Medical cannabis regulations advance from Nebraska legislative committee
LINCOLN — A legislative bill designed to help implement medical cannabis in Nebraska narrowly advanced from committee Thursday in the waning days of the 2025 session.
Legislative Bill 677, from State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, advanced 5-3 from the General Affairs Committee. It would set up a clearer state regulatory scheme for the medical cannabis system that voters overwhelmingly approved in November. Just two weeks ago, the bill failed to advance 3-5 after no committee member tried to adopt a narrowing amendment.
A new 'compromise' amendment adopted Thursday passed with one major change: up to 2 ounces of cannabis flower or bud could be sold to a qualified patient or caregiver.
Smoking would not be allowed, and post-traumatic stress would not be a qualified medical condition, similar to the most recent version of LB 677 from Hansen.
The latest changes won over conservative State Sens. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue and Stan Clouse of Kearney, who voted to advance the bill with three Democrats, State Sens. John Cavanaugh of Omaha, Dan Quick of Grand Island and Victor Rountree of Bellevue.
State Sens. Bob Andersen of north-central Sarpy County, Barry DeKay of Niobrara and Jared Storm of David City, all Republicans in the officially nonpartisan body, again opposed LB 677.
Hansen, a Republican, said Thursday's action is the 'first step of a few to move the ball forward, but instead of it being stagnant, it's like you finally gave it a kick.'
Crista Eggers, executive director of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, whose son would benefit under the law, said LB 677's advancement to the legislative floor was an 'extremely huge win' for patients and advocates who have fought for more than a decade for the measure.
That timeline includes three ballot campaigns, multiple court cases and numerous legislative bills, including the most recent bill in 2021, which stalled by one vote.
'I think today we saw that the determination and the grit and the hurdles and the setbacks, they've all been worth it,' Eggers told reporters. 'We are extremely happy.'
Hansen has said getting LB 677 passed this spring is critical to prevent the 'Wild West,' as it's unclear what would happen without state funds or clearer enacting legislation for the new Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission that voters also created. The law allows patients to possess up to 5 ounces of medical cannabis with a physician's recommendation.
The Legislature's budget-writing Appropriations Committee plans to provide an extra $30,000 to the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, at the executive director's request, to cover additional duties that his staff will jointly take on with the Medical Cannabis Commission.
The three commissioners on the Liquor Control Commission also serve on the Medical Cannabis Commission. LB 677, as amended, would explicitly allow commission staff to share resources in carrying out each group's respective responsibilities.
Storm and Andersen again led opposition to LB 677 during a committee meeting over concerns it represented 'big marijuana' and that the proposal, as advanced, essentially enables recreational marijuana, which Hansen denies.
Andersen called the latest iteration of LB 677 among the 'most liberal' and asked how lawmakers could rectify LB 677 with the position of Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers that the Legislature should not act on any medical marijuana legislation.
Holdcroft and Cavanaugh, the chair and vice chair of the General Affairs Committee, repeatedly pushed back and said they had to do something for the voters and that Hilgers' opinion was just that, an opinion.
Part of the concern is that passing LB 677 could nullify the pending appeal to the Nebraska Supreme Court over whether the ballot measures should have been allowed to be voted on. In Lancaster County District Court, Hilgers lost.
This week, in an interview with Nebraska Public Media, Hilgers described the situation as a 60-yard or 65-yard game-winning field goal when there was 'clearly' an offensive player offside or who had a false start, or some other penalty. In his analogy, Hilgers is the referee.
'It has to be done the right way or it shouldn't count,' Hilgers said in that interview.
Holdcroft in March, questioning a representative of the AG's Office opposing LB 677 at the bill's public hearing, said he felt Hilgers 'wants us to keep this law stupid, where he can find some loopholes in it and make it illegal.'
'The Legislature just isn't that kind of body,' Holdcroft said at the time.
DeKay questioned whether LB 677 could lead to the 'black market,' because of a patient's immunity from possessing cannabis regardless of the source. Hansen's bill would tax medical cannabis the same as other products — 5.5 cents per $1, prior to local sales taxes.
Cavanaugh, a lawyer, said black markets thrive on uncertainty and that if DeKay, Andersen or Storm wanted to stop that, then they should support LB 677.
'I am in favor of this because the voters voted for it, and this makes it safe, regulated and accessible,' Cavanaugh said, though he said he wished the bill also allowed PTSD as a qualifying condition.
Clouse indicated that he still would have some amendments coming to the bill — the specifics of which he didn't share. He has said he wants to allow the governor to appoint up to two more outside members in addition to the two he can already appoint. The governor also already appoints the three commissioners to the Liquor Control Commission.
Outside appointees, Clouse said, could perhaps include law enforcement or supply chain representatives. LB 677 would require at least one appointee to be a health care practitioner. Members would serve six-year terms.
Gov. Jim Pillen this week appointed Lorelle Mueting, the prevention director of Heartland Family Service, which, among other things, connects people to substance abuse treatment, and Dr. Monica Oldenburg, an anesthesiologist, to the commission. Both women opposed recent medical cannabis proposals in Nebraska, Oldenburg in 2019 and Mueting in March.
The General Affairs Committee will host hearings on the appointments this session.
At one point during the sometimes contentious afternoon meeting, Holdcroft said he wasn't going to convince Andersen or Storm and called the vote. Holdcroft said the full Legislature deserved to be able to debate LB 677, with a chance of passage.
Other changes advanced as part of the amended LB 677, from what voters decided in November, include limiting a qualified 'health care practitioner' to licensed physicians, osteopathic physicians, physician assistants or nurse practitioners and practitioners. Medical providers could not recommend cannabis unless they have treated the patient for at least six months or if the provider primarily practices in Nebraska.
Currently, a provider just has to be licensed anywhere in the country and follow the law to write a recommendation.
Under existing statute, which has been the case since December, Nebraskans can use medical cannabis with a doctor's recommendation for any ailment.
The amendment would limit 'qualifying medical conditions' to 15 ailments, similar to a list drafted by former State Sen. Anna Wishart of Lincoln with the Nebraska Medical Association on a previous bill:
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Autism with frequent self-injurious or aggressive behavior.
Cancer.
Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.
Epilepsy or epileptic seizures.
Hepatitis C that causes moderate to severe nausea or cachexia.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).
Huntington's disease.
Parkinson's disease.
Spinal cord injury or disease with residual neurologic deficits.
Terminal illness with a probable life expectancy of under one year.
Tourette's syndrome.
A serious medical condition or related treatment that causes severe nausea or cachexia.
Severe and persistent muscle spasms caused by multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or muscular dystrophy.
Severe or chronic pain lasting longer than six months that is not adequately managed, in the opinion of a health care practitioner, despite treatment attempts using either conventional medications other than opioids or opiates or physical interventions.
Acceptable forms of cannabis would include edibles, concentrates, ointments, transdermal patches or creams, nebulizers and vaporizer cartridges or pens. Products intended for smoking, such as bongs or joints, could not be sold.
Andersen and Storm said Nebraskans would just buy the flower or bud and make joints, which Cavanaugh and Holdcroft said would not be permitted.
Eggers, Hansen and Holdcroft all noted the path ahead wouldn't be easy, with Eggers describing it as a 'huge journey' and Holdcroft saying he anticipated an 'uphill battle.'
Hansen said that it was still too early to tell whether he could get 33 votes and pass the bill over the finish line. That's the minimum amount of votes needed under the Nebraska Constitution to amend a state law enacted by voters, regardless of a promised filibuster. Unlike other ballot measures this spring, supporters asked for companion legislation to beef up the proposal.
Holdcroft said he would argue in favor of the measure but would 'reserve' his vote to see how the debate goes.
This Saturday in La Vista, Sunday in Omaha and Monday in Lincoln, Holdcroft, Hansen and Cavanaugh will host public forums for the public to weigh in on medical cannabis. Eggers said Thursday also represented that senators were listening to voters on this issue and encouraged any Nebraskans to get engaged.
Much of the next two weeks will be consumed by debate on the state budget. LB 677 is expected to be debated to its maximum debate limit across three stages of debate, lasting a combined 13 hours, leaving a tight timeline for LB 677 to become law.
The bill would need to pass by June 2, in case it is vetoed by the governor, who has so far declined to weigh in on the bill but has joined Hilgers in saying the two have reservations.
Hansen noted Hilgers' opposition is nothing new but that Hilgers, a former state senator and speaker of the Legislature, is a friend whom he trusts on many things.
'This is just one thing we differ on,' Hansen told the Nebraska Examiner.
Hansen continued: 'I think he might know the legalities more than I do, but I know what the people want and what they deserve and what they voted for. We kind of have to meld those two things together somehow.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
43 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Black mayors of cities Trump decries as ‘lawless' tout significant declines in violent crimes
As President Trump declared Washington, D.C., a crime-ridden wasteland in need of federal intervention last week and threatened similar actions in other Black-led cities, several mayors compared notes. The president's characterization of their cities contradicts what they began noticing last year: that they were seeing a drop in violent crime after a pandemic-era spike. In some cases the declines were monumental, due in large part to more youth engagement, gun buyback programs and community partnerships. Now members of the African American Mayors Assn. are determined to stop Trump from burying accomplishments that they already believed were overlooked. And they're using the administration's unprecedented law enforcement takeover in the nation's capital as an opportunity to disprove his narrative about some of the country's greatest urban enclaves. 'It gives us an opportunity to say we need to amplify our voices to confront the rhetoric that crime is just running rampant around major U.S. cities. It's just not true,' said Van Johnson, mayor of Savannah, Ga., and president of the African American Mayors Assn. 'It's not supported by any evidence or statistics whatsoever.' Trump has deployed the first of 800 National Guard members to the nation's capital, and at his request, the Republican governors of three states pledged hundreds more Saturday. West Virginia said it was sending 300 to 400 Guard troops, South Carolina pledged 200, and Ohio said it would send 150 in the coming days, marking a significant escalation of the federal intervention. Beyond Washington, the Republican president is setting his sights on other cities including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles and Oakland, calling them crime-ridden and 'horribly run.' One thing they all have in common: They're led by Black mayors. 'It was not lost on any member of our organization that the mayors either were Black or perceived to be Democrats,' Johnson said. 'And that's unfortunate. For mayors, we play with whoever's on the field.' The federal government's actions have heightened some of the mayors' desires to champion the strategies used to help make their cities safer. Trump argued that federal law enforcement had to step in after a prominent employee of his White House advisory team known as the Department of Government Efficiency was attacked in an attempted carjacking. He also pointed to homeless encampments, graffiti and potholes as evidence of Washington 'getting worse.' But statistics published by Washington's Metropolitan Police contradict the president and show violent crime has dropped there since a post-pandemic-emergency peak in 2023. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson scoffed at Trump's remarks, hailing the city's 'historic progress driving down homicides by more than 30% and shootings by almost 40% in the last year alone.' Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles, where homicides fell 14% from 2023 to 2024, called the federal takeover in District of Columbia a performative 'power grab.' In Baltimore, officials say they have seen historic decreases in homicides and nonfatal shootings this year, and those have been on the decline since 2022, according to the city's public safety data dashboard. Carjackings were down 20% in 2023, and other major crimes fell in 2024. Only burglaries have climbed slightly. The lower crime rates are attributed to tackling violence with a 'public health' approach, city officials say. In 2021, under Mayor Brandon Scott, Baltimore created a Comprehensive Violence Prevention Plan that called for more investment in community violence intervention, more services for crime victims and other initiatives. Scott accused Trump of exploiting crime as a 'wedge issue and dog whistle' rather than caring about curbing violence. 'He has actively undermined efforts that are making a difference saving lives in cities across the country in favor of militarized policing of Black communities,' Scott said via email. The Democratic mayor pointed out that the Justice Department has slashed more than $1 million in funding this year that would have gone toward community anti-violence measures. He vowed to keep on making headway regardless. 'We will continue to closely work with our regional federal law enforcement agencies, who have been great partners, and will do everything in our power to continue the progress despite the roadblocks this administration attempts to implement,' Scott said. Oakland officials this month touted significant decreases in crime in the first half of this year compared with the same period in 2024, including a 21% drop in homicides and a 29% decrease in all violent crime, according to the midyear report by the Major Cities Chiefs Assn. Officials credited collaborations with community organizations and crisis response services through the city's Department of Violence Prevention, established in 2017. 'These results show that we're on the right track,' Mayor Barbara Lee said at a news conference. 'We're going to keep building on this progress with the same comprehensive approach that got us here.' After the president gave his assessment of Oakland last week, Lee, a steadfast Trump antagonist during her years in Congress, rejected it as 'fearmongering.' Social justice advocates agree that crime has gone down and say Trump is perpetuating exaggerated perceptions that have long plagued Oakland. Nicole Lee, executive director of Urban Peace Movement, an Oakland-based organization that focuses on empowering communities of color and young people through initiatives such as leadership training and assistance to victims of gun violence, said much credit for the gains on lower crime rates is due to community groups. 'We really want to acknowledge all of the hard work that our network of community partners and community organizations have been doing over the past couple of years coming out of the pandemic to really create real community safety,' Lee said. 'The things we are doing are working.' She worries that an intervention by military troops would undermine that progress. 'It creates kind of an environment of fear in our community,' she said. In Washington, agents from multiple federal agencies, National Guard members and even the United States Park Police have been seen performing law enforcement duties including patrolling the National Mall and questioning people parked illegally. Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson said the National Guard troops will not be armed, but he declined to elaborate on their assignments to safety patrols and beautification efforts. Savannah's Johnson said he is all for partnering with the federal government, but troops on city streets is not what he envisioned. Instead, he said, cities need federal assistance for things like multistate investigation and fighting problems such as gun trafficking and cybercrime. 'I'm a former law enforcement officer. There is a different skill set that is used for municipal law enforcement agencies than the military,' Johnson said. There has also been speculation that federal intervention could entail curfews for young people. But that would do more harm, Lee said, disproportionately affecting young people of color and wrongfully assuming that youths are the main instigators of violence. 'If you're a young person, basically you can be cited, criminalized, simply for being outside after certain hours,' she said. 'Not only does that not solve anything in regard to violence and crime, it puts young people in the crosshairs of the criminal justice system.' For now, Johnson said, the mayors are closely watching their counterpart in Washington, Muriel Bowser, to see how she navigates the unprecedented federal intervention. She has been walking a fine line between critiquing and cooperating since Trump's takeover, but things ramped up Friday when officials sued to block the administration's naming its Drug Enforcement Administration chief as an 'emergency' head of the police force. The administration soon backed away from that move. Johnson praised Bowser for carrying on with dignity and grace. 'Black mayors are resilient. We are intrinsically children of struggle,' Johnson said. 'We learn to adapt quickly, and I believe that we will and we are.' Tang writes for the Associated Press.


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal
Top Senate Democrats are urging President Trump to rethink his plan that allows artificial intelligence chip sales to China. In an open letter, they warned that the deal could contradict U.S. national security goals. The policy gives chip makers Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) the right to sell advanced AI chips to China if they share 15% of sales revenue with the U.S. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The Senators said that any move which gives China more access to high-grade chips could strengthen its AI sector. They pointed out that such an outcome could hurt U.S. defense and tech goals. Therefore, they urged Trump to pause and weigh the risks before moving forward. The letter reflects rising concern in Washington about the role of AI chips in both global trade and military use. What It Could Mean for the Companies and Investors For investors, the core issue is whether this letter leads to a policy shift. If Trump does not change course, the deal stands, and both Nvidia and AMD keep access to China, the largest global chip market. However, if Trump rethinks the move and imposes new curbs, the financial hit could be sharp. Nvidia earns most of its revenue from selling chips designed for data centers, particularly those used in AI. China has been a major market for these products, accounting for nearly a quarter of Nvidia's revenue even after earlier trade restrictions. If new rules cut off those sales, the company could lose billions in annual revenue. Such a setback could weigh heavily on Nvidia's growth outlook and its share price. As for AMD, it has a smaller share of the AI chip space, but its plans depend on growth in this market. If it loses China sales, the company may fall short of its targets for data center gains. In turn, this could slow its race with Nvidia and limit returns for investors who are betting on strong AI growth. As a result, the open letter marks a sign of ongoing tension that could hit chip makers in real ways. While the outcome of the policy fight is not set, the risk for both Nvidia and AMD is that a large source of demand may shrink at a time when growth in AI is key to their value story. By using TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we've compared Nvidia and AMD to gain a broader look at both companies' financials and overall sentiment.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
DC police allegedly downplay violent crimes to make stats look more favorable: ‘Completely agree' with Trump
The Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, DC, is facing accusations it routinely manipulates statistics on crimes such as stabbings, shootings and carjackings to create the appearance that violent offenses are dropping. At least one high-ranking officer has been suspended so far over the disturbing allegations, which the DC Police Union has said effectively reflect standard operating procedure. Michael Pulliam, police commander of the DC's 3rd District, was put on paid leave in mid-May, allegedly for manipulating local crime statistics to make them appear more favorable. 'When our members respond to the scene of a felony offense where there is a victim reporting that a felony occurred, inevitably there will be a lieutenant or a captain that will show up on that scene and direct those members to take a report for a lesser offense,' DC Police Union Chairman Gregg Pemberton told NBC Washington last month. 'So instead of taking a report for a shooting or a stabbing or a carjacking, they will order that officer to take a report for a theft or an injured person to the hospital or a felony assault, which is not the same type of classification.' The department confirmed to the outlet that Michael Pulliam, commander of the city's 3rd District, was put on paid leave in mid-May — and unnamed law enforcement sources said he was being investigated internally for making questionable changes to crime data. Pulliam allegedly falsified violent crime statistics to make them appear more favorable for the city, an accusation he denies. President Trump last week invoked section 740 of DC's Home Rule Act to place the capital's police force under federal control for 30 days, citing an out-of-control rise in violent crime, particularly among youthful offenders. President Trump evoked a section of Washington, DC's, Home Rule Act to put law enforcement authorities under federal control in the district for 30 days and has deployed 700 National Guard troops. AP 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,' Trump said Monday. 'And we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it.' Trump said the crime crackdown — which he dubbed 'Liberation Day' for DC — would include the deployment of 700 National Guard members, with an additional 750 coming from GOP-led South Carolina, Ohio and West Virginia in the days to come. The move provoked swift condemnation from liberals, who rushed to left-leaning news outlets such as CNN and MSNBC to accuse the president of everything from 'federal overreach' to 'a power grab' to using the federal takeover as a ploy to get late powerful pedophile Jeffrey Epstein out of the headlines. Prominent Democrats including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York City and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took to social media to parrot the MPD's crime stats, which have been thrown into question pending the results of the Pulliam investigation. 'Violent crime in Washington, DD, is at a 30-year low,' Jeffries said Monday. 'Donald Trump has no basis to take over the local police department. And zero credibility on the issue of law and order. Get lost.' Clinton posted on X last week, 'As you listen to an unhinged Trump try to justify deploying the National Guard in DC, here's reality: Violent crime in DC is at a 30-year low.' The District of Columbia has the fourth-highest murder rate per capita in the US, according to a February report by Rochester Institute of Technology, seeing 265 murders — a 20-year high — in 2023 and 186 in 2024. Even with the 30.7% drop in homicides between 2023 and 2024 as recorded by the MPD, DC remained the fourth worst US city for murders per capita, edging out well-known homicide hot spots like Compton, California; Newark, New Jersey and even Chicago. In announcing the crackdown, President Trump noted that DC's murder rate even eclipses those of crime-challenged Mexico City and Bogota, Colombia. The MPD's data also asserts that violent crime in DC dropped 35% across the board between 2023 (5,345 reported incidents) and 2024 (3,469 incidents). Pemberton said during an interview on Fox Business that the police union 'completely agree[s]' with Trump's decision to federalize the city's police force. 'Crime in the district is out of control and something needs to be done about it. This concept that crime is down is really an old trope,' he said. 'They're using statistics in a way that makes it appear that crime is going down, but our rank-and-file officers know that we're going call to call to call for armed carjackings, stabbings, robberies, shootings, homicides and the crime isn't going anywhere.' The Post reached out to the union Sunday but did not immediately hear back.