Plans for 280 apartments on campus of former Bessborough mother and baby home refused
An Coimisiún Pleanála, formerly An Bord Pleanála, gave two key reasons, linked to concerns about housing mix and its design, for rejecting Estuary View's The Meadows scheme – one of two large residential schemes proposed by the company on separate sites it owns at Bessborough.
The buy-to-sell Meadows scheme was earmarked for a landbank on the eastern side of the site, and included four buildings ranging in height from one to 10 storeys.
It was submitted to the former Bord Pleanála in 2021 under the since-discontinued strategic housing development (SHD) process.
It also proposed a new pedestrian and cycle way bridge connection with the Blackrock to Passage West greenway, which flanks the site's eastern boundary. The zoning in the area permits residential, but it is an area designated as high landscape value.
However, in its ruling An Coimisiún Pleanála said the mix of units did not meet the target levels set out in the city development plan.
It also said no "statement of housing mix" was submitted, and therefore no justification had been provided in relation to the proposed mix of units.
Secondly, it said it considered its 'excessive and sustained scale, bulk and mass in combination with height, and the consequent plot ratio" would be visually obtrusive from several viewpoints within and adjoining the site.
Burial ground
The commission also noted a third recommended reason for refusal from its inspector – the presence of a potential burial ground immediately in front of the folly – which was among the reasons for its decision to refuse permission for a previous SHD application and another housing proposal on Bessborough.
But it said it believes the Meadows site, could, subject to careful forensic monitoring of ground works, be more amenable to residential development, and it decided not to include this as a reason for refusal.
Labour Cllr Peter Horgan said: "Given that this entire site is fraught with emotion and history, we need to put an end to the constant retrenching of concern that is brought whenever an application is provided here."
Estuary View declined to comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
New service station to be built outside Gorey despite appeal – ‘you have failed to identity the obvious potential safety problems'
Situated in Knockmullen on the R741 regional approach road to Gorey, an application to develop the service station was submitted to Wexford County Council (WCC) in July of last year by Mr Pat and Tom Redmond. WCC granted planning permission to the applicants on February 19, 2025 but did so only after approving the 'material contravention' of the Gorey Local Area Plan (LAP) so that a service station could be developed at this location. A material contravention occurs when a planning application significantly deviates from the objectives of the local development plan, but the planning authority (WCC) deems it necessary for the area's sustainable development. In its first planning report on August 26 of last year, WCC stated that the site is in 'an area zoned Business and Technology Park where a petrol station is not normally acceptable' and that, as a result, 'the proposal would therefore be a material contravention of the Local Area Plan'. However, following a request for further information including a revised road safety audit, WCC's updated planning report (December 17, 2024) stated that its roads department considered the development to 'be acceptable' and recommended that a material contravention be applied. Prior to planning being granted, the chief executive of WCC approved the development on the grounds that the service station will provide local facilities for car users on 'one of the main routes into the town', that it will 'provide ten electric vehicle recharging points which are currently lacking in the Gorey area', and a 'changing places' facility which will enhance the network of services that brings dignity for people with a range of disabilities'. The chief executive also noted the service station will bring 'additional employment opportunities and investment to Gorey' before the application was approved by local councillors. Opposing the development, Mr Oliver Lynn, who owns a property opposite the site, objected to the changes in road layout which will 'obstruct access' to his home and argued that the road safety audit had 'failed to identity the obvious potential safety problems within the scheme' and failed to provide 'recommendations to minimise collision occurrence and severity'. He also argued that the new road junction design would result in an 'increased risk of side-on collision for traffic turning right into the private laneway', 'increase congestion' beside his home and that a 'private commercial entity should not be allowed to supersede the rights of users of the private laneway to safely and without obstruction, access their lands and homes'. After planning permission was granted for the service station, Mr Lynn lodged an appeal to An Coimisiún Pleanála, the national planning authority, on March 14 of this year. ADVERTISEMENT In his appeal, he referenced the material contravention and stated his belief that his concerns were not 'adequately highlighted' in the process. 'Given the Gorey LAP is eight-years-old, it is not in keeping with proper planning and development to make a zoning change of this nature prior to the development of a new plan,' read his appeal. Mr Lynn's appeal also referenced the size of the development, stating that it was in excess of 100m2 and thus contravened the Wexford County Development Plan. On the issue of road safety, Mr Lynn's appeal stated that existing issues will be 'considerably worsened' by the development of a service station and that 'inadequate provision is (being) made for traffic entering (his) laneway approaching from the Gorey direction'. Highlighting the presence of a recorded monument on the development site, Mr Lynn also stated that he had not been notified of WCC's decision to approve planning permission until he contacted its offices. In their response to Mr Lynn's appeal (April 14, 2025), Mr Pat and Tom Redmond said the development had been permitted by WCC following a 'transparent and lawful application of the material contravention procedure'. 'From the outset the planning authority considered the development to be appropriate subject to resolution of identified issues,' they continued. 'There is no legal or policy bases to suggest that planning applications should be withheld or curtailed during the life of an extended local area plan. In relation to Mr Lynn's concerns regarding road safety, the applicants said the proposed development has been designed 'in accordance with all relevant road and traffic safety standards and guidance' and the road safety audit did not raise 'concerns about the proposed site entrance to the broader road network or the ability of the R 741 to safely accommodate the development'. They also contended that, in accordance with the Local Area Plan, the subject site does not lie 'within or in proximity to any recorded monuments, newly identified archaeological sites or areas classed as historic town and archaeological interest'. In his assessment of the case, planning inspector with An Coimisiún Pleanála Mr Peter Nelson addressed the issue of the material contravention and the applicants' other properties in the area. 'The proposed service station will be accommodated on a section of the Business and Technology Park (BTP) zoned lands in this location and I consider that there is adequate space on the remaining BTP lands and on the existing Hatch Lab site for its potential expansion and for similar types of units which will provide office space for start-ups. 'I also note that there is a large section of undeveloped BTP zoned lands on the Courtown Road. The applicant has submitted a letter stating that as the owner/landlord of the M11 Business Campus, where the Hatch Lab is located, they have struggled to secure tenants for the space since its completion in 2017. "They state they have an addition c.2,800 sqm of commercial space in Gorey that they are having difficulty leasing. Having regard to all of the above I consider that the proposed development will not prejudice the expansion on the existing Hatch Lab or the development of similar type enterprises. I also consider that there are currently adequate zoned lands for BTP use in Gorey. 'While recognising that the provision of a service station on BTP zoned lands is a material contravention on the LAP, I consider that given the site is located on the main approach to Gorey, to and from the M11, I consider that in principle that this location is acceptable for a service station. Being on the edge of the town the service station, which includes the provisions of ten electric car space will provide a service for Gorey town. "I note that the planner in his report considers the site is far enough off the M11 so as not to attract motorway users which would create additional unnecessary traffic to the southern part of the town. I consider that this would be the case.' With regards to the road safety concerns highlighted by Mr Lynn, the inspector stated that the 'proposed entrance with the new signalised junction will significantly slow the traffic along this section of the R741' and that 'cars travelling from Gorey will have adequate visibility and will safely be able to turn right into the laneway'. 'I do not consider that the scale of the development will result in an excess number of trips in/out per day so as to cause concern,' he continues, adding that the proposed service station will 'not cause undue traffic congestion' in this location. As Mr Lynn and Messrs Redmond had a difference of opinion regarding the presence of a recorded monument in the site location, Mr Nelson sought to provide clarity on this issue. Referencing the National Monuments Service's Historic Environment Viewer, Mr Nelson says it describes a 'circular enclosure defined by a slight fosse or drain' which is visible on Google Earth. In addition, archaeological testing by Seán Shanahan in the area immediately to the east of the central enclosure recovered a pit. As a result, Mr Nelson stated that the 'implication of the proposed development on any archaeology needs to be assessed'. 'I recommend that a condition be attached requiring the applicant to engage a suitably qualified archaeologist to carry out an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) including an archaeological impact statement and mitigation strategy, to be submitted for the written agreement of the planning authority in advance of any site preparation works, groundworks and/or construction works.' Recommending that permission be granted and that Mr Lynn's appeal be dismissed, Mr Nelson stated that 'the proposed development would be acceptable and would not seriously injure the amenities of the area and would be acceptable in terms of traffic safety'. However, he did recommend that a number of conditions be applied to the application including a stipulation that the 'total net retail sales space of the forecourt shop shall not exceed 100m2', that 'all proposed car parking spaces shall be capable of accommodating functioning electric vehicle (EV) charging stations/points', and that the developer shall engage a 'suitably qualified (license eligible) archaeologist to carry out an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) . . . in advance of any site preparation works and groundworks'. , Following Mr Nelson's report, three members of the Coimisiún na Pleanála board (Chris McGarry, Mary Henchy, and Marie O'Connor) met on July 9 to assess his recommendation. They chose to accept Mr Nelson's recommendation and grant planning permission for the service station.
Irish Independent
6 days ago
- Irish Independent
161-hectare Cork solar farm refused permission amid fears of impact on sensitive archaeology
Aglish Solar Farm Limited had applied for a 10-year permission to put solar panels on six parcels of land around the southern bank of the river Lee, about 25 km west of Cork city. The solar farm did not include battery storage and was to connect to the grid using a new substation on the site. The application said that the solar farm would have an operational lifespan of 40 years and would generate enough electricity to power almost 49,000 homes. Cork County Council refused the application, stating that 'the applicant has not demonstrated that sufficient archaeological investigations have been undertaken to guide the proposed development towards preserving in-situ potential archaeological features and thereby safeguarding archaeological heritage.' The area in which the solar farm was to be built features a number of standing stones, fulacht fiadh (Bronze Age cooking pits) and other objects of archaeological interest. In its decision document the council said that the proposed development would contravene the County Development Plan, seriously injure the amenities of property in the vicinity, and set an undesirable precedent. 'The proposed development is therefore contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area,' it concluded. The application received over 200 objections expressing concerns about the environmental and health implications, the scale of the development and a lack of community consultation. Aglish Solar Farm Limited has four weeks to lodge an appeal with An Coimisiún Pleanála. A company spokesperson told the Irish Independent that the company is currently reviewing the council's decision and 'the probability is that we will appeal it.' Cork has become a hotspot for solar farm projects. In July alone Cork County Council granted permission for a 47-hectare solar farm between Rathcormac and Castlelyons and a battery storage facility in Curraduff, Newmarket.
RTÉ News
6 days ago
- RTÉ News
Aer Lingus CEO calls for removal of Dublin Airport night-time noise restrictions
The Aer Lingus chief executive has said the recent An Coimisiún Pleanála decision on night-time noise at Dublin Airport introduced an "unnecessary" annual movement restriction, which is likely to impede both future growth of north Atlantic traffic and the basing of more short-haul aircraft in Dublin. "This restriction on night-time movements will have to be removed," Lynne Embleton stated. "Together with the continued uncertainty around the passenger cap at Dublin Airport, it will have negative economic and employment impacts," the Aer Lingus CEO said. "It is also now imperative that Government intervenes and urgently legislates for the removal of the passenger cap," she added. Her comments come as Aer Lingus reported operating profits of €135m for the second quarter of this year, a significant improvement on its operating profit of €91m the same time last year. The airline, which is owned by IAG, said this takes its operating profit for the first half of 2025 to €80m, compared to €9m for the first half of 20204. Aer Lingus said its strong performance was driven by capacity growth and a robust revenue performance, while it also saw the benefit of favourable fuel pricing. It saw a 4.3% increase in passenger numbers in the three month period, while it also reported 10.9% growth in overall capacity. Aer Lingus began operating its biggest ever North American network this summer including the start of new services from Dublin to Nashville and Indianapolis as well as an expanded European leisure network. It also announced its first direct flight to Cancún in Mexico, which is due to start in January 2026. Ms Embleton said the airline's second quarter financial performance builds upon the momentum seen in the business in both the fourth quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025.
