EU faces heat over millions paid to Musk firms
The EU handed over hundreds of millions of euros to companies belonging to the world's richest man,
Elon Musk
, a key ally of US President Donald
Trump
and frequent critic of the bloc, a document seen by AFP showed Tuesday.
German Green EU lawmaker Daniel Freund sent a letter in March to the European Commission, asking for information about
EU funding
to Musk-linked businesses.
In a response to Freund, the European Commission said it paid around 159 million euros ($176 million) to automaker Tesla to build charging stations for electric cars in 2023.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
2025 Top Trending local enterprise accounting software [Click Here]
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
It also said in 2024, the EU commissioned Musk's
SpaceX
to launch satellites for the European
Galileo satellite system
, in a contract worth around $197 million.
The commission said it used SpaceX "due to delays in the commissioning of Ariane 6, the standard launch vehicle for Galileo".
Live Events
The EU also paid Musk's X 630,000 euros for paid advertising on the social media platform until it suspending use of such services in October 2023.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
Transatlantic relations have hit historic lows since Trump returned to the White House in January and Musk has attacked the EU's digital laws as censorship.
Critics including Freund cite that as good reason for the EU to pull the plug on payments to the tech billionaire.
"This man is an outspoken enemy of the EU and our core values. It is unacceptable that we continue to pay the richest man in the world hundreds of millions," Freund said on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk
THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump's many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show. So it is with the break-up between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest man and until last week a 'special government employee". A few months ago Mr Musk posted on X, his social-media platform, that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man". On May 30th, at a joint press conference in the Oval Office to announce Mr Musk's departure from government, Mr Trump called him 'an incredible patriot" and praised his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (known as DOGE). Yet by June 5th it had all broken down. On his Truth Social media platform the president posted that the billionaire was 'wearing thin" and 'went CRAZY". Mr Trump then threatened to 'terminate" his government contracts. Mr Musk responded on X, claiming that Mr Trump's name appears in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier who was convicted of trafficking and having sex with underage girls. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public," wrote Mr Musk. Later he agreed with a post saying that Mr Trump should be impeached. He also said he would begin decommissioning his Dragon spacecraft, which transports astronauts to the International Space Station. If carried out, the threats could be disastrous for both men. Mr Trump could lose a valuable donor and the supportive sway of X; Mr Musk's business interests could suffer enormously. But in response to a comment advising him to 'cool off", Mr Musk wrote 'good advice" and backtracked on his call to decommission the Dragon. Where things go from here is anyone's guess. The initial cause of the falling out between Mr Trump and his 'first buddy" was the president's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill". Mr Musk was incensed that the measure would add enormously to the deficit, and so undermine the work of DOGE. On June 3rd he escalated his criticism, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination". On June 5th he added another complaint, saying that Mr Trump's tariffs are going to bring about a recession. Mr Trump has his own explanation for Mr Musk's sudden disloyalty. He says the Tesla CEO is unhappy because his bill would cancel a government subsidy for electric cars created by Joe Biden. If Mr Trump does decide to retaliate, the risks to Mr Musk and his businesses are extensive. The threats the president has already made, however, are the least credible. Cancelling the contracts of SpaceX, Mr Musk's space company, would be profoundly disruptive to the government. Without SpaceX rockets, it would struggle to put anything into space, including spy satellites. The Pentagon relies heavily on the firm's Starlink satellites. SpaceX itself could probably weather such moves. Though it has benefited greatly from government contracts, the firm's commercial revenues soared nearly three-fold last year, according to estimates by Quilty Space, a business-intelligence firm. Mr Musk has also wanted to cancel the Dragon spacecraft for some time. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Mr Trump who is no fan of Mr Musk, has proposed even bigger penalties. He wants the South African-born billionaire to be stripped of his American citizenship—he says Mr Musk is an 'illegal alien"—and his companies nationalised under the Defence Production Act. Such actions also seem unrealistic. Stripping Mr Musk's citizenship would require a judge to rule he committed fraud. The Defence Production Act almost certainly does not permit sudden nationalisation, even if the country is at war. That does not mean Mr Musk can breathe easy, though. His interests are vulnerable to more routine measures. At the time he entered government in January, he and his companies were subject to 65 potential or actual regulatory actions by 11 federal agencies, according to the minority staff of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, an arm of the Senate. These include accusations that Tesla, Mr Musk's car company, lied about its self-driving technology; that Neuralink, his brain-implant company, violated the Animal Welfare Act with its experiments on monkeys; and that SpaceX repeatedly failed to follow the law when launching rockets. (As head of DOGE, Mr Musk was able to dismantle some of the agencies within the government investigating him, such as the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.) One of the reasons why Silicon Valley magnates like Mr Musk rallied around Mr Trump last year was that he promised a more favourable regulatory environment. But 'there was always the risk that what they were buying instead were the conditions of oligarchy", says Donald Moynihan of the Gerald Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. That is, business leaders who are loyal to the president get to operate as they like, while those who are critical get the full force of the law. Mr Musk may be about to discover what life is like outside the tent. Perhaps on feeling the cold he will find a way back inside. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Indian export businesses are using AI to stay ahead on global tax rules
Live Events Indian organisations have long embraced Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning technologies in various aspects to achieve their business goals. Now, they are actively exploring ways to implement these advancements responsibly and profitably. This goal closely aligns with the Digital India initiative , launched in 2015 to build a next-generation empowered many measures, the country is steadily progressing toward this vision, with its digital economy projected to contribute nearly one-fifth of the nation's GDP by 2030. This shift holds significant potential for businesses operating domestically, as well as for those planning to expand into global markets.. However, they must address regulatory compliance, cross-border taxation, and evolving trade policies to navigate international trade these concerns, many organisations are turning to technology-driven tax solutions. A recent survey stated that 92% of companies have adopted or planned to implement digital tax platforms within the next five years. Moreover, over half are actively integrating AI-driven technologies to streamline tax functions, paving the way for a smarter, more automated compliance constant stress of creating a tax-transparent and globally connected trade environment has driven Indian exporters to seek the best-in-class solutions. This stress arises from the multilayered regulations they need to tackle from the outset. In the US, for instance, tax compliance becomes challenging due to the multijurisdictional nature of sales tax. Each state imposes their own rates and economic nexus laws requiring businesses to collect and remit sales tax once they exceed certain revenue thresholds, even if the company has no physical presence there are over 13,000 sales and use tax jurisdictions in the US with their policies and deadlines. Similarly, the VAT system in the European Union (EU) has its own set of requirements. An Indian exporter selling across member states may need to charge different VAT rates based on the product type and the buyer's location, leading to a convoluted network of compliance responsibilities. This can be overwhelming, especially as compliance errors can lead to penalties and disruptions in overcome this, AI-powered tax systems offer an integrated solution that consolidates tax laws from multiple jurisdictions, automating calculations, filings, and regulatory updates. By reducing manual efforts and decreasing the risk of errors, AI helps exporters redirect their focus from regulatory burdens to strategic AI-enabled platforms can help track real-time transactions, proactively flagging potential issues before filing returns. For example, if an Indian exporter selling apparel online approaches California's economic nexus threshold of $500,000 in sales, AI systems can alert the business to register for sales tax in that utilizing ML algorithms, AI can also predict future tax liabilities based on historical data and projections, helping businesses avoid unforeseen tax burdens. Simultaneously, AI and ML make accessing and interpreting vast amounts of tax data stored in the cloud easier. AI-driven platforms can source and structure this data, helping businesses understand what has changed, track new tax rates, and automatically find the correct rates for each product and line with this, companies are increasingly adopting advanced technologies, such as GenAI, blockchain, and data analytics, to revolutionise their tax to recent studies, 87% of tax and finance professionals believe GenAI will significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their operations. GenAI helps businesses automate complex tax-related processes, such as generating accurate tax reports, predicting potential liabilities, and identifying discrepancies across jurisdictions. This allows organisations to swiftly adapt to regulatory shifts, ensuring greater compliance and reducing the risk of costly mistakes in cross-border the basicsThe push for Digital India is propelling significant progress in various sectors, focusing on leveraging technology to streamline operations and compliance. A recent example of this impel is the launch of Bharat Trade Net (BTN), a unified digital platform designed to simplify cross-border trade. BTN focuses on enhancing logistics, customs clearance, and trade documentation processes, which are often burdensome for it significantly improves transparency and provides easier access to financing, making it simpler for Indian businesses to expand. Given this, as AI drives tax compliance and automation, it has the potential to enhance the capabilities of platforms like BTN, ensuring that Indian businesses remain innovative and efficient the collaboration between the government and businesses will be crucial in shaping a future-ready tax ecosystem. With this, the increasing adoption of third-party, automated tax solution providers signals towards more secure, scalable, and cost-efficient solutions for managing tax compliance. Looking ahead, all these advancements will smoothen the tax processes and empower businesses to respond faster to regulatory changes, ensuring greater accuracy and transparency. As the industry evolves, Indian exporters need to be better equipped to meet the obstacles of a rapidly changing tax world, enabling sustainable growth and unfolding new opportunities for businesses and the economy author is VP, Product Management, The views expressed are solely of the author and ETCIO does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETCIO shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump vs Musk: Caught in the middle are two top US govt advisors, married to each other. What next?
As the feud between US President Donald Trump and his former top advisor, also the world's richest man, Elon Musk ensues, a Trump loyalist couple faces a conundrum like no other. Stephen Miller and his wife Katie Miller are now on the opposite sides of the Donald Trump-Elon Musk break up. How? Because one is the White House deputy chief of staff for policy and the other had until recently been serving as an advisor and a spokeswoman for Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. According to a New York Times report, last week, as Musk was leaving Washington behind, there were news reports that Katie was also leaving DOGE to work for Musk full time, a development that led to speculation about her relationship with the administration – and her husband. By Thursday, speculations intensified after Donald Trump and Elon Musk engaged in an ugly spat with Musk suggesting the president was ungrateful for the $250 million he spent on getting him elected and Trump saying he could cancel the tech billionaire's many government contracts. Musk then reportedly stopped following Stephen Miller, and several other conservative leaders, on X, the social media platform he owns. A day later, Trump said that Musk had "lost his mind" but insisted he wanted to move on from the fiery split with his billionaire former ally. Trump had scrapped the idea of a call with Musk and was even thinking of ditching the red Tesla he bought at the height of their bromance, White House officials told AFP. "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" Trump said in a call with ABC when asked about Musk, adding that he was "not particularly" interested in talking to the tycoon. Trump later told Fox News that Musk had "lost it." Just a week ago Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the DOGE after four months working there. Attempts to reach the Millers for comment were unsuccessful, the NYT report added. 'Let's take the richest guy in the world and put him in a room with the most powerful person in the world: Did anybody ever think this was ever going work out?' said James Carville, the veteran Democratic strategist. 'You couldn't be a casual observer of human nature and be remotely surprised by this," the NYT quoted him as saying. Carville was also caught in the middle, just like the Millers are. Back in the 1900s, while working as the chief strategist in the Clinton White House, he made headlines for his relationship with his wife, Mary Matalin, a Republican political consultant who helped manage the 1992 Bush campaign. The couple survived the Clinton administration, and remains married today, the report added. According to the report, Trump has caused a deeper rift between another married couple: Kellyanne Conway, a former campaign manager for the president, and her now ex-husband, George Conway, a conservative lawyer, who announced their divorce in 2023, after years of differing opinions on the president. (She approved, he decidedly did not.) (With inputs from agencies)
