logo
How I Became… Nars Cosmetics' Deputy General Manager of Global Marketing

How I Became… Nars Cosmetics' Deputy General Manager of Global Marketing

Discover global job opportunities in beauty on BoF Careers today.
When Jennifer Jackson began her career in New York, she held a PR assistant role that was 'definitely that 'paying your dues' job,' she told BoF's commercial features editorial director, Sophie Soar, during her Building a Career in Beauty LinkedIn Live session.
Armed with a Journalism and Business degree at New York University, Jackson interned in PR at Saks Fifth Avenue. She then went on to work at a PR agency, collaborating with the likes of Net-a-Porter and Coach, before moving in-house at global fashion labels including Calvin Klein and Alexander Wang.
In order to further her career in marketing, Jackson soon realised she would need to explore opportunities outside of fashion: 'I realised that a lot of the fashion companies that I would have probably wanted to work at were actually not based in New York,' she shared. 'I figured out I wanted to do a global role, versus a market role at that particular moment in my career.'
Jackson pivoted to beauty — an industry she loved as a consumer but had no direct experience in — and began her journey at Nars Cosmetics as senior global marketing manager. 'I had to learn some of the mechanics behind it, but I picked it up, and I think that was really the key.'
Today, as the company's deputy general manager of global marketing, she leads on strategic initiatives that elevate brand equity and deepen consumer engagement across diverse platforms. In her current role, she is responsible for international brand storytelling and increasing the awareness of Nars in global markets.
Now, Jackson shares her career advice for breaking into beauty, and the key lessons she's learned from her 12 years in the industry — from leaning on your network to facilitate career moves, to the value of retail experience.
For the full interview, watch our LinkedIn Live, Building a Career in Beauty with Jennifer Jackson. Jennifer Jackson, Nars Cosmetics' deputy general manager of global marketing. (Nars Cosmetics) What is key to breaking into beauty?
I think first and foremost, just really loving the industry, really loving the product side and being interested. Don't become reticent to be on social channels or to embrace the new [ways of] marketing, [and] be prepared for constant change. Be willing to be scrappy and [to] not just accept the status quo.
Always think about how you can change, how you can improve, how you can learn and really bring that passion through to what you're doing. How did you leverage your PR experience to work in-house?
If anybody remembers New York PR assistant days, it was definitely that 'paying your dues' job, but it really helped [me] to learn the industry. It helped [me] to learn the network of assistants, everybody who was just starting out, but it also really taught [me] how to get things done.
I learnt that every client is going through a different thing at a different time. [...] So I happened to be working on when Net-a-Porter was just launching in the United States, which would have been a very different situation than a heritage brand like Coach that was looking to reinvent itself a little bit.
[...] It really allowed [me] to see what type of client I would like to work with if I went in-house, but supporting people at different places of their journey was super interesting, because some people needed more branding help; some people needed help on events; some people needed help with more typical PR placements. So again, it helps you to see [...] what facets are interesting to work on should you ever go in-house. Why and how did you transition into the beauty industry from fashion?
I had always loved beauty as a consumer. [...] Nars was a perfect fit for me because it bridged what I loved about fashion, but also had the beauty component. I was, and definitely still am, into makeup [...] so [a career in beauty] was perfect for me.
When I was interviewing, [they asked me questions like], 'You don't have any beauty experience, tell us why this could work?', and I think that it is very important to be open-minded about [...] figuring out what you can bring to the table.
Don't become reticent to be on social channels or to embrace the new [ways of] marketing, [and] be prepared for constant change.
So I could bring the branding, or the fashion angle. I knew there was a founder at the brand, which was important. If you think about my experience — I had all of that. A lot of the creative teams we worked with at Alexander Wang [were also the same] — so the Nars team also worked with [advertising agency] Baron and Baron. There were a lot of intersections.
I just didn't necessarily have makeup experience, but I was a consumer. I could step into the role and know what we were talking about in a meeting. I had to learn some of the mechanics behind it, but I picked it up, and I think that was really the key. How can you lean on networking for a career switch?
It should really start with your own personal network. [...] Is it talking to a friend that might have experience with [the company you want to work at]?
Of course, you can do different things on LinkedIn, and that's important — so [start by] thinking about if there's a company you are interested in working at, type it in, see who you have in common there, even if it's a second-level connection. [...] Reach out to that person, see if they can set you up for an exploratory coffee or chat. Think about how you might want to attend events [the company] is [hosting] or, how could you interface with understanding [them better]. How would you advise gaining experience in the beauty industry?
Putting [retail experience on your CV] is really helpful. [...] You'll be able to talk about insights into what sells well with consumers, like what if you worked at Sephora or Ulta [Beauty] or a department store — you would be able to share that insight in terms of ideas. [At Nars,] we speak with our field teams, we speak with consumers — they're the front lines. So that insight you can bring in terms of ideas is super important.
You just never know exactly how your experience is going to lead you to your next step. For entry-level jobs, it can be hard — [hiring managers] will say they want one to two years of experience. That's not always easy, but if you can come in with the experience of working in a retail channel, well — there's your experience. You already have a wealth of competitive knowledge, consumer knowledge, and marketing tactics that you've seen. What does your day-to-day entail as deputy general manager of global marketing?
It definitely depends on the day, but I think what's very exciting about my job day-to-day is I'm working on some things that are out right now — I might be looking at the performance of a new collection that we have out, seeing if we need to do something different on social [media]. [...] Are we taking real-time insight from what consumers are saying and applying that to something down the pipeline?
Always think about how you can change, how you can improve, how you can learn and really bring that passion through to what you're doing.
I'm also working on 2027 and 2028, looking at trends with the team and seeing what makes sense for the future, thinking about our campaigns. We also get to travel sometimes, which is really amazing — to spend time with the local teams and understand what their pain points are. To experience Nars all over the world and see how consumers are reacting and how we can help the teams, it feels really special, [particularly] when we can make a difference or make something successful together. What are some of your key learnings from your 12 years at Nars?
I feel like I've had a lot of different roles here [over the past] 12 years, and it does not necessarily feel like that and that's because the industry has changed completely. We're relearning marketing every day, every year. You have to keep educating yourself and learning about the platforms and consumers.
I know it sounds very obvious, but just listening and learning — absorbing information, asking questions. Also — raising your hand for a project where you could bring value, [rather than] someone having to ask you to do it.
When you have different managers, they are looking for people to come to them and say, 'This is what we should be doing.' Everyone is really busy and so it is sometimes hard for leaders to know exactly what's what, but the reality is — [when] you're working your way through, you actually see where the big opportunities are.
That's what I love about Nars, but also this size of company, is that people will come to me or I still go to my manager and say, 'We have to do this — this could be great,' and we do it. I also just think that being scrappy is really important. We get things done and I think it's something that the fashion industry and PR really taught me. There's always a way to make something happen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Donald Trump threatens to cut Elon Musk's government contracts as their public feud escalates
President Donald Trump threatens to cut Elon Musk's government contracts as their public feud escalates

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

President Donald Trump threatens to cut Elon Musk's government contracts as their public feud escalates

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump threatened to cut Elon Musk's government contracts as their fractured alliance rapidly escalated into a public feud Thursday. Hours after Trump lamented his breakup with Musk and said he was 'disappointed' in his former backer and adviser and Musk responded on social media, Trump escalated the feud by threatening to use the U.S. government to hurt Musk's bottom line. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!'WASHINGTON (AP) — The breakup between the president of the United States and the world's richest man is unfurling much like their relationship started — rapidly, intensely and very publicly. As President Donald Trump sat in the Oval Office on Thursday with Germany's leader, he lamented his soured relationship with Elon Musk, his adviser-turned-social media antagonist. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former backer lambasted the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending plans. 'Whatever,' Musk wrote on his social media platform while responding to Trump in real time. Musk later offered up an especially stinging insult to a president sensitive about his standing among voters: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk retorted. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk said in a follow-up post. Politicians and their donor patrons rarely see eye to eye. But the magnitude of Musk's support for Trump, spending at least $250 million backing his campaign, and the scope of free reign the president gave him to slash and delve into the government with the Department of Government Efficiency is eclipsed only by the speed of their falling out. Musk announced his support for Trump shortly after the then-candidate was nearly assassinated on stage at a Butler, Pennsylvania, rally last July. News of Musk's political action committee in support of Trump's election came days later. Musk soon became a close adviser and frequent companion, memorably leaping in the air behind Trump on stage at a rally in October. Once Trump was elected, the tech billionaire stood behind him as he took the oath of office, flew with him on Air Force One for weekend stays at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, slept in the White House's Lincoln Bedroom at the president's invitation and joined his Cabinet meetings wearing a MAGA hat (sometimes more than one). 'I'll be honest, I think he missed the place,' Trump said Thursday. 'He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office.' Musk bid farewell to Trump last week in a subdued news conference in the Oval Office, where he sported a black eye that he said came from his young son but that seemed to be a metaphor for his messy time in government service. Trump, who rarely misses an opportunity to zing his critics on appearance, brought it up Thursday. 'I said, 'Do you want a little makeup? We'll get you a little makeup.' Which is interesting,' Trump said. The Republican president's comments came as Musk has stewed for days on social media about Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' warning that it will increase the federal deficit. Musk has called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said Thursday in the Oval Office. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Observers had long wondered if the friendship between the two brash billionaires known for lobbing insults online would flame out in spectacular fashion. It did, in less than a year. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. The president said some people who leave his administration 'miss it so badly' and 'actually become hostile.' 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. He brushed aside the billionaire's efforts to get him elected last year, including a $1 million-a-day voter sweepstakes in Pennsylvania. The surge of cash Musk showed he was willing to spend seemed to set him up as a highly coveted ally for Republicans going forward, but his split with Trump, the party's leader, raises questions about whether they or any others will see such a campaign windfall in the future. Trump said Musk, the CEO and founder of Tesla, 'only developed a problem' with the bill because it rolls back tax credits for electric vehicles. 'False,' Musk fired back on his social media platform as the president continued speaking. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' In another post, he said Trump could keep the spending cuts but 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The bill would unleash trillions of dollars in tax cuts and slash spending but also spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade and leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress. Besides Musk being 'disturbed' by the electric vehicle tax credits, Trump said another point of contention was Musk's promotion of Jared Isaacman to run NASA. Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination over the weekend, days after Musk left his government role. 'I didn't think it was appropriate,' Trump said, calling Isaacman 'totally a Democrat.' Musk, reverting to his main form of political activity before he joined forces with Trump, continued slinging his responses on social media. He shared some posts Trump made over a decade ago criticizing Republicans for their spending, musings made when he, too, was just a billionaire lobbing his thoughts on social media. 'Where is the man who wrote these words?' Musk wrote. 'Was he replaced by a body double!?'

Pentagon Wants To Shift Funds From Navy F/A-XX To USAF F-47: Report
Pentagon Wants To Shift Funds From Navy F/A-XX To USAF F-47: Report

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Pentagon Wants To Shift Funds From Navy F/A-XX To USAF F-47: Report

The U.S. Navy's F/A-XX sixth-generation fighter program looks to have hit another snag, with the Pentagon reportedly prioritizing the Air Force's F-47 stealth fighter, amid concerns about how to run the two efforts simultaneously. Already, the F/A-XX was in limbo, with a U.S. official telling TWZ last month that the future of the program was still being reviewed. This came after reports that a contract award for the Navy's new combat jet could be delayed by as much as three years. Navy officials, meanwhile, continue to stress the importance of the F/A-XX to their plans. 'There's certainly a strong requirement for a sixth-gen fighter still,' Dr. Brett A. Seidle, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition (RD&A), said yesterday. 'I know there's a lot of discussion about [F/A-XX] right now, but the Navy position on that is there's a requirement that's necessary.' Seidle was speaking at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Seapower and Projection Forces. His comments came in response to questions from U.S. Rep. Joseph David Courtney, the Democrat representative for Connecticut's 2nd congressional district. You can see that exchange in the video below, starting at the 35.25 mark: The hearing followed a Pentagon request last month to the House and Senate defense policy committees, which was seen by Bloomberg News, warning that 'Simultaneously pursuing two sixth-generation fighters risks under-delivery on both.' 'Given the schedule delays and cost growth across numerous airframes, DoD recommends a focus on the F-47, giving the Navy's F/A-XX program time for technical maturity and development,' the Pentagon request added. 'Phasing the F/A-XX after the Air Force's initial F-47 development will alleviate capacity concerns in the industrial base.' Exactly why there should be concerns about industrial capacity is somewhat unclear, although that could be a factor were Boeing to win the F/A-XX contract on top of the F-47. On the other hand, with Northrop Grumman busy with the B-21 stealth bomber, which still needs to get through flight testing, adding a few years to the F/A-XX timeline could mitigate risk there, were this contractor to walk away with F/A-XX. Reportedly, the U.S. Department of Defense requested that Congress shift $500 million from F/A-XX to the F-47, the contract for which was awarded to Boeing in March. Previously, these funds were allocated for the 'accelerated development' of the Navy fighter. There is now something of a battle between the Pentagon Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the House Armed Services Committee (HASC). On the one hand, the F-47 is considered by the Pentagon to have 'full presidential support,' making it a priority for the $500 million that the House Armed Services Committee had added to the F/A-XX program under President Donald Trump's sweeping $3.9-trillion tax breaks package. While we previously reported on Pentagon recommendations to withhold $500 million from the F/A-XX program, it wasn't previously understood that it wanted to redirect this to the Air Force's equivalent effort, the F-47. The House Armed Services Committee is now seeking to block the funds from being redirected to the F-47, arguing that the Pentagon hasn't provided an adequate reason for this. Heather Vaughan, a committee spokesperson, told Bloomberg News that the Pentagon 'has yet to brief the committee on any changes for its plans to develop and procure' the Navy's new stealth jet. 'Absent any new information from the Navy concerning revision to defined capability gaps and shortfalls, mission requirements, cost, or acquisition strategy for F/A-XX, the committee continues to support the development of this critical platform,' Vaughan added. Earlier this week, the Senate Armed Services Committee released its defense section of the tax breaks package, which includes $750 million to 'accelerate the F/A-XX aircraft.' Originally, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman were all in the running to develop the F/A-XX. However, Lockheed Martin was reportedly eliminated from the competition in March because its proposal 'did not satisfy the service's criteria,' according to Breaking Defense, whose story cited an unnamed source with knowledge of the program. Any holdups to the F/A-XX program will be a worry for the Navy. The service considers a sixth-generation combat aircraft as a prerequisite for the future carrier air wing, especially in terms of a potential confrontation with China in the Indo-Pacific theater. 'The sixth-gen fighter has some capabilities that we need to counter the PRC,' Navy Adm. James W. Kilby, acting Chief of Naval Operations, said of the F/A-XX last month. 'Those are signatures, those are range, those are different engines. Those are all the things that will make it survivable. The Air Force and Navy have different missions, but we're going against the same threat.' Last month, a U.S. official, speaking to TWZ on condition of anonymity, denied reports that the F/A-XX program contract award could be delayed by as much as three years. 'Nothing is being delayed,' the official stated. 'A decision hasn't been made yet. That decision is still being determined by [the Pentagon] and service leaders, with conversations among Congress as well. It's a big program. Obviously, these things don't get settled on by one individual. Leaders are making a decision on whether to invest. It's all part of the process.' The Navy had planned for the F/A-XX aircraft to enter service in the 2030s and thereafter to replace F/A-18E/F Super Hornet strike fighters and EA-18G Growler electronic attack jets. According to a 2025 Naval Aviation Playbook, the F/A-XX 'is expected to feature superior range, speed, and sensor capabilities, with an emphasis on integrating manned and unmanned systems. This includes collaboration with autonomous drones serving as force multipliers and electronic warfare assets.' In regards to the range, it emerged earlier this year that the F/A-XX may offer just a 25 percent increase in this respect over the existing tactical combat jets in its carrier air wings. That disclosure is surprising, given that the service consistently makes it clear that extending the reach of its carrier strike groups and thus enhancing their survivability is a critical priority, as the range of expected threats also continues to grow. Regardless, the continued funding dispute may well still derail the current timeline for F/A-XX. In a report last month, Reuters wrote that the Pentagon's main issue about the F/A-XX program was 'concerns about engineering and production capacity,' but didn't elaborate further. If the F/A-XX does end up being delayed, the Navy might well have to look again at its tactical fighter fleet to avoid shortfalls. One immediate result would be the service relying longer than expected on its aging fleets of Super Hornets and Growlers. At one stage, the Super Hornet production line was expected to be shut down this year. However, in March of last year, the Navy issued Boeing a $1.3-billion contract for 17 new Super Hornets with a final delivery planned for spring 2027 at the latest. Buying more Super Hornets could be an option, but such a move would have to be made before the line is closed. An alternative would be to push more resources toward the F-35C stealth fighter, which the Navy has introduced to replace the last of its 'legacy' Hornets. As well as the baseline F-35C, Lockheed Martin is increasingly looking at the potential of further advanced developments of the Joint Strike Fighter, something the company has previously described as a 'Ferrari' or 'NASCAR upgrade' to the F-35's core 'chassis.' This could include a substantial fuselage redesign. With a future Pacific fight very much on its mind, neither of these options would be ideal for the Navy, and the current uncertainty around the F/A-XX program is very much bad news for the service. It's also worth considering the Navy's approach for the fleets of carrier-capable drone wingmen that it wants to accompany crewed combat aircraft in the future. As it now stands, the service wants its Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) designs to cost no more than $15 million to buy and have zero long-term sustainment costs. At the same time, there are signs the Navy may not be moving as quickly on CCAs as the Air Force, as you can read about here. Meanwhile, if the Pentagon gets its way and is able to inject another $500 million into the F-47, that will only help realize its goal to have the next-generation Air Force combat jet flying before the end of the current Trump administration. Contact the author: thomas@

Ravens GM confirms team is in 'introductory stage' of contract talks with Lamar Jackson
Ravens GM confirms team is in 'introductory stage' of contract talks with Lamar Jackson

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Ravens GM confirms team is in 'introductory stage' of contract talks with Lamar Jackson

Ravens GM confirms team is in 'introductory stage' of contract talks with Lamar Jackson During an appearance on the BMore Baseball Podcast, Ravens GM Eric DeCosta confirmed that the team is in the 'introductory stage' of contract talks with Lamar Jackson. Lamar Jackson is a two-time NFL MVP and arguably should have won the award in 2024. Baltimore's 2025 NFL season is quickly approaching, and the Ravens' focus has shifted to reshaping the roster and preparing for a juggernaut of a schedule. The Ravens have made fifth-year option decisions on Kyle Hamilton and Tyler Linderbaum, while Jackson will have a cap hit of over $70 million for the 2026 season. During March's NFL owners' meetings in Florida, head coach John Harbaugh confirmed that Jackson is due for a new deal that will once again make him the highest-paid player in NFL history. That hasn't happened yet, but DeCosta, during an appearance on the BMore Baseball Podcast, confirmed that those discussions have started. 'We've had some conversations before the draft, after the draft, in person last week,' DeCosta said, via the team's website. 'I think we're in the introductory sort of stage of looking at what an extension might look like.' Last week, former sports agent and CBS Sports lead analyst Joel Corry masterfully broke down the leverage Jackson again holds over the franchise with his 2026 and 2027 cap hits being unworkable for the organization. The Ravens have more urgency for a new deal than Jackson although he has dropped to the NFL's 10th-highest-paid player after Brock Purdy's recent five-year, $265 million contract extension, averaging $53 million per year, with the San Francisco 49ers. Patience can be Jackson's best friend because his salary cap number jumps from $43.5 million in 2025 to an unmanageable $74.5 million in 2026 and also in 2027. The $74.5 million is 2026's third highest cap number. Fortunately for Jackson, Harbaugh conceded at the league meetings that Jackson was going to be put back at the top of the NFL salary hierarchy with his next contract. "The value is the top," Harbaugh said. "When Lamar gets paid, he's going to be the highest-paid player in football, just like he was last time. I think every contract he signs till he decides to hang up his cleats, he's going to be that guy." These dynamics give Jackson, who represents himself and has never had an agent, significant leverage in negotiations. He shouldn't think about twice about using the existing circumstances to his advantage. As Corry pointed out, Jackson just finished the second year of a five-year, $260 million contract signed with the Baltimore Ravens on May 4, 2023. Of this, $185 million is guaranteed, of which $135 million was fully guaranteed at signing. As of this article, Jackson is the 10th highest-paid quarterback in the NFL after Brock Purdy's new contract. Corry highlighted that based on recent trends with Dak Prescott and Josh Allen, Jackson can justify $65.5 million to $67 million per year" for a contract extension he signs in the coming months. With inflation and an adjustment for the 24.2% increase of the salary cap since he signed in 2023, Jackson could command upwards of $64.5 million per year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store