&w=3840&q=100)
Nato walks on eggshells as Trump heads to Hague summit with allies bracing for fireworks
As Nato leaders meet in The Hague, all eyes are on US President Donald Trump. Will he support the alliance or disrupt it again? Leaders are hoping that a short, carefully planned summit, designed to please Trump, will help keep the talks on track. read more
Nato members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its war against Ukraine in February 2022. Reuters
As Nato leaders gather in The Hague, one big question looms: Will US President Donald Trump cooperate — or will he once again cause disruption, as he has done on several occasions?
Nato leaders are hoping that a carefully choreographed summit, short in duration and filled with praise for Trump, will keep discussions on track when they begin on Wednesday.
Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte sent a glowing message to Donald Trump on Tuesday, saying: 'You are flying into another big success.' The message was one of several that Trump eagerly shared online while crossing the Atlantic aboard Air Force One.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In the message, Rutte even compared Nato's new defence spending plan to the recent US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites. 'Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do,' he wrote.
The flattering tone highlighted just how eager Rutte and other Western leaders are to ensure the NATO summit runs smoothly. With Trump's commitment to the alliance often uncertain, they are doing everything they can to keep him focused and cooperative.
Efforts to avoid a Trump outburst
Every precaution has been taken to avoid a Trump outburst, including giving him credit for securing a major new defence spending agreement. However, even before landing in Europe, Trump raised tensions by refusing to clearly reaffirm his commitment to Nato's Article 5, the principle that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
'Depends on your definition,' he said, unsettling allies shortly before a dinner with them on Tuesday evening.
NATO countries are expected to approve a plan to spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence, plus an additional 1.5 per cent on broader security-related areas like cybersecurity. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described the move as 'historic.'
Trump targets Spain, flirts with Russia
The increased defence spending is intended to keep Trump engaged with the alliance. He has long complained that European countries spend too little on their own defence, especially following Russia's war on Ukraine.
Spain was the final country to back the new target, calling the 5 per cent goal 'unreasonable', a stance that angered Trump.
He accused Spain of risking the success of the summit and pointed out that the US spends nearly $1 trillion on defence. Spain is only now reaching NATO's existing 2 per cent target after a €10 billion funding increase.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'We'll be discussing it soon,' Trump warned.
Concerns over unity on Russia and Ukraine
Rutte emphasised that the increased defence spending is vital to deter Russia, but Trump's unpredictable stance on Ukraine continues to cause concern. He has softened his position on Russia and previously clashed with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Zelensky left out of main summit session
Ahead of the summit, Zelensky told Dutch MPs, 'Russia must see that Ukraine won't be left alone.'
Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet privately, with officials hoping to avoid a repeat of their previous tense Oval Office meeting. Zelensky has not been invited to the main summit session, which has been shortened to just two and a half hours, reportedly to suit Trump's dislike of lengthy meetings.
Support for Ukraine, but no talk of membership
Rutte said NATO's support for Ukraine remains firm, but the alliance will avoid any mention of Ukraine's push for membership, after Trump ruled it out.
With inputs from AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination in jeopardy after explosive fallout with Ukraine and Pakistan—what happens now?
Donald Trump has been formally nominated for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, credited for helping negotiate a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The nomination was submitted by U.S. Republican Congressman Buddy Carter, who described Trump's efforts as 'extraordinary and historic.' In his letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Carter highlighted Trump's role in halting a rapidly escalating conflict, saying the agreement 'offered the world a rare glimpse of hope.' Carter added that Trump's involvement required 'both courage and clarity,' and that the resulting ceasefire helped prevent what could have been a wider regional war in the Middle East. Ukrainian lawmaker withdraws support over Ukraine stance However, Trump's nomination has not been without controversy. Oleksandr Merezhko, a senior Ukrainian lawmaker who had earlier nominated Trump for the same prize, withdrew his support. Merezhko, who chairs Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee, told Newsweek he no longer believed Trump could deliver on his promise to end the Russia-Ukraine war. 'I have lost any sort of faith and belief in Trump and his ability to secure a ceasefire between Moscow and Kyiv,' he said. Merezhko also criticized Trump's reluctance to impose sanctions on Russia and described his response to recent missile attacks on Kyiv as 'appeasement.' In March, Ukraine accepted a U.S.-backed peace proposal, but Russia has not responded. Trump previously claimed he would end the conflict within 24 hours if re-elected. In May, he said, 'If Putin is stalling, we'll respond a little bit differently,' but did not follow up with action. Pakistan praises Trump, then Condemns US strikes Pakistan had initially expressed strong support for Trump's nomination. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar credited him for reducing tensions between India and Pakistan and submitted a formal nomination. However, this endorsement was short-lived. A day after Trump's ceasefire announcement, he approved a U.S. strike on three Iranian nuclear sites. Pakistan's Foreign Ministry quickly responded with criticism, calling the military action 'deeply disturbing.' Ceasefire named '12-day war'; Trump voices disappointment The ceasefire between Israel and Iran, which Trump announced on a Monday, came just two days after the military action. He proposed naming the conflict the '12-Day War' and called the resolution a pivotal step toward avoiding broader violence in the region. Despite this, Trump expressed frustration over his past diplomatic efforts going unrecognized. On Truth Social, he said, 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' referencing previous attempts like the Abraham Accords and mediation efforts involving India-Pakistan and Serbia-Kosovo. Speaking to reporters, he added, 'I should have gotten it four or five times… They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.' So far, only three U.S. presidents—Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Barack Obama—have received the Nobel nomination is official, but wavering international support and political criticism may complicate the path ahead.
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
Nearly 50 Vietnamese evacuated from Israel
Hanoi: Nearly 50 Vietnamese citizens have been evacuated from the conflict zone in Israel to Egypt, the state media reported on Wednesday. Several evacuees have already returned to Vietnam, while others are completing necessary procedures to repatriate as soon as possible, the Vietnamese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said. The evacuation was carried out through coordinated efforts by the Vietnamese embassies in Israel and Egypt, Vietnam News Agency reported. The Vietnamese Embassy in Israel continues to advise citizens remaining in the conflict area to stay calm, maintain regular contact with the embassy, and strictly follow guidance and warnings issued by local authorities, MOFA and the embassy, Xinhua news agency reported. Meanwhile, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres welcomed US President Donald Trump's announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Guterres urges Israel and Iran to fully respect the ceasefire and to stop fighting, noting that the people of the two countries have already suffered too much, said Stephane Dujarric, Guterres' spokesman. "The secretary-general hopes that this ceasefire can be replicated in the other conflicts in the region," said the spokesman on Tuesday. Earlier on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump declared that a ceasefire between Iran and Israel has officially taken effect, urging both sides to maintain restraint. "THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!" Trump posted on social media platform Truth Social. The announcement came amid escalating violence in the Middle East, but President Trump's declaration appeared to catch both parties off guard. The ceasefire claim was quickly contradicted by Iran, which asserted it had not received any formal proposal from Washington and had not agreed to a bilateral ceasefire. Earlier in the day, President Trump wrote, "Israel & Iran came to me, almost simultaneously, and said, 'Peace'! I knew the time was NOW. The World, and the Middle East, are the real winners!" "Both Nations will see tremendous love, peace and prosperity in their futures. They have so much to gain, and yet, so much to lose if they stray from the road of righteousness and truth. The future for Israel & Iran is unlimited, & filled with great promise. God bless you both!" he added. Earlier, Iran announced a unilateral halt to its military operations against Israel, effective 4 a.m. local time, but made it clear that the pause was conditional, based entirely on whether Israel would stop its own airstrikes and military actions.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Japan is stepping back from NATO, not Indo-Pacific ties—China is watching the cracks closely
But this year's NATO summit told a different story. Only New Zealand's Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, is participating. Japan and other key Indo-Pacific countries are conspicuously absent. The gap between Western strategic ambitions and regional realities is on full display. Japan also cancelled its 2+2 security talks with the US, a telling signal of unease about Washington's relentless push for Tokyo to ramp up defence spending. A commentary published on Baidu Baijiahao pointed to NATO's evolution from a regional defence bloc into what is now seen as an overstretched force projecting power far beyond the North Atlantic. Japan's increasing proximity to NATO and its willingness to speak on China's internal affairs are cast as foreign interference with potentially destabilising consequences. On the Chinese microblogging site, Weibo , a post framed Japan's engagement with NATO as part of an inflated China threat narrative. China has long criticised the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, for drawing Indo-Pacific countries—Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand—into its orbit. From Beijing's perspective, this marks a troubling effort to export Western military influence to Asia and to contain China's rise. Among Chinese observers, the prospect of Japan aligning more closely with NATO has sparked particular concern. Japan rethinking Western ties Pan Wanli, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, described Japan as a 'springboard' for foreign powers seeking to enter the Asia-Pacific. He warned that it's a strategy that could escalate geopolitical rivalry and threaten regional stability. Another commentator branded Japan as the cornerstone of American hegemony in East Asia. But there is a shift in the tone of Chinese discourse: Japan may be slowly distancing itself from its traditional role as the West's most reliable partner in Asia. What once seemed like temporary hesitation now appears to some Chinese analysts as a deeper strategic rethink. With President Donald Trump consumed by multiple global crises and his desire to be a peacemaker, the Indo-Pacific seems to have slipped from Washington's immediate focus, and Tokyo is paying attention. Chinese reporter Zhao Shifeng noted Japan's abrupt backpedalling on the 2+2 talks—once seen as a diplomatic priority—as a sign of growing discomfort with the direction of the US-Japan alliance. From Beijing's vantage point, Japan's reluctance to deepen ties with NATO and increased military exchanges speaks volumes. For Chinese observers, Japan's approach signals a delicate balancing act: staying engaged, while laying low key, resisting entanglement in a new great-power rivalry, and avoiding being on the US' side in the Iran-Israel conflict. This is not merely caution. Chinese analysts frame it as a broader strategic awakening: a resistance to Cold War-style blocs imposed by external powers. Xiang Haoyu, a researcher in the Department for Asia-Pacific Studies, China Institute of International Studies, described Japan as NATO's vanguard in the Asia-Pacific. But he argues the alliance is fraying under the weight of American pressure, ranging from defence spending demands to trade barriers. Already burdened by debt and demographic challenges, Xiang says, Japan has resisted calls to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. It remains constrained by its pacifist constitution and dependency on the US. As Xiang sees it, 'America First' is pushing allies too far, demanding more while offering less. Another strand in Chinese commentary argues that the alliance has become a numbers game. By tying coordination to military budgets, the US has turned a cooperative relationship into a zero-sum contest, one that Japan is increasingly unwilling to play at the cost of economic stability and public welfare. Also read: NATO chief expresses concern over China's rapid military buildup in Taiwan Investing in regional ties Despite the US drift, Japan is not stepping back from the region. It is stepping up, and on its own terms. Chinese commentators have noted Tokyo's subtle but deliberate efforts to reconfigure its Indo-Pacific role, embracing a more independent and self-defined strategy. Young Chinese scholars—Li Jiaxing, Zhao Jingyuan, Yang Xiaojie, and Wu Xiang—have identified Japan's Indo-Pacific strategy as one rooted in maritime strength. They argue, Japan is consciously positioning itself apart from land-based continental powers, investing in naval capabilities and regional defence integration. Its goal is clear: to unite like-minded maritime states to balance China's growing clout. There is growing realisation in China that Japan, while cautious with the US, is deepening ties with regional partners like India, Australia, and the Philippines. Its defence diplomacy is expanding beyond formal alliances, Japan is holding joint exercises with the Philippines and participating in the Malabar naval drills alongside India. A Weibo post warned that Japan and the Philippines are tightening their coordination and preparing for joint military action against China. Whether or not that is hyperbole, the perception is that Japan's defence outreach is accelerating. In a move that caught the attention of Chinese media, Japan plans to deliver defence equipment to eight countries, namely Thailand, Tonga, East Timor, Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, and Sri Lanka. This initiative spans Southeast Asia and the South Pacific, covering what one post colourfully described as 'half the geography textbook.' From Beijing's perspective, the Japan-US alliance remains a concern. While Trump's diminished focus on the Indo-Pacific may offer temporary relief, it does not fundamentally change the regional equation or threat perception. Even in America's partial absence, Japan is holding the fort, taking the lead in collective defence and playing an increasingly active role in maintaining the region's fragile security balance. Sana Hashmi is fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
