France adopts the Duplomb Law, upholding ban on controversial insecticide
Critics of the bill, adopted in July in a fractured lower house of parliament, say it was rushed through without proper debate. The law was published in the government's official journal on Tuesday, August 12 after the Constitutional Council, the country's highest court, struck down the contested provision about the reintroduction of acetamiprid.
The court said that the insecticides known as neonicotinoids posed "risks to human health" and was unconstitutional as it undermined the right to live in a balanced and healthy environment as guaranteed in the country's environmental charter. Banned in France since 2018, acetamiprid is legal in the European Union and proponents say French farmers need it to help them compete with their European counterparts.
The main farmers' union has railed against the court ruling. Supporters of the petition said their frustration with the legislation went beyond environmental concerns. Commentators have said it may be a sign of exasperation with deadlock in a hung parliament and a desire to have a greater say in political matters.
After the ruling, Macron had said he intended to quickly enact the law and rejected further parliamentary debate. The controversial legislation has been dubbed the Duplomb law, after its author, Laurent Duplomb, a senator for the right-wing Republicans party. French Health Minister Yannick Neuder has called for a European reassessment of the impact of acetamiprid on human health.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
23 minutes ago
- LeMonde
European leaders see hope for a ceasefire after the Trump and Putin summit
European leaders expressed cautious relief following their videoconference with Donald Trump, organized on Wednesday, August 13, at the initiative of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and attended by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The Europeans sought to decipher the intentions of the US president ahead of his meeting with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska on Friday, August 15, and to persuade him not to compromise European security. Have these efforts paid off? The European participants answered in the affirmative. Merz said he had "hope that something is moving." Keir Starmer, the British prime minister, said he believes there is a "viable chance" of achieving a ceasefire, echoing Zelensky's view. French President Emmanuel Macron concluded from discussions with Trump that "what the United States wants is to obtain a ceasefire during this meeting in Alaska (...) as well as new prisoner exchanges and the liberation of children." Securing Putin's swift agreement to a ceasefire will therefore be Trump's objective on Friday in Anchorage, according to European officials. While Putin wants to maintain or even expand his positions in eastern Ukraine, "territorial" questions will reportedly not be raised at the summit, even though Trump had suggested otherwise two days earlier. Macron has stressed that there is no serious plan for territorial transactions and that Donald Trump has made it very clear that "the question of Ukrainian territory can and will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president." A trilateral meeting, including Zelensky, could take place in the coming days, depending on the outcome of Friday's summit.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
'Smartphone sales to under-15s should be banned'
Has Europe finally found the key to protecting its youngest citizens from the harmful effects of digital technology? On July 14, the European Commission unveiled a technical system for age verification and published its first guidelines for enforcing the child protection measures of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The next day, in France, the Conseil d'Etat (France's top administrative court) reinstated the requirement for age checks on pornographic websites, a measure that had been suspended a month earlier under pressure from the platforms. Both were strong signals – steps that could mark a promising turning point. Yet, there remains a long and obstacle-strewn path between these announcements and reality. Since 2019, the need to bring order to the legal chaos of Europe's digital landscape has been on the table. Thierry Breton, then newly appointed as European commissioner for the internal market, put it simply and aptly: "What is illegal offline must also be illegal online." The DSA, passed at the end of 2022, is rooted in this principle: It imposes on major digital platforms a responsibility to identify their own risks, to correct them and to meet their protection obligations – or face enormous fines. Unlike other pieces of legislation, the DSA does not mandate a specific method, but it does demand a result. The new guidelines published in July clarify what is expected: private accounts by default, loyalty mechanisms disabled, targeted advertising banned, reports from minors processed within 48 hours and algorithms adapted to prevent exposure to inappropriate content. However, all of this hinges on a single requirement: namely, reliably knowing the age of users. That is why this age verification prototype is so important; it is meant to ensure accurate age assessment without collecting excessive personal data. On paper, the protective measures appear promising. In practice, however, the rollout of the DSA has revealed just how slowly the system is moving. Although it has been legally in force since February 2024, the DSA will not deliver its first independent audits of platform risk assessments until 2026. Meanwhile, the statistics speak for themselves: 90% of 12-year-olds own a smartphone, according to the Born Social 2024 study; by age 12, half of boys visit a pornographic website at least once a month, according to a 2023 study by ARCOM (France's audiovisual and digital communications regulator); one in five adolescents in Europe experiences mental health disorders, which are often worsened by social media, according to the World Health Organization.
LeMonde
8 hours ago
- LeMonde
Britain, France and Germany threaten to reimpose sanctions on Iran as nuclear program deadline nears
The top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany threatened to reimpose sanctions on Iran as an end-of-the-month deadline nears for the country to resume negotiations with the West over its nuclear program and cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog . The three countries − known as the E3 − wrote in a letter to the United Nations dated Friday, August 8, that they were willing to trigger a process known as the "snapback" mechanism − which allows one of the Western parties to reimpose UN sanctions − if Tehran doesn't comply with its requirements. French Foreign Minister Jean-Nöel Barrot posted the letter on Wednesday to X. He co-signed it along with top diplomats from Germany and the United Kingdom. "E3 have always committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon," the letter said. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism." The Iranian government didn't immediately respond to the development, but parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki − who was Iran's top diplomat for five years in the 2000s − warned of a swift reaction to any move to trigger the snapback mechanism. He said the Iranian parliament has a "finger on the trigger" for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, or NPT, the international treaty aimed at halting the spread of nuclear weapons. "We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal," if the E3 raises the issue at the UN Security Council, Mottaki said. The letter from the E3 comes following a period of apparent diplomatic deadlock after a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June, where Israeli and American jets struck some key nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic. The countries met with Iranian officials last month in Turkey at Iran's consulate building in Istanbul on the possibility of reimposing international sanctions, lifted in 2015 in exchange for Tehran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said at the time that he hoped that the meeting would see the E3 nations reassess their "previous unconstructive attitude." Since the war, talks with Washington for a new nuclear deal haven't resumed, and Iran has since suspended ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog , following the attacks. The IAEA's first visit to Iran since the war didn't entail any visits to nuclear facilities Monday, and cooperation wasn't officially restored. One of the three countries opting to trigger the snapback mechanism would renew sanctions on Iran, but Tehran renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and addressing concerns about its highly-enriched uranium stockpile would delay it. Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume. German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher on Wednesday said that the letter "once again underlines that the legal preconditions for snapback have long existed." "Our position and our appeal is, very clearly, that Iran still has the choice of deciding to return to diplomacy (…) and full cooperation with the IAEA," he told reporters at a regular news conference in Berlin. US intelligence agencies and the IAEA had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% − a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
