Florida plans 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center
* Florida plans 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center
Florida begins construction of 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention facility
*
Facility to house up to 5,000 migrants, costing $450 million annually
*
DHS to use FEMA funds to cover detention center costs
By Ted Hesson
June 24 - Florida began on Tuesday construction of a temporary migrant detention facility dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" due to its remote location in the Everglades, a vast subtropical wetland teeming with alligators, crocodiles and pythons.
Footage aired by a local NBC affiliate showed the start of construction on the site, which will feature large tents to house migrants and trailers for staff. The facility will have minimal security due to the natural barriers provided by the surrounding inhospitable marshy grasslands, a Florida official said last week.
U.S. President Donald Trump, a Republican, has sought to ramp up the detention and deportation of migrants, saying it was needed after millions crossed the border illegally under Democrat Joe Biden.
The number of people in federal immigration detention has risen sharply from 39,000 when Trump took office to 56,000 as of June 15, according to U.S. government data, and the Trump administration has pushed to find more space.
The Florida facility, estimated to cost $450 million annually, could eventually house up to 5,000 people, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
In a video posted on social media last week, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said the site could hold up to an initial 1,000 people in 30-60 days.
ICE on average pays $165 per day for a detention bed, according to agency budget documents. If the Florida facility eventually has capacity for 5,000 people, the cost would be $247 per day.
DHS said it had set aside funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency's shelter and services program to cover a "large part" of the cost of the detention center.
The shelter funds, normally used in case of major disasters, were used by the Biden administration to reimburse New York City and other cities for housing newly arrived migrants.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
Nato walks on eggshells as Trump heads to Hague summit with allies bracing for fireworks
As Nato leaders meet in The Hague, all eyes are on US President Donald Trump. Will he support the alliance or disrupt it again? Leaders are hoping that a short, carefully planned summit, designed to please Trump, will help keep the talks on track. read more Nato members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its war against Ukraine in February 2022. Reuters As Nato leaders gather in The Hague, one big question looms: Will US President Donald Trump cooperate — or will he once again cause disruption, as he has done on several occasions? Nato leaders are hoping that a carefully choreographed summit, short in duration and filled with praise for Trump, will keep discussions on track when they begin on Wednesday. Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte sent a glowing message to Donald Trump on Tuesday, saying: 'You are flying into another big success.' The message was one of several that Trump eagerly shared online while crossing the Atlantic aboard Air Force One. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the message, Rutte even compared Nato's new defence spending plan to the recent US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites. 'Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do,' he wrote. The flattering tone highlighted just how eager Rutte and other Western leaders are to ensure the NATO summit runs smoothly. With Trump's commitment to the alliance often uncertain, they are doing everything they can to keep him focused and cooperative. Efforts to avoid a Trump outburst Every precaution has been taken to avoid a Trump outburst, including giving him credit for securing a major new defence spending agreement. However, even before landing in Europe, Trump raised tensions by refusing to clearly reaffirm his commitment to Nato's Article 5, the principle that an attack on one member is an attack on all. 'Depends on your definition,' he said, unsettling allies shortly before a dinner with them on Tuesday evening. NATO countries are expected to approve a plan to spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence, plus an additional 1.5 per cent on broader security-related areas like cybersecurity. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the move as 'historic.' Trump targets Spain, flirts with Russia The increased defence spending is intended to keep Trump engaged with the alliance. He has long complained that European countries spend too little on their own defence, especially following Russia's war on Ukraine. Spain was the final country to back the new target, calling the 5 per cent goal 'unreasonable', a stance that angered Trump. He accused Spain of risking the success of the summit and pointed out that the US spends nearly $1 trillion on defence. Spain is only now reaching NATO's existing 2 per cent target after a €10 billion funding increase. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We'll be discussing it soon,' Trump warned. Concerns over unity on Russia and Ukraine Rutte emphasised that the increased defence spending is vital to deter Russia, but Trump's unpredictable stance on Ukraine continues to cause concern. He has softened his position on Russia and previously clashed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky left out of main summit session Ahead of the summit, Zelensky told Dutch MPs, 'Russia must see that Ukraine won't be left alone.' Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet privately, with officials hoping to avoid a repeat of their previous tense Oval Office meeting. Zelensky has not been invited to the main summit session, which has been shortened to just two and a half hours, reportedly to suit Trump's dislike of lengthy meetings. Support for Ukraine, but no talk of membership Rutte said NATO's support for Ukraine remains firm, but the alliance will avoid any mention of Ukraine's push for membership, after Trump ruled it out. With inputs from AFP
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Both Israel and Iran deny violating truce
After US President Donald Trump harshly criticised Israel and Iran on Tuesday for mounting attacks after his announcement that a ceasefire deal had been reached, both countries denied having violated the truce and pushed back with their own timelines of events. The absence of details surrounding the truce deal added to the confusion about the sequence of the strikes and counter-strikes that took place in the hours after the initial announcement. Trump did not publicly specify a start time when he announced the truce, for example. There are also time differences involved. Iranian time is half an hour ahead of Israeli time, which is seven hours ahead of Eastern Daylight Time. Yet despite the discordant Iranian and Israeli claims about timelines, the mutual denials of violations strongly suggested that each side wanted the ceasefire to hold. PM Netanyahu of Israel said Tuesday afternoon that the ceasefire had been set to take effect at 7am Israel time. Four hours earlier, at 3am, Israel attacked targets "in the heart of Tehran," his office said in a statement, adding that shortly before the truce came into effect Iran fired a barrage of missiles at Israel. One hit an apartment building in the southern Israeli city of Beersheba, killing four people. At 7.06am in Israel, Iran fired another missile, and then two more at 10.25am, according to Israel. Netanyahu's office said those missiles were intercepted or fell in open areas. In response, Netanyahu's office said, Israeli forces destroyed a radar position near Tehran. By then, Trump had publicly demanded that Israel not respond, describing the last volley of missiles fired by Iran at northern Israel as "one rocket that didn't land, that was shot perhaps by mistake." Despite earlier threats from the Israeli defence minister and military that Israel would respond forcefully to the missile fire, the actual Israeli response appeared to be limited and symbolic. "Following a conversation between President Trump and PM Netanyahu, Israel refrained from further attacks," Netanyahu's office said. Around the same time, Trump wrote on social media that Israel's warplanes would "turn around and head home." Iran, for its part, said its missile fire came as retaliation for Israel's pre-dawn bombardment, and only before the cease-fire was meant to start. The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps said that in retaliation for "savage" Israeli attacks on Iran overnight, Iran had launched 14 missiles at military and logistical centres in Israel in the "final minutes" before the cease-fire came into effect, according to a statement published on the Telegram channel of Press TV, an Iranian state news channel. The statement made no mention of the firing any missiles after the cease-fire came into force, as Trump and Israel charged. In addition, an Iranian military spokesman, Lt. Col. Ebrahim Zolfaqari, said Israel had launched "three waves of attacks" against Iran on Tuesday morning, after the ceasefire was supposed to take effect, with the last ending at 9 am Iranian time, according to a Press TV report citing a report from Defa Press, another Iranian news agency. Fars, a news agency managed by the Revolutionary Guards, reported that explosions were heard in Babol and Babolsar, Iranian cities to the northeast of Tehran, without providing a time or any other details. Trump first announced that Israel and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire deal on Monday evening - around 1.30am Tuesday in Tehran - and Iran's state television later announced a ceasefire early on Tuesday morning local time. The Israeli govt remained silent until it made its own announcement of a ceasefire at about 9am. Israel time, saying Israel had agreed to the truce. nyt
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Fake news': Trump rejects intelligence report suggesting US strikes didn't destroy Iran nuclear sites
US President Donald Trump, on Tuesday (June 24), pushed back against a CNN report which, citing an early US intelligence assessment, suggested that the US military strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure failed to destroy the core components of Tehran's nuclear programme. Trump rebuffed the report, calling it 'fake news', claiming the airstrikes were 'ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MILITARY STRIKES IN HISTORY.' He reiterated that 'THE NUCLEAR SITES IN IRAN ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED!' While on his way to the NATO summit in the Netherlands, he told reporters aboard Air Force One that the press was very 'disrespectful' of the US strikes. 'And our B2 pilots made this all possible. They had a magnificent hit in the dark of night with no moon, no light, no nothing. They hit the target perfectly, wiped it out, and the press is very disrespectful. I saw CNN fake news going: Well, maybe it wasn't a perfect hit. It was perfect. They said maybe it did destroy it, we agree, it did destroy it, but maybe it could have destroyed it more. No, No. Everyone hit, and it's very disrespectful to those great geniuses and patriots that flew those planes through tremendous dangers,' Trump said. The CNN report The CNN report claimed that US military strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, likely set back the country's nuclear programme by only a few months, citing an early US intelligence assessment. Quoting two people familiar with the developments, the report suggested that the stockpile of Iran's enriched uranium was not destroyed in the US strikes and Tehran's centrifuges, targeted by Israel and the United States, remain largely 'intact'. The DIA reports stated that the enriched uranium, which could be put to use for manufacturing nuclear weapons, may have been moved to other secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran. 'So the (DIA) assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops,' CNN quoted one of the people as saying. White House Press Secretary disputes report White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt swiftly disputed the report, labelling it 'flat-out wrong'. In a post on X, Leavitt said, 'This alleged 'assessment' is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community.' 🚨FAKE NEWS CNN STRIKES AGAIN: This alleged 'assessment' is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean… — Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) June 24, 2025 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' she added. The report casts doubt on Trump's claims, who has repeatedly asserted that the recent US military strikes had 'completely and totally obliterated' Tehran's nuclear infrastructure.
