logo
The US and Iran have had bitter relations for decades. After the bombs, a new chapter begins.

The US and Iran have had bitter relations for decades. After the bombs, a new chapter begins.

Boston Globe4 hours ago

A B-2 bomber arrived at Whiteman Air Force Base Mo., on Sunday, the same aircraft used to carry out the US's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend.
David Smith/Associated Press
This change of tone, however fleeting, came after the intense U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear-development sites this week, Iran's retaliatory yet restrained attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar and the
The U.S. attack on three targets inflicted serious damage but did not destroy them,
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Here are some questions and answers about the long history of bad blood between the two countries:
Advertisement
Why did Trump offer blessings all around?
In the first blush of a ceasefire agreement, even before Israel and Iran appeared to be fully on board, Trump exulted in the achievement. 'God bless Israel,' he posted on social media. 'God bless Iran.' He wished blessings on the Middle East, America and the world, too.
When it became clear that all hostilities had not immediately ceased after all, he took to swearing instead.
'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f— they're doing,' he said on camera.
Advertisement
In that moment, Trump was especially critical of Israel, the steadfast U.S. ally, for seeming less attached to the pause in fighting than the country that has been shouting 'Death to America' for generations and is accused of trying to assassinate him.
Why did U.S.-Iran relations sour in the first place?
In two words, Operation Ajax.
That was the 1953 coup orchestrated by the CIA, with British support, that overthrew Iran's democratically elected government and handed power to the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The Western powers had feared the rise of Soviet influence and the nationalization of Iran's oil industry.
The shah was a strategic U.S. ally who repaired official relations with Washington. But grievances simmered among Iranians over his autocratic rule and his bowing to America's interests.
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, with a heavy escort, as he entered a car to leave the airport in Tehran in 1979 after arriving back in the country.
FY/Associated Press
All of that boiled over in 1979 when the shah fled the country and the theocratic revolutionaries took control, imposing their own hard line.
How did the Iranian revolution deepen tensions?
Profoundly.
On Nov. 4, 1979, with anti-American sentiment at a fever pitch, Iranian students took 66 American diplomats and citizens hostage and held more than 50 of them in captivity for 444 days.
It was a humiliating spectacle for the United States and President Jimmy Carter, who ordered a secret rescue mission months into the Iran hostage crisis. In Operation Eagle Claw, eight Navy helicopters and six Air Force transport planes were sent to rendezvous in the Iranian desert. A sand storm aborted the mission and eight service members died when a helicopter crashed into a C-120 refueling plane.
FILE - Remains of a burned-out U.S. helicopter lis photographed in the eastern desert region of Iran, April 27,1980, one day after an abortive American commando raid to free the U.S. Embassy hostages. (AP Photo, File)
Uncredited/Associated Press
Diplomatic ties were severed in 1980 and remain broken.
Iran released the hostages minutes after Ronald Reagan's presidential inauguration on Jan. 20, 1981. That was just long enough to ensure that Carter, bogged in the crisis for over a year, would not see them freed in his term.
Advertisement
Was this week's U.S. attack the first against Iran?
No. But the last big one was at sea.
On April 18, 1988, the U.S. Navy sank two Iranian ships, damaged another and destroyed two surveillance platforms in its largest surface engagement since World War II. Operation Praying Mantis was in retaliation against the mining of the USS Samuel B. Roberts in the Persian Gulf four days earlier. Ten sailors were injured and the explosion left a gaping hole in the hull.
Did the U.S. take sides in the Iran-Iraq war?
Not officially, but essentially.
The U.S. provided economic aid, intelligence sharing and military-adjacent technology to Iraq, concerned that an Iranian victory would spread instability through the region and strain oil supplies. Iran and Iraq emerged from the 1980-1988 war with no clear victor and the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives, while U.S.-Iraq relations fractured spectacularly in the years after.
What was the Iran-Contra affair?
An example of U.S.-Iran cooperation of sorts — an illegal, and secret, one until it wasn't.
Retired Air Force Major Gen. Richard Secord recieved some advice from his attorney Thomas Green while testifying on Capitol Hill before a congressional committee holding hearings on the Iran-Contra affair, in 1987,
LANA HARRIS/Associated Press
Not long after the U.S. designated Iran a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984 — a status that remains — it emerged that America was illicitly selling arms to Iran. One purpose was to win the release of hostages in Lebanon under the control of Iran-backed Hezbollah. The other was to raise secret money for the Contra rebels in Nicaragua in defiance of a U.S. ban on supporting them.
President Ronald Reagan fumbled his way through the scandal but emerged unscathed — legally if not reputationally.
How many nations does the U.S. designate as state sponsors of terrorism?
Only four: Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Syria.
The designation makes those countries the target of broad sanctions. Syria's designation is being reviewed in light of the fall of Bashar Assad's government.
Advertisement
Where did the term 'Axis of Evil' come from?
From President George W. Bush in his 2002 State of the Union address. He spoke five months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the year before he launched the invasion of Iraq on the wrong premise that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.
He singled out Iran, North Korea and Saddam's Iraq and said: 'States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.'
In this January 2002 photo, former President George W. Bush labels North Korea, Iran and Iraq an "axis of evil" during his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill.
DOUG MILLS/Associated Press
In response, Iran and some of its anti-American proxies and allies in the region took to calling their informal coalition an Axis of Resistance at times.
What about those proxies and allies?
Some, like Hezbollah and Hamas, are degraded due to Israel's fierce and sustained assault on them. In Syria, Assad fled to safety in Moscow after losing power to rebels once tied to Islamic State terrorism but now cautiously welcomed by Trump.
In Yemen, Houthi rebels who have attacked commercial ships in the Red Sea and pledge common cause with Palestinians have been bombed by the U.S. and Britain. In Iraq, armed Shia factions controlled or supported by Iran still operate and attract periodic attacks from the United States.
What about Iran's nuclear program?
In 2015, President Barack Obama and other powers struck a deal with Iran to limit its nuclear development in return for the easing of sanctions. Iran agreed to get rid of an enriched uranium stockpile, dismantle most centrifuges and give international inspectors more access to see what it was doing.
This image released by the official website of the office of the Iranian Presidency shows President Hassan Rouhani has he listened to explanations on new nuclear achievements at a ceremony to mark "National Nuclear Day," in Tehran in April 2018.
Uncredited/Associated Press
Trump assailed the deal in his 2016 campaign and scrapped it two years later as president, imposing a 'maximum pressure' campaign of sanctions. He argued the deal only delayed the development of nuclear weapons and did nothing to restrain Iran's aggression in the region. Iran's nuclear program resumed over time and, according to inspectors, accelerated in recent months.
Advertisement
Trump's exit from the nuclear deal brought a warning from Hassan Rouhani, then Iran's president, in 2018: 'America must understand well that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace. And war with Iran is the mother of all wars.'
How did Trump respond to Iran's provocations?
In January 2020, Trump ordered the drone strike that killed Qasem Soleimani, Iran's top commander, when he was in Iraq.
Then Iran came after him, according to President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland. Days after Trump won last year's election, the Justice Department filed charges against an Iranian man believed to still be in his country and two alleged associates in New York.
Coffins of Gen. Qassem Soleimani and others who were killed in Iraq by a US drone strike were carried on a truck surrounded by mourners, in the city of Kerman, Iran, in January 2020.
Uncredited/Associated Press
'The Justice Department has charged an asset of the Iranian regime who was tasked by the regime to direct a network of criminal associates to further Iran's assassination plots against its targets, including President-elect Donald Trump,' Garland said.
Now, Trump is seeking peace at the table after ordering bombs dropped on Iran, and offering blessings.
It is potentially the mother of all turnarounds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wants more drones and missiles, fewer F-35s in $893 billion budget request
Trump wants more drones and missiles, fewer F-35s in $893 billion budget request

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wants more drones and missiles, fewer F-35s in $893 billion budget request

By Mike Stone WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump wants a pay raise for troops, more high-tech missiles and drones in next year's defense budget, while cutting Navy jobs, and buying fewer ships and fighter jets to save money, according to budget materials posted Wednesday. At $892.6 billion, the defense and national security budget request is flat compared with this year. The budget, which also includes nuclear weapons-related activities carried out by the Department of Energy and increases funding for homeland security, puts Trump's mark on the military by pulling funds away from weaponry and services to fund his priorities. The White House said the funding will be used to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific, and revitalize the defense industrial base. Most of the funding for Trump's marquee Golden Dome missile defense shield was included in a separate budget request and is not part of the latest proposal sent to Congress. In the 2026 budget Trump requested fewer F-35 jets made by Lockheed Martin and only three warships. Procurement of a Virginia-class made by General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries and 15 other ships are expected to be included in a separate appropriation bill, the Navy said. The budget asks for a 3.8% pay raise for troops, but also trims costs by retiring older weaponry including ships and planes that are more expensive to operate. Under the plan, the Navy will reduce its civilian employee workforce by 7,286 people. Compared to Biden's budget from his last year in office, which had asked for 68 F-35 jets in fiscal 2025, Trump's fiscal 2026 request seeks only 47 of the fighter jets. The budget has already sparked debate on Capitol Hill where the House Appropriations Committee's Defense subcommittee's draft bill for fiscal-year 2026 boosts the F-35 buy to 69, one more than Biden's 2025 request. The Pentagon continues prioritizing purchasing munitions and key weapons systems. The Air Force is continuing its investment the Joint Air to Surface Standoff Missile – Extended Range and Long Range Anti-Ship missile which have longer ranges and can be more effective in the Pacific. On the other hand, the budget seeks far fewer Precision Strike Missile, which will replace the Army Tactical Missile (ATACM) used in Ukraine. Lockheed Martin makes all three missiles. The budget also boosts spending on small drones - in part because of lessons learned in Ukraine where unmanned aircraft have proven to be an integral part of low-cost, yet highly effective warfighting. The detailed request comes as Republicans debate defense spending priorities in their sweeping $150 billion defense package contained in the pending "One Big Beautiful Bill Act". The act has already been passed the House of Representatives and will give an initial $25 billion boost to Trump's controversial Golden Dome missile defense shield. Defense spending usually accounts for about half of the U.S. discretionary budget; the rest goes to transportation, education, diplomacy and other departments. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump offers relief to NATO allies: 'We're with them all the way'
Trump offers relief to NATO allies: 'We're with them all the way'

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump offers relief to NATO allies: 'We're with them all the way'

President Trump offered robust support for Europe and a rebuke of Russian President Vladimir Putin at the NATO summit in The Hague on Wednesday, capping a visit that came as a relief to anxious allies across the continent. The gathering was designed by NATO leadership to appease the president, and it delivered, with nearly all members of the transatlantic alliance agreeing to spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense — a historic increase that had been a priority to Trump for several years. 'We're with them all the way,' Trump said of NATO, sitting alongside its secretary general, Mark Rutte. He later added to reporters, 'if I didn't stand with it, why would I be here?' Rutte was obsequious throughout the visit, at one point referring to Trump as a "daddy" disciplining childlike nations at war with one another. But addressing reporters, he defended his praise of the president as well-earned. Read more: Wary of Washington, Europe frets it will be left behind on an AI battlefield 'When it comes to making more investments, I mean, would you ever think this would be the result of this summit, if he would not have been reelected president?" Rutte said. "Do you really think that seven or eight countries who said, 'Somewhere in the 2030s, we might make the 2%,' would have all decided in the last four or five months to get to 2%? So doesn't he deserve some praise?' At the summit, the president faced repeated questioning over the success of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, which were designed to supplement an Israeli campaign to effectively end Iran's uranium enrichment program. But Trump expressed confidence in the mission, stating that intelligence continues to come in supporting the conclusion that its facilities were 'obliterated.' 'It's been obliterated, totally obliterated,' he said. 'We've collected additional intelligence. We've also spoken to people that have seen the site, and the site is obliterated.' An initial Defense Intelligence Agency report, first reported by CNN, cast doubt on that conclusion. But an Israeli official told The Times that preliminary findings from an on-the-ground assessment gives Israel confidence that the program has been set back by several years. 'You can see that the intelligence was very high quality in the execution of this operation — that gives us confidence in the information we have on the different facilities,' the official said. At a news conference, Trump seemed to commit to enforce Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization charter, a key provision stating an attack on one member is an attack on all. In the past, Trump has cast doubt on his commitment to the pledge. 'As far as Article 5, look — when I came here, I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing,' Trump said. 'I watched the heads of these countries get up, and the love and the passion that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never seen quite anything like it. They want to protect their country, and they need the United States, and without the United States, it's not going to be the same.' Read more: Chabria: How conflict with Iran could supercharge Trump's domestic agenda The visual was moving, the president said. 'I left here saying that these people really love their countries,' he added. 'It's not a rip-off. And we're here to help them protect their countries.' Trump also gave himself praise for helping to broker ceasefires around the world — most recently between Israel and Iran, but also between Pakistan and India, as well as Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo — while expressing frustration with Russia's president for what he described as 'misguided' views that have perpetuated Moscow's war against Ukraine. He described a bilateral meeting with Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, as 'very nice' — 'he couldn't have been nicer,' Trump said — while offering choice words for Putin, an uncharacteristic position for a president who has repeatedly referred to the Russian leader as a potential friend and partner. 'Vladimir Putin has been more difficult,' Trump said, telling one Ukrainian reporter that he is looking to provide Kyiv with Patriot missile defense batteries — long a request of the Ukrainian government. Trump also said he was open to sending additional defense funds to Kyiv if Putin fails to make progress toward a ceasefire. 'As far as money going, we'll see what happens — there's a lot of spirit,' he said. 'Look, Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' he added. Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures hold steady as Trump looks forward to Powell's replacement
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures hold steady as Trump looks forward to Powell's replacement

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures hold steady as Trump looks forward to Powell's replacement

US stock futures held steady as President Trump talked up his search for a successor to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) flatlined. The Wall Street Journal reported late Wednesday that the president's frustration with Powell's "wait and see" approach to interest rates has led him to consider announcing his pick to succeed the Fed chair in September or October. Powell's term ends in May 2026 and such an announcement would be far earlier than the typical three or four month transition period. Trump said earlier on Wednesday he is actively considering replacements for Powell, adding "I know within three or four people who I'm going to pick." Powell wrapped up two days of testifying before the House and the Senate, where he stressed to lawmakers the central bank is "well-positioned" to wait and see how Trump's tariffs are impacting the economy before reducing rates. Stocks wobbled throughout the day with the S&P 500 finishing just below a record high. Investors' jubilation from the day before, sparked by an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, moderated even as Trump declared the conflict "over." Nvidia (NVDA), meanwhile, leaped to a record high. The main event for Wall Street to end the week lands Friday with the release of the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report. Investors will be watching closely for any signs that Trump's tariffs pushed prices higher. The dollar (DX=F) has hit a low against the euro that hasn't been reached in over three and a half years. Concerns over Trump's tariff impacts on US economic stability, combined with a loss of trust over the ability of the Fed to remain independent, have consistently applied downward pressure on the greenback. Reuters reports: Read more here. The dollar (DX=F) has hit a low against the euro that hasn't been reached in over three and a half years. Concerns over Trump's tariff impacts on US economic stability, combined with a loss of trust over the ability of the Fed to remain independent, have consistently applied downward pressure on the greenback. Reuters reports: Read more here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store