Alice Coster: Shots fired as old boys wage war against Sydney billionaire
Don't miss out on the headlines from Opinion. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Can't you just imagine the grog blossoms at the Melbourne Club board meeting pulsating with rage at the mere mention of change?
It's long been known the members at the city's most conservative all-male establishment wear the same colours as the Melbourne Football Club (which most of them barrack for).
Blue noses and red cheeks!
And nothing makes them redder than the idea of change.
For nearly 200 years the club has been home to the city's business leaders.
But with a not-on-my-patch mentality they have decided to use a long-dormant financial contract to block the construction of a hotel, nightclub and restaurant complex near their heritage-listed club.
No doubt the idea of knocking back the move came with added glee, since the multimillion-dollar 'creative wonderland' is the brainchild of flashy Sydney billionaire Justin Hemmes.
The club is a symbol of our British heritage, established at a gathering of 23 gentlemen in 1838, just three years after John Batman declared what became Melbourne as 'the place for a village'.
Situated at the Paris end of Collins St, it has welcomed high-profile figures such as former PM Malcolm Fraser and governors-general Sir Isaac Isaacs, Baron Casey and Sir Ninian Stephen.
Not all members have been distinguished or free thinkers.
Some of the more conservative would probably have opposed the clock tower at Flinders St Station or a footy ground near the Yarra.
It was a giant leap forward for womankind in 1993 when, lo, females were welcomed to the club … just on special occasions.
But it's not only the old fogeys knocking back the Hemmes project next door.
It's the young fogeys, who also like things the way they are at the place they can sit under a plane tree in the garden and play at being gentlemen.
They joined an overwhelming vote to exercise a long-held lease option to stop Hemmes turning the nearby carpark into a 'hospitality, entertainment and creative wonderland'.
The developer's Merivale Group bought the eight-storey carpark from the City of Melbourne for $55m to build a multi-level hotel, bars, restaurants and 'sky garden'.
The Melbourne Club may think it has beaten back the upstart Sydney invader.
But Hemmes, 52, has time and dollars on his side, and is offering clubs people actually want to get in to. 'Disaster': Hemmes' $55m purchase 'a joke'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
AUKUS: Defence Minister Richard Marles forced to pour cold water on fears over Pentagon review
Defence Minister Richard Marles has been forced to pour cold water on fears over a new Pentagon inquiry into AUKUS, insisting the Government was 'very confident' the $368 billion nuclear-powered submarine program would go ahead. The review to ensure the trilateral agreement with Australia and the UK fits with the priorities of the new Trump administration will be led by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, viewed as an AUKUS sceptic. 'We are reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda,' a US official said of the decision. But Mr Marles downplayed concerns, describing it as a 'natural' move for a new administration that followed a similar 'positive' inquiry by the British Government following the election of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'We are committed to AUKUS and we look forward to working closely with the US on the review,' he said in a statement, adding that Canberra had been given advance notice. Mr Marles, who made an $800m down payment on the submarine program earlier this year, pointed to bipartisan support in the United States for the program, including the passage of important legislative provisions to enable the transfer of US Virginia class submarines to Australia. However, shadow defence minister Angus Taylor said the review was 'deeply concerning' and called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to urgently seek a direct meeting with President Trump to 'ensure Australia's national interests are protected.' Mr Albanese is expected to speak with Mr Trump on sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada this weekend, although a one-on-one meeting has not yet been confirmed. Mr Taylor questioned whether the review had been triggered by the Albanese Government's refusal to commit to US demands to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and the decision to sanction two far-right Israeli ministers. 'Australia cannot afford to be seen as a fair-weather friend. This government has sent mixed messages to our allies, and we're now seeing the consequences,' he said. By contrast, former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison urged people not to 'over-interpret' a departmental review that was not a policy decision, arguing America was 'within its remit' to examine the multibillion-dollar pact. AUKUS, established by the former Coalition Government in 2021, is viewed as critical to Australia's defence as regional tensions grow over China's military build-up and territorial ambitions. It aims to deliver a nuclear-powered submarine capability for Australia with the help of the US and the UK, as well as boosting trilateral defence cooperation on cyber and artificial intelligence and other cutting-edge technologies The first stage would see British and American nuclear submarines rotating through Perth from 2027 before the sale of US Navy Virginia-class attack submarines to Australia in the early 2030s. In the latter stage, Australia will construct a new SSN-Aukus fleet in Adelaide. 'This is all or nothing for Australia, and for the sake of our national security, we need to make sure that we can at least provide some deterrent for potential hostile threats to our nation, and the best way to do that is to partner with the United States,' former Ambassador to the US Joe Hockey told ABC Radio National Breakfast. He said he did not believe the review made the program more vulnerable but urged the Prime Minister to have a detailed discussion directly with the US President. Elbridge Colby, known to be hawkish on China and who has frequently called for other nations to increase their defence spending, has previously questioned why the US should give away its 'crown jewel asset' when asked about the future of AUKUS. However, in his recent confirmation hearing in the Senate Armed Services Committee, he also expressed support. 'I think it should be the policy of the United States Government to do everything we can to make this work,' he said.
Herald Sun
5 hours ago
- Herald Sun
NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Consumer and Commercial Hearings at Albury, Thursday, June 12
Don't miss out on the headlines from Hyperlocal. Followed categories will be added to My News. This is a list of today's New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal consumer and commercial hearings at Albury : Jayden Quinlivan v Sussie Hassapithis Got It Covered Solutions Pty Ltd v Frolad Pty Ltd Trading As Blacklocks Ford Albury / Wodonga Amanda Crispin v Angela Okungu New South Wales Land And Housing Corporation v Nicole Bevan Homes Out West v Naomie Tiplady Brianna Bewley v Nathan Mundy New South Wales Land And Housing Corporation v Erine Gilbert John Warren v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 34967 Scott Sears v Joanna Graham New South Wales Land And Housing Corporation v Jordon Murray The previous NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) Consumer and Commercial Hearings at Albury article can be viewed here. Hyperlocal Here is a list of matters listed at Albury Local Court on Thursday. Hyperlocal Here is a list of matters listed at Wodonga Magistrates' Court on Thursday.
Sydney Morning Herald
11 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
AUKUS in doubt as US starts review into whether the deal is ‘America First'
However, Colby expressed more optimism about AUKUS at his confirmation hearing earlier this year, saying he wanted to remove red tape and barriers to submarine production so that the partnership could be expedited. News of the review comes just days before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expects to meet Trump on the sidelines of the G7 world leaders' summit in Canada. But on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president's schedule for those G7 meetings was still being finalised. Albanese's office has been contacted for comment, as was Australia's embassy in Washington, which referred questions to Canberra. At a meeting with Defence Minister Richard Marles at the start of his month, Hegseth urged Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a request reiterated by Colby on social media this week. Several AUKUS experts urged caution in interpreting the intent of the US review. They pointed to the fact the United Kingdom recently commenced a parliamentary inquiry into the pact, and said it was natural that the Trump administration would seek to ensure AUKUS aligned with its own priorities. The review also comes just weeks after the new US ambassador to Britain, Republican donor Warren Stephens, told a London audience that AUKUS was 'vital' to global peace and security. Under the first pillar of the pact, Australia will purchase three to five nuclear-powered submarines from the US, starting in the 2030s, and build more through a joint initiative with the US and UK. Under the second pillar, the three nations will collaborate on advanced defence technologies. Australia is also contributing at least $US3 billion to the US defence industrial base to shore up submarine production. The deal was announced in 2021 under then prime minister Scott Morrison and then US president Joe Biden. Sophia Gaston, UK foreign policy lead at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in London, said the British inquiry had 'injected new dynamism and political edge into the UK's approach', which was helpful in taking AUKUS forward under Trump. Loading She said it was perfectly reasonable for the new administration to conduct a review into a project as large and significant as AUKUS. 'We can never be certain of where another government's review will take them, but Britain and Australia must be confident in the rationale behind AUKUS and its alignment with America's core goals of deterrence and competition towards China,' Gaston said. 'The best thing both allies can do during this review process is to put themselves in a posture ready to deliver some quick wins, particularly on pillar two, which will demonstrate the value in America partnering with allies to amplify its strengths in both scale and innovation.' Alessio Patalano, a professor of war and strategy in East Asia at King's College London, said Colby's views on AUKUS before he joined the current administration would likely inform how AUKUS advocates perceived this review. Loading 'However, these views are now being channelled into a government effort to 'audit' how AUKUS advances the US economy and security,' he said. 'As such, the review represents an opportunity to assess whether the current governance structure and priorities would benefit from greater focus.' Supporters argue the pact is a strategic bulwark in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific region, though critics warn that delays and shifting political dynamics could undermine its success. But British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last month declared the AUKUS defence pact the centrepiece of his government's national security strategy, promising the UK's largest military investment since the Cold War. At a high-level event in Westminster, Starmer described AUKUS as a 'national endeavour' and named former national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove as his special representative to lead the project.
