'Mountainhead': 'Succession' creator's film inspired by former crypto mogul convicted of fraud
Succession creator Jesse Armstrong has moved from telling a story about a media dynasty, to a tech bro satire with the film Mountainhead (on Crave in Canada), written, directed and produced by Armstrong. Starring Steve Carell, Jason Schwartzman, Ramy Youssef and Cory Michael Smith, the movie begins as four tech tycoons gather for a weekend of fun, amid an international crisis and the potential downfall of civilization.
They're all staying at a mountain mansion owned by Hugo, who goes by "Souper" or "Soup" (Jason Schwartzman). Soup has a wellness app he's trying to make successful, and his net worth is also the lowest of the group, just a mere $521 million.
Randall (Steve Carell) is a venture capitalist who has received a terminal cancer prognosis, which he's refusing to accept and demands that there's a doctor who can cure him.
Venis (Cory Michael Smith) is described as "the richest man in the world," the social media titan of the company Traam. A new feature that can create deepfake videos, which has sparked global chaos from the spread of disinformation.
Conversely, Jeff (Ramy Youssef) has created AI technology that can be used as "guardrails" for disinformation online. As Jeff says in the movie, "I'm sitting on the cure to info-cancer while everybody dies."
As Armstrong described the characters in his film, they're "the four horsemen of the apocalypse."
"The film hopefully plays on a line of, when you look at it one way it feels like a comedy, in another way it's a tragedy," Armstrong said.
For Armstrong, he didn't necessarily set out to write another project about the rich and powerful. But the idea for Mountainhead came after he wrote a book review about Sam Bankman-Fried, the U.S. crypto mogul who's serving a 25-year sentence after being convicted of stealing $8 billion from customers of his FTX cryptocurrency exchange.
"Often, for a writer, the first thing that starts working for you is ... getting the voices. That was very important for Succession, the tone of voice of how that family interacted," Armstrong explained. "And I started to feel like, oh I can hear these guys, how they talk and how they see the world. And that was the thing that clicked and made me think, I think I want to write in this world."
"Succession was about old media, legacy media, and this is ... about the new media, the social media, which is the way that, increasingly, people get their sense of the world and information."But Armstrong, Smith and Youssef are all in agreement that there's one scene that's particularly critical for the whole movie.
Jeff is a unique character, because he does have an understanding how of Venis' company is sending the world into chaos, but boosting his net worth is still a priority for Jeff.
"It was a really fun thing to play because on a level, he kind of is able to see the larger issue with a bit of empathy, and at the same time he kind of wants to monetize that empathy," Youssef said. "I don't think that I could look at him as holistically better than the rest of the guys, even though he might feel like the moral conscience at times. He's just as driven by monetizing as they are."
Then we get to one moment in the film where Soup, Randall and Venis are all talking about possibly killing Jeff.
"He wants to stop a new world from being born," Randall says.
The three friends talk about how it could happen, and any possible "moral issues" are explain away by the thinking that the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people happens in the "absence" of Jeff. From conversations about how they'll actually do it, and how they'll get a "pre-pardon" from the president, the dialogue is quick, witty and absurd in a particularly interesting way.
"I loved writing it. It's a crucial moment," Armstrong said. "The tone has been somewhat heightened all the way through the movie, but that one is where an extraordinary idea gets introduced."
"So it was a technical challenge, which I really enjoyed. And I have to say it's one of one of the most exciting scenes I've ever been involved with shooting, because watching those three brilliant comic actors play off each other with quite a dramatic frame, but with some words that I was pleased with, and feeling like I'd given them good ammunition. ... And it worked on the day. ... And I was just in awe of the actors, watching them navigate their way through it."
Smith called working on this scene one of his "favourite experiences as an actor."
"It was like in real time ... knowing that this is just a great scene," he said. "Jesse wrote a great scene and doing it, we just didn't want to stop."
"I haven't done a lot of comedy and the way that scene uses comedy, but is so truly deadly serious, I just think is masterful from Jesse's position. But getting to play in that scene and watch Jason and Steve navigate that was the greatest lesson in comedy ... that I've ever had, and will probably ever have. I just really loved that day."
"I loved watching that day," Youssef added. "I was just sitting there ... watching them talking about killing me. Very fun."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Funniest Posts From Women This Week (May 31-June 6)
The ladies of the internet never fail to brighten our day with their brilliant and succinct wit. Each week, HuffPost Women rounds up their hilarious musings. Scroll through this week's great tweets, threads, skeets and other posts from women, and then visit our 'Funniest Tweets From Women' page for past roundups. Sign up for our Funniest Tweets of the Week newsletter. sandy_horseshoe/Threads @katiemarks_/Threads mashedpotatoes.94/Threads lindarpersaud/Threads Threads/ginnyhogan_ Threads/thelesliegaar aristielle/Threads @dory_._.__/Threads mariadecotis/Threads Millennials use 'lol' like STOP at the end of a telegram lol — Sulla (@gaulicsmith) June 4, 2025 Millennials use 'lol' like STOP at the end of a telegram lol If I was named Jeff I'd constantly be saying things like 'jeffinately' and 'I jeffed up' — 𝚂𝚔𝚒𝚗 𝙼𝚞𝚏𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚜 (@SkinMuffins) June 4, 2025 If I was named Jeff I'd constantly be saying things like 'jeffinately' and 'I jeffed up' one of my favorite stories ever is when my friend's mom tried to use a PG version of a common phrase around us bc we were 10 but she accidentally said 'when the shit hits the you-know-what' — trash jones (@jzux) June 1, 2025 one of my favorite stories ever is when my friend's mom tried to use a PG version of a common phrase around us bc we were 10 but she accidentally said 'when the shit hits the you-know-what' 'I could see myself living here' me in a different city for more than 24 hours — perfume&prose (@Brieyonce) June 1, 2025 'I could see myself living here' me in a different city for more than 24 hours what's wrong babe you've barely touched your potential even though all your elementary teachers really liked you and said you were gifted and that you were going to do great things — ໊ (@ppyowna) June 1, 2025 what's wrong babe you've barely touched your potential even though all your elementary teachers really liked you and said you were gifted and that you were going to do great things Big day for ethical vampires — Nina ☽☾ (@peculiarreverie) June 1, 2025 Big day for ethical vampires kkidd2023/Threads sweeet__liife/Threads pariphrased/Threads metelauthor/Threads @emmawillmann/Threads heysweeney/Threads themissybaker/Threads iitsley/Threads @_naturella1/Threads lindseybeckerbooks/Threads seetaslibrary/Threads writesofnovember/Threads lindarpersaud/Threads staying at a hotel and left my sleep shirt on my bed…when they cleaned my room it was left folded up like this lmfao i really couldn't stop laughing — sarah hagi (@KindaHagi) June 4, 2025 staying at a hotel and left my sleep shirt on my bed…when they cleaned my room it was left folded up like this lmfao i really couldn't stop laughing put clothes away for 5 Minutes. time to reward my self with an hour of screen time — des :3 (@desdotjs) June 2, 2025 put clothes away for 5 Minutes. time to reward my self with an hour of screen time she gaslit an entire generation into feeling sorry for her when she was the one cheating.. legendary — 𝒴 (@ysmammri) June 2, 2025 she gaslit an entire generation into feeling sorry for her when she was the one cheating.. legendary i love the word 'also' because i'm never done talking — erika (@yeeeerika) June 4, 2025 i love the word 'also' because i'm never done talking one time i was so high my bra unclasped and i thought i got shot — ً (@cryst6ls) June 4, 2025 one time i was so high my bra unclasped and i thought i got shot Are we still on for today?? — ♡ (@Cosyluv_) June 3, 2025 Are we still on for today?? boyfriend's appendix ruptured and i get to take care of him im so excitedddd — Grace (@gracecamille_) June 4, 2025 boyfriend's appendix ruptured and i get to take care of him im so excitedddd finding out that 'wanting a labubu' means wanting a specific toy plushy and isn't a silly way of wishing for a lobotomy that everyone suddenly got on board with has felt like four, maybe even even five 9/11s — Tea ☕️ (@SSSmallTea) June 4, 2025 finding out that 'wanting a labubu' means wanting a specific toy plushy and isn't a silly way of wishing for a lobotomy that everyone suddenly got on board with has felt like four, maybe even even five 9/11s Went to high five someone who was actually just trying to wave a mosquito away. My soul left my body. — One Awkward Mom (@oneawkwardmom) June 1, 2025 Went to high five someone who was actually just trying to wave a mosquito away. My soul left my body. @ The Funniest Tweets From Women This Week The Funniest Tweets From Women This Week The Funniest Tweets From Women This Week


Eater
3 hours ago
- Eater
On Instagram, Recipe-Sharing Automation Is Here to Stay
In December, the actress Sarah Snook, best known for playing the icy Shiv Roy on Succession , commented just one word on an Instagram post by NYT Cooking: 'Meatball.' And who could argue with that? Ali Slagle's Thai-inspired chicken meatball soup looked good, and getting the recipe required only that one leave the word 'meatball' in a comment. Do so, and a message from NYT Cooking pops into your inbox in seconds, offering a direct link to the recipe. This new format for engaging readers circumvents the clunky 'link in bio' maneuver, a workaround necessitated by the photo app's incompatibility with clickable links in captions and now considered the norm for publications and creators who use the platform to promote work that lives on other websites. Recently, a slew of new add-ons — including Manychat, which NYT Cooking uses — has allowed creators to automate messages and replies in this way. Food52 uses them too, as do recipe developers with unwieldy follower counts, like Yumna Jawad of Feel Good Foodie (4.7 million) and Deb Perelman of Smitten Kitchen (1.8 million). Influencers and creators have taken advantage of automation like this for a while, whether it's to send followers recipes or to share shoppable affiliate links. The effect is twofold, saving individuals from the tedious act of manually responding thousands of times and guaranteeing higher engagement since it prompts people to leave comments. These tools have become common enough to have instilled a habit: Some people now attempt to trigger chatbots even when a creator doesn't use them or instructs other steps for getting recipes. 'It doesn't actually matter as a content creator/pusher whether you use the bot thing — it's so standard now that people assume you do,' Perelman of Smitten Kitchen told me in a DM. For viewers, these tools are easier and less confusing than asking people to click the link in her bio. 'The actual conversation I had with myself was, 'Am I going to ignore hundreds of comments a day like this, or am I going to cough up $100/month(!) to give people what they want? With social media, the latter is my default — just make it easy; meet people where they are.' It's true: Recipe developers and creators use these tools because Instagram isn't the best place to share their recipes. Dropping instructions and measurements into a caption is easiest for viewers, but for creators, that means losing the potential revenue and the boosts to their engagement statistics that come from someone clicking through to their blog or signing up for their newsletter. However, since it isn't in Instagram's best interest to direct people to leave the app — or empower them to do so easily — the workarounds for highlighting off-platform content are annoying. Today, many people still don't understand their way around a 'link in bio,' even though the strategy has been in use since around 2018. Thus, recipe-sharing chatbots have emerged and taken hold. Do creators like them? Not necessarily. Do users? Begrudgingly. For the people who use them, these automation tools are a new necessary evil, just like being beholden to the whims of an algorithm. At best, these tools ensure that creator and commenter both get what they want. For one, that's a click; for the other, a recipe. At worst, they undermine the social nature of social media and depersonalize the experience of sharing food online. I went to Instagram — where I post pictures of food, pointedly without recipes — to ask food creators for their thoughts on these tools. The responses were overwhelmingly negative. 'Yes I hate it if that's strong enough of a sentiment,' said one. 'HATEEEEE,' said another. 'I HATE IT,' said yet another. Non-creators felt strongly enough that they had to write in too. Words that came up often were 'scammy' and 'desperate,' and some people resented them for being too obvious a play for engagement. Indeed, in one ad, which claims 'No Follow. No Freebies,' Manychat promotes that it allows creators to 'request a follow' before they 'give away content.' A common throughline was the idea of transactionality. 'On a deeper level, as a content creator who puts a lot of thought into how I create my recipes and corresponding content, I don't want people to simply think of me as a robotic recipe mill, constantly churning out recipes for consumption,' Lisa Lin, who runs the blog Healthy Nibbles, told me. 'An automated tool seems antithetical to that sentiment,' she added. This has long been the situation with food on social media. Get enough eyes on a picture of food online and you'll certainly become familiar with the 'recipe?' commenter. Not all pictures of food warrant a recipe, and not all people who post food are recipe developers; sometimes, the point is just to be proud of a nice lunch. Yet the 'recipe?' commenter sees no distinction between the professionalism of a published recipe meticulously shot and developed, and the individual's personhood, preserved and savored. At best, it's a well-meaning follower's detour into modest annoyance; at worst, it's the prelude to a total internet stranger becoming put out when a poster doesn't provide on-demand service, tailored to every need. In 2022, The New York Times 's Tejal Rao wrote of this phenomenon, coining it the 'endless torment of the 'recipe?' guy.' The core intentions of the ''recipe?' guy' are rarely bad: Isn't a desire to imitate a compliment? Yet their assumptions speak to a sense of entitlement around recipes and theto cooks for providing them. With one word, that request turns a shared appreciation of food into a transaction, regardless of whether its creator intended for it to be or if they even benefit at all financially. 'It's a way of treating the people who share their cooking online entirely as products. But I think it's also a way of becoming a bit less human,' Rao wrote. Indeed, this use of chatbots and automation tools only accelerates the normalization of treating people who share food online like robots themselves. Automation tools reward this behavior. They make it normal to drop a one-word comment to a stranger, like a caveman grunting a demand, without any effort toward etiquette or building a rapport. They reinforce the notion that creators must always provide, as well as the problematic sentiment that whatever we see on our screens should also be available for us to have. 'I've worked so hard to build a community,' said recipe developer and creator Erin Clarkson, known as @cloudykitchen. She chooses not to use automation tools, in part because she feels they detract from the conversational vibe she works to foster on her platforms. 'A chatbot destroys comment sections,' Clarkson said. That sentiment was echoed in the responses I got on Instagram, especially from non-creators. It used to be funny or helpful to read the comments, where people made jokes, shared their candid reactions and experiences, or asked clarifying questions. Now, as people seek to trigger auto-response tools, it's useless. We might see this as yet another example of enshittification: a once-social space optimized in favor of efficiency, but ultimately resulting in a worse experience for the people using the product. To Clarkson, these tools have also made readers 'even more lazy.' Clarkson says she regularly sees readers' assumptions that she uses them, even though she doesn't. She sees those presumptive comments another way: If these people can't bother to read the captions to figure that out, then they likely won't fare well with the level of detail on her blog . Everyone wants things instantly and easily, and recipes are no exception. Still, these tools remain a 'stopgap,' Lin said. Despite her ideological hesitation to tools that encourage robotic behavior from both creators and their audiences, the reality for her and most other recipe developers and food creators is that she 'primarily earns a living on a website outside of Instagram. At the end of the day, I need eyeballs on my website,' she said. Having now subscribed to one of these tools for several months, Lin has found that they're useful in getting people to visit her website. (Even when it comes to the established link-in-bio system, 'many, many people can't be bothered.') 'If Instagram would simply allow us to embed clickable links in our captions, we would not need this ridiculous workaround to deliver links to our audience,' Lin said. 'This automated recipe-sharing ecosystem wouldn't even need to exist. But I don't see Instagram developers changing their ways any time soon, so we're all stuck in this situation.' After hearing the malaise of social media users on all sides of the issue, I returned to the prompt that started it all. Committed to testing it out, I, like Snook, commented on that NYT Cooking post. Immediately, it felt silly — not just to comment 'meatball' publicly, but also to add to the mindless cacophony of requests and to masquerade as yet another someone who didn't bother to Google or search NYT Cooking. Afterward, I felt weirdly embarrassed: What friction was I really removing from my life by commenting? Sure, the recipe ended up in my inbox immediately, but then again, my mess of DMs is where useful information goes to die. The instant access didn't make me any more likely to make the recipe, and in fact, it would take me an awkwardly long time just to find the link in my inbox if I were in need of it while planning out dinner. I thought about all the recipes that have piled up in my saves on Instagram and in my screenshots folder. So many of them came to me so easily, offered up by way of too-knowing algorithms, and yet, I've never made most of them either. We now have access to so much information that we take its abundance — and the work that went into creating it — for granted. We see recipes as commodities that we are owed by virtue of us simply having seen them, even when we don't have any intention of following through. I thought about the technique that always works better for me anyway: just googling ingredients I have and then seeing how other people have already put them together. It makes me think a little more, of course, but especially in the age of AI, the most humanizing thing is to do a little of the work yourself — to have to think through a problem. I end up with something that's all mine; not something anyone willing to just comment 'meatball' can reproduce. The freshest news from the food world every day


Buzz Feed
5 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Character Swap: Dil Dhadakne Do vs. Succession
It's been 10 years since Dil Dhadakne Do first gave us a front-row seat to the chaos of a rich, emotionally stuck Indian family. But rewatch it now, and tell us this doesn't feel like the Desi version of Succession, just with more choreographed dancing and less corporate jargon. Let's break it down. Kamal Mehra = Logan Roy (But With Better Hair and Worse Shirts) Kamal Mehra might not cuss like Logan Roy, but make no mistake, the man knows how to emotionally bulldoze a room. Both are old-school, self-made patriarchs obsessed with legacy, respect, and making their kids feel like underperforming power is rooted in fear and guilt, and they both have an incredible talent for making every family interaction feel like a board meeting with invisible said, 'You're not serious people.'Kamal said, 'What will people say?'Same vibe, different continent. Neelam Mehra = Caroline Collingwood (But in Pastels) Neelam Mehra doesn't raise her voice. She doesn't even need to. Her carefully curated silences say more than most monologues. Like Caroline Collingwood, she's distant, elegant, and emotionally untouchable. Whether it's Caroline ghosting her kids from a villa or Neelam hosting the perfect dinner while ignoring her daughter's sadness, both know how to maintain appearances while offering very little actual comfort. Ayesha Mehra = Shiv Roy (CEO Material, No One Notices) Runs her own business. Has a husband who's draining. Smarter than every man in the room. Still treated like she's playing dress-up. Shiv fights to take over a company, Ayesha fights to take control of her own life. Honestly? Give them both a bottle of wine and a group chat, they'd fix each other. Kabir Mehra = Kendall Roy (If Kendall Went To Therapy) Both are the sons no one really takes seriously—until they do. Kendall performs power, Kabir avoids it entirely. But deep down? Same wound: a desperate need for their father's approval. They're stuck between rebellion and guilt, ambition and exhaustion. One crashes board meetings, the other crash-lands expectations. Same pressure, different coping mechanisms. Roman Roy = Sunny Gill (The Rebel Who Keeps It Cool) Roman Roy is the loud, messy black sheep who keeps the Roy family meetings way more entertaining (and stressful). Sunny Gill, Farhan Akhtar's character, is the chill black sheep doing his own thing and happily avoiding the family feel trapped as square pegs in round holes, but while Roman's the chaotic wildcard, Sunny's got the perfect 'not my circus, not my monkeys' vibe. Manav Sangha = Tom Wambsgans (But Without the Charm) Married into power. Obsessed with control. Deeply might actually outscore Manav on the empathy scale, and that's saying a lot. Both men exist to remind us that 'nice' guys can still be the worst. Pluto = Greg (The Lovable Underdogs) Pluto, the family dog in Dil Dhadakne Do, might not say much, but he's always there soaking up the chaos with wide-eyed confusion—and honestly, same. Greg Hirsch is basically the human version of Pluto: awkward, trying to fit in with the powerful Roys, and often left confused by the family's drama. Bonus: The Dysfunction Olympics Let's not forget: both families are walking PR disasters hiding behind well-tailored clothes and forced family photos. The Mehras have a cruise. The Roys have a boardroom. Either way, nobody's talking about their feelings and everyone's ready to snap by brunch.