Scientists Line Up Satellites to Create "Artificial Total Solar Eclipse"
Two satellites just carefully lined up to form a perfect "artificial total solar eclipse" in orbit.
Earlier this year, the two probes, which are part of the European Space Agency's Proba-3 mission, positioned themselves in a perfect line 492 feet apart to have one of them perfectly obfuscate the Sun's rays.
Impressively, they were able to maintain their position with an accuracy down to the millimeter.
The outermost satellite then snapped fascinating pictures of the Sun's corona, the outermost part of our star's atmosphere, something that's generally speaking only possible during a natural solar eclipse.
The first "Occulter" satellite's 4.6-foot disc cast a three-inch shadow onto the Association of Spacecraft for Polarimetric and Imaging Investigation of the Corona of the Sun (ASPIICS) instrument mounted to the second "Coronagraph" satellite, allowing it to get an uninterrupted view of the Sun's corona.
The spectacular satellite dance could give researchers new ways to study solar wind, or the continuous flow of particles from the Sun. It could also give them new views of coronal mass ejections, powerful explosions of plasma and magnetic fields that have been linked to radio blackouts and GPS outages here on Earth.
"It is exciting to see these stunning images validate our technologies in what is now the world's first precision formation flying mission," said ESA director of technology Dietmar Pilz in a statement.
Researchers behind the stunt are excited to gather even more images and data of the Sun's corona.
"I was absolutely thrilled to see the images, especially since we got them on the first try," ASPIICS principal investigator Andrei Zhukov added. "Now we are working on extending the observation time to six hours in every orbit."
"Each full image — covering the area from the occulted Sun all the way to the edge of the field of view – is actually constructed from three images," he explained. "Combining the three images gives us the full view of the corona."
Best of all, Zhukov and his colleagues found that the satellites' "'artificial eclipse' images are comparable with those taken during a natural eclipse."
"The difference is that we can create our eclipse once every 19.6-hour orbit," he added, "while total solar eclipses only occur naturally around once, very rarely twice a year."
Scientists are already excited about the glut of new observations that could greatly enhance existing research into the Sun's atmosphere, including efforts to use computer simulations to predict future patterns.
"This huge flow of observations will help refine computer models further as we compare and adjust variables to match the real images," said ESA space weather modeling coordinator Jorge Amaya in the statement.
More on solar eclipses: Here's What NASA's Rovers See During an Eclipse on Mars
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Archaeologists Were Exploring a Cave—and Found 100 Prehistoric Structures
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: The discovery of more than 100 prehistoric structures in the Cova Dones cave in Spain makes it one of the most significant prehistoric underground sites in the world. Archaeologists found stalagmites intentionally reassembled within the caves, dating them to prehistoric times. Questions remain about the purpose of the underground structures in a cave already known for a wealth of finds. Prehistoric humans intentionally modified stalagmites in the Cova Dones cave in Spain, forming over 100 structures—known as speleofacts—as a result. The recent archaeological find becomes one of the most significant prehistoric underground discoveries in the world, according to the team behind the discovery. 'This finding shows the adaptation of the environment by the prehistoric communities and places the site as the second most important in the world in this category, only behind the French cave of Saint-Marcel,' the discovery team from the universities of Alicante and Zaragoza wrote in a translated statement. Located in Millares, Cova Dones may have just jumped to the forefront of prehistoric underground discussions, but answers may be hard to come by. The archaeological team identified more than 100 speleofacts coming from the fracture, displacement, or regrouping of stalagmites to form structures. Experts believe this is 'convincing evidence of the planned occupation of the underground environment by prehistoric societies.' Still, some of the patterning of the recreated forms leaves questions as to their purpose, whether ritual or instead related to site planning by forming boundaries. The team was able to start dating the speleofacts thanks to calcium regrowth on the fractures, allowing them to 'attribute, at least partially, these interventions to prehistoric periods.' The researchers plan to continue to study the speleofacts to better date the timing of the underground work and 'accurately determine the scope and chronology of these structures.' This isn't the first time the prehistoric nature of Cova Dones has surfaced. In 2023, Antiquity published a study classifying the cave as home to the largest set of Paleolithic rock art on the eastern Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula, with more than 100 paintings and engravings dated around 24,000 years old. The paintings included at least 19 animal representation in three different zones in the cave, some roughly 1,300 feet from the entrance. The study noted that all the zones were easily accessible without any climbing required. Key animals shown in the graphics included horses, deer, aurochs, and a stag. The researchers were able to date the cave art because of an overlap with cave bear claw marks and the artwork. Cave bears went extinct roughly 24,000 years ago. Shortly after the rock art finding, the existence of a 1,900-year-old Roman sanctuary was revealed in a room roughly 650 feet from the entrance of the cave, with a set of inscriptions and a coin of Emperor Claudius. The 2023 study noted that much of the cave system was yet unexplored by modern archaeologists, opening the possibility for additional finds. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Advanced AI models generate up to 50 times more CO₂ emissions than more common LLMs when answering the same questions
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The more accurate we try to make AI models, the bigger their carbon footprint — with some prompts producing up to 50 times more carbon dioxide emissions than others, a new study has revealed. Reasoning models, such as Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's o3 and DeepSeek's R1, are specialized large language models (LLMs) that dedicate more time and computing power to produce more accurate responses than their predecessors. Yet, aside from some impressive results, these models have been shown to face severe limitations in their ability to crack complex problems. Now, a team of researchers has highlighted another constraint on the models' performance — their exorbitant carbon footprint. They published their findings June 19 in the journal Frontiers in Communication. "The environmental impact of questioning trained LLMs is strongly determined by their reasoning approach, with explicit reasoning processes significantly driving up energy consumption and carbon emissions," study first author Maximilian Dauner, a researcher at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences in Germany, said in a statement. "We found that reasoning-enabled models produced up to 50 times more CO₂ emissions than concise response models." To answer the prompts given to them, LLMs break up language into tokens — word chunks that are converted into a string of numbers before being fed into neural networks. These neural networks are tuned using training data that calculates the probabilities of certain patterns appearing. They then use these probabilities to generate responses. Reasoning models further attempt to boost accuracy using a process known as "chain-of-thought." This is a technique that works by breaking down one complex problem into smaller, more digestible intermediary steps that follow a logical flow, mimicking how humans might arrive at the conclusion to the same problem. Related: AI 'hallucinates' constantly, but there's a solution However, these models have significantly higher energy demands than conventional LLMs, posing a potential economic bottleneck for companies and users wishing to deploy them. Yet, despite some research into the environmental impacts of growing AI adoption more generally, comparisons between the carbon footprints of different models remain relatively rare. To examine the CO₂ emissions produced by different models, the scientists behind the new study asked 14 LLMs 1,000 questions across different topics. The different models had between 7 and 72 billion parameters. The computations were performed using a Perun framework (which analyzes LLM performance and the energy it requires) on an NVIDIA A100 GPU. The team then converted energy usage into CO₂ by assuming each kilowatt-hour of energy produces 480 grams of CO₂. Their results show that, on average, reasoning models generated 543.5 tokens per question compared to just 37.7 tokens for more concise models. These extra tokens — amounting to more computations — meant that the more accurate reasoning models produced more CO₂. The most accurate model was the 72 billion parameter Cogito model, which answered 84.9% of the benchmark questions correctly. Cogito released three times the CO₂ emissions of similarly sized models made to generate answers more concisely. "Currently, we see a clear accuracy-sustainability trade-off inherent in LLM technologies," said Dauner. "None of the models that kept emissions below 500 grams of CO₂ equivalent [total greenhouse gases released] achieved higher than 80% accuracy on answering the 1,000 questions correctly." RELATED STORIES —Replika AI chatbot is sexually harassing users, including minors, new study claims —OpenAI's 'smartest' AI model was explicitly told to shut down — and it refused —AI benchmarking platform is helping top companies rig their model performances, study claims But the issues go beyond accuracy. Questions that needed longer reasoning times, like in algebra or philosophy, caused emissions to spike six times higher than straightforward look-up queries. The researchers' calculations also show that the emissions depended on the models that were chosen. To answer 60,000 questions, DeepSeek's 70 billion parameter R1 model would produce the CO₂ emitted by a round-trip flight between New York and London. Alibaba Cloud's 72 billion parameter Qwen 2.5 model, however, would be able to answer these with similar accuracy rates for a third of the emissions. The study's findings aren't definitive; emissions may vary depending on the hardware used and the energy grids used to supply their power, the researchers emphasized. But they should prompt AI users to think before they deploy the technology, the researchers noted. "If users know the exact CO₂ cost of their AI-generated outputs, such as casually turning themselves into an action figure, they might be more selective and thoughtful about when and how they use these technologies," Dauner said.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Cannabis use raises risk of heart attack and stroke more than cocaine, other drugs, major review suggests
The potential risk of cannabis use has been in the spotlight following recent research pointing toward negative health effects. This includes a new meta-analysis by French researchers, published in the journal Heart, which reviewed multiple studies to assess the link between cannabis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The researchers analyzed data from more than 400 million patients involved in 24 previous cross-sectional studies (capturing data at a single point in time) and cohort studies (following patients over time). One study focused on medical cannabis. The overall results noted a significant increase in risk of major cardiovascular events, including a 29% higher likelihood of heart attack, 20% higher risk of stroke and twice the chances of cardiovascular death. The danger was also elevated in people who used cannabis at least once a week. Several studies found higher odds of acute myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack. One study pinpointed the risk among younger populations aged 15 to 22, while another observed it in patients who used cannabis more than once a week. One study from the primary French administrative database for hospitals found that, compared to other illicit drugs like cocaine and opioids, cannabis was a larger predictor of heart attack. Another study analyzed the association between cannabis and acute coronary syndrome (reduced blood flow to the heart) in nearly 15,000 patients ranging from 18 to 54 years old. The analysis found no significant association in the overall sample, but signaled a higher risk in a subgroup of patients aged 18 to 36. Cannabis use significantly increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of patients who experienced a heart attack before age 50. A UK Biobank analysis pointed out that women have a "significantly higher" risk of cardiovascular mortality than men. The larger review concluded that these findings reveal "positive associations" between cannabis use and MACE, and should "encourage investigating cannabis use in all patients presenting with serious cardiovascular disorders." Although medical marijuana can provide relief for people with conditions like arthritis, multiple sclerosis, cancer and other illnesses, overuse has been linked to potential health risks, especially for seniors. The authors of the French review acknowledged that there were some limitations to the findings – primarily that there is a lower prevalence of cocaine and opioids compared to cannabis use. "Cannabis exposure was poorly reported in the included studies, which prevented our meta-analysis from assessing it," they wrote. There was also a potential for some degree of bias in some of the studies due to lack of information or missing data. "Studies that relied on patient surveys faced substantial bias regarding exposure and outcome misclassification when patients assessed these data themselves," the researchers noted. Other potential limitations included overlapping data and limited timeframes. During an appearance on "America's Newsroom" in early June, Fox News senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel commented on a recent study that found more seniors are using cannabis than ever before, despite the potential health risks. Siegel noted that regular use of cannabis can be dangerous if not tracked. "We definitely jumped the gun by not anticipating all the medical risks here." "You might use a gummy to go to bed, and then the next thing, you're using two gummies, or three gummies, and it could increase anxiety, it can increase discombobulation, you're not thinking clearly, ER visits are on the increase," he cautioned. "We know about problems with the lungs," Siegel added. "It can accelerate dementia and can affect behavior." The doctor likened the use of marijuana to the effects of smoking cigarettes in terms of damage to the heart and lungs. "It is absolutely an active chemical we need to watch out for, and I'm very disturbed that the elderly are using it," he said. "We've completely jumped the gun [on legalization] because people are going to the ER with psychosis. They're going there with vomiting disorders. They're having car accidents as a result," he went on. For more Health articles, visit "We are studying Colorado ever since it was legalized there, and the results are not pretty. We definitely jumped the gun by not anticipating all the medical risks here." Fox News Digital reached out to the study authors for comment.
