logo
The disturbing social media posts of leading Palestine Action activist: Campaigner poses with GUN and shows off 'terrorist-linked' tattoos amid claims Iran is funding group's activities

The disturbing social media posts of leading Palestine Action activist: Campaigner poses with GUN and shows off 'terrorist-linked' tattoos amid claims Iran is funding group's activities

Daily Mail​a day ago

A prominent Palestine Action activist has posed with a handgun and showed off a tattoo adopted by terrorist organisations in a series of disturbing social media posts, it has been revealed.
Paul Shortt, 52, is one of the group's leading protesters who was convicted of breaking into an international defence technology firm which it claims supplies weapons to the Israeli military.
Shortt, from Dumfries, Scotland, and six others used sledgehammers to break into Elbit Systems UK in Bristol on May 15 2022 and caused thousands of pounds of damage to equipment while also spray-painting 'Free Palestine' across the building.
The group, dubbed the 'Bristol 7' by Palestine Action, were convicted of burglary and criminal damage last year but received suspended 23-month jail sentences.
Shortt, who was ordered to undertake 200 hours of unpaid work for the attack, was pictured launching a fire extinguisher through one of Elbit's windows and being hauled away in handcuffs wearing a 'Free Palestine' all-red outfit.
He said after his conviction: 'I'm Scottish, I know about colonialism, I know about land grabs, about ethnic cleansing. We used to do supposedly 'democratic' protests, it just didn't work. Direct action was the only way.'
He is one of the prominent members of Palestine Action who the Government is moving to proscribe as a terror group after a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage' culminated in its 'disgraceful attack' at RAF Brize Norton on Friday.
Shortt has shared photos online wearing a Palestine football shirt, posing with what appeared to be a handgun and showing off his anti-Israel tattoos.
His middle finger has a red triangle tattoo used by pro-Palestine groups including Hamas, the terrorist organisation which carried out the October 7 massacre in Israel.
It has been widely used in pro-Palestine protests after it started appearing in Hamas videos to indicate targets such as Israeli tanks.
In the disturbing gun post, first reported by The Times, he wrote: 'Resistance is not terrorism! Resistance is justified. When people are occupied. Resist! By any means necessary.'
The activist also has a large black tattoo on his lower arm which depicts a map some claim should be Palestine, including the whole of the state of Israel.
Shortt, who has moved to erase his social media footprint, has previously shared photos of pro-Israel campaigners in Glasgow with the red triangle symbol imposed over them.
Those who display the inverted red triangle on banners, bags, T-shirts and tattoos, argue it is a symbol of resistance and support for the Palestinian cause.
However, antisemitism experts believe the symbol is now being widely displayed has very different origins.
Some point to the use of the red triangle in Nazi concentration camps during the Second World War, when political opponents were forced to wear the symbol on their jackets.
More recently, it has been associated with Hamas and used in pro-Palestinian activists.
Last July, Berlin - which has the largest Palestinian population in Europe - passed a motion to ban the symbol in Germany.
Palestine Action was set up in 2020 but the group have conducted 356 attacks on sites across the UK in the last five years - with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper revealing the damage caused is 'running into the millions of pounds'.
Last night, The Times reported how the Home Office is investigating whether Iran is funding Palestine Action.
Officials are understood to be probing the group's source of donations amid concerns it is not bound by financial transparency rules.
There are fears Iran could be providing money, via proxies, given their objectives of 'dismantling the apartheid regime in Israel' are aligned.
Palestine Action invites donations directly through its website but does not publish financial information.
The Home Office has voiced concerns around where the group is raising the significant sums it requires for its legal costs as it has instructed lawyers to pursue 'all avenues for legal challenge'.
Palestine Action states on its website it is a grassroots movement and accepts funding is 'sometimes inconsistent'. Donations are said to go towards supporting members who are arrested and imprisoned.
NGO Monitor a research institute that aims to promote transparency, has said the group's lack of public financial information 'reflects a lack of transparency and accountability'.
But one of its known public donors is James 'Fergie' Chambers - an American communist and philanthropist who is heir to a multi-billion conglomerate.
Mr Chambers stated in 2023 he had paid the legal fees of Palestine Action members.
Beyond concerns around transparency, the Home Office is yet to state direct evidence that links Palestine Action with Iran.
Yesterday, Palestine Action protesters violently clashed with police during a protest in Trafalgar Square as tensions ran high amid plans to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws. 13 people, including counter-protesters, were arrested.
As the protest was going on, Ms Cooper announced she has decided to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group and will lay an order before Parliament next week to make membership and support for the them illegal.
The proscription of Palestine Action puts the group on a par with Hamas, al-Qaeda or ISIS under British law, banning anyone from promoting the group, arranging meetings or carrying its logo in public.
Those breaching the rules could face up to 14 years in jail.
Palestine Action described the move as 'unhinged', adding: 'We are teachers, nurses, students and parents who take part in actions disrupting the private companies who are arming Israel's genocide, by spray-painting or entering their factory premises.
'It is plainly preposterous to rank us with terrorist groups like Isis, National Action and Boko Haram.'
The protest group was founded by Huda Ammori, the middle class daughter of a top NHS surgeon, alongside former Extinction Rebellion member Richard Barnard.
Ms Ammori, a former campaigner at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, was born in Bolton to a Palestinian father, a surgeon, and an Iraqi mother. She later went on to graduate from the University of Manchester with an international business and finance degree.
Ms Ammori quickly became captivated by student activism during her time at the prestigious institution - even getting a brand of hummus banned from the campus shop.
The then-student, who had spotted 'Sabra' hummus, jointly owned by a company who invest in Israeli's military forces, was on sale, launched a tireless campaign that eventually saw the chickpea dip successfully blacklisted.
Now, she leads the militant movement for Palestine Action, who broke away from XR and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign in 2020.
On Friday morning, the group posted footage online showing two people inside the base at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire.
The clip shows one person riding an electric scooter up to an Airbus Voyager air-to-air refuelling tanker and appearing to spray paint into its jet engine. They managed to infiltrate the base and escape without being caught.
The group has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire.
The seriousness of these attacks includes the extent and nature of damage caused, including to targets affecting UK national security, and the impact on innocent members of the public fleeing for safety and subjected to violence.
The extent of damage across these three attacks alone, spreading the length and breadth of the UK, runs into the millions of pounds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man jailed 38 years after he pushed a woman into the sea at Nairn
Man jailed 38 years after he pushed a woman into the sea at Nairn

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Man jailed 38 years after he pushed a woman into the sea at Nairn

A man who pushed a woman into the sea from a pier in Nairn 38 years ago has been jailed for two McDonald, 76, from Ardersier, assaulted the woman on other occasions over an almost 50-year period between 1975 and High Court in Edinburgh heard he put her life in danger by pushing her into the sea at Nairn Harbour in the summer of 1987.A jury found McDonald guilty on serious assault and threatening behaviour charges following a trial at the High Court in Inverness earlier this year. He was acquitted of charges alleging he carried out sexual assaults. Judge Michael O'Grady KC told McDonald he needed to go to prison for his "disturbing" said: "These episodes demonstrate a disturbing propensity towards violence and cruelty towards your victim."The situation can only be resolved by way of a custodial sentence - that will be one of two years."Before sentence was passed, defence advocate Jonathan Deans told the court that his client had previously run a gardening business.

Sadiq Khan is Britain's most cynical politician
Sadiq Khan is Britain's most cynical politician

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Sadiq Khan is Britain's most cynical politician

Sadiq Khan is posing a unique problem for Keir Starmer at the most inconvenient time. At least part of the solution lies in the Prime Minister's grasp. It is striking how the era of devolution brought forth a cohort of politicians with absolutely no respect whatever for the basic principles of devolution. John Swinney, the First Minister of Scotland, whose responsibilities include keeping the health service and the ferries running, loves nothing more than to wax lyrical about the conflict in the Middle East, despite his having no more locus in Gaza and Israel than any other member of the Scottish public. Similarly, the Mayor of London just cannot resist any opportunity to stick his oar in where, from a strictly legislative perspective, he has absolutely nothing to contribute. Khan has announced (and I have no doubt that at least in his mind, his words were accompanied by a not-remotely-modest fanfare) that Labour must 'think again' about its welfare reforms, offering implied support to the more than 100 Labour MPs actively thinking of scuppering the Government's legislation. And why shouldn't Khan pontificate on issues over which he has absolutely no responsibility? It's not as if there are any problems in the capital that might need his attention. If the welfare reforms are rejected by the Commons, it would be genuinely catastrophic for the Government and the Labour Party. It's difficult to see how Starmer himself could remain much longer in office, especially if his Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall, has already returned to the back benches. Labour's programme for office, its very raison d'être, will have been upended. The Prime Minister would be a political laughing stock, staring at the very real prospect of losing his entire majority at the next election. Quite a turnaround from that optimistic day almost exactly a year ago when Starmer first arrived in Downing Street. Would Khan welcome the scenario that, by his own words, he is encouraging to happen? What could be in it for him? That is the key question. He has form, of course, in encouraging terrible things to happen to his party – and potentially, the country – provided it would advance his own career. In 2015 he was a million miles away from Jeremy Corbyn politically; Khan has always been on the centre-Left of his party and had organised Ed Miliband's successful leadership campaign in 2010 (another feat for which the party and the country can thank him). Nevertheless, he, along with the current Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, courted the support of Left-wing Labour members in the contest to win the London mayoral nomination for the following year by nominating Corbyn for the party leadership. This was an entirely cynical act given that neither of them wanted Corbyn to win the contest. The tactic worked – for Khan, not Lammy. And also for Corbyn. But not for the country. Does Khan have another career change in mind today? Having won three consecutive elections for City Hall it would be natural if he was thinking ahead, perhaps even to a return to the green benches of the Commons. Why shouldn't he try to 'do a Boris' and use London as a springboard to reach Downing Street itself? Which is where Starmer has an opportunity to restore at least a portion of his lost authority. Government whips are at the moment ringing round their charges and threatening them with the loss of the party whip if they vote against the welfare reforms. If such suspension lasted long enough, the rebels would not be able to stand as Labour candidates at the next general election. It's a serious threat that Starmer has carried out before and undoubtedly will again. But why should backbench MPs be the only ones to face such censure? Khan is an elected official of the Labour Party and is subject to the national party's disciplinary code just as much as anyone else. By encouraging rebellion against the Government from a safe distance he is, in effect, seeking to wield power without responsibility which, as Stanley Baldwin said in reference to the press, is the prerogative of the harlot. Perhaps a senior member of the whips' office might want to include Mayor Khan on his list of phone calls in advance of the Commons vote, in order to remind him that even London Mayors need the approval of the central party – and therefore of the leader – in order to stand for a parliamentary seat. In fact, if Khan is considering standing in London again for a fourth term, he would still need the official endorsement of the party, unless he felt he could win as an independent. In a situation where the stakes are as high as they are, Starmer cannot afford to withhold any weapon available to him. Elected Labour mayors should be as accountable as any anonymous back bencher, and should face exactly the same disciplinary measures if they decide to foment rebellion in the ranks. Sadiq Khan should be reminded that it's in his own best interests, not to mention the interests of the people of London, that he turns his mind to the responsibilities of his own office, and away from the responsibilities he might want to have at some point in the future.

Tea fraudster who conned luxury hotels has sentencing delayed
Tea fraudster who conned luxury hotels has sentencing delayed

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Tea fraudster who conned luxury hotels has sentencing delayed

The sentencing of a fraudster who passed off ordinary tea as a unique, Scottish-grown variety and sold it to luxury hotels, retailers and growers in a near £553,000 scam has been delayed after his lawyer withdrew at short notice. Thomas Robinson, 55, claimed to have cultivated the tea at his Perthshire estate using innovative techniques, but in reality it was bought from wholesalers and grown outside of Scotland. Operating under the business name The Wee Tea Plantation, Robinson fraudulently sold the tea to high-profile clients in the hospitality sector between January 2014 and February 2019. Representatives of the Balmoral Hotel, the Dorchester Hotel and a company acting on behalf of Fortnum & Mason were among those tricked by the fraudster. A Food Standards Scotland (FSS) investigation found Robinson also misled genuine Scottish tea growers by selling them plants under the false pretence they were a unique, locally-grown variety. He was found guilty of two counts of fraud to a value of almost £553,000 following a trial at Falkirk Sheriff Court in May, which came after an investigation by FSS. Robinson also tried to bolster his credibility by fabricating academic qualifications and industry awards and claimed to have sold tea to customers including Kensington Palace. The 55-year-old, also known as Tam O'Braan and Thomas O'Brien, was due to be sentenced at Stirling Sheriff Court on Wednesday morning. However solicitor Virgil Crawford, who had previously represented Robinson, told the court he was withdrawing from acting on his behalf. Robinson, identifying himself as Thomas O'Brien, appeared by video-link from HMP Low Moss and said he had been informed Mr Crawford was withdrawing 'about 10 to 15 minutes ago'. Sheriff Keith O'Mahony asked whether he had had the opportunity to read the criminal justice social report prepared ahead of sentencing, to which Robinson replied he had not. The sheriff asked whether he would be in a position to offer mitigations on his own behalf if he is sentenced later without legal representation. Robinson said: 'I have notes of mitigation in my cell. I've made some very brief notes in the 10 minutes since I spoke to Mr Crawford. 'In essence I don't think the sentiment will change – there is a deep regret on my part and that's entirely what I'm going to be saying.' The sheriff said he would defer the case until 2.30pm on Wednesday to give the 55-year-old the opportunity to read the report and make inquiries about legal representation. He said: 'I will decide this afternoon whether to proceed to sentence.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store