U.S. Army Corps analysis looks at Enbridge's Line 5 tunnel plan and potential environmental impacts
The analysis moves the corps a step closer to approving the tunnel for Line 5 in the Straits of Mackinac. The tunnel was proposed in 2018 at a cost of $500 million but has been bogged down by legal challenges. The corps fast-tracked the project in April after U.S. President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies in January to identify energy projects for expedited emergency permitting.
A final environmental assessment is expected by autumn, with a permitting decision to follow later this year. The agency initially planned to issue a permitting decision in early 2026.
Story continues below advertisement
With that permit in hand, Enbridge would only need permission from the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy before it could begin constructing the tunnel. That's far from a given, though.
Environmentalists have been pressuring the state to deny the permit. Meanwhile, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer are trying to win court rulings that would force Enbridge to remove the existing pipeline from the straits for good.
Construction could have major short-term, long-term impacts
The analysis notes that the tunnel would eliminate the risk of a boat anchor rupturing the pipeline and causing a spill in the straits, a key concern for environmentalists. But the construction would have sweeping effects on everything from recreation to wildlife.
View image in full screen
In this photo shot from a television screen provided by the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy in June 2020, shows damage to anchor support EP-17-1 on the east leg of the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline within the Straits of Mackinac in Mich. CREDIT: Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy via AP, File
Many of the impacts, such as noise, vistas marred by 121-metre cranes, construction lights degrading stargazing opportunities at Headlands International Dark Sky Park and vibrations that would disturb aquatic wildlife would end when the work is completed, the report found.
Story continues below advertisement
Other impacts would last longer, including the loss of wetlands and vegetation on both sides of the strait that connects Lake Huron and Lake Michigan, and the loss of nearly 300 trees that the northern long-eared bat and tricoloured bat use to roost. Grading and excavation also could disturb or destroy archaeological sites.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The tunnel-boring machine could cause vibrations that could shift the area's geology. Soil in the construction area could become contaminated and nearly 200 truck trips daily during the six-year construction period would degrade area roads, the analysis found. Gas mixing with water seeping into the tunnel could result in an explosion, but the analysis notes that Enbridge plans to install fans to properly ventilate the tunnel during excavation.
Enbridge has pledged to comply with all safety standards, replant vegetation where possible and contain erosion, the analysis noted. The company also has said it would try to limit the loudest work to daytime hours as much as possible, and offset harm to wetlands and protected species by buying credits through mitigation banks. That money can then be used to fund restoration in other areas.
'Our goal is to have the smallest possible environmental footprint,' Enbridge officials said in a statement.
The Sierra Club issued a statement Friday saying the tunnel remains 'an existential threat.'
'Chances of an oil spill in the Great Lakes — our most valuable freshwater resource — skyrockets if this tunnel is built in the Straits,' the group said.
Story continues below advertisement
'We can't drink oil. We can't fish or swim in oil.'
Julie Goodwin, a senior attorney with Earthjustice, an environmental law group that opposes the project, said the corps failed to consider the impacts of a spill that could still happen on either side of the straits or stopping the flow of oil through the Great Lakes.
'My key takeaways are the Army corps has put blinders are in service to Enbridge and President Trump's fossil fuel agenda,' she said.
Tunnel would protect portion of Line 5 running through straits
Enbridge has been using the Line 5 pipeline to transport crude oil and natural gas liquids between Superior, Wis., and Sarnia, Ont., since 1953. Roughly six kilometres of the pipeline runs along the bottom of the Straits of Mackinac.
Story continues below advertisement
Concerns about the aging pipeline rupturing and causing a potentially disastrous spill in the straits have been building over the last decade. Those fears intensified in 2018 when an anchor damaged the line.
Enbridge contends that the line remains structurally sound, but it struck a deal with then-Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder's administration in 2018 that calls for the company to replace the straits portion of the line with a new section that would be encased in a protective underground tunnel.
Enbridge and environmentalists spar in court battles
Environmentalists, Indigenous groups and Democrats have been fighting in court for years to stop the tunnel and force Enbridge to remove the existing pipeline from the straits. They've had little success so far.
A Michigan appellate court in February validated the state Public Service Commission's permits for the tunnel. Nessel sued in 2019 seeking to void the easement that allows Line 5 to run through the straits. That case is still pending. Whitmer revoked the easement in 2020, but Enbridge challenged that decision and a federal appellate court in April ruled that the case can proceed.
Another legal fight over Line 5 in Wisconsin
About 19 kilometres of Line 5 runs across the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa's reservation in northern Wisconsin. That tribe sued in 2019 to force Enbridge to remove the line from the reservation, arguing it's prone to spilling and that easements allowing it to operate on the reservation expired in 2013.
Story continues below advertisement
Enbridge has proposed a 66-kilometre reroute around the reservation. The tribe has filed a lawsuit seeking to void state construction permits for the project and has joined several other groups in challenging the permits through the state's contested case process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
15 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump extends China tariff deadline by another 90 days
U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order extending a tariff truce with China by another 90 days, a White House official said on Monday with only hours to go before U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods were due to snap back to triple-digit rates. The order followed a noncommittal answer by Trump to reporters as to whether he would extend the lower tariff rates a day after he urged Beijing to quadruple its purchases of U.S. soybeans. A tariff truce between Beijing and Washington was set to expire on Tuesday at 00:01 ET. The order prevents U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145 per cent, with Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods set to hit 125 per cent, rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo. 'We'll see what happens,' Trump told a press conference, when asked how he planned to extend the deadline. 'They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi (Jinping) and myself.' Imports from China are currently subject to 30 per cent tariffs, including a 10 per cent base rate and 20 per cent in fentanyl-related tariffs imposed by Washington in February and March. China had matched the de-escalation, lowering its rate on U.S. imports to 10 per cent. Global investors see few winners as tariff storm lashes global markets The two sides in May announced a truce in their trade dispute after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden in late July, but did not announce an agreement to further extend the deadline. Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said she expected Trump to extend the 90-day 'tariff détente' for another 90 days later on Monday. 'It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire,' she said, adding Trump could also announce progress in other aspects of the economic relationship as a backdrop for granting the extension. 'The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations and there's been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend,' she said. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, welcomed the news. 'This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the U.S. and China work toward a framework deal in the fall. I'm certain investment commitments will factor into any potential deal, and the extension gives them more time to try and work through some of the longstanding trade concerns,' he said. The White House declined to comment beyond Trump's remarks. The Treasury Department and U.S. Trade Representative's Office did not respond to requests for comment. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said Washington has the makings of a deal with China and he was 'optimistic' about the path forward. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. But Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Trump says tariffs will not be placed on gold, bringing relief to bullion markets
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he would not impose tariffs on gold, a move welcomed by global bullion markets and which ended days of speculation that the yellow metal could be caught up in the ongoing global trade spat. 'Gold will not be Tariffed!' Trump said in a statement posted on his social media account. He gave no details. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection had posted a ruling on its website on Friday saying that Washington might place the most widely traded gold bullion bars in the United States under country-specific import tariffs, which would have rocked the metal's global supply chains. In response, a White House official told Reuters on Friday that the Trump administration was preparing an executive order 'clarifying misinformation' about tariffs on gold bars and other specialty products. A U.S. gold tariff would have been especially harmful for Switzerland, a major refining and transit hub for gold. Trump's Monday post removes that concern. Analysis: Gold and Trump's chaos are key to the TSX's stellar performance this year 'Delighted to hear the crisis has been averted,' said Ross Norman, an independent gold market analyst. 'It will come as an enormous relief to the bullion markets, as the potential for disruption was incalculable.' U.S. gold futures dropped 2.4 per cent to $3,407 per ounce after Trump's post on Monday, reducing a premium over spot gold, the global benchmark, which fell 1.2 per cent to $3,357. Shares of Barrick Mining ABX-T fell 2.8 per cent on Monday afternoon after the company posted quarterly results, while shares of Newmont NGT-T – the world's largest gold miner – were down slightly to $68.87. Both companies are major U.S. gold producers.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump's new congressional map in Texas still stymied as Gavin Newsom urges president to give up
A map of U.S Congressional Districts proposed plan is seen at a Texas legislators' public hearing on congressional redistricting in Austin, Texas, on Aug. 1, 2025. (Eric Gay / AP Photo) Texas Republicans were unable again Monday to approve new congressional districts to meet U.S. President Donald Trump's demands as California Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats urged Republicans to stand down and avoid a partisan brawl spanning multiple statehouses. Texas Democratic lawmakers remained outside of Texas after leaving the state to deny their GOP colleagues the quorum necessary to vote on Trump's aggressive redistricting play and push the stalemate into its second week. The president's agenda also spurred Democratic governors, including Newsom, to pledge retaliatory redistricting efforts in their states — setting up the possibility of an extended standoff that could upend the 2026 midterm elections. Newsom urged Trump in a letter Monday to abandon his scheme, telling the president he is 'playing with fire' and 'risking the destabilization of our democracy.' At the Texas Capitol, House Speaker Dustin Burrows adjourned another attempted session within minutes of its early afternoon opening. He used the brief gathering to chastise dozens of Democrats who have civil warrants out for their arrest. Because they are out of state, those lawmakers are beyond the reach of state authorities. Burrows said Texas law enforcement agencies have been to the residences of the absent legislators, 'conducting surveillance, knocking on doors' and calling their cellphones trying to bring them to the statehouse. 'The search continues, and it will not stop,' the speaker said. Later he added, 'Eventually you will be here.' Just a few seats could determine control of Congress Burrows' GOP House majority wants to redraw districts so that five more Republicans can be elected. Trump is pushing other Republican-controlled legislatures to follow suit as he tries to avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms. Those elections during Trump's first presidency yielded a new Democratic majority in the U.S. House that stymied his agenda and twice impeached him. Existing maps nationally put Democrats within three seats of a House majority at a time when there are only several dozen competitive districts out of 435. Texas Democrats intend to run out the clock on their current special session, which cannot extend beyond Aug. 19. But Gov. Greg Abbott said he'll call lawmakers back to the Statehouse again and again until enough Democrats show up to reach the attendance threshold required to vote on the bill. Responding to Texas, Newsom and other California Democrats are considering new boundaries to yield a five-seat shift toward Democrats, neutralizing any Texas change. That would require, however, getting California voters to set aside existing maps drawn by an independent commission. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker have promised similar efforts in their Democratic-run statehouses. In his letter to Trump, Newsom said he prefers that independent bodies draw political districts rather than partisan legislatures, as is done in Texas and most GOP-controlled states. But, Newsom wrote, 'California cannot stand idly by as this power grab unfolds.' If Texas and 'the other states call off their redistricting efforts,' the governor added, 'we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' The absent Texas lawmakers are staying in Illinois, New York and elsewhere — and say they have no intentions of returning as long as Republicans are intent on mollifying Trump. 'Democrats, especially in Texas, are standing firm,' said Rep. Rhetta Bowers at a gathering of Texas lawmakers Monday in Illinois. Democrats urged Abbott to focus on flood response and he declined Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a U.S. Senate candidate, want state courts to remove Democratic lawmakers, asserting that they have abandoned their posts. 'If they show back up in the state of Texas, they will be arrested and taken to the Capitol,' Abbott promised over the weekend on 'Fox News Sunday.' Paxton has asked an Illinois court to enforce the Texas warrants issued for absent lawmakers so they could be arrested beyond Texas' borders. At the very least, they face $500 daily fines for each absence under legislative rules. Bowers and others have said they remain undeterred. She compared both the proposed Texas maps, which would disproportionately affect districts represented by Black and Latino Democrats, and Abbott's and Paxton's threats to the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-20th century. Republicans, she said, are using 'the very same tactics used against Black and brown Americans' who pushed for passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. 'Their fight is our fight, and just like the Civil Rights heroes of the past, no matter the cost we are prepared to see it through to the end,' Bowers said. Back in Austin, Burrows never mentioned the redistricting legislation, instead highlighting that the special session also includes several disaster response measures after catastrophic floods that killed at least 135 people in the state. He said those bills are set for action on the floor Tuesday morning. 'The only thing standing between Texas and real disaster relief is whether our absent colleagues decide to show up tomorrow,' Burrows said. In fact, Texas Democrats urged Abbott and GOP legislative leaders to call a session devoted only to flood response. Abbott declined, intentionally pairing the matter with Trump's agenda in the same session. —- Barrow reported from Atlanta. Associated Press reporter Jesse Bedayn contributed from Denver. Bill Barrow, The Associated Press
