logo
Waiting for Gustavo Dudamel, the Philharmonic Is Doing Just Fine

Waiting for Gustavo Dudamel, the Philharmonic Is Doing Just Fine

New York Times3 days ago

The New York Philharmonic is flying free.
Its former music director, Jaap van Zweden, left last summer. Its next, Gustavo Dudamel, is gradually deepening his commitment — including performances of Mahler's Seventh Symphony at David Geffen Hall through Sunday — but doesn't officially start until fall 2026.
Those who follow orchestras tend to assume that their quality will dip without a devoted director to oversee things. Partly because of the myth of the indispensable, all-powerful maestro, it can be easy to fear that conductorless periods will be rudderless ones.
That certainly hasn't been the case this season at Geffen Hall. The Philharmonic has been sounding great: fresh, vital, engaged, more cohesive. The chilly blare that seemed to frost the hall's acoustics when it reopened in 2022 after a renovation has warmed and softened.
The most telling music-making of the year was in a program last month led by the Hungarian conductor Ivan Fischer. The final hour of the concert was given over to a rare performance of Bartok's fairy-tale ballet 'The Wooden Prince,' a sprawling, instrument-packed score that swerves from candied to bombastic, from radiant expanses to driving dances. The orchestra rose to the occasion with playing that was nuanced and colorful, and in Mozart's 'Turkish' Violin Concerto, the ensemble matched Lisa Batiashvili's sensual flair.
But in a way, I was even more impressed by the opener: Mozart's overture to 'The Magic Flute,' a chestnut of the kind that is often passed over quickly in rehearsal. It glowed.
The true test of a great orchestra — what reveals its base line standard — isn't how it does in the big symphonies and premieres that steal the lion's share of attention and applause. It's how the group sounds in little repertory standards, and that 'Magic Flute' overture may have been the most encouraging seven minutes of the season.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Imagiyo Makes AI Art Generation Super Easy and Affordable
Imagiyo Makes AI Art Generation Super Easy and Affordable

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Imagiyo Makes AI Art Generation Super Easy and Affordable

The following content is brought to you by PCMag partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. If you'd like to streamline your image game, for work or fun, Imagiyo is a powerful AI image generator built for creators, marketers, designers, and anyone who needs stunning visuals on demand. For a limited time, you can get lifetime access to the Imagiyo AI Image Generator Standard Plan for just $39.97 (reg. $495) through July 20. Imagiyo uses Stable Diffusion and FLUX AI to generate high-quality images from simple text prompts. Whether you're designing ad creatives, book covers, social posts, or custom artwork, Imagiyo delivers impressive results. The platform supports multiple image sizes, advanced models, and commercial use rights, giving users full flexibility and ownership over their content. The user interface is clean and responsive across all devices, making it easy to generate and download images in seconds. Using privacy mode, you can even create NSFW content. Skip the subscriptions and pay once to generate limitless visuals. Whether you're outfitting a small business with creative content or just tired of using generic stock images, Imagiyo is a one-time investment that delivers value immediately—and for years to come. Get access to the Imagiyo AI Image Generator Standard Plan for just $39.97 (reg. $495). Prices subject to change. PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through StackSocial affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes
ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes

Medscape

time34 minutes ago

  • Medscape

ED Work Environment Discord Affects Patient Outcomes

In a recent study, emergency nurses and physicians in approximately half of the study hospitals disagreed on the quality of the work environment. An environment rated "unfavorable" by both groups was significantly associated with worse clinician and patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional analysis included emergency department (ED) clinicians (1190 nurses and 414 physicians) from 47 Magnet hospitals who completed the 2021 US Clinician Wellbeing Study. Researchers classified hospitals into profiles according to the level of agreement between nurses and physicians regarding the hospital work environment. Researchers assessed clinician job outcomes (burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave), patient safety, and quality-of-care metrics. TAKEAWAY: Hospital profiles revealed three distinct patterns: "Agree, Unfavorable Environment" (10 hospitals); "Agree, Favorable Environment" (15 hospitals); and "Disagree, Less Favorable Environment Among Nurses" (22 hospitals). Compared with hospitals where clinicians agreed on a favorable environment, hospitals where clinicians agreed on an unfavorable environment had significantly higher rates of burnout (β, 25.8), job dissatisfaction (β, 32.5), intent to leave (β, 31.7), and unfavorable patient safety grades (β, 29.1), after adjustment for hospital characteristics ( P < .001 for all). < .001 for all). Hospitals where nurses rated the environment less favorably than physicians demonstrated increased burnout (β, 15.4; P < .001) and poorer patient safety grades (β, 11.9; P < .01), after adjustment for hospital characteristics. < .001) and poorer patient safety grades (β, 11.9; < .01), after adjustment for hospital characteristics. Compared with physicians in hospitals with an "Agree, Favorable" profile, those in hospitals rated as having an "Unfavorable" work environment showed significantly higher rates for all outcomes except burnout and patient-care quality. Similarly, nurses in hospitals with a "Disagree, Less Favorable Among Nurses" profile experienced higher rates across all job-related and patient-care outcomes. IN PRACTICE: "This cross-sectional study found that ED nurses and phy­sicians in close to half of study hospitals disagreed on the quality of their work environment. Clinician job and patient outcomes were worse when both clinicians rated their work environment unfavorably and when nurses only reported their work environments as unfavor­able," the authors wrote. "The implication of these findings is that, if two essential partners in emergency care within the same institution do not agree on the deficiencies in ED work environments, significant interdisciplinary research is needed to bridge these gaps and disparate experiences," they added. SOURCE: The study was led by Jane Muir, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. It was published online on May 16, 2025, in BMC Health Services Research . LIMITATIONS: The study included only Magnet hospitals, which are known for favorable work environments and good physician-nurse collaboration, suggesting the findings may have underestimated the variation in clinician work environment agreement across all hospitals. The cross-sectional design prevented causal inference, and the sample had more nurses than physicians. DISCLOSURES: The research was funded by the Clinician Well-being Study Consortium and the National Institutes of Health. Additionally, it was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the National Clinician Scholars Program, and the Emergency Medicine Foundation/Emergency Nurses Association Foundation. The authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

Fever take on the Mystics on 3-game slide
Fever take on the Mystics on 3-game slide

Associated Press

time44 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Fever take on the Mystics on 3-game slide

Washington Mystics (3-4, 3-1 Eastern Conference) at Indiana Fever (2-4, 2-4 Eastern Conference) Indianapolis; Tuesday, 7 p.m. EDT BOTTOM LINE: Indiana Fever looks to break its three-game losing streak when the Fever take on Washington Mystics. Indiana went 11-9 in Eastern Conference action and 12-8 at home during the 2024-25 season. The Fever averaged 85.0 points per game while allowing opponents to score 87.7 last season. Washington went 14-26 overall and 7-13 in Eastern Conference play during the 2024-25 season. The Mystics averaged 79.3 points per game last season, 11.5 on free throws and 29.1 from beyond the arc. INJURIES: Fever: Caitlin Clark: out (quadriceps). Mystics: Georgia Amoore: out for season (acl). ___ The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store