
GE2025: Why Red Dot United's scientists Dr Syed Alwi Ahmad and Dr David Foo could be game-changers in Nee Soon
Meet Dr Syed Alwi Ahmad, a theoretical physicist who has spent years studying one of the most profound mysteries of the universe: black holes. These cosmic giants are so powerful that nothing—not even light—can escape their pull, but what truly happens to the matter and information that crosses the point of no return?
That's the question Dr Ahmad set out to answer in his research, blending the abstract world of quantum mechanics with real questions about what it means to lose—whether it's data, matter, or trust. Today, he's bringing that same curiosity and integrity to the political arena. What Dr Syed Alwi Ahmad did
Dr Ahmad's research zeroed in on fermions—the tiniest building blocks of matter, like electrons and neutrinos. These are particles that obey some of the strictest laws in nature, and they're essential to everything that exists.
To study them, he used a tool called Quantum Field Theory—imagine applying chemistry's periodic table not to elements, but to energy. It's a way of understanding how particles form, move, and interact with forces in the universe.
However, instead of applying this in normal space, Dr Ahmad did something more ambitious: He studied how these matter particles behave near and inside black holes. What he found
Here's where things get really fascinating.
In ordinary space, quantum fields—which describe how particles behave—are smooth and continuous, but Dr Ahmad found that when you approach a black hole, these fields for fermions don't stretch across like they should. Instead, they cut off at the event horizon—the invisible boundary beyond which nothing can return.
Imagine watching a movie, but halfway through, the screen goes black. You can still hear the sound, but you can't follow the story anymore. That's what's happening at a black hole's edge. The 'story' of the object—its identity, its data—gets silenced, and all we see is thermal static.
Because of this, the radiation coming from black holes looks like random heat—not a message, not a pattern, just noise. Why this matters
This research gives us one possible answer to the age-old question: What happens to the past when it falls into a black hole?
Dr Ahmad's work suggests that the information may not come back—not in any readable, recoverable way. That would mean black holes don't just eat matter—they erase memory.
Or, it could mean that we're still missing a major piece of the puzzle and that our understanding of the universe needs to evolve. A Singaporean at the edge of space-time
What's truly inspiring is that this work didn't just come from a top Ivy League lab—it came from a Singaporean physicist. Dr Ahmad's journey shows that world-changing ideas can come from anywhere, even the heartlands of Yishun.
He approached one of the most difficult puzzles in physics not with sci-fi drama, but with cold, clear mathematics—and concepts most of us first encounter in O-Level physics and chemistry: energy, particles, and the conservation of information.
His work doesn't just inspire scientists—it inspires young Singaporeans to ask bold questions, dream bigger, and know that the horizon of discovery is open to them too.
Dr Ahmad has said:
'To truly understand what people are going through, you need both a microscope and a telescope — to see the fine details of daily struggle, and the wide horizon of possibility.'
It's this same mindset he brings to politics.
He believes unity doesn't mean conformity. It means listening deeply, lifting others, and leading with dignity. Only then, he says, can we bring out the best in Singapore—not by silencing difference, but by making space for it. What about the chemist who went from lab coats to the ballot box?
Dr David Foo, chairman of RDU and the second scientist on the party's Nee Soon GRC slate, isn't your typical politician. He's a chemist, an educator, and a staunch advocate for civic awareness—all rolled into one.
As Singapore heads toward GE2025, Dr Foo is once again stepping into the political arena, but he doesn't come armed with slogans alone. He brings a career built on inquiry, service, and reform. A Scientist first: Chemistry at his core
Dr Foo earned his PhD in chemistry from the University of Idaho, laying the groundwork for a career that has spanned continents and disciplines.
In the early stages of his career, he worked in high-level laboratories in the United States, later returning to Singapore where he became one of the founding scientists of the Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences (ICES). His expertise also led him to Johnson & Johnson's regional research centre, where he contributed as part of their technical staff.
A major highlight? Dr Foo became the first Singaporean to be awarded the Glenn T. Seaborg Fellowship at the prestigious Los Alamos National Laboratory in the US—a top-tier recognition in the field of nuclear and analytical chemistry. Championing science education
However, Dr Foo didn't stay behind the lab bench.
Believing strongly in the power of youth education, he founded Science Ventures Learning Hub, a platform dedicated to making science more interactive, engaging, and accessible to students.
He played a significant role in Singapore's National Science Challenge, helping design chemistry challenges beyond rote learning—challenges that inspired curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking in young minds. From Political Awareness to Policy Making
Dr Foo's political journey began in 2001, when he co-founded Think Centre, one of Singapore's earliest and boldest independent civic research organisations. At a time when political discourse in Singapore was still tentative, his move into civil society was both visionary and courageous.
He contested in Jurong GRC during the 2015 General Election under the Singaporeans First party and later joined RDU, where he now plays a leadership role. Today, he is contesting Nee Soon GRC as part of RDU's diverse and forward-looking team—alongside figures like secretary-general Ravi Philemon and theoretical physicist Dr Syed Alwi Ahmad. Science meets policy
Dr Foo represents the rare convergence of scientific precision and policy vision.
Whether he's discussing climate action, energy sustainability, or public health, he brings to the table a calm, methodical approach rooted in data and evidence, but just as importantly, he pairs that objectivity with a belief in civic empowerment and transparency.
To him, policymaking isn't about political theatre—it's about making sense of complex systems and finding solutions that work. Why it matters
In a political landscape often shaped by bureaucratic inertia and risk-averse leadership, Dr Foo is a breath of fresh air. He reminds us that public service doesn't just belong to lifelong politicians. It belongs to scientists, teachers, and ordinary citizens with a commitment to truth and change.
As Singaporeans head to the polls, figures like Dr David Foo raise a powerful question:
What kind of leadership do we want?
One that simply manages the status quo—or one that dares to innovate, educate, and elevate?
Stay tuned to The Independent for more deep dives and human stories behind the headlines—as we journey together toward Singapore's next General Election.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
10-08-2025
- Straits Times
Pixar film-maker, We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong on the lessons his S'porean parents taught him
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Daniel Chong is the writer and director of Pixar comedy-adventure Hoppers, which is expected to open in Singapore cinemas in March 2026. LOS ANGELES – In the upcoming Pixar adventure comedy Hoppers, a young scientist uses a new technology that lets her mind 'hop' into the body of a lifelike robotic beaver. Now able to communicate with real beavers and other animals, she discovers the surprising 'pond rules', or rules of life, that creatures live by. The animated tale features the voices of American actors Piper Curda as animal-loving protagonist Mabel and Jon Hamm as the mayor trying to destroy the animals' habitat. The film's writer-director Daniel Chong, whose parents migrated from Singapore to the United States before he was born, says the 'pond rules' taught to him by his Singaporean parents shaped his childhood in the US. Due to open in Singapore cinemas on March 5, 2026, Hoppers is the big-screen feature debut of Chong, a Chinese-American animator known for creating the beloved Cartoon Network series We Bare Bears (2015 to 2019) and its spin-off, We Bare Bears: The Movie (2020). Chong, 46, was born in North Dakota and grew up in southern California, where he still lives today. Speaking to The Straits Times over Zoom, he says his immigrant parents' Singaporean values 'almost certainly' rubbed off on him as a child. His father, who worked as an engineer before becoming a professor of business management, and his mother, a stay-at-home parent who later worked as a nurse, were both 'very strict with me and understandably so', Chong recalls. And like many first-generation Asian immigrants in the US, they did not understand their son's dream of becoming an artist. 'They didn't quite know what it meant to have an art career, although that was something I kind of wanted pretty young,' says the film-maker, who attended the prestigious California Institute of the Arts and worked as a storyboard artist on animated hits such as Inside Out (2015) and Cars 2 (2011). 'So, I would say, if they had 'pond rules', it was definitely, like, 'Focus on studies, make sure you play your piano and do all the prerequisites before you do the fun stuff like drawing.' 'And as long as I did that – as, I think, most Asian parents would demand – I was okay,' Chong says. The animator's Singapore connection has also inspired his work on at least one occasion. 'The one time we did a shout-out for Singapore was after I had visited there doing some press for We Bare Bears. They took me to see the Merlion, which I know is probably the most cliched thing in Singapore, but we actually put that in an episode,' he says of the animated sitcom, which follows three adoptive brothers – a panda, grizzly and polar bear – as they navigate human society. Praised for its understated humour and charm, the show – based on Chong's 2010 webcomic The Three Bare Bears – went on to win an Annie award for Best Animated Television Production for Children and pick up an Emmy nomination for Outstanding Short Form Animated Programme. Released in July 2025, the first trailer for Hoppers hints at another charming and unique story about animals, which Chong says he has always been drawn to. 'I've always loved animals. I love drawing them, and that was really my entry point to art. I had this encyclopaedia of animals as a kid, and every day, I would open it up and just copy pictures from it.' In Hoppers, he wants to tell 'a story about humans' relationship with animals – and what animals think about us, which is a big mystery'. Animal-loving scientist Mabel (left, voiced by Piper Curda) lets her mind "hop" into the body of a lifelike robotic beaver in the Pixar film Hoppers. PHOTO: PIXAR While developing the movie, he also learnt beavers are 'incredible animals – a keystone species that creates an ecosystem for a whole array of other animals'. In 2024, an article in entertainment magazine The Hollywood Reporter quoted an unnamed former Pixar artist who claimed the animation studio's bosses had forced the Hoppers team to 'downplay its planned message of environmentalism'. But Chong, who reportedly began working on Hoppers at the end of 2020, says 'that's not entirely true'. 'All movies here go through so many changes, and this movie just changed a lot over the time period that we made it, because it's hard to be articulate right away with how you want to frame it. 'But we were very aligned with the studio and with (parent company) Disney about what this movie was about, and they never questioned it,' he adds. 'I'm very happy with how the movie came out and nothing got toned down, nor were we ever told to.' Hoppers opens in Singapore cinemas on March 5, 2026.


Independent Singapore
06-08-2025
- Independent Singapore
Too risky or just right? Experts split on nuclear power for Singapore
SINGAPORE: As Singapore races to decarbonise its economy and meet rising energy demands and climate change, the debate over nuclear power has taken on renewed relevance. Past discussions have largely dismissed the idea due to safety and geographic concerns; new nuclear technologies — such as small modular reactors (SMRs) and thorium molten salt designs — have not just reopened the conversation but enabled a new vision for our evolving energy needs. These next-generation nuclear systems are promoted as safer, more compact, and cleaner than traditional reactors. Some advocates have suggested that Singapore could one day deploy them offshore or in partnership with regional neighbours. A physicist's message Dr Syed Alwi Ahmad, a theoretical physicist and member of the RDU Central Executive Committee, remains firmly sceptical. He argues that nuclear energy, regardless of form, is a poor fit for Singapore's physical and structural realities. 'Our limited land, the impossibility of effective evacuation, and lack of geological capacity to store nuclear waste — they represent physical boundaries that must be observed with scientific discipline,' he says. He added that 'there is no outside zone, no rural province, no extended hinterland to fall back on. All risks remain localised.' While thorium molten salt reactors are seen as promising alternatives, Dr Ahmad points out that the most advanced prototype, located in China's Gobi Desert, only produces two megawatts of thermal energy. 'To be clear, Singapore currently consumes more than fifty-five terawatt-hours of electricity per year, and that is projected to rise significantly by 2035,' he said. He is also wary of proposals to site such reactors offshore. Operating nuclear systems in marine environments introduces further complexity: corrosion from saltwater, vulnerability to severe weather, fuel transport and waste disposal issues — all magnified in Singapore's heavily trafficked coastal areas. Even the waste from thorium reactors, though smaller in volume, must be stored securely for centuries. He also notes the economic challenge. Developing small-scale, experimental nuclear platforms would require massive investment, a regulatory system overhaul, and centuries-long commitment, all for a technology not yet proven at scale. In contrast, renewables like solar and regional grid integration are already showing real returns. IAEA sees nuclear as a natural fit Yet others believe Singapore could — and potentially should — embrace nuclear technology in the near future. Rafael Grossi, Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), recently told an audience at the National University of Singapore that nuclear energy could be a vital solution for the city-state's clean energy future. 'In my opinion,' he said, 'Singapore could rightly be the most perfect example of a country that needs nuclear energy.' Given the lack of hydropower, limited land for wind and solar farms, and rising energy demand, Grossi believes a compact nuclear plant could offer a level of energy density 'you cannot match with anything else.' He highlighted the potential of small modular reactors — creating an ecosystem designed with passive safety features, lower risk profiles, and smaller footprints. Although still largely in the research and pilot stage globally, Grossi believes SMRs will be commercially viable within a few years. The core of the nuclear conversation in Singapore is not just about apprehension but about weighing the risks, benefits, and trade-offs of alternative pathways as voiced by a range of commentators with different stakes in the energy race. Grossi then floated the idea of regional collaboration, 'Singapore could develop a plant in collaboration with another ASEAN country,' he suggested, pointing to a future where shared infrastructure might ease national constraints. Dr Ahmad also believes the path forward lies in accelerating Singapore's renewable energy investments, expanding regional grid partnerships with countries like Indonesia, which is pursuing its own nuclear ambitions, and scalable technologies that don't come with radioactive waste or existential safety concerns. The IAEA, meanwhile, argues that Singapore's spatial limitations and advanced technologies are precisely why nuclear power might be its best option — a clean, dense, reliable energy source that requires little land and could ensure long-term stability in a nation attempting to 'go green'.

Straits Times
27-07-2025
- Straits Times
First Singaporean appointed as a chief scientific adviser to European Commission
Life sciences professor Mangala Srinivas is head of the cell biology and immunology department at Wageningen University and Research in the Netherlands. SINGAPORE – Life sciences professor Mangala Srinivas, 44, is the first Singaporean among a team of top scientists advising European Union (EU) politicians on shaping new policies and laws based on science. Prof Srinivas, who is based in the Netherlands, is one of seven new chief scientific advisers to the European Commission – the EU's executive body – and the first non-EU citizen to take up this role, which was created in 2015. The advisers, who serve three-year terms, were chosen from around 400 nominees, including Nobel laureates. Appointed in May, Prof Srinivas – along with the other advisers – provides independent advice to the European Commission's political leaders on any science-related matter, including policy issues that the European Parliament and the European Council consider to be of major importance. Topics that previous advisers have weighed in include sustainable agriculture, cancer screening, clean energy and controversial methods to reduce global warming by reflecting sunlight back into space. Their opinions and reports are published on the commission's Scientific Advice Mechanism website. The 2022 opinion on cancer screening, for example, underpinned the new EU Cancer Screening Scheme, which aims to ensure that 90 per cent of eligible Europeans are offered breast, cervical and colorectal screening by 2025. 'I think it's really heartening, especially now, to see that politicians still take science seriously, at least in this part of the world,' said Prof Srinivas, who grew up in Tampines. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole Asia Singapore-only car washes will get business licences revoked, says Johor govt World Food airdropped into Gaza as Israel opens aid routes Sport Arsenal beat Newcastle in five-goal thriller to bring Singapore Festival of Football to a close Singapore Benchmark barrier: Six of her homeschooled kids had to retake the PSLE Asia S'porean trainee doctor in Melbourne arrested for allegedly filming colleagues in toilets since 2021 She has lived in the Netherlands for the past 17 years after completing her PhD in the US. Since 2021, she has headed the department of cell biology and immunology at Wageningen University and Research. As an undergraduate at the National University of Singapore, she was torn between medicine and biology, but eventually chose biochemistry. She was 'drawn to understanding how cells function and how different biological systems connect'. After her doctorate, she worked at the Radboud University Medical Centre in the Netherlands, planning to stay for just two years. However, with further research funding and young children to care for, settling in Europe became the easier choice. She has a 14-year-old son and two girls aged 11 and eight. They visit Singapore every two years, with her last visit in February for a conference. Her current research focuses on improving how doctors see specific cells such as immune or therapeutic cells in the body. Current techniques like MRI often fall short in tracking such cells closely over time, she noted. This visibility is especially important when scientists are evaluating promising but often extremely costly cell therapies for diseases like cancer, she said. To address this, Prof Srinivas and her team have been developing novel nanoparticles, or tiny tools, that can be used to track immune cells in both humans and animals. Her team , together with international collaborators, are preparing to start a clinical trial using these nanoparticles to track the immune cells of patients with rectal cancer. But when wearing her scientific adviser hat, she has to take a step back when handling questions from politicians on life sciences to avoid bringing personal bias into the final opinion. 'The aim isn't to offer my own expert opinion but to help translate input from a wide range of specialists into something policymakers can use,' she said. On her decision to throw her hat into the ring, Prof Srinivas said: 'When I looked at the former members of this group, they are really established. One of them was the director of Cern (the European Organisation for Nuclear Research). It's that level of people, and I thought I probably have no chance of getting it. 'But on the other hand, if I don't apply, I really have no chance. So let's just give it a go.' The selection process for the new batch of top scientists took about a year. In early 2024, Prof Srinivas was nominated by the Young Academy of Europe – a coalition of young scientists who champion science policy – where she served as chair and board member. She was interviewed by former chief scientific advisers. The EU commissioner for start-ups, research and innovation hand-picked the final seven who were announced in late May. Onboarding for the new team took place in Brussels in early July. Prof Srinivas credited her selection to her contributions to science policy with the Young Academy, as well as her international background. She has industry experience, where she focused on strategy at multinational corporation GE Healthcare (now Cytiva) and co-founded a medical imaging start-up. 'I was really excited, but then you realise this is actually an important position, and it's a responsibility... I could have impact on a lot of people on real matters. And representing not only my university and the Netherlands but also Singapore,' she said. Soon after, the weight of her selection sank in: She is not just a prominent expert but also a representative of female scientists of colour and working mothers. When her children were between ages one and five, she raised them alone for a few years as a single mother. She is now remarried. 'My husband is very supportive. But in the few years when I was a single mother, it was really a challenge, especially during the (pandemic) lockdown and I had to homeschool them,' she said. 'A lot of people were sceptical that it's feasible to mix a position like being professor with having young children.' Beyond advising the European government, she hopes to continue representing minority women in science. 'I hope to champion evidence-based policymaking while highlighting diversity and inclusion – especially for women and scientists from under-represented backgrounds.'