby's plans are ambitious, but they are perfectly feasible. The partnerships with Toyota, Uber, and Delta make sense, and Joby's management is de-risking the stock with its capacity expansion and progress toward certification. Should you buy stock in Joby Aviation right now? Before you buy stock in Joby Aviation, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Joby Aviation wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Delta Air Lines. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's Why Joby Aviation Stock Flew Higher in July was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
