
Gastrointestinal Cancers Are Rising Among US Adults Under 50
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A new review published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reports that early-onset gastrointestinal cancers—including colon, pancreatic, and stomach cancers—are rising significantly among adults under 50 in the United States.
Newsweek has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the review's authors for comment via email on Saturday.
Why It Matters
Cancer was one of the leading causes of death in the U.S. in 2023, with 613,349 deaths, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The review's findings come amid the Trump administration's proposed deep cuts for scientific programming, including $18 billion in funding to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The funding cuts are expected to have wide-reaching effects on NIH programs, including disease research and the development of new drugs. The NIH, through the National Cancer Institute, provides a significant share of funding for cancer research throughout the U.S.
Health policy has been a point of contention during the Trump administration's second term, with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promoting a "Make America Healthy Again" platform. The administration has faced criticism from scientists and physicians over vaccine misinformation and skepticism toward established immunization practices, particularly amid a resurgence of measles in the country.
What To Know
A review authored by two doctors at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute published in the peer-reviewed JAMA highlighted that "early-onset GI cancers, typically defined as cancer diagnosed in individuals younger than 50 years, are among the largest subset of early-onset cancers globally." It found that GI- cancers are the fastest-growing type of cancer to be diagnosed in adults under 50 in the U.S.
The review noted that in the U.S. over 24,000 people were reported with early-onset GI cancers in 2022, with the vast majority, 20,800 diagnosed with colon cancer. Over the past decade, from 2010 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate of early-onset GI cancers in the U.S. increased 2.16 percent.
Adults age 45 and older are advised to begin regular screening for colon cancer, which can help detect the disease early and reduce the risk of death.
The review notes that there are "modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors" associated with the development of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers, stating that "obesity, low-quality diet (e.g., high consumption of processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages, and ultraprocessed foods), sedentary lifestyle, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption" all may increase risk. Nonmodifiable factors include family history, heredity, and bowel disease.
The report relied on data from various medical articles, reviews, studies, and trials, as well as statistics from various cancer institutes over the past decade.
Treatment of early-onset GI cancers often include some combination of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation depending on the size, stage, location, and type of cancer.
Demonstrators protest funding cuts outside of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, on March 8.
Demonstrators protest funding cuts outside of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, on March 8.
Photo by MICHAEL MATHES/AFP via Getty Images
What People Are Saying
Dr. Kimmie Ng, the review's co-author and director of the Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, told NBC News: "This really points to the importance of trying to improve screening and early detection."
Dr. John Marshall, chief medical consultant at the nonprofit Colorectal Cancer Alliance, told NBC News: "It never used to happen in this age group, and now a very significant rise in 20-, 30- and 40-year-olds are getting colon cancer."
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday: "Fewer than 1 in 5 U.S. adults screened for colorectal cancer, despite guidelines. This review in @JAMA_current by @DanaFarber charts a global rise of many GI cancers, noting colorectal cancer leads the alarming trend."
What Happens Next?
The proposed 2026 fiscal budget, which includes massive cuts to NIH, is before Congress. If approved, it would go into effect in October.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"Never Has America Been More Vulnerable" — People Are Horrified After RFK Jr. Announced He's Cutting $500 Million In Funding For mRNA Vaccines
I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. In a now-viral X video, RFK Jr. tried to explain the funding cuts saying, "HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." Twitter: @SecKennedy According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." Related: In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." Related: While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." Related: And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." Related: "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s shock decision to cancel nearly half a billion dollars' worth of research projects because they're based on mRNA technology horrified vaccine experts Tuesday, among them President Donald Trump's own former surgeon general. Jerome Adams, who served as the nation's 20th surgeon general during Trump's first term, warned on social media that the decision will have very real negative consequences. 'I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives,' he wrote. 'mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions.' Adams ended the missive with the 'head exploding' emoji. I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives. mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions. 🤯 — Jerome Adams (@JeromeAdamsMD) August 6, 2025 In another thread, Adams blamed politicized messaging around vaccination during the coronavirus pandemic for leading to a widespread public misunderstanding of what vaccines actually accomplish. People believed that 'if you get this vaccine you won't get COVID,' said Adams, when the real aim was to prevent severe cases of the disease. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, technology has potential far beyond COVID. At Emory University, for instance, researchers are looking into using mRNA technology to train the immune system to cure cancer and chronic infections, thanks to a $24.8 million federal grant. The three-year program was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, or ARPA-H, which Kennedy merged with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, in March — only to announce Tuesday he'd be pulling the funding for BARDA's mRNA investments. The inaugural director of ARPA-H, Dr. Renee Wegrzyn, was fired by the Trump administration in February amid mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tiba Biotech, another research company that saw its HHS contracts terminated Tuesday, is investigating using mRNA to combat tick-borne diseases. Thanks to climate change, more ticks are surviving through warmer winters, leading to a sharp increase in tick-borne illnesses. Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, told The Associated Press the decision on mRNA research is a historically bad one. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' he said. Related... RFK Jr. Cancels $500 Million In Funding For Vaccine Development 800,000 Vaccine Doses The U.S. Pledged To Send To Africa Are About To Expire Instead RFK Jr.'s Stunning Claim About Black People And Vaccines Sparks Concern From Medical Experts RFK Jr. Keeps Telling A Flat-Out Lie About Childhood Vaccines — And Doctors Are Sick Of It


Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
Florida bans soda and candy for SNAP users in 2026
Florida is among a few states that have narrowed their list of food eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs (SNAP) this week to exclude sugary snacks and drinks. Why it matters: Starting next year, more than a million families in the state will no longer be able to use their benefits to buy a box of Little Debbie's, a liter of Coca-Cola or a Hershey bar at the checkout. The big picture: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined his "Make America Healthy Again" campaign in April, encouraging states to restrict SNAP purchases to ensure taxpayer dollars go toward "wholesome foods." One study found little difference between purchases made by households with SNAP and those without benefits, with 20 cents of every dollar spent on sweetened beverages, desserts, candy and sugar. How it works: SNAP, often called food stamps, helps low-income families, seniors and people with disabilities buy groceries. Five other states — Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia — were approved to restrict eligible food on Monday. Before these changes, SNAP recipients were already prohibited from using their benefits to purchase alcohol, tobacco, hot and prepared foods and personal care items, according to a press release. Zoom in: Florida amended its statutory definition of food to exclude: Candy, which the state defined as sugar or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruits, nuts, caramels and gummies. Prepared desserts, which the state defined as processed, pre-packaged sweet foods intended for immediate consumption. Soda, which the state defined as a beverage that is made with carbonated water and flavored with sugar or artificial sweeteners. Energy drinks, which the state defined as a beverage with at least 65 milligrams of caffeine per 8 fluid ounces that are marketed as increasing the consumer's mental and physical energy. Yes, but: Drinks like sparkling water and coffee are still eligible. What they're saying: "In Florida, we are ensuring SNAP supports nutritious options that help families thrive, not unhealthy products that lead to long-term health problems," Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a statement. "Thank you to President Trump for approving our waiver request." The other side: "Because these products are inexpensive, banning SNAP use on them won't have the desired effect," Christopher Bosso, a political science professor at Northeastern University, wrote in an op-ed for The Hill. "SNAP enrollees simply will use other funds on them," Bosso went on. "After all, SNAP is 'supplemental,' and most enrolled households have cash on hand to spend $3 on that 2-liter bottle of Pepsi if they want one."