logo
Drew Hancock on Why ‘Companion' Is More ‘Marriage Story' Than ‘Minority Report': ‘This Is a Breakup Movie at Its Core'

Drew Hancock on Why ‘Companion' Is More ‘Marriage Story' Than ‘Minority Report': ‘This Is a Breakup Movie at Its Core'

Yahoo31-01-2025

Writer/director Drew Hancock's 'Companion' is the best kind of cinematic thrill ride, a combination rom-com, heist movie, and sci-fi thriller that keeps the audience guessing at every turn — yet reveals itself on second viewing to have been carefully constructed so that every twist seems completely inevitable. According to Hancock, it was a structure arrived at by a combination of careful planning and improvisation.
'It was a heavily outlined first half,' Hancock told IndieWire's Filmmaker Toolkit podcast, 'and then I knew where it was going and had the basic ingredients of what we would end up with. But I've written enough to know that if you outline too much, you end up wasting a lot of time on the ending, because most of the time, you'll find a completely different ending while you're writing it.'
More from IndieWire
Mo Amer Took Season 2 of 'Mo' on a Walkabout from 'Shawshank Redemption' to Bob Ross
Karla Sofía Gascón Offers an Apology That May Not Be Enough
To that end, Hancock meticulously outlined the first hour of the movie and started writing. Once he figured out the characters' voices, and they were 'telling me what story they wanted to be told,' he closed the Final Draft file and outlined the second half after the first half had been fully written. 'That took about a month to crack, and then I opened the Final Draft file again and just started where I left off and finished it. And then the rewriting process was pretty intense.'
One thing that continued to evolve throughout the rewriting process was the film's tone, which is carefully calibrated throughout to walk a fine line between comedy and drama, fantasy and reality, and romance and horror. Many of the genre elements that made it into the final film weren't even there in the original conception. 'The very first draft had no comedy to it,' Hancock said. 'It had no heist element to it. It was a not very good 'Black Mirror' episode.'
That forced Hancock to step back and think about the purpose of writing the script to begin with. 'I was in a place where I wasn't being given the career opportunities that I wanted, and 'Companion' sprung from that,' he said. 'It was just, sit down, write something that represents your voice. The irony of that is the first draft didn't represent my voice because I have a very comedic mindset. A lot of people that come from comedy think it's easy, and, therefore, you think, because it's easy, it's not what I should be doing. Writing needs to be tough.'
Once Hancock realized that his instincts were wrong, he went back and added the comedy and tonal shifts. 'In hindsight, obviously there were all these genres mixed together because it could easily have been my last script,' Hancock said. 'I was in my 40s and living paycheck to paycheck with a comfortably low cost of living because I don't have a family. So when I look back at the script, it does feel like, oh, this might be the only thing I write, so let's throw everything at the wall. Let's make it a heist movie. Let's make it a horror movie. Let's make it a thriller with a relationship drama at the spine of it.'
The ways in which 'Companion' keeps rebooting are what make it such a pleasure for the audience. It gives the viewer the same charge as early John Carpenter or Quentin Tarantino movies in the way that it reinvents and reinvigorates the genres it's riffing on. That grew out of Hancock's desire to go for broke. 'It was me advertising to the world, 'Look, I can do all of these things.' That's something I didn't realize when I was writing it, but I feel now.'
Writing the script was one thing, but what makes 'Companion' truly remarkable is how precisely — again, echoes of early Tarantino and Carpenter — Hancock expresses what's in the script and gives it another layer through his visual language. His orchestration of the production design, cinematography, costumes, and other elements to find a pitch-perfect balance between a relatable real world and a slightly futuristic one in which key aspects are just slightly off-kilter exhibits an impressive degree of control and taste for a first-time director.
Hancock credits his collaborators with contributing a lot of the film's ideas, explaining that part of directing was not keeping too tight a grip on what he had created as a writer. 'I think the best directing comes from a place of finding the guardrails,' he said. ''This is too far in this direction, this is too far in that direction.' Within this boundary you can play and have fun and make discoveries of your own and figure it out.'
Hancock feels that it's especially important to give the actors both freedom and protection, an approach that yields two thrillingly inventive and hilarious performances from leads Jack Quaid and Sophie Thatcher. He said that he let the actors know 'I will protect you and make sure you never color outside the lines. When I'm writing the script, I want to define as much as possible and paint my version of the movie. And then we can change that and mess with it, and I'm always open for any conversations.'
In the end, what unifies 'Companion and gives it its impact is Hancock's emphasis on the more grounded aspects of his genre-jumping script. 'There was a very specific directive,' he said. 'I didn't want this movie to look or feel like a sci-fi movie. Let's think of this as a relationship drama and filter everything through that. You want it to be more like 'Marriage Story' than 'Minority Report.' This is a breakup movie at its core.'
To hear our interview with Drew Hancock, subscribe to the Toolkit podcast on Apple, Spotify, or your favorite podcast platform.
'Companion' opens nationwide on January 31.
Best of IndieWire
The 25 Best Sci-Fi TV Series of the 21st Century, Ranked
The 15 Best Thrillers Streaming on Netflix in January, from 'Fair Play' to 'Emily the Criminal'
The Best Modern Westerns, from 'The Power of the Dog' to 'Killers of the Flower Moon' to 'The Hateful Eight'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colin Farrell and Makeup Designer Mike Marino Toast ‘The Penguin' — and Push Back Against AI
Colin Farrell and Makeup Designer Mike Marino Toast ‘The Penguin' — and Push Back Against AI

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Colin Farrell and Makeup Designer Mike Marino Toast ‘The Penguin' — and Push Back Against AI

It's not every day you get to bring your vigilante artistry to Gotham City. That joyous privilege and the power of practical effects was top of mind for 'The Penguin' star Colin Farrell and makeup designer Mike Marino, accepting the 2025 IndieWire Honors Wavelength award for their striking partnership in HBO's gritty superhero spinoff. 'We were two big kids in a really vast sandbox,' said Farrell at the Los Angeles event on June 5. 'Both of us grew up watching genre films. I grew up watching Danny DeVito. Well, I know I haven't fully grown up. I think we've established that. And we go to go to work every day and play in the sandbox. It was such a joy [and] nightmare Mike Marino's canvas.' More from IndieWire From a Mini 'Girlfriends' Reunion to 'Matlock' Rolling Deep, IndieWire Honors 2025 Was About Support The Return of 'Phineas and Ferb' Promises Aliens, Therapy, and the Best Summer Vacation Ever 'It means a lot to be recognized for something that was done entirely by human hands,' said Marino. 'Just clay, glue, rubber, inspiration, and the intention to create something special. There was no AI involved here. No shortcuts, just time, thought, and trust. Colin Farrell was fully committed.' Academy Award nominee Farrell reflected on his experience growing up 'enthralled' by Burgess Meredith's performance as The Penguin. He also shared the fear he felt taking on the role at first. 'Matt Reeves wrote the film 'The Batman,' and I was lucky enough to get the role of The Penguin in that. Then, Lauren LeFranc wrote this show, but it was only when I saw Mike's design of the visage of Oz Cobb that I couldn't leave it. Before that I was struggling to think of what I could bring to the project. I was going, 'I'm just going to be flat as fuck and it's going to be terrible.'' But looking at Marino's design for the first time, Farrell said, 'I couldn't believe it. I kind of got emotional because as I said, I'm 49 going on 10 sometimes and I just got so man is an extraordinary, extraordinary artist. I am so grateful.' He went to thank the legendary Christopher Tucker, the makeup artist on 'The Elephant Man' who inspired Marino to take up the craft. Farrell continued, 'Things are ever shifting now in a business where everything is going towards tech, and I understand that. I'm not like campaigning for pigeons with notes in their talons. But I also notice that there is a kind of edging away from practical makeup and the magic and the artistry and the tactility and the immediacy and the beauty of practical makeup.' Speaking on existential evolutions within the industry, Marino said, 'It takes many thousands of steps to do something so realistic. When you think you know what someone looks like in your mind and then you want to see it come to life, it's a huge task. We're in time when AI can create basically anything convincingly right now. That does make it a substitute for human creativity. If we want to protect the soul of filmmaking, we have to protect the people who make it.' The IndieWire Honors event took place at NeueHouse in Hollywood on Thursday, June 5. Other honorees for the evening included Ben Stiller, Owen Cooper, Julianne Nicholson, Kathy Bates, and more. Best of IndieWire 2023 Emmy Predictions: Who Will Win at the Primetime Emmy Awards? 2023 Emmy Predictions: Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special 2023 Emmy Predictions: Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Series

Where Does ‘Doctor Who' Go From Here?
Where Does ‘Doctor Who' Go From Here?

Gizmodo

time14 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

Where Does ‘Doctor Who' Go From Here?

The end of the latest season of Doctor Who would be controversial for a good many reasons beyond its shocking cliffhanger ending—from its confounding narrative choices to its complete character re-writing of its latest companion—but perhaps what has made it reach another level of ire is that, for the foreseeable future, this might be it. Right now, the continuation of Doctor Who on TV is in about as unsure a place as it can be for the first time in 20 years. Of course, the show has contemplated disaster across those two decades, but we mostly learned of those moments well after the fact: on the public front, Doctor Who persisted into the institution it has become, in spite of it all. But Doctor Who ends its latest run of episodes without that public acknowledgement of its own inevitability. For all the talk of scripts and eventual, possible continuity, right now there is currently no further Doctor Who confirmed beyond a five-episode spinoff series, War Between the Land and the Sea. The show will not air this holiday season; for the first time since it returned, a third season of this Disney-BBC partnership era has not been commissioned. Doctor Who, on-screen at least, is currently standing on the edge of a proverbial cliff. That does not mean that Doctor Who is necessarily dead. Doctor Who will always live on in some form or another: it did back in 1989 when it was first cancelled, thriving in books, audio dramas, the brief spike of the 1996 TV movie, all before it came roaring back to life again in 2005. It also doesn't mean that there aren't options for the series, either, even in this moment of uncertainty. Let's explore a few of them. Option 1: Doctor Who Continues As-Is Of all the options on the table right now, this seems like the least likely. Not because of the perspective of Doctor Who's shaky reputation coming out if its finale, and its wild stunt-casting Hail Mary to close out Ncuti Gatwa's time on the show (it's currently unclear whether or not Billie Piper is going to be a full-fledged 16th incarnation of the Doctor; much like the show's current status, details about that are still up the air), but because at this point it's pretty much logistically impossible for the series to make a return any time soon unless it enters production immediately. A week out from the finale and with no official statement on the renewal of the BBC's licensing partnership with Disney—with the latter already having made it clear that there was going to be a review of Doctor Who's viewership across the latest season before any decision about the deal—it seems unlikely that we're going to hear anything soon, whether Disney backs out or carries on financially supporting the series. A Christmas special for 2025 is already out of the picture at this point; one was not included in the original agreement. And even if we got news of a deal imminently, the likeliness of a new season of Doctor Who being broadcast before 2027 narrows to the point of impossibility with each passing day. The question is, however, even if Doctor Who was renewed in the immediate future, should it continue as-is? It's become clear—and it's also clearly part of the reason why an official renewal didn't come with the conclusion of the latest season—that Doctor Who has struggled in the past few years to reclaim a wider audience again. Putting aside right-wing culture war accusations of overt 'wokeness' in the series (it has arguably been an era where Doctor Who's long-standing progressive themes have never been so purely surface-level), a mix of a streaming-first approach that has shaken up broadcast times in Doctor Who's home nation and plotlines that are failing to energize either diehard fans or new audiences has led to the series being on a ratings decline. In a period that was meant to be a new onboarding point for curious global audiences—a new Doctor, a new companion, a distancing for recent and further flung continuity threads—the series has instead wrapped itself in increasing insularity, building its dramatic climaxes on arcane connections to Who's past and season arcs that build towards the return of increasingly obscure old villains, while also paradoxically failing to capitalize on those returning characters. Even if Doctor Who was greenlit for more seasons, whether or not its current self is working would remain uncertain. Option 2: Doctor Who Takes a Break So maybe the show takes a break that's longer than the logistically enforced couple of years it would take to continue on as it has been. Whether that's three years rather than two, whether it's three or four or even five, it would give the show the chance to have a creative reset behind the scenes and return with a renewed plan for its future and a renewed energy with a completely new Doctor and companion. That doesn't necessarily mean that much changes behind the scenes, but it could depending on the length of the break. We have, at least, the upcoming War Between the Land and the Sea to act as something already made that could be broadcast in the place of a traditional season. But given the current uncertainty as to what Billie Piper's role in this transitional period could be—whether she's the Doctor at all, whether she's a regeneration similar to David Tennant's 14th and won't stick around long, or whether she is indeed a fully-fledged incarnation that will stay as the face of the series for multiple seasons—perhaps we could even see something akin to what happened with Doctor Who in 2009. Then, as the series prepared to transition between the exit of both its main star in David Tennant and its creative leadership in showrunner Russell T Davies, Who went on a quasi-break for the year, instead broadcasting four one-off special episodes throughout 2009, while a new creative team under Steven Moffat began working on getting the next era of the show ready for broadcast in 2010. Maybe after War Between the Land and the Sea we'll see a similar 'specials' era for Piper, before a return to regular seasons with a new incarnation of the Doctor. Regardless, it would give time for Doctor Who's creative team to take a look at the last couple of years of the show, see what's working and what isn't, and lay out a new plan for what the series could eventually look like upon its return. Option 3: Doctor Who Dies (But Not Really) Or maybe, this is it. In not having a deal renewed at all, whether with Disney's help or without it, Doctor Who is effectively cancelled as it was back in 1989. On screen Who goes out with Piper's smiling face cutting to credits, a more open-ended but similar conclusion akin to the Seventh Doctor and Ace walking off into adventures unseen at the end of 'Survival.' Of course, this means that we know that even if Doctor Who on TV is dead, it really isn't dead at all. Just as was the case nearly 40 years ago, the show's first wandering into 'The Wilderness Years,' as they came to be known in Doctor Who fandom, didn't really mean that Who ceased to exist. Virgin's New Adventures novels carried on the stories of the Doctor and Ace, and yet further beyond, providing a treasure trove of stories pushing the world of Doctor Who beyond the imaginings of its televised self. The Big Finish audio drama series began in 1999 and continues to this day, simultaneously giving Paul McGann's Eighth Doctor from the TV movie a whole life of adventures while also revisiting Doctors past, enriching their own histories with more stories and spinoffs. In fits and starts, we did still get glimpses of new Doctor Who media, from the cheesy reunions of Dimensions in Time, to the aforementioned attempted revival with the 1996 movie, and then things like the online web animation Scream of the Shalka in 2003. But while Doctor Who wasn't regularly on TV any more, it was far from dormant. We've already seen the series survive one such period, only to come back and change the face of genre television all over again. Who's to say it couldn't do the same again? After all, cheating death is part of the key to Doctor Who's longevity!

The 7 Best New Movies on Netflix in June 2025
The 7 Best New Movies on Netflix in June 2025

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The 7 Best New Movies on Netflix in June 2025

There are some months when movies are not the primary benefit of having a Netflix subscription. This is not one of those months. June 2025 sees the streaming giant adding a cornucopia of classic and modern films to its repertory library, headlined by a series of Alfred Hitchcock classics that are accompanied by screenings in Netflix-owned theaters in both New York and Los Angeles. There are also plenty of recent hits to choose from, including arguably the laugh-out-loud funniest 'Saturday Night Live' movie to date, a feel-good LEGO music documentary, and one of the most exciting horror movies of the 2020s. More from IndieWire Mara Brock Akil on the Response to 'Forever': 'It Is a Privilege to Be Trusted That Much' Does 'Materialists' Satisfy as a Romance? Screen Talk Debates Celine Song's Film, Shares 'F1' First Reactions 'I Don't Understand You' Review: Nick Kroll and Andrew Rannells Kill It in Grisly Destination Rom-Com Keep reading for our 7 favorite movies coming to Netflix in June 2025. Best of IndieWire Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See 'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store