Arizona's previous 15-week abortion ban declared unconstitutional
The Brief
Arizona's 15-week abortion ban, which isn't in effect anymore, was deemed unconstitutional on March 5 by a Maricopa County Superior Court judge.
Arizona's abortion laws are based on the voter-approved Prop 139, passed in November 2024.
Prop 139 allows abortions up until "fetal viability," which is 22 to 24 weeks.
PHOENIX - Arizona's previous 15-week abortion ban has been officially declared "unconstitutional."
What we know
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge issued the ruling Wednesday morning.
But, this doesn't change much.
Abortion remains legal in Arizona up to fetal viability, which was approved by voters.
The legality of abortions in Arizona has been in flux since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
Dig deeper
March 5's ruling doesn't change the law on the books for Arizona, which is Prop 139, approved by Arizona voters last November.
That measure enshrines abortion rights in our state's constitution, and allows for abortions up until the point of "fetal viability," which is 22 to 24 weeks.
Wednesday's ruling, however, permanently blocks Arizona's former abortion ban that prohibited abortions after 15 weeks. That law also threatened doctors who violated it with up to two years in prison.
Two local OB-GYNs and the Arizona chapter of Planned Parenthood took the state to court over the 15-week ban late last year, asking for it to be thrown out.
What's next
Reproductive freedom advocates organized at the capitol on Wednesday, calling the ruling a win, but say their fight isn't over.
The ruling also prevents lawmakers from taking action against abortion rights in the legislature.
At least four GOP-backed bills were introduced this current session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israel launches 'preemptive' strikes on Iran
Israel carried out "preemptive" strikes against Iran on Friday, targeting its nuclear plant and military sites, after US President Donald Trump warned of a possible "massive conflict" in the region. Explosions were heard Friday morning in the Iranian capital, state TV reported, adding that Iran's air defence were at "100 percent operational capacity". Israel declared a state of emergency, with Defence Minister Israel Katz saying that retaliatory action from Tehran was possible following the operation. "Following the State of Israel's preemptive strike against Iran, a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future," Katz said. Oil prices surged as much as 6 percent on the strikes, which came after Trump warned of a possible Iranian attack and said the US was drawing down staff in the region. "I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen," Trump told reporters at the White House Thursday when asked if an Israeli attack loomed. Trump said he believed a "pretty good" deal on Iran's nuclear programme was "fairly close", but said that an Israeli attack on its arch foe could wreck the chances of an agreement. The US leader did not disclose the details of a conversation on Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but said: "I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it." Trump quickly added: "Might help it actually, but it also could blow it." A US official said there had been no US involvement in the Israeli strikes on Iran. -- 'Extremist' -- The United States on Wednesday said it was reducing embassy staff in Iraq -- long a zone of proxy conflict with Iran. Israel, which counts on US military and diplomatic support, sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat and hit Iranian air defences last year. Netanyahu has vowed less restraint since the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Tehran-backed Hamas, which triggered the massive Israeli offensive in Gaza. The United States and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has repeatedly denied. Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations. The resolution could lay the groundwork for European countries to invoke a "snapback" mechanism, which expires in October, that would reinstate UN sanctions eased under a 2015 nuclear deal negotiated by then US president Barack Obama. Trump pulled out of the deal in his first term and slapped Iran with sweeping sanctions. Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, slammed the resolution as "extremist" and blamed Israeli influence. In response to the resolution, Iran said it would launch a new enrichment centre in a secure location. Iran would also replace "all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines" at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant, said Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close, though still short, of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. bur-hmn/tym
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor
Elmo has a friend, indeed. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., brought along a stuffed friend to help make a point on the House floor Thursday. Jeffries held up a stuffed Elmo doll while accusing Republicans of targeting beloved children's shows like "Sesame Street" in their push to slash federal spending."Today, we are on the floor of the House of Representatives debating legislation that targets Elmo. And Big Bird. And Daniel Tiger and 'Sesame Street,'" Jeffries said, waving the puppet as he railed against the GOP-led rescissions Sends $9.4 Billion Doge Cuts Proposal To Congress, Targeting Npr, Pbs The moment, widely circulated online, came during debate over the Republican-backed Proposed Rescissions of Budgetary Resources from President Trump, which would eliminate over $9 billion in unspent or low-priority federal funds. Among the targeted programs: $3 million in taxpayer support for an international version of Sesame Street in Iraq. Democrats objected to what they characterized as cultural and humanitarian vandalism disguised as fiscal responsibility. Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, D-Calif., delivered one of the sharpest lines of the day: "While you all have killed off Elmo, I urge my colleagues to vote no on this trash and I yield back," Garcia said. Read On The Fox News App Republicans dismissed the theatrics and defended the package as a commonsense rollback of bloated, ideological spending. The bill also includes broader cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports PBS and NPR, long-time targets of fiscal conservatives who argue the taxpayer shouldn't subsidize public Lisa McClain, R-Mich., rebutted, "I never realized Elmo was more important to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle than the American people." House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., pushed back forcefully: "The Minority Leader held up a Sesame Street character here on the floor as if Sesame Street's somehow going to go away," Scalise said. Sesame Street's Pride Month Post Sparks Backlash From Republican Lawmakers Amid Pbs Funding Threats "I was watching a commercial on TV yesterday where the Cookie Monster was actually doing an advertisement for Netflix because a private company is paying money to run Sesame Street. It's not going away. It's doing just fine. Very lucrative." Scalise argued the bill doesn't threaten Sesame Street's survival, only its taxpayer subsidy, and called out what he described as "far-left, radical views" being promoted through outlets like NPR and PBS."There is still going to be a plethora of options for the American people," he said. "But if they are paying their hard-earned dollars to get content, why should your tax dollars go to only one thing that the other side wants to promote?" He concluded bluntly: "They can still watch Sesame Street in Iraq. But let the Iraqi people pay for it — not the taxpayers of the United States of America's children." Even more eyebrow‑raising was the inclusion of taxpayer‑funded global health spending for procedures like the line items flagged by GOP lawmakers: $3 million to subsidize circumcisions, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia, alongside similar grants for transgender surgeries in Nepal. Republicans contended that pulling back these types of low-impact or ideological slush funds was a logical first step toward returning more than $9 billion to the U.S. Treasury. The bill passed the House Appropriations Committee earlier this week and Senate Democrats have signaled strong opposition. The bill passed the House in a 214–212 vote. Four Republicans, Reps. Mark Amodei, R-Nev.; Mike Turner, R-Ohio; Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.; and Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., broke ranks to vote against the bill. All Democrats voted article source: 'Killed off Elmo': Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nevada GOP governor vetoes voter ID bill that he pushed for in a deal with Democrats
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Nevada Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo unexpectedly vetoed a bill on Thursday that would have required voters in the swing state to show a photo ID at the polls — a conservative priority across the country and something that has long been on the governor's legislative wish list. The move brings a dramatic end to one of the legislative session's most surprising outcomes: A bipartisan deal that combined the requirement for voter identification with a Democratic-backed measure to add more drop boxes for mail ballots that Lombardo had initially vetoed. The bill came together in the final days of the session and passed mere minutes before the Democratic-controlled Legislature adjourned on June 3. Lombardo had been expected to sign it. The voter ID requirements in the bill mirrored a ballot initiative that Nevada voters overwhelmingly approved last November. But voters would have to pass it again in 2026 to amend the state constitution. The requirement would then be in place by 2028. Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, the Democrat who brokered the deal with Lombardo, said when he introduced the legislation that voters seemed poised to give the final approval, and that enacting a voter ID law would have given the state a head start on ensuring a smooth rollout before the next presidential election. The Associated Press sent phone messages Thursday seeking comment from both Lombardo's spokespeople and Yeager. Voting rights groups condemned the legislation, saying it would have made it harder for some people to vote, including low-income or unhoused voters, people with disabilities and older voters. Barbara Wells, president of the League of Women Voters of Nevada, said the voter ID portion of the bill would "not allow their voices to be heard.' 'In Nevada, security throughout the voting process is so watertight that any deception is extremely rare, yet those who pushed for this bill would have the residents of our state believe otherwise,' Wells said, adding that while it 'was touted as a preventative or cure for voter fraud, it will create significant difficulties for many hard-working Nevadans.' Lombardo on Thursday also vetoed a bill that would have allowed the swing state's nonpartisan voters to cast ballots in Republican or Democratic primary races.
