Russian drone strike in north-eastern Ukraine kills nine, officials say
The attack came just hours after Moscow and Kyiv held their first direct peace talks in years which failed to yield a ceasefire.
Ukraine's national police released photos showing the aftermath of the strike in Sumy's Bilopillia city, around six miles from the front line and border with Russia.
'This is another war crime by Russia – a deliberate strike on civilian transport that posed no threat,' the Sumy regional administration said in a post on the Telegram messaging app.
Mr Zelensky met European leaders on Friday (Leon Neal/Pool via AP)
A period of mourning has been declared in Bilopillia from Saturday through until Monday, with local community chief Yurii Zarko calling the day of the attack 'Black Saturday'.
The local media outlet Suspilne said the passengers on the bus were being evacuated from Bilopillia when the strike occurred. Authorities are working to identify some of the victims, most of them elderly women.
The injured were taken to a hospital in Sumy, the regional capital. Three people were reported to be in a serious condition.
It is not immediately clear how the strike would affect peace efforts.
The first direct Russia-Ukraine peace talks since the early weeks of Moscow's 2022 invasion ended after less than two hours on Friday, and while both sides agreed on a large prisoner swap, they clearly remained far apart on key conditions for ending the fighting.
One such condition for Ukraine, backed by its Western allies, is a temporary ceasefire as a first step toward a peaceful settlement.
The Kremlin has pushed back against such a truce, which remains elusive.
Spoke with @POTUS together with President Macron, Federal Chancellor Merz, Prime Ministers Starmer and Tusk. We discussed the meeting in Istanbul.
Ukraine is ready to take the fastest possible steps to bring real peace, and it is important that the world holds a strong stance.… pic.twitter.com/CG3pAnN5Ip
— Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) May 16, 2025
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he discussed the talks with US President Donald Trump and the leaders of France, Germany, the UK and Poland.
In a post on X from a European leadership meeting in Albania, he urged 'tough sanctions' against Moscow if it rejects 'a full and unconditional ceasefire and an end to killings'.
Kyiv and Moscow agreed in Istanbul to exchange 1,000 prisoners of war each, according to the heads of both delegations, in what would be their biggest such swap.
Both sides also discussed a ceasefire and a meeting between their heads of state, according to chief Ukrainian delegate, defence minister Rustem Umerov.
An aide to President Vladimir Putin said both sides also agreed to provide each other with detailed ceasefire proposals, with Ukraine requesting the heads of state meeting, which Russia took under consideration.
Mr Zelensky was in Tirana, Albania, on Friday, meeting with leaders of 47 European countries to discuss security, defence and democratic standards against the backdrop of the war.
He met with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk.
'Pressure on Russia must be maintained until Russia is ready to end the war,' Mr Zelensky said on X, posting a photo of the leaders during the call, the second for the group since May 10.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Most US adults do not think Trump's $45M military parade is ‘a good use of money,' poll finds
It's an OK idea ... but way too expensive. A new poll has found that a majority of Americans don't think the massive military parade that President Donald Trump has ordered up for his 79th birthday on Saturday is a good use of taxpayer dollars, even as most adults either approve of the parade itself or have no opinion of the plan. An Associated Press and NORC survey of 1,158 adults across all 50 U.S. states asked respondents whether they believe the parade, which is ostensibly meant to mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, is 'a good use of government funds' or 'not a good use of government funds.' According to results published on Thursday, a full 60 percent of respondents said they agreed with the latter statement that the parade — the first military parade in Washington since a victory parade held after Operation Desert Storm in 1991 — was 'not a good use' of money collected from taxpayers. Just 38 percent said the parade was a good use of funds. But when asked whether they approve, disapprove, or have no opinion of the parade itself, respondents were far more accepting of Trump's plan. Roughly four in 10 Americans said they either somewhat or strongly approve of the parade compared with 29 percent who said they somewhat or strongly disapprove of it. Approximately 31 percent of respondents said they neither approve or disapprove of the parade plans, which will include a fireworks display and performance by Army parachutists. The parade is expected to require spending somewhere between $25 million and $45 million, including a significant portion that will be spent after the parade to repair damage caused to D.C. roads by the numerous tanks expected to roll through the streets in a scene reminiscent of the annual Victory Day parade held in Moscow's Red Square, an Army spokesman said. Trump has pushed for the U.S. military to parade through the streets of Washington with tanks and missile launchers since he returned from a state visit to France early in his first term. During that July 2017 trip, the president saw the annual Bastille Day parade in Paris and wanted to replicate the martial display in the nation's capital, complete with Abrams battle tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles. But the military leadership in place during his first term balked at the idea because it's not something that is part of the American military tradition. Pentagon brass eventually permitted some static displays of tanks and other heavy for Independence Day celebrations on the National Mall in 2019, where they served as part of a backdrop for Trump to deliver a speech in which he credited the Continental Army — the forerunner to the U.S. Army founded during the American Revolutionary War — with having 'took over the airports' from the British. The bizarre remark drew ridicule from historians, who correctly noted that were no airports for either side to control during that conflict because powered flight would not be invented until 1904. At least one Republican senator, Rand Paul of Kentucky, has spoken out against the parade plans, telling NBC News this week that he had never supported "goose-stepping soldiers and big tanks and missiles rolling down the street," and he "wouldn't have done it." "I'm not sure what the actual expense of it is, but I'm not really, you know, we were always different than, you know, the images you saw in the Soviet Union and North Korea. We were proud not to be that,' Paul said. For his part, Trump has downplayed the cost of the parade, telling NBC News last month that the expenditure is "peanuts compared to the value of doing it." "We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it," he added. The parade is expected to include as many as 6,000 soldiers from National Guard, the Army Reserve, Special Operations Command, West Point and Reserve Officers' Training Corps elements, as well as 50 aircraft, 150 vehicles — including tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, HIMARS launchers — plus 34 horses, two mules and a dog.
South Wales Argus
35 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Israel to deport six more activists detained on Gaza aid boat, rights group says
The six include Rima Hassan, a French member of the European parliament who Israel had previously barred from entering Israel and the Palestinian territories, citing her support for boycotts of the country. 🚨 Messages from Rima and other members of the Freedom Flotilla crew.#FreedomFlotilla #FreeMadleen — Rima Hassan (@RimaHas) June 11, 2025 Israel's Foreign Ministry, which has dismissed the aid boat as a publicity stunt, posted a photo of Ms Hassan on what appeared to be an aeroplane. 'Six more passengers from the 'selfie yacht,' including Rima Hassan, are on their way out of Israel,' the ministry wrote on X. 'Bye-bye — and don't forget to take a selfie before you leave.' They were among 12 passengers, including climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, aboard the Madleen, a boat that sought to break Israel's blockade of Gaza and deliver a symbolic amount of aid. Israel seized the vessel early on Monday and deported Miss Thunberg and three others the following day. The last two activists are expected to be deported on Friday, according to Adalah, a local human rights group representing them. It said the activists were subjected to 'mistreatment, punitive measures, and aggressive treatment, and two volunteers were held for some period of time in solitary confinement'. Israeli authorities declined to comment on their treatment. Activists, including Greta Thunberg, sailed on the Madleen, a boat that sought to break Israel's blockage of Gaza (Salvatore Cavalli/AP) Israel says it treats detainees in a lawful manner and investigates any allegations of abuse. Israel portrayed the voyage as a media spectacle, dubbing it the 'selfie yacht'. It says the blockade, which it has imposed in various forms along with Egypt since Hamas seized power in 2007, is needed to prevent the militant group from importing arms. Critics view it as a collective punishment of Gaza's roughly 2 million Palestinians. The Israeli Foreign Ministry said those activists who signed deportation documents would be deported immediately, while those who refused would be brought before a judicial authority to authorise their deportation in keeping with Israeli law. The activists have protested that they had no intention of entering Israel and were brought there against their will. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which organised the journey, said it was aimed at protesting Israel's blockade of Gaza and ongoing military campaign there, which experts say has pushed the territory to the brink of famine more than 20 months into the Israel-Hamas war.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge amid jury issues
Deliberations ended on Thursday, a day after the jury delivered a partial verdict in Weinstein's sex crimes retrial. The jury foreperson said he would not continue deliberating after claiming he was bullied by another juror (Elizabeth Williams via AP) The jury got stuck on a third charge – a rape accusation dating to 2013. The foreperson complained on Wednesday that he felt bullied by another juror and said on Thursday he would not go back into the jury room. The panel convicted the former studio boss of one charge but acquitted him of another. Both of those charges concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. The jury of seven women and five men unanimously reached those decisions last Friday, the foreperson later told the judge. The verdict was delivered on Wednesday only because Judge Curtis Farber asked whether there was agreement on any of the charges. The third charge was a rape accusation involving a woman who also said she had a consensual relationship with the Oscar-winning producer. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the other two counts. Weinstein denies all the charges. In an unusual exchange with the judge, Harvey Weinstein told him the judge was 'endangering' him, saying 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this' (Elizabeth Williams via AP) In an unusual exchange with the judge during some legal arguments before the partial verdict was disclosed on Wednesday, Weinstein insisted it was unfair to continue the trial after two jurors came forward with concerns about the proceedings. 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this,' said Weinstein, 73, claiming the judge was 'endangering' him. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view on Friday when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then on Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again on Wednesday. In a closed-door discussion with prosecutors, defence lawyers and the judge, the foreperson said another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one point vowed, 'You going to see me outside.' 'I feel afraid inside there,' the foreperson told the judge and lawyers, according to a transcript. Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct. Harvey Weinstein was convicted of one charge, was acquitted of another and a mistrial ruled on the third (Jefferson Siegel /The New York Times via AP, Pool) But that conviction was overturned last year and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. His defence portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimised to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted – twice, now – of sexually assaulting, said outside court on Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope'. Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. Weinstein also was convicted of raping another woman in California. He is appealing that conviction. The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Ms Haley and Ms Sokola did so.
