Trump reassures allies as NATO agrees 'historic' spending hike
THE HAGUE - US President Donald Trump took a victory lap at NATO's Hague summit Wednesday, joining leaders in reaffirming the "ironclad" commitment to protect each other after allies agreed to his demand to ramp up defence spending.
The unpredictable US leader appeared keen to take the plaudits as he secured a key foreign policy win by getting NATO's 32 countries to agree to meet his headline target of five percent of GDP on defence spending.
In a move that will provide reassurance to allies in Europe worried over the threat from Russia, Trump signed off on a final leaders' declaration confirming "our ironclad commitment" to NATO's collective defence pledge that an attack on one is an attack on all.
"It's a great victory for everybody, I think, and we will be equalised," Trump said of the new spending commitment, ahead of the summit's main session.
Diplomats said that behind closed doors Trump insisted there was no greater ally than Washington and urged others to spend some of the new money on US weaponry.
The deal hatched by NATO is a compromise that allows Trump to claim triumph, while in reality providing wiggle room for cash-strapped governments in Europe.
It sees countries promise to dedicate 3.5 percent of GDP to core military spending by 2035, and a further 1.5 to broader security-related areas such as infrastructure.
Entering the meeting, leaders lined up to declare the summit's spending hike as "historic".
NATO allies say the increase is needed to counter a growing threat from Russia but also to keep Trump engaged, with the US leader long complaining that Europe spends too little on its own defence.
Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever said: "As Europeans, we should realise that our long break from history is over."
The continent needed to take responsibility for its own security "in a very difficult time", added De Wever.
- 'Totally committed' -
Everything was carefully choreographed at the gathering in The Hague to keep the volatile US president on board: from chopping back the official part of the meeting to putting him up overnight in the royal palace.
Trump rattled his allies by appearing to cast some doubt on the validity of NATO's mutual defence clause -- known as Article Five of the alliance treaty -- telling reporters on the way to The Hague that it "depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five."
But Rutte insisted Trump remained "totally committed" to the pledge -- which was reaffirmed unequivocally in the summit's final statement.
Underpinning the leaders' discussions on defence was Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, and in another sop to the demands of allies the United States allowed NATO to refer to the "long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security" in the communique.
Though its language was watered down from previous years, the declaration also said allies would continue to support Ukraine "whose security contributes to ours" and could use money from the new spending pledge to fund military aid for Kyiv.
- 'Nice guy' -
That came as Trump was poised to meet the war-torn country's president Volodymyr Zelensky on the summit sidelines.
Zelensky is playing a less central role here than at previous summits, to avoid a bust-up with Trump after their infamous Oval Office shouting match.
But Trump described him as a "nice guy" and added that he was talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war, saying: "I think progress is being made."
But despite Rutte's insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains "irreversible", NATO's statement avoided any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out.
Hungary's Kremlin-friendly Prime Minister Viktor Orban was more categorical.
"NATO has no business in Ukraine," he said. "My job is to keep it as it is."
By Max Delany And Richard Carter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
Ceasefire in place between Israel and Iran
PRETORIA - Iran officials say US airstrikes didn't damage the counrtry's nuclear sites. A ceasefire is now in place between the two countries with the hope that the protracted hostilities are truly over. READ | Trump says Iran-Israel truce holds after berating both countries Professor André Thomashausen, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Unisa spoke to eNCA.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Donald Trump claims 'win' as NATO agrees to massive spending hike
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (right), flanked by US President Donald Trump, speaks at a NATO press conference on June 25. Image: John Thys / AFP NATO countries agreed on Wednesday to massively ramp up their defence spending to satisfy US President Donald Trump, who hailed it as a "monumental win" for America - and reaffirmed his country's commitment to protect its European allies. Trump cut a jubilant figure after NATO's 32 countries agreed to his headline target of five percent of GDP on defence spending following two days of talks in The Hague. Taking credit for a "fantastic" outcome that "no one really thought possible", Trump described the spending hike as "a monumental win for the United States". "They said you did it, sir," he told a news conference. "Well I don't know if I did it - but I think I did." In a reassuring move for European allies worried over the threat from Russia, Trump signed off on a final leaders' declaration confirming "our ironclad commitment" to NATO's collective defence pledge that an attack on one is an attack on all. NATO allies backed the spending increase to help counter a growing threat from Russia but also - crucially - to keep Trump engaged, with the US leader repeatedly suggesting Washington could withhold protection from lower-paying allies in Europe. The deal appeared - for now at least - to have laid those gripes to rest. The compromise hatched by NATO sees countries promise to dedicate 3.5 percent of GDP to core military spending by 2035, and a further 1.5 to broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. While signing off on the target on paper, Spain has said it thinks it can fulfil NATO's demands while spending less - earning a fresh rebuke Wednesday from Trump, who threatened to hit its trade interests in response. But the pledge endorsed in The Hague allows Trump to claim triumph, while in practice providing some wiggle room for cash-strapped governments in Europe. Diplomats said that behind closed doors Trump had given strong assurances of Washington's commitment as an ally and urged others to spend some of the new money on US weaponry. 'Couldn't have been nicer' Everything was choreographed at the gathering in The Hague to keep the volatile US president on board: from chopping back the official part of the meeting to putting him up overnight in the royal palace. Underpinning the leaders' discussions on defence was Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, and in another sop to the demands of allies the United States allowed NATO to refer to the "long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security" in the communique. Though its language was watered down from previous years, the declaration also said allies would continue to support Ukraine "whose security contributes to ours" and could use money from the new spending pledge to fund military aid for Kyiv. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky played a less central role here than at previous summits -- with leaders wary of any bust-up after his infamous Oval Office shouting match with Trump. But the US president did meet the war-torn country's leader on the summit sidelines, declaring afterwards the encounter "couldn't have been nicer" and Zelensky hailed a "substantive" meeting. Trump also said he was talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war, saying: "I think progress is being made." That said, despite the insistence by NATO chief Mark Rutte that Ukraine's bid for membership remains "irreversible", the summit statement avoided any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. 'Not a rip-off' Trump had rattled allies on the summit's eve by appearing to cast some doubt on the validity of NATO's mutual defence clause - known as Article Five of the alliance treaty. But the pledge was reaffirmed unequivocally in the summit's final statement - and Trump drove the point home at his closing press conference. "I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing," Trump said in closing remarks to the press, when pressed on the mutual defence clause known as Article Five. "But I left here a little bit differently," said the US leader - who was visibly delighted at the red carpet welcome and the praise lavished on him by NATO's Rutte among others. "Without the United States, they couldn't really have NATO. Wouldn't work," Trump said. "It will in the future, because now they're paying much more money." AFP
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Africa on edge: How global tensions between Israel, Iran and the US threaten stability
The conflict in Iran may seem far away, but it's creating volatility that African leaders must act on urgently. Israel, Iran and the United States' (US) escalating hostilities have sent geopolitical tremors far beyond the Middle East. With the fragile ceasefire holding for now, the world waits tensely to see if a broader regional or global conflict will erupt. For African policymakers, three critical vectors demand close scrutiny — security, diplomatic and economic. Each carries risks that may have outsized effects on the continent. The first danger lies in the security sphere. The conflict risks drawing multiple global powers — Russia, China, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) — into yet another Middle Eastern quagmire. Historically, when the great powers collide, Africa often becomes an unintended theatre of competition and collateral. The scars of the Ukraine and Gaza conflicts are still apparent in myriad economic, diplomatic and security shocks. There is a worrying sense of déjà vu in the current situation. If global tensions spill into new ideological or military standoffs, African countries could get trapped in the messy middle. North and East African states face particular exposure to direct risks from primary and proxy actors. Security vulnerabilities Iranian projectiles have already lit up Cairo's night sky — a reminder of Egypt's security vulnerabilities; with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi advocating for de-escalation. Elsewhere, US-aligned military assets in Djibouti and Somalia, and Israel's assets in Eritrea, could become the focus of retaliatory strikes by Iran or its regional proxies, such as the Houthis. There is also an indirect security risk arising from a reprioritisation of Western strategic interests. With defence budgets and attention stretched by the Ukraine war and domestic concerns, Africa's security sectors may find themselves increasingly under-resourced and unable to manage transnational threats. Testament to Africa's declining geostrategic value in the Western security psyche, the continent received little attention during recent G7 and Nato meetings. Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger are already feeling the brunt of Western retrenchment in the Sahelian theatre. Further disengagement would leave them even more vulnerable to insurgencies. Human security — often overlooked — is also at stake. Food insecurity, climate shocks and governance deficits already strain many African states. Fresh pressures could arise if Middle Eastern instability fuels large-scale migration or refugee flows into Europe. European diversion of development funding to manage such spillovers could further undermine safety nets for Africa's most vulnerable populations. Religious and sectarian tensions, exacerbated by Middle East developments, may also inflame local disputes in Africa's multi-faith societies. A concern is Nigeria where Shia groups could engage in attacks in solidarity with Iran. Compounding these risks is the spectre of nuclear proliferation. If Iran abandons nuclear restraint, other regional players may follow, raising the chances of an arms race with global consequences. Weakened influence For Africa — a strong proponent of nuclear disarmament under the Pelindaba Treaty — such a shift would weaken its influence in future global arms control negotiations. Diplomatically, pressure on African states to take sides will intensify. They may be forced into uncomfortable choices — between Washington and Tehran, or the US and its rivals in Moscow or Beijing — with sanctions or aid withdrawal the price for defiance. South Africa is in a particularly delicate position. Its inconsistent foreign policy has left it walking a narrow tightrope. Washington has sparred with Pretoria over its stance on Israel, its domestic policies, proximity to Iran, and its alignment with BRICS. The US could react punitively to any sign of sympathy towards Iran. Multilateral institutions, especially the United Nations Security Council and expanded BRICS+, will also be tested. Iran's recent accession to BRICS has added complexity and may strain the bloc's unity. African members like South Africa, Egypt and Ethiopia could face awkward choices should the bloc lean towards favouring Tehran. The implications are profound. A world that abandons international law for raw power threatens the very framework that protects smaller, less powerful states. For Africa, this is an existential issue — without rules-based multilateralism, the continent's collective influence diminishes. Worse, a global slide into 'might is right' politics may embolden expansionist African leaders. Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed Ali, Rwanda's Paul Kagame and Morocco's King Mohammed VI could feel encouraged to pursue territorial ambitions under the cover of global disorder. Others may take 'preventive' strikes against perceived enemies like the US and Israel — illegal under current international law. Africa's collective voting strength at global forums may also erode in such a scenario. If influence weakens, so too does Africa's leverage on crucial matters such as debt restructuring, climate finance and development aid. Only through a unified, strategic voice can the continent avoid marginalisation. Yet the most immediate and tangible impact is economic. Global uncertainty traditionally sparks a 'flight to safety', strengthening the US dollar and weakening African currencies. This raises debt servicing costs for African sovereigns, many of which are heavily dollar-indebted. Bond yields could spike, and fiscal pressures — already strained by post-pandemic recovery and fallout from the Ukraine war — would tighten further. Energy security is another looming flashpoint. Disruption of the Strait of Hormuz — the conduit for a third of the world's oil — would send energy prices soaring. Net oil importers, including many African economies, would suffer painful imported inflation, raising transport, food and energy costs. This would intensify cost-of-living crises and complicate monetary policy just as central banks prepare to loosen rates to spur growth. Recession Broader trade disruptions, coupled with the expiry of US President Donald Trump's tariff reprieves, could drag the global economy into recession. For Africa, the fallout could be severe. Depreciation-driven debt deterioration could complicate restructuring in Zambia, Ethiopia and Ghana. Others — like Kenya and Nigeria, where debt servicing swallows more than 30% of revenue — would face even tighter fiscal constraints. Smaller economies reliant on customs-sharing arrangements, like Lesotho and Eswatini, are also vulnerable, with Southern African Customs Union earnings there already projected to decline by as much as 20% this year. Limited fiscal buffers would force many African governments to divert funds from development spending to cover external gaps — risking social unrest, political instability and the erosion of already thin reserves. Still, a few bright spots exist. Rising gold prices could benefit producers like Ghana and South Africa. Likewise, higher oil prices may boost revenues for exporters like Nigeria, Angola, Algeria and Libya. Yet these gains probably wouldn't offset the broader economic harm of disrupted supply chains, slower global growth and weaker demand for non-commodity African exports. In this volatile context, African leaders must act. Security capacities and collaboration must be bolstered to reduce dependence on foreign powers and cushion against internal and external threats. Diplomacy must become more unified and strategic — both to protect Africa's interests and uphold the international rules that safeguard its sovereignty. Economic resilience, through fiscal prudence, dollar de-risking and deeper regional market development, is urgent. The Iran crisis may rage abroad, but its sparks are falling on African soil — and the continent must brace for impact. DM
