MIT researchers develop hydrogen from sugarcane juice
The project is led by researchers Sagar Kanekar, Bharat Kale, Anand Kulkarni, prof Niraj Topare, Santosh Patil, Dev Thapa, Biswas and Ratnadip Joshi.
As per the information given by the research team, the university has developed a unique process to generate hydrogen from sugarcane juice using microorganisms, which also convert carbon dioxide into acetic acid, making it more sustainable. A patent has already been submitted for this technology. This project proposal has been submitted to the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy (MNRE) for funding.
Dr Bharat Kale, emeritus professor and director of Material Science [COE]s said, 'The university's bioprocess operates at room temperature using sugarcane juice, seawater, and wastewater, contributing to global efforts to reduce hydrogen costs to $1/kg. We are seeking industry partners for lab-scale development and eventual technology transfer.'
'The work on hydrogen storage is also in progress using Metal-Organic Framework (MOF). The MOFs for hydrogen storage and CO2 capture have been focused on intensely. The university aims to support industries in scaling up the technology, which could be commercially viable within a year,' said Sagar Kanekar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
MIT study: 95% GenAI projects fail to show returns
While companies have rushed to adopt AI tools into their work processes, most of these projects haven't made any impact as only 5% of AI pilots showed growth in revenue. A new MIT study, titled 'The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025,' which surveyed 300 AI deployments and spoke to 350 employees, found that 95% of AI projects showed no returns on investment for the companies. The failure was not because AI models did not work efficiently, but because they were harder to adapt with pre-existing workflows in a company. According to a Fortune report, citing the study's lead researcher, the 5% AI deployments that were successful were focused on solving a single problem and had worked on execution. Companies are also dealing with a 'learning gap' in their workforce although company executives blamed AI model's performance. The study also showed that more than half of GenAI budgets went to sales and marketing but the highest returns were seen in automating back-office processes like cutting external agency costs, and streamlining roles. The report also noted that companies that purchasing AI tools from specialised vendors worked around 67% of the time while internal tools only succeeded one-third of the time.
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
AI can't make companies rich: MIT study finds 95% of firms fail to profit from their investments
Artificial intelligence was supposed to be the technology that launched businesses into a new era of efficiency, streamlined operations, and untapped revenues. But as the dust settles and the bills roll in, a new MIT study is showing just how far reality has lagged behind the dream. Across the United States, companies have poured an estimated $35–40 billion into AI projects in just the last year. For most, though, the only visible outcome so far is an alarming drain on resources. AI's gateway to the future is blocked, for now. Most businesses watch budgets vanish while waiting for tech to deliver.(AI generated) The expectation was straightforward: invest big in AI, reap even bigger returns. Instead, nearly all businesses are seeing little, if any, measurable results. According to the MIT report, 'The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025,' 95 percent of firms surveyed have not managed to move the needle on profits or tangible business improvements thanks to their AI investments. The notion of AI as a gateway to future growth is fast turning into a lesson in patience, disappointment, and financial risk. Where the hype fell flat So, what's going wrong? In short, most businesses jumped on the AI train without a map or destination. The study found that the majority of companies wasted time and cash applying AI to sales and marketing, betting these consumer-facing applications would bring instant wins. In reality, these areas still require a human touch and aren't where automation shines brightest. Instead, the potential of AI remains locked up in back-office and repetitive tasks - the sorts of everyday admin duties that are less glamorous but far more suitable for automation. Companies that ignored these areas simply never got the payback they'd hoped for. Add to that the mismatch between generic, off-the-shelf AI tools and the unique workflows at each company. Many relied on big-name platforms like ChatGPT, but instead of integrating seamlessly, these tools often feel awkward, stalling out and having minimal impact in real business contexts. Custom problems need custom solutions, something many forgot in their race to invest. Warning for the workforce Yet a handful of businesses have found the secret sauce. The study highlights young startups and nimble teams that took a different tack: target one business pain point, solve it with precision, and partner with third-party vendors who know the tools inside and out. For them, the results are silver-lining material, some saw their revenues climb from zero to $20 million in just a year by staying sharply focused and realistic. Notably, two-thirds of successful AI deployments came from third-party vendors, compared to only a third built in-house. On the job front, layoffs due to AI aren't happening yet, but companies are filling fewer support and admin roles as technology steps in. How long this quiet approach can last before real disruption remains a hot question. Experts warn that when (or if) AI masters true contextual work and autonomy, the workforce may not be so safe.
Economic Times
12 hours ago
- Economic Times
Cracks in the AI hype? Warning signs suggest the Bubble could soon explode
In March 2000, Barron's asked, 'When will the internet bubble burst?' warning the pop could happen before year-end. On that same day, a top tech company saw its share price drop 60pc, and many others collapsed, wiping out trillions. Now, some Wall Street experts worry the same 'unpleasant popping sound' may hit the AI boom. On Tuesday, tech stocks fell sharply after a report from MIT said most AI investments give 'zero return' for businesses. MIT academics wrote: 'Despite $30-40bn in enterprise investment into Generative AI, 95pc of organisations are getting zero return'. Nvidia shares dropped 3.5pc and Palantir fell 9pc after the report. MIT's findings could be the pin that pops the tech stock bubble, which has increased US stock values by trillions. Since ChatGPT's launch in 2022, Silicon Valley has claimed AI chatbots will transform the economy, promising cost savings and productivity gains. MIT's report suggests the AI revolution has stalled, despite big investments, as reported by The Telegraph. MIT surveyed 150 business leaders and 350 employees, finding only 5pc of AI pilots generate millions in value; the rest show no measurable profit impact. Marko Kolanovic, former JP Morgan head of research, commented: 'Sounds about right for a bubble'. MIT found half of AI projects fail, 80pc of companies explored AI, but only 40pc actually deployed it. Only 20pc of enterprise-grade AI systems reached the pilot stage and just 5pc reached production. ALSO READ: Google Pixel 10 series and Pixel 10 Pro fold launched with AI features and new designs Many employees prefer using consumer AI products like ChatGPT on their own rather than corporate AI tools. The report emphasized: 'AI is already transforming work, just not through official channels'. Despite benefiting from AI, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned investors: 'Are investors overexcited? My opinion is yes… some people stand to lose a phenomenal amount of money'. Investors worry about SoftBank, which invested billions in OpenAI; its shares fell 7pc on Tuesday. OpenAI recently launched ChatGPT-5, which underwhelmed users; improvements were seen as small or incremental. Morgan Stanley predicts $3tn will be spent on data centres over three years, mostly fueled by debt, to support AI growth, as stated by The Telegraph. Morgan Stanley also projects AI could add $16tn to the S&P 500 through 40pc salary savings, though MIT's report suggests this may be unrealistic. Meta announced a reorganization of its AI division, including staff reductions, showing even big AI believers are cautious. Mark Zuckerberg has spent hundreds of millions to hire AI engineers at Meta, as per the New York Times the sell-off, the market hasn't collapsed completely; some analysts see it as just a speed bump. Dan Ives, tech analyst at Wedbush Securities, said skeptics of the tech rally will be proven wrong again. Nvidia will report results next week, potentially showing the true state of AI investments in major companies. Ives believes the tech bull cycle will continue for another 2-3 years, but many are still listening for the ominous pop, as mentioned by The Telegraph. Q1. Is the AI boom at risk of a market crash? Yes, experts warn that most AI investments show zero return, which could trigger a tech stock bubble burst. Q2. Are big companies slowing down their AI projects? Yes, many firms like Meta and SoftBank are cautious, with AI projects failing or being scaled back.
