Omagh families ‘woefully let down' by police, father of victim tells inquiry
Victor Barker told the Omagh Bombing Inquiry that his son James's life had been taken away from him in the most 'evil and barbaric fashion'.
James Barker was 12 when he was killed in the bombing.
Twenty-nine people, including a woman pregnant with twins, were killed when the Real IRA bombed the Co Tyrone town in August 1998.
A public inquiry, being held at the Strule Arts Centre, has been hearing personal statements from those affected by the massacre.
Appearing via a remote link, Mr Barker said: 'Like so many thousands of others who have lost loved ones in the Troubles, I have some very dark moments.
'But I have done all I can to bring some kind of justice for James and everyone else.
'We have been woefully let down by a very poorly conducted police investigation and, I might add, a chief constable in Sir Ronnie Flanagan who, in my view, fell well short of the mark.
'The civil case has taken a great deal out of so many families.
'James had his life taken away from him in the most evil and barbaric fashion and he was robbed of his bright and happy future.
'I sometimes doubt whether he has the same human rights as the terrorists.
'We should all remember that pain has no nationality and no borders, but neither does the love of the human heart.'
Concluding the proceedings for Monday, counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC said that Tracey Devine, who was severely injured in the explosion which killed her daughter Breda, had died on Saturday.
He said the inquiry would not sit during her funeral on Tuesday.
Earlier, the inquiry had heard from emergency service workers who had been in Omagh on the day of the explosion.
Richard Quigley told the inquiry that he was a young paramedic and Omagh was the first explosion he had ever attended.
He gave evidence that he had helped to transfer dead victims in body bags from the scene to a temporary mortuary.
He said: 'I recall seeing the number of body bags laid out and each had its own area. All in rows.
'The size of the gym and the number of the body bags on the floor was something that should only have been seen in a movie.'
The inquiry also heard from firefighter Paddy Quinn, who said he has never forgotten his experiences from attending the bomb scene.
Recalling for years how he had struggled to return to the site, he said: 'I couldn't drive it, I couldn't walk it.
'I would go right round the town, no matter where I was, and enter through George's Street and down past the courthouse to avoid it.
'People had died there, people were injured there. I couldn't walk over it, I couldn't drive over it.'
Mr Greaney read statements from three survivors of the attack, Maeve O'Brien, her sister Dervlagh, and Damian Murphy.
Maeve O'Brien was 13 and had been shopping in Omagh on the day of the attack.
She said people were moved to Market Street, where the bomb exploded, but her grandmother said they should move to another location.
She said this was the reason she and her family were not physically harmed.
Her statement said: 'My life has been divided into a time of living before and after the Omagh bomb.
'It was the end of childhood and the final loss of innocence for me.
'Even now, in 2024, I can viscerally remember the sound of the bomb, the strange electrical smell and the haze coming from Market Street.'
She added: 'I remember the panic and fear in everyone's movements after the initial blast.
'I have a true understanding of the saying your blood running cold.'
Her sister, Dervlagh, was eight years old on the day the bomb exploded.
She recalled the power of the blast causing her to fall to the ground and crawling underneath a car for safety.
She said the subsequent scenes of devastation in the town have had a lifelong impact on her.
She said: 'In my 20s I developed panic attacks.
'I took myself to Omagh minor injuries unit, as I believed I was having a heart attack.'
She added: 'I feel my experience will have a lifelong negative impact on the quality of my life.'
Mr Murphy was training to be a teacher in 1998 and had gone into Omagh to send some emails.
He said the bomb exploded as he reached the town's library.
'I came back through the smoke and dust to Lower Market Street,' he said.
'The screams and smells were overwhelming.
'I first saw people come past me with loads of bleeding.'
He said he met three Spanish girls who were bleeding and he gave them paper towels.
'I was somewhat dazed as I entered what looked like Market Street. My immediate thought was to get people out of here.
'I jumped in a window and grabbed a chair. I saw a policeman. I shouted at him and said 'Come on, let's get people out of here'.
'We put people on the chair and lifted them down for easier access to cars and ambulances.
'I can't remember how many times we did this.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Democrats see weaponization blitz in moves from DOJ, intelligence leaders
Lawmakers and advocates are sounding the alarm over a series of actions taken by the Justice Department and intelligence community that they argue are both abuses of power and threats to the traditional independence held by both organizations. The FBI agreed to aid the Texas government last week in tracking down Democratic members of the state's legislature who fled in an effort to block a controversial redistricting plan. The commitment came as it fired a series of agents, including those who had worked on controversial matters related to President Trump, prompting complaints agents were facing retribution simply for taking on assigned cases. Meanwhile, the Justice Department subpoenaed New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) for documents related to court victories against the Trump Organization and the National Rifle Association. The same day, DOJ also tapped Ed Martin to investigate James as well as Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) on allegations of mortgage fraud. DOJ on Monday also launched a grand jury investigation into Obama-era officials they've accused of engaging in a 'treasonous conspiracy' in investigating Russia's efforts to influence the 2016 election. Intelligence community leaders have since come under fire for releasing a number of documents related to the claim. Democrats say the documents expose sources and methods of intelligence gathering. James, through an attorney, said she was targeted as part of 'the president's political retribution campaign.' 'Weaponizing the Department of Justice to try to punish an elected official for doing her job is an attack on the rule of law and a dangerous escalation by this administration. If prosecutors carry out this improper tactic and are genuinely interested in the truth, we are ready and waiting with the facts and the law,' her attorney Abbe Lowell said in a statement. The other moves are likewise coming under scrutiny. Democrats sent a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for the legal basis under which the bureau could be involved in tracking down the Texas lawmakers. 'These reports suggest that the FBI is diverting federal law enforcement away from fighting terrorism, drug trafficking, and other federal crimes to instead harass and target Texans' duly elected representatives, and thus raise urgent questions about the legal basis, scale, and appropriateness of federal law enforcement involvement in a state-level political matter,' Reps. Robert Garcia (Calif.) and Jamie Raskin (Md.), the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, wrote in a letter also signed by Texas Democrats Reps. Greg Casar and Jasmine Crockett. The group pointed to a 2003 ruling from a state judge that reviewed another incident in which state lawmakers sought to prevent a legislative quorum, determining that the Texas Department of Public Safety was limited in pursuing residents in cases where there was no crime. 'The ruling made clear that the state cannot treat quorum-breaking as a criminal offense subject to law enforcement pursuit,' they wrote. The firing of numerous agents also sparked claims the bureau's leadership was abusing its power and running afoul of civil servant protections in dismissing several career agents. Brian Driscoll previously served as acting FBI director before Patel was confirmed, and during his brief tenure rebuffed an early request from the Trump administration to turn over the names of all agents who worked on the cases of Jan. 6 rioters – a group that includes thousands of people. Also fired was Scott Jensen, who Patel had recently promoted to director of the Washington, D.C. Field Office, and Walter Giardina, an agent who worked for special counsel Robert Mueller and aided in the prosecution of Peter Navarro. In a final note to staff, Driscoll said he was given no reason for his dismissal. The FBI Agent's Association criticized the firing as unlawful. 'The FBI Agents Association strongly condemns today's unlawful firing of FBI Special Agents. These Agents were carrying out the assignments given to them and did their jobs professionally and with integrity,' the group said in a Friday statement. 'This action sets a dangerous precedent. It increases our vulnerability to criminal and national security threats at home and abroad. It prioritizes division over unity, stokes anger instead of solidarity within our ranks, and threatens to chill the work of agents rather than support it.' The move was also blasted by Raskin and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. 'These are individuals [who] have dedicated their careers to protecting the American people, and their firings are part of a disturbing pattern of retaliation and politicization at an institution charged with safeguarding national security and the rule of law,' Warner said in a statement. The FBI and DOJ declined to comment on the firings, their involvement in Texas, the launch of the grand jury, or its probe into James. But the Trump administration has broadly defended such moves, consistently arguing the FBI and the Justice Department were political tools of previous administrations while arguing their own actions help confront those abuses. 'President Trump is restoring integrity to the Department of Justice after four years of weaponization, hoaxes, and attempts to imprison him. The DOJ is upholding Lady Justice and working to execute President Trump's Make America Safe Again agenda, which is lowering crime, holding criminals accountable, and empowering our law enforcement community,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement to The Hill. Trump has at various turns denied asking for Justice Department interventions, though he has not hid his approval of the actions. 'Pam is doing a great job,' Trump said on CNBC when asked about the grand jury investigation into Obama officials. 'I have nothing to do with it. I will tell you this, they deserve it. I was happy to hear it.' The mortgage investigation from Martin is one of the first public actions taken by the Justice Department's new Weaponization Working Group, a role he was given after senators signaled their opposition to him for a U.S. Attorney role. Schiff, through an attorney, said Martin has a conflict of interest in the matter as the lawmaker previously placed a hold on his nomination, in part due to Martin's vocal defense of Jan. 6 rioters. 'The allegations against Senator Schiff are transparently false, stale, and long debunked. Now Ed Martin, the most brazenly partisan and politically compromised person possible for the task, has been picked to investigate a political adversary. The bias here is glaring,' said Preet Bharara, a former U.S. Attorney fired by Trump who is now representing Schiff. 'Mr. Martin is a January 6-defending lawyer who has repeatedly pursued baseless and politically-motivated investigations to fulfill demands to investigate and prosecute perceived enemies. Any supposed investigation led by him would be the very definition of weaponization of the justice process.' Also sparking pushback is the decision to open a grand jury inquiry into referrals made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. A memo released by Gabbard last month accuses Obama-era officials of a 'treasonous conspiracy' she said was designed to undermine Trump. The documents she released, however, largely show officials discussing something that was never in dispute – that Russia was never able to alter vote totals. She later released a report from House Intelligence Committee Republicans casting doubt on whether Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed to help Trump win the election rather than just sow chaos in the U.S. election. Most other reviews, however, determined Russia wanted to help Trump win. The Justice Department later released a previously classified annex to special counsel John Durham's report on the 2016 election. Rep. Jim Himes (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said both the Durham annex and the Republican report were both 'considered so sensitive and revealing of sources and methods that, until last month, [the committee] was not even permitted to retain a copy of either document within a classified safe in our own secure facility.' 'The highly irregular declassification process you engaged in could imperil critical intelligence sources and methods—a destructive action taken in order to advance a patently false political narrative,' he wrote, adding that they failed to consider 'how foreign adversaries might use the information exposed.' 'When done in a cavalier manner for partisan ends, declassification can literally endanger lives and enable adversaries to discover and disrupt the means through which we collect intelligence.' Former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, two of the officials involved in the claims, have called the accusations 'patently false' and rejected claims they attempted to smear Trump. 'Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election,' the two wrote. 'Contrary to the Trump administration's wild and baseless claims, there was no mention of 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the assessment,' they added. The intelligence community under Trump has defended the release of the documents, calling it a transparency measure. 'This effort reflects Director Ratcliffe's continued commitment to elevating the truth and bringing transparency to the American people,' the CIA said in a statement when Gabbard released the documents. Gabbard during a White House press conference also brushed off questions about the release. 'I think it's a disservice to the American people that former President Obama's office and others who are criticizing the transparency that is being delivered by releasing these documents,' Gabbard said. 'They are doing a disservice to the American people in trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal.'


New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: Trump turns tables on Democrats after years of lawfare — now it's time to hold them accountable
'No one is above the law' was the favorite refrain of Democrats as they pursued Donald Trump uphill and down dale in an effort to destroy his first presidency and ensure he could never serve again. They threw everything at him, manufacturing intelligence to frame him as a Russian stooge, weaponizing the FBI and DOJ against him, impeaching him, siccing the most unscrupulous prosecutors on him, contriving spurious civil cases against him and his family, trying to jail him and bankrupt him, all the while lying and assassinating his character. If that didn't bring him down, two assassination attempts would have finished off a lesser mortal. Advertisement But, sadly for Trump's Democrat/Deep State persecutors, they failed spectacularly. They decimated their own party and destroyed the reputations of the intelligence agencies and the mainstream media allies who aided and abetted their crooked schemes. As the saying goes: If you come at the king, you best not miss. Now accountability is afoot. 'Illegitimate president' Advertisement On Thursday, Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed pit bull lawyer Ed Martin as a special attorney to lead investigations of New York AG Letitia James and California Sen. Adam Schiff for potential charges including mortgage fraud, bank fraud and wire fraud, which carry jail terms of up to 30 years. Grand juries in Virginia and Maryland are currently weighing criminal indictments against the two Trump-deranged Democrats over allegations they falsified property records to secure favorable loan terms. The Albany US attorney has also reportedly issued subpoenas in a separate civil rights investigation into James, including into whether her office violated Trump's rights in a lawsuit she brought against him. Advertisement James has sued Trump, his children and his businesses dozens of times. She ran for office vowing to 'take on' the man she called an 'illegitimate president.' For his part, Schiff abused his position as House Intelligence Committee chairman to manipulate and distort intelligence to damage Trump. He created false narratives about Trump's connections to Russia and Ukraine, which led to his first impeachment. Schiff has been the most enthusiastic Democrat to use the phrase 'No one is above the law.' Now he's about to find out the hard way. Advertisement Meanwhile, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has spent months extracting documents from hidden reaches of the intelligence agencies and declassifying them, against the wishes of embedded Deep Staters at the CIA and FBI whose ruse is to redact documents to the point of indecipherability. Too bad. Gabbard went to the White House to overrule these resistance guerillas and successfully expose the truth about Russiagate and Barack Obama's role as 'ringleader,' to use Trump's word. We now know that on Dec. 9, 2016, Obama directed his national security officials, DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and others to create an intelligence assessment with the foregone conclusion they all knew to be false: that Russia had influenced the 2016 election to help Trump win. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! 'Documentation that came from the Obama White House; documentation that came from Obama's ODNI; documentation from the CIA, all of these pieces fit quite seamlessly together creating a very clear timeline that shifted from before the election when the intelligence community almost uniformly said essentially that Russia is trying to sow discord in the US election, but has no preference for one candidate over another,' Gabbard told me last week on Pod Force One. 'And then all of a sudden, Trump wins the election, surprising many people, both here and abroad . . . [and the Obama officials falsely claim] that Russia aspired to help Trump get elected, or that Russia hacked the election in favor of Donald Trump, really trying to discredit President Trump's win and give a big middle finger to the American people who had just voted him into office,' she said. 'President Obama, unhappy with the outcome of the election and making the appearance of a peaceful transition of power and claiming to be the champion of democracy, and yet launch[ed] what we now know . . . was a covert mission to subvert the will of the American people, create this lie that would challenge the legitimacy of President Trump's election . . . resulting in what was truly a yearslong coup,' she said. Advertisement Gabbard believes that the only way to stop such a travesty happening again is to punish the wrongdoers. 'Accountability has to take place,' she said. 'We've referred all the documents we have found and will continue to refer them to the Department of Justice for a criminal referral. 'AG Pam Bondi has created a strike force team . . . focused singularly on [bringing] accountability to those who are responsible for this,' she added. 'We also have to recognize that [Brennan and Clapper] have their own disciples . . . and many of those people still exist within the intelligence community now. So, in these documents that we're finding, we are uncovering names of people who were involved with this Russia hoax, this manufactured intelligence document, [who] would otherwise never be known publicly.' Accountability equals deterrence. It's why we have jails. Advertisement Without punishment, wrongdoers are emboldened. They regard mercy as weakness to be exploited. That's the lesson we take from the behavior of Trump's antagonists over the last nine years. 'Lock her up!' Despite efforts to paint Trump as a vengeful madman hellbent on retribution, the truth is clear from his first term: His tendency is to let bygones be bygones. He won in 2016. He didn't feel the need to drag his vanquished opponent through the mud even though at his rallies his supporters would regularly chant: 'Lock her up!' Advertisement 'We had Hillary Clinton down for whatever we wanted to do with her, but I felt it was inappropriate,' Trump told me in Scotland two weeks ago. 'She was the wife of a president. She was a secretary of state, and we could have done a very big number [on her. But] the concept of putting her in jail, indicting her, all the things that you have to do, it's tough stuff. And I said, 'We don't want to do that.' ' Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters He showed Hillary mercy because he wanted the country to 'heal' from the discord of the Obama years. 'And yet they did it to me,' he said, confessing to feeling 'a little bit' angry after his mercy was rewarded by being dragged through the mud for years. Advertisement 'So I feel differently. I mean, I'm a human being. I have my feelings too,' he said. 'Obama, what he did was terrible. What Brennan did and Clapper and Comey and all these lightweights . . . did was so unnecessary. And they made it really hard. 'We had a great first term,' Trump said. 'But it certainly made it . . . less comfortable.' Trump and his current administration understand the need for heads on pikes to act as a deterrent and ultimately to restore public trust in our national security institutions. Now the hunters are the hunted. Every tool is being used to find wrongdoers and bring them to account in a lawful, systematic, administration-wide effort. At least some plotters are sure to see inside a jail cell. None will sleep easy.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Justice Department targets New York attorney general, a Trump foe. Here's what to know
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — President Donald Trump's Justice Department is zeroing in on New York Attorney General Letitia James with a subpoena for records related to the $454 million civil judgement she won against Trump for lying about his wealth, a person familiar with the matter has told The Associated Press. The subpoena is part of an investigation into whether James violated Trump's civil rights, another person said. The people could not publicly discuss details of the investigation and spoke Friday to the AP on the condition of anonymity. Another subpoena seeks records related to James' lawsuit involving the National Rifle Association, a person familiar with the matter said. On top of that, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi recently named a special prosecutor to help conduct a mortgage fraud investigation into James. James has sued Trump and his Republican administration dozens of times over his policies as president and over how he conducted his private business empire. Trump vowed on the campaign trail to seek retribution against his opponents, and the moves against James are among the most serious yet against Trump's political foes by the Justice Department. Here's what to know about James and the escalating investigations: James says she's being politically targeted The Democratic attorney general has denied any wrongdoing and said the mortgage probe is politically motivated. Her personal attorney, Abbe D. Lowell, called the subpoenas 'improper.' 'Weaponizing the Department of Justice to try to punish an elected official for doing her job is an attack on the rule of law and a dangerous escalation by this administration,' Lowell said. 'The art of the steal' James is the first Black woman elected to statewide office in New York, the state's first Black attorney general and the first woman elected to the post. She fixated on Trump during the 2018 campaign, branding him as a 'con man' and pledging to shine a 'bright light into every dark corner of his real estate dealings.' As soon as she took office, James launched several lawsuits over his immigration and environmental policies. She inherited a state lawsuit against Trump's charitable foundation and steered it to a settlement that included a $2 million fine. She filed another civil lawsuit against Trump in September 2022, alleging that his company deceived banks, insurers and others by overvaluing assets and his net worth on financial paperwork. 'It's the art of the steal,' she said when announcing the case against Trump, turning the title of Trump's book 'The Art of the Deal' against him. Trump says James never intended to be fair In 2024, a New York judge ruled that Trump lied for years about his wealth and ordered him to pay $354.9 million in penalties plus nearly $100 million in interest. Trump is appealing the judgement. He also posted a $175 million bond to halt the state from collecting what he owes and seizing his assets. Trump says his financial statements actually understated his wealth and that any mistakes in the documents were harmless errors that played no role in banks' lending decisions. He and his lawyers repeatedly accused James of engaging in 'lawfare' for political purposes — a claim she denies. Trump has long criticized James′ legal volleys as political theater designed to catapult her to fame. Trump also complained that her comments about him, prior to her election, show she never intended to be fair. 'Corporate death penalty' In her role as a regulator of charities and nonprofit groups registered in New York, James sued the NRA and its longtime leader Wayne LaPierre. A jury last year found that LaPierre misspent millions of dollars and used the organization's funds to pay for an extravagant lifestyle, while the NRA itself failed to properly manage its assets and violated whistleblower protections. A New York judge also banned LaPierre from holding a paid position with the organization for a decade, but declined to appoint an independent monitor to oversee the group. James had sought to dissolve the powerful gun advocacy organization, however a judge ruled that the allegations did not warrant a 'corporate death penalty.' Mortgage fraud investigation FBI Director Kash Patel in May confirmed James was being investigated after a Trump administration official accused her of mortgage fraud. James' lawyer says the accusation was a lie based on a purposeful misreading of documents. The investigation centers on forms James signed in 2023 while helping a niece buy a home in Norfolk, Virginia. One form stated that James intended to occupy the home as her 'principal residence.' But in other documents, James made clear she had no intention of living there. An email to the mortgage loan broker two weeks before she signed the documents stated the property 'WILL NOT be my primary residence.' This week, Bondi named Ed Martin as a special prosecutor to help conduct a mortgage fraud investigation into James, according to the person familiar with the matter. James denied any wrongdoing and called the claim politically motivated. Martin leads the Weaponization Working Group, which is examining Trump's claims of anti-conservative bias inside the Justice Department. Martin's nomination for District of Columbia U.S. attorney was pulled amid Republican lawmakers' concerns about his scant prosecutorial experience and support for Jan. 6 rioters.