Republicans struggle with Trump's mixed signals on 'big, beautiful bill'
It's hard enough to know what you want. It's even harder to know what others want. But what if what you want hinges on what somebody else wants…and they aren't sure what they want?
Hence the conundrum now facing Congressional Republicans as they try to approve the "big, beautiful bill."
GOPers are waiting for President Trump to push for very specific items to be in the bill – or fall by the wayside.
Congressional Republicans are aligned closely with the President and willing to bend to his wishes. But it complicates things when Trump calls for what he termed a "tiny" tax increase for the super wealthy.
Trump Says Tax Raises Are 'Good Politics,' Dismissing Gop Critics
"People would love to do it. Rich people. I would love to do it, frankly. Giving us something up top in order to make people in the middle income and the lower income brackets [have] more. So, it's really a redistribution," said the president.
Read On The Fox News App
First, President Trump suggested a form of rations, limiting how many pencils kids need or how many dolls a little girl should have. That puzzled free marketeers in the GOP.
Now, to use his phrase, "redistribution."
You understand how much heartburn this gives capitalists in Congress. But what's worse is the mixed messaging.
When writing on Truth Social about creating a higher tax bracket for the wealthy, the president muddled his instructions for lawmakers:
"Republicans should probably not do it, but I'm OK if they do!!!" declared President Trump.
Civil War Threatens Gop Over Millionaire Tax Hikes In Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
This exasperated Congressional Republicans who oppose raising any taxes – a long-held tenet of the Republican Party.
In another political universe, taxing the wealthy would be – at best – a trial balloon. So, most Congressional Republicans decided it was time for this to pop.
"No, we are not going to do tax increases," said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., on Fox Business.
"We don't want to raise taxes on anybody. I mean, we're about lowering taxes on Americans," said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., on Fox.
But President Trump's Republican Party is very different from the Reagan Republican Party. The GOP shifts to where Trump wants it. Just consider the approach to tariffs compared to free trade.
Trump Pushes Tax Hikes For Wealthy As 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Deadline Looms
President Trump broadened the party's base in the last election. The GOP is no longer dominated by big business, titans of commerce and the well-to-do. Part of the president's appeal was the blue-collar coalition he cobbled together. And his fundamental economic message on taxes resonated with millions of voters. That's why his top advisers say Trump is sticking to campaign promises.
"President Trump has made it clear that he has his priorities, like no tax on tips. No tax on overtime. No tax on Social Security," said National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Fox.
However, revenue generated from new taxes on the wealthy could help cover the cost of spending cuts.
"We need to see what we need to do with the math to make sure that we are doing the country well fiscally and that we don't just add to the debt," said Rep. Adrian Smith, R-Neb.
But Republicans are frustrated after House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., shrank the size of the tax cuts and spending reductions.
The tax breaks were supposed to be around $4.5 trillion at one point. They dwindled to $4 trillion. They were angling to lock in $2 trillion in tax cuts. They're scaled back to $1.5 trillion.
'Hard No': Millionaire Tax Hike Proposal Has House Republicans Divided
"Republicans talk a big game in campaigns," lamented House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas. "If we're not able to bend the curve on mandatory spending, then we will send a very bad signal to the bond markets."
But regardless of what's in the package, the White House is expecting Congressional Republicans to ultimately vote yes on the "big, beautiful bill."
"The president has great political instincts. That's why he's back in the Oval Office," said White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt.
But that's what Congressional Republicans found so vexing. The president may have great political instincts. But the marching orders were far from clear.
Trump conceded that a tax hike may be controversial politically.
Congressional Republicans suffer from political PTSD. They remember another Republican President who made one of the most famous political promises of all time. And then broke it.
"No new taxes," intoned the late President George H.W. Bush in his address to a Joint Session of Congress in 1989.
But Bush famously reversed himself as part of a 1990 budget pact. That was not necessarily the reason "Bush 41" lost reelection in 1992 to former President Clinton. And President Trump was sure enough to point that out on social media.
Trump Slams Republican 'Grandstanders' Opposing Budget Bill, Predicts Massive Us Tax Increases If It Fails
"The Radical Left Democrat Lunatics would go around screaming, 'Read my lips,' the fabled Quote by George Bush the Elder that is said to have cost him the Election. NO, Ross Perot cost him the Election!" wrote Trump.
The "Perot Effect" certainly deprived George H.W. Bush of a second term more than breaking the "no new taxes" promise. But that doesn't mean that Republicans aren't skittish about voting for tax increases.
And regardless, the legislative product that emerged from the Ways and Means Committee markup this week lacked the type of tax hike dangled by President Trump.
That said, Congressional Republicans certainly have their opinions about what they think of the developing "big, beautiful bill."
"A growing number of us, we don't want smoke and mirrors. We want real cuts," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. "$2 trillion (in cuts) is really a teardrop in the ocean."
"You've got front-loaded tax [cuts]. Backloaded spending restraint," groused Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas. "Medicaid reforms and work requirements don't kick in for four years."
"It'll be ironic and sad in a way that conservatives will be voting for the largest increase in the debt ceiling," mused Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. "I have a feeling it's going to be wimpy on the spending cuts and maybe a little wimpy on the taxes, too."
So, at least some Republicans grasp what they want in the bill. And they're willing to take direction from the president. That's why clear direction from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. will be key next week as the House tries to pass the measure.
Members will say they can't vote for the bill because it has this or excludes that. But they just might be able to vote yea if President Trump knows what he wants – and makes that clear to lawmakers.Original article source: Republicans struggle with Trump's mixed signals on 'big, beautiful bill'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
18 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court limits outside access to DOGE records
The Supreme Court has reined in a lower-court order that allowed a watchdog group wide-ranging access to records of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. The high court's majority said a judge's directive allowing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to examine DOGE's recommendations for cost savings at executive branch agencies was 'not appropriately tailored.' In a two-page order Friday, the Supreme Court said such access was not a proper way to resolve an ongoing dispute about whether DOGE is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act or operates as a presidential advisory body that does not have to share its records with the public. 'Separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications,' the court's majority wrote. All three of the court's liberal justices indicated they disagreed with the decision, but none provided an explanation of her views.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Over the finish line': Tuberville says passing spending bill bolster economic growth
ALABAMA (WHNT) — As the Big Beautiful Bill is under consideration in the Senate, an Alabama Senator says his top priority is to get the spending bill passed. U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville said Thursday the legislation is likely to undergo some significant changes while in the Senate, but he said his ultimate goal was to get the bill over the finish line. Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Rick Pate to run for lieutenant governor 'The number one priority in this bill is getting the jobs and tax cuts done,' Tuberville said. The spending bill has received criticism from conservatives over the past few days, including the former head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency. Elon Musk has called the bill an 'abomination,' posting on social media platform X about how the spending bill will significantly increase the national debt. 'The problem that Elon Musk looks at, I look at it different,' Tuberville told members of the press on Thursday. 'Number one, the way to grow this country is to get the tax cuts done and that tax cuts are in this bill and we need to make them permanent.' Tuberville said he and his colleagues have complained that Democrats spend too much money. He said he wants to cut back on how much can be cut from this bill. 'There's a lot of things the federal government, in this bill, is trying to send down to the states,' Tuberville said. 'We can't afford it in Alabama. We can't afford to pick up the tab for a federal government agency that was started years ago by the federal government. We don't need it in the state.' Tuberville said he is looking to the future to make changes. 'Remember, we will do another reconciliation after this,' Tuberville said. 'We have two more in the next year and a half, so whatever we don't get done in this bill, hopefully we can get done in the next.' The president has given Republicans in the Senate a tight deadline to pass the spending bill, asking them to have it on his desk by July 4th. The Tax Foundation estimates the bill passed by the House of Representatives will add more than $2 trillion to the national deficit over the next 10 years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration to pay nearly $5M in wrongful death lawsuit of Jan. 6 rioter shot by police
The Trump administration will pay a $4.975 million settlement in the lawsuit over the wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a U.S. Capitol Police officer after storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Babbitt — a 35-year-old from California and veteran of the Air Force who went to Washington for President Donald Trump's rally — was among an early group of rioters that reached the doors of the Speaker's Lobby, adjacent to the House chamber, while lawmakers were still evacuating. Details of the settlement were released by Judicial Watch, a pro-Trump advocacy group that represented her estate and family members in the lawsuit. The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to request to comment. The settlement is likely to inflame tensions on Capitol Hill over the riot. Outgoing Capitol Police chief Thomas Manger blasted the reported settlement last month, saying it 'sends a chilling message to law enforcement nationwide, especially to those with a protective mission like ours.' As members of the mob standing near Babbitt pounded on the doors and cracked glass window panes, outnumbered police officers stepped aside and ceded the hallway to the rioters. Moments later, Babbitt is seen on video attempting to enter the lobby through a shattered window. That's when Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd fired the fatal shot. Byrd was investigated and cleared by local and federal authorities. Babbitt was the only rioter killed by police, but several others died either during or in the hours immediately after the protest. Over 100 Capitol Police officers were injured during the protest. The lawsuit was filed in California by Babbitt's family in 2024, claiming wrongful death, assault and battery, as well as negligence claims. The lawsuit was set to go to trial in 2026, but both parties agreed to the settlement. A joint filing Friday from government attorneys and Babbitt's acknowledged that a settlement was reached, but did not disclose details. 'This fair settlement is a historic and necessary step for justice for Ashli Babbitt's family. Ashli should never have been killed, and this settlement destroys the evil, partisan narrative that justified her outrageous killing and protected her killer,' said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a press release on the settlement. Trump has repeatedly praised Babbitt, portraying her as an innocent patriot and decrying her death at the hands of Capitol police. It's part of the Trump administration's efforts to repaint the protest on Jan. 6 as a day of patriotism and freedom of expression, rather than an unprecedented insurrection widely denounced in 2021 by Republicans and Democrats. Trump issued sweeping pardons for nearly all of those charged or under investigation for their actions on Jan. 6, including over 300 charged with assaulting the police. Numerous Jan. 6 rioters have been arrested on unrelated charges since. Kyle Cheney contributed to this report.