logo
Florida puts a man to death for killing 2 outside a bar, the 26th US execution this year

Florida puts a man to death for killing 2 outside a bar, the 26th US execution this year

CTV News15-07-2025
STARKE, Fla. (AP) — A man convicted of fatally shooting two people outside a Florida bar in 1993 as part of an attempted revenge killing was executed Tuesday evening, the 26th person put to death in the U.S. this year.
Michael Bernard Bell, 54, was pronounced dead at 6:25 p.m. after receiving a lethal injection at Florida State Prison near Starke, said Bryan Griffin, a spokesperson for Gov. Ron DeSantis. Bell was convicted in 1995 and sentenced to death for the murders of Jimmy West and Tamecka Smith.
When the team warden asked Bell if he had any final words, he responded, 'Thank you for not letting me spend the rest of my life in prison.'
Strapped to a gurney, Bell was alert and looking around the death chamber as the drugs began to flow into his outstretched left arm. After about 2 minutes, he closed his eyes and stopped moving. His breathing became more labored for about a minute and then slowed.
At 6:15 p.m., the team warden checked Bell's eyes and shouted his name, but there was no response. The color began to drain from Bell's face about 6:20 p.m. A medical worker entered the chamber at 6:24 p.m. and declared Bell dead a minute later.
With Bell's death, the number of executions in the U.S. surpassed last year's total with more than five months left on the calendar. The number of executions has largely trended downward nationally this century after peaking with 98 in 1999. From 1995 to 2006, there was an average of about 67 executions per year.
John Blume, the director of the Cornell Death Penalty Project, says the uptick in executions doesn't appear to be linked to a change in public support for the death penalty or an increase in the rate of death sentences, but is rather the function of the discretion of state governors.
'A number of these people being executed are people that have been in the system for a long time; they've been on death row for a long time," Blume said, adding that there are aggressive executives and attorney generals 'who want to execute these people.'
He pointed to a sweeping executive order signed by President Donald Trump on his first day back in office aimed at urging prosecutors to seek the death penalty and preserving capital punishment in the states.
'The most cynical view would be: It seems to matter to the president, so it matters to them,' Blume said of the governors.
Florida Department of Corrections spokesperson Ted Veerman said Tuesday that the department was well-prepared to do its duty as assigned by the courts and the governor.
Bell is the eighth person executed in Florida this year, with a ninth scheduled for later this month. The state executed six people in 2023 but only one last year.
Florida has executed more people than any other state this year, with Texas and South Carolina tied for second place at four each. Alabama has executed three people, Oklahoma has killed two, and Arizona, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee each have killed one.
In December 1993, Bell spotted what he thought was the car of the man who fatally shot his brother earlier that year, according to court records. Bell was apparently unaware that the man had sold the car to West.
Bell called on two friends and armed himself with an AK-47 rifle, authorities said. They found the car parked outside a liquor lounge and waited. When West, Smith and another woman eventually exited the club, Bell approached the car and opened fire, officials said.
West died at the scene, and Smith died on the way to the hospital. The other woman escaped injury. Witnesses said Bell also fired at a crowd of onlookers before fleeing the area. He was eventually arrested the next year.
Bell was later convicted of three additional murders — a woman and her toddler son in 1989 and his mother's boyfriend about four months before the attack on West and Smith.
Prison officials said Bell woke up at 6:30 a.m. and ate his last meal, which was an omelet, bacon, home fries and orange juice. He met with a spiritual adviser but did not have any other visitors.
His lawyers argued in their state filing that Bell's execution should be halted because of newly discovered evidence about witness testimony. But justices unanimously rejected the argument last week and pointed to overwhelming evidence of Bell's guilt.
The U.S. Supreme Court denied Bell's request to stay the execution Tuesday.
___
Associated Press reporters Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Fla., and Freida Frisaro in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, contributed to this report.
David Fischer, The Associated Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats refuse to go back to the state as they face threats of arrest and expulsion
Texas Democrats refuse to go back to the state as they face threats of arrest and expulsion

CBC

time29 minutes ago

  • CBC

Texas Democrats refuse to go back to the state as they face threats of arrest and expulsion

Vikki Goodwin says she's not worried about the bribery allegations, daily fines and arrest warrants being levelled against her and her fellow Texas Democrats who have fled the state. Goodwin is one of dozens of House Democrats who have hunkered down in liberal states to deny Texas Republicans the quorum they need to vote on a new redistricting plan, championed by President Donald Trump, with the goal of bolstering Republican control of the legislature. But even as Gov. Greg Abbott is doing everything he can to compel the Democrats to return, Goodwin says she and her colleagues are gaining public support every day for their self-imposed exile. "As people are learning why we are doing this, they, too, are becoming outraged that we could have our governor bowing down to the president of the United States," Goodwin, who is in Illinois, told As It Happens guest host Rebecca Zandbergen. "The idea that we're drawing lines in order to pick more Republican representation, I think that just goes against everybody's idea of what a true democracy is." Trump demands 5 more seats Abbott has convened a special session to vote on the redistricting bill, which is expected to give the Republicans five extra seats and protect their narrow majority in next year's congressional midterm elections. But he can't pass a bill in the 150-member House without two-thirds of members present. Democrats hold 62 seats in the majority-Republican chamber, and at least 51 left the state, according to a Democratic aide. The lawmakers have mostly fled to the Democrat-led states of Illinois, New York and Massachusett. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the U.S. Census Bureau, but the current Texas map was passed just four years ago. Goodwin says the process to push through a new map mid-cycle has been rushed and undemocratic. "It's simply because Trump asked for it, and Abbott is willing to do whatever Trump asks," she said. Trump, himself, has made no secret of his desire to bolster Republican dominance in Texas. "We are entitled to five more seats," he told CNBC on Tuesday. In that same interview, Trump said gerrymandering goes both ways, and accused Democrat-led legislatures of drawing electoral maps in their own favour. "They go to Illinois for safety. But that's all gerrymandered. California is gerrymandered. We should have many more seats in Congress," he said. A White House official told Reuters that Trump wants Abbott to do "whatever is necessary" to get the new map passed. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said the plan is more than a power grab; it's "turbocharged racism" that will further dilute the voting power of racial minorities in the state. The new lines likely would make it harder for four Hispanic incumbents and two Black incumbents to retain their seats in 2026, according to The Associated Press. Texas Republicans dispute Wu's claims, noting the new map would create four new racially diverse districts, and increase the number of Hispanic-majority districts by one. 'There will be consequences' Abbott has called the Democrats who left the state "un-Texan" and is pulling out all the stops to force them back. He has threatened to remove them from their seats for absconding their duty — something legal experts say would be a lengthy process, not guaranteed to work, and would require new elections to fill vacant seats. The House has also issued civil arrest warrants for absent Democrats, and Abbott ordered state troopers to find and arrest them — something they are legally unable to do outside state boundaries. Under House rules, each representative faces a $500 US fine for every day they're absent. Abbott has said that any lawmaker who solicits funds to cover those costs could face bribery charges, and vowed to extradite any "potential out-of-state felons." "If you continue to go down this road, there will be consequences," House Speaker Rep. Dustin Burrows, a Republican, threatened from the chamber floor Monday. Asked about the bribery charge threats, Goodwin said: "Personally, I have not taken any money that has driven me to the decision to leave the state. This is purely out of the need to protect our democracy, the need to push back against Trump." As for the fines, she said: "We will find a way to cover those costs." Democrat-led states vow to fight fire with fire The state standoff has quickly become a national one. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul — all Democrats — have each threatened to re-draw their own congressional district maps if Texas moves forward with its plan. Goodwin says the tactic of waiting out Abbott's special session can only work for so long. When this one ends on Aug. 19, she says, he's likely to call a new one. But her hope, she says, is that she and her colleagues will continue to gain public support from Texans of all stripes, and Abbott will be forced to abandon the bill in order to avoid jeopardizing his re-election. "That would be my ultimate goal," she said. "Stranger things have happened."

Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation
Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation

CTV News

time30 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation

The Federal Emergency Management Agency headquarters is shown in Washington on May 5, 2025. (Gene J. Puskar / AP Photo) BOSTON — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from reallocating US$4 billion meant to help communities protect against natural disasters. U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns in Boston granted a preliminary injunction sought by 20 Democrat-led states while their lawsuit over the funding moves ahead. A spokesperson for the Federal Emergency Management Agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The states argued FEMA lacked the authority to end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program and redirect more than $4 billion of its funding. The program aims to harden infrastructure around the country against potential storm damage. FEMA initially announced it was ending the program, but later said in a court filing that it was evaluating it. Noting money for the program was allocated by Congress, the states' lawsuit says any attempt to redirect it would run afoul of the Constitution. A lawyer for the government, Nicole O'Connor, argued at a hearing in July that the funds can be used both for disaster recovery and disaster prevention and that FEMA should have discretion to use the money how it sees fit. In his ruling, Stearns said he was not convinced Congress had given FEMA any discretion to redirect the funds. The states had also shown that the 'balance of hardship and public interest' was in their favor. 'There is an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law, and the potential hardship accruing to the States from the funds being repurposed is great,' Stearns wrote. 'The BRIC program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives.' The program has provided grants for a range of disaster management projects, including strengthening electrical grids, constructing levees for flood protection and relocating vulnerable water treatment facilities. Many of the projects are in rural communities. FEMA said in a news release in April that it was 'ending' the program, but the agency's acting chief, David Richardson, later said in a court filing that FEMA was merely evaluating whether to end or revise it. Stearns said it appeared FEMA had decided to end the program and was 'inching towards a fait accompli,' noting it had cancelled new funding opportunities and told stakeholders they shouldn't expect any unobligated funding. The states, including California, New York and Washington, argued that the threat of losing the funding alone had put numerous projects at risk of being cancelled, delayed or downsized. And they warned ending the program would be highly imprudent. 'By proactively fortifying our communities against disasters before they strike, rather than just responding afterward, we will reduce injuries, save lives, protect property, and, ultimately, save money that would otherwise be spent on post-disaster costs,' they wrote in the suit filed in July. FEMA said in a court filing that an injunction on its use of the funds could hamper its ability to respond to major disasters. But Stearns said the administration could come back to him to release funding should a disaster of 'unprecedented proportions' occur. Jack Brook and Michael Casey, The Associated Press

Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released
Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released

CTV News

time30 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Epstein's ex, Ghislaine Maxwell, doesn't want grand jury transcripts released

Audrey Strauss, acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, points to a photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell during a news conference in New York on July 2, 2020. (John Minchillo / AP Photo) NEW YORK — Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, wants to keep grand jury records secret in the sex trafficking case that sent her to prison, her lawyers said Tuesday as prosecutors continued urging a court to release some of those records in the criminal case-turned-political fireball. Maxwell hasn't seen the material herself, her attorneys said — the grand jury process is conducted behind closed doors. But she opposes unsealing what her lawyers described as potentially 'hearsay-laden' transcripts of grand jury testimony, which was given in secret and without her lawyers there to challenge it. 'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain,' attorneys David O. Markus and Melissa Madrigal wrote. Prosecutors declined to comment. Government attorneys have been trying to quell a clamour for transparency by seeking the transcripts' release — though the government also says the public already knows much of what's in the documents. Most of the information 'was made publicly available at trial or has otherwise been publicly reported through the public statements of victims and witnesses,' prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday. They noted that the disclosures excluded some victims' and witnesses' names. Prosecutors had also said last week that some of what the grand jurors heard eventually came out at Maxwell's 2021 trial and in various victims' lawsuits. There were only two grand jury witnesses, both of them law enforcement officials, prosecutors said. Prosecutors made clear Monday that they're seeking to unseal only the transcripts of grand jury witnesses' testimony, not the exhibits that accompanied it. But they are also working to parse how much of the exhibits also became public record over the years. While prosecutors have sought to temper expectations about any new revelations from the grand jury proceedings, they aren't proposing to release a cache of other information the government collected while looking into Epstein. The transcript faceoff comes six years after authorities said Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and four years after Maxwell was convicted of grooming underage girls to participate in sex acts with him. The British socialite denied the allegations and has appealed her conviction, so far unsuccessfully. Some of President Donald Trump 's allies spent years suggesting there was more to the Epstein saga than met the eye and calling for more disclosures. A few got powerful positions in Trump's Justice Department — and then faced backlash after it abruptly announced that nothing more would be released and that a long-rumored Epstein 'client list' doesn't exist. After trying unsuccessfully to change the subject and denigrating his own supporters for not moving on, the Republican president told Attorney General Pam Bondi to ask courts to unseal the grand jury transcripts in the case. A top Justice Department official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, interviewed Maxwell late last month, at the government's request. Last week, she was moved from a federal prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas to continue serving her 20-year sentence. Officials didn't explain why. Trump said Tuesday that he didn't know ahead of time about Maxwell's prison transfer and hadn't spoken to Blanche about his conversation with her. 'I think he probably wants to make sure that people should not be involved, or aren't involved, are not hurt by something that would be very, very unfortunate, very unfair to a lot of people,' Trump said in a news conference Tuesday. The Epstein uproar also has reached Congress, where the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files in the case. The committee also issued subpoenas to conduct sworn questioning of former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials. Bill Clinton, a Democrat, was among a number of Epstein's famous former friends; so was Trump, a Republican. Both men have said they knew nothing of Epstein's crimes until he was charged, and Epstein's accusers have not alleged any wrongdoing by Trump or Clinton. ____________ Associated Press writer Will Weissert in Washington contributed reporting. Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store