The Association for Responsible Aquaculture Reports Allegations of Bid-Rigging in Nova Scotia Aquaculture Expansion
Documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests suggest that municipal staff and local oyster operators worked behind the scenes to fix the locations of Aquaculture Development Areas (ADAs) -placing them adjacent to residential properties without engaging affected residents or conducting meaningful consultation.
The controversial site selection has prompted accusations of favouritism and secrecy, with constituents questioning why certain locations were chosen and who benefited. Despite repeated calls for transparency and accountability, the municipality has ignored these concerns.
'People feel betrayed,' said Susan Savriga, an Argyle resident. 'This wasn't a transparent process. It feels like the decisions were made behind closed doors to benefit a few, while the broader community was left in the dark.'
Further compounding the issue, The Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture (DFA) is reported to have approved the contested ADA locations based on the municipality's recommendations-recommendations now mired in claims of improper influence.
During a June 2024 council meeting, the Municipality of Argyle confirmed that no meaningful public consultation had been conducted on the site selections-further fuelling community frustration.
Top Right to Left: Nolan Deon, and Colton Deon from Deon's Oysters sit behind Deputy Warden Ted Saulnier, Warden Nicole Albright, and CAO Alain Muise during the March 20 session for the municipality of Argyle NS.
Evidence and Escalating Concerns
Residents allege that municipal councillors and staff enabled specific oyster farmers to secure preferential treatment under the ADA program. In response, the municipality has hired an independent third-party investigator. Simultaneously, the Nova Scotia Ombudsman has launched a separate investigation into the municipality's failure to conduct proper consultation.
Despite these developments, the Municipality and DFA have refused to address or resolve the reported conflicts and continue to resist public calls for a reset of the ADA process to perform fair and open public consultations.
Rising Barriers to Transparency
In what residents describe as an attempt to stifle public oversight, the municipality has begun imposing excessive fees for FOIPOP requests. Additionally, it is invoking Bill 1, recently passed by the provincial government, to label certain information requests as 'trivial, frivolous, or vexatious,' potentially blocking further disclosures.
Community Voices Call for Accountability
'Seeing local councillors refuse to represent and listen to their constituents is extremely alarming,' said Lorelei Murphy, Former Liberal Candidate for MLA Argyle. 'Given the volume of concerns and perceived evidence presented by the residents throughout the area, I think it is council's obligation to hold an open and unbiased review of their decisions to this point and act accordingly moving forward.'
'It's clear now that the farmers cheated,' said Chris Thibedeau, a member of the Argyle Residents Association (ARA). 'The email evidence shows individuals inside the municipality helped them. These are no longer perceived conflicts-they are real, and they must be investigated.'
'I've been respectful in all of my communications,' said ARA member Corey Clamp. 'Yet weeks go by with no reply from my councillor. People are watching. If you can't respond to your constituents, you should step down.'
As public pressure builds, residents are calling for a full halt to aquaculture approvals until an independent review is completed. The integrity of the municipal governance, they say is on the line.
About the ARA
The Association for Responsible Aquaculture (ARA) in Argyle is a community stakeholder group of over 400 residents concerned with the lack of transparency and fairness offered by the Aquaculture Development Area (ADA) Pilot led by the Municipality of Argyle and the NS Dept. of Fisheries and Aquaculture. While the ADA is a government led effort, the ARA represents the public and residents of Lobster Bay who seek fairness and a balance of realizing aquaculture expansion in non residential areas in a manner that promotes Tourism and the local harvesting of seafood. ARA is not anti-aquaculture. The goal is to make sure the ADA achieves balance and offers a win for all stakeholders including industry and the public.
https://www.facebook.com/associationforresponsibleaquaculture
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0aec507f-92f3-47a0-a90b-c1b18e470dbe
Videos accompanying this announcement are available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e6490fec-de8b-4fd1-aa13-beacce677198
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e3d15935-5989-48d9-b652-f5fb99aebdf0
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fcdd9d7c-5efc-4a8b-a05b-f0d141e46709
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 hours ago
- USA Today
I rely on Medicaid to live. Trump's cuts make survival a privilege instead of a right.
When Congress cuts Medicaid, they aren't just targeting a program. They're threatening our ability to live, to care and to be cared for. I wake up every morning unsure if someone will be there to help me out of bed. That's the reality for many disabled people like me who rely on Medicaid. It's the program that allows me to live on my own terms – to work, create and contribute. But every year, my future is reduced to a line item politicians can vote on. The system was already failing us before these recent cuts. Getting enough hours felt like a battle. Navigating paperwork was a full-time job. The support I needed was out of reach – offered in theory, withheld in practice. My caregivers have other jobs and families. Coordinating support feels like solving a puzzle that keeps changing. When I can't make it work, I miss out. I cancel plans, skip opportunities, stay home. Not because I'm disabled, but because the system makes participation impossible. We recently marked two anniversaries: 35 years since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became law and 60 years since Medicaid was created. These were meant to be moments of celebration. Instead, I spent those days at a 60-hour vigil outside the Capitol, protesting the Medicaid cuts buried inside what the Trump administration calls 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' I sat sweating in my wheelchair while they celebrated the ADA, honoring disability rights while gutting the program that makes those rights real. Trump's hollow gestures mask brutal cuts for people with disabilities The symbolism was hollow. The reality was brutal. Medicaid pays the caregivers who help me eat, bathe and start my day. Without that funding, that care disappears – and so do the jobs that provide it. Opinion: Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill victory tour hits major bump – voters hate it I've had a disability – muscular dystrophy – my entire life, and have relied on Medicaid throughout my adulthood. The former shaped my identity with pride. The latter turned my existence into a negotiation, where my needs are measured against cost and my future hinges on someone else's math and stock prices. In 2020, I moved out on my own during the COVID-19 pandemic and asked for more caregiving hours. I was denied. I appealed to my Medicaid provider but was ultimately rejected again, essentially because I was 'not disabled enough.' That's what it's like to live in a system where your basic needs are judged by people who don't understand your life. Millions of families are in the same impossible position – forced to choose between caregiving and working, between paying for help and paying rent. The wages are low and the hours are unpredictable. Without stability, how do you build a life? One of the harshest provisions, part of nearly $1 trillion in cuts, would force people with lifelong disabilities to reverify their Medicaid eligibility every six months – as if conditions like muscular dystrophy might just disappear. This isn't about fraud prevention. It's about making the process so exhausting that people give up or get left behind. Two years ago, my Medicaid office lost a form. They said I never submitted it and ended my coverage. I had to start over, submitting more than 400 pages of documents. I went two months without insurance or caregiving. It was terrifying. And this bill could make that nightmare the norm. Medicaid cuts will make care a luxury for Americans with disabilities The agenda behind these cuts reflects a cruel belief: that people like me are expendable. That our care is a luxury. That billionaires deserve tax breaks more than I deserve to go to the bathroom more than twice a day. But I've seen what's possible when we invest in care. I helped pass the Domestic Workers Bill of Rights in New Jersey because I know how essential care work is – and how deeply undervalued it remains. I've lost caregivers not because they didn't care, but because they couldn't afford to stay. Your Turn: Medicaid handouts only create dependency. Able-bodied adults should work. | Opinion Forum Medicaid makes life possible. It funds home and community-based care not just for disabled people but also for older adults, parents and caregivers across the country. When Congress cuts Medicaid, they aren't just targeting a program. They're threatening our ability to live, to care and to be cared for. And here's the truth: You don't have to be disabled to need Medicaid. One accident, one diagnosis, one lost job – that's all it takes. When I couldn't get the care I needed, my best friend Zack stepped in. He crashed on my couch for months to make sure I was safe and fed. He did it out of love. But no one should have to rely on a friend to survive. We need more than speeches. We need leaders who see disabled people as human beings. We need a Medicaid system that doesn't just help us survive but lets us thrive. So don't just celebrate the ADA. Don't just mark Medicaid's anniversary. Show us that our lives matter. Protect the programs that give us independence, dignity and joy. From where I sit, holding tight to the care that keeps me alive, this bill isn't beautiful. It's a threat to everything we've built – and everything we still hope to become. Steve Way, an actor and comedian, is a member of the Caring Across Generations' Creative Care Council.
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Prince Andrew ‘annoyed' by lack of royal status, has no future: author
Prince Andrew has no future within the royal fold and is 'annoyed' over the lack of his royal status, according to a prominent author. The disgraced Duke of York, 65, is reportedly still licking his wounds three years on from being stripped of his royal and military titles, as well as patronages. According to author Andrew Lownie, who details various tidbits about the scandal-scarred prince in his latest biography, 'Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York,' the duke doesn't have a bright future regarding his royal and private life. 4 Prince Andrew has no future within the royal fold and is 'annoyed' over the lack of his royal status, according to a prominent author. Mirrorpix / MEGA What's more, Lownie claims that Andrew — who had recently won his yearslong fight to stay at the Royal Lodge — is already 'living the life of a retired man.' 'I don't think he has any public future. I would say his private future is pretty limited, too,' Lownie told Sky News. 'I mean, he lives in Royal Lodge, he plays golf, watches TV, and presumably sees his grandchildren … he's living the life of a retired man.' Lownie added that one palace staffer claimed that Andrew had been most affected by the stripping of his titles. 'What most annoys him is his lack of a royal status. That's what really sort of gave him his whole sense of identity,' he told the outlet. 4 The disgraced Duke of York, 65, is reportedly still licking his wounds three years on from being stripped of his royal and military titles, as well as patronages. Getty Images 'And that's, you know, it's not being able to put on his uniforms and strut around and being self-important.' Andrew's status within the royal fold quickly disappeared following his many controversies — including his close association with late convicted pedophile and financier Jeffrey Epstein, the sexual abuse lawsuit filed against him by the late Virginia Giuffre and his links to alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo. The late Queen Elizabeth II stripped her son of his military titles and royal patronages, as well as his HRH title, in 2022. He was also forced to give up his role as a working royal. 4 Lownie claims that Andrew is already 'living the life of a retired man.' Getty Images Shortly after losing his HRH titles and military honors, Andrew's Freedom of the City of York honor was also taken away following a historic vote by councilors. Elsewhere, Lownie has called for 'more accountability from the royal family and more transparency' after claiming there was a lot of secrecy behind closed doors during the research stage of his book. The royal author spent four years writing his latest book, and submitted hundreds of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to government departments. Follow The Post's royal family live blog for the latest pics, news, exclusive details and more However, Lownie claims that his applications regarding Prince Andrew and his work bounced back for reasons unknown. 'Clearly there are details that people have picked up on and run with. And you know, that's inevitable in these sort of books,' he told the outlet. 4 The late Queen Elizabeth II stripped her son of his military titles and royal patronages, as well as his HRH title, in 2022. Getty Images 'If they're to earn our trust and support, they have to show that they are not hiding things — that they are behaving well.' 'They blame everything from security reasons, to cost and man hours, to data protection, to my questions being too broad,' Lownie added. The Post has reached out to Andrew's reps and Buckingham Palace for comment.
Business Upturn
2 days ago
- Business Upturn
The Window to Build Real Wealth May Be Reopening—And This Presentation Shows Where to Look
Washington, D.C., Aug. 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Former CIA advisor and economic strategist Jim Rickards highlights in a briefing what he calls a 'generational opening' —a rare window where younger Americans may have access to something their parents and grandparents lost long ago: a tangible path to wealth. 'You don't need a trust fund or a tech job. You need to know where the country is shifting—and get there first.' Millennials and Gen Z: The Lost Opportunity Generations? For years, headlines have painted a bleak picture: younger generations saddled with debt, priced out of homes, locked out of traditional wealth-building paths. But Rickards argues this narrative may be about to flip—not because of tech, but because of land and resources. 'It's about the raw materials and physical building blocks of the future.' Why the Next Era of Wealth Will Be Built on the Ground—Not the Cloud Rickards says a shift is happening behind the scenes—one where physical assets like copper, lithium, and land are becoming more valuable than ever due to surging demand from AI, EVs, and advanced infrastructure. He calls it a rare convergence of industry, innovation, and raw supply—and believes those who recognize it early could be at the front of a generational wealth wave. 'It's not just tech that's booming—it's the physical inputs that make tech work.' America's First Real Onramp in Decades for the Working Class The presentation highlights a dramatic shift from the digital-only economy of the 2010s to what Rickards calls a 'resource-based recovery'—one that could create real jobs, real industries, and real opportunity in forgotten parts of the country. Why the Elites May Miss It Entirely Rickards points out that many institutional investors may ignore these trends—not because they're wrong, but because the opportunities are too small for their capital to scale. That's what gives regular Americans, especially younger ones, the chance to move first. 'Buffett couldn't meaningfully invest in some of these companies if he wanted to… but you can.' About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, Department of Defense, and U.S. Treasury, with over five decades of experience guiding high-level strategy. He is the editor of Strategic Intelligence , a monthly briefing focused on emerging economic shifts, overlooked trends, and the real forces shaping America's future. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
