logo
We shouldn't have to fight this hard to prove our mana in Tāmaki

We shouldn't have to fight this hard to prove our mana in Tāmaki

The Spinoff10-07-2025
Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei deputy chair Ngarimu Blair reflects on a hard-fought Environment Court battle, and what the ruling on Westhaven Marina really means for tangata whenua.
While there was major gratitude for the success of my iwi in the recent decision from the Environment Court regarding the Westhaven Marina, it was tinged with some sadness. Sadness the action needed to be taken, requiring significant cost and time to fight a process that challenged the very essence of my iwi – our status as tangata whenua of central Auckland.
But there was also immense sadness at the unnecessary conflict the Crown and council consultation and settlement process forces on my people, plus the devastation it has had on some formerly close and collegial relationships.
The judge asked me why I thought there was so much competition for our rohe. I responded that no one wanted it 100 years ago, but when iwi are forced to fight for the crumbs of the Treaty settlement process, this is what happens. However, it doesn't need to be like this.
It is incredibly disappointing that court action was required again to confirm what almost everyone with passing knowledge of and connection to Tāmaki Makaurau knows – that my people, through devastating loss and harrowing adversity, has hard-earned our place as tangata whenua of central Auckland.
My people can look across from our marae in Ōrakei to the very development at the heart of this dispute – a dispute where Crown and council policy enabled an action that we had no option but to oppose. This is an ongoing reality for us.
The court decision resulted from action taken in response to resource consent obtained by Eke Panuku Development Auckland from the council to expand Westhaven Marina. Conditions required engagement with 19 listed mana whenua groups through a forum. Originally 19 Pou Whenua for each 'mana whenua' were proposed, along with transferring the title of the reclaimed area to the Tāmaki Collective, not to ourselves.
Such council action challenges the immense sacrifices of my tūpuna, a challenge that says our centuries of hard-fought occupation, and the immense sacrifice and loss required for our people to keep our home fires burning here in central Tamaki Makaurau, meant nothing: That our kaumātua had no more authority to speak on the whenua at the heart of this dispute than those whose marae are more than 100km away.
The court acknowledged the connection of Ngāi Tuperiri of Ngāti Whātua ki Tāmaki to Westhaven through take raupatu, take tūpuna, take tuku whenua, and ahi kā – the pillars that uphold mana for all iwi and hapū across the motu.
'We are struck at just how little evidence there is of use and occupation by any of the [other] parties of the lands and waters around Westhaven over the past 200 or more years,' the decision said. The Marutuahu traditional expert explained that according to their tikanga, we have been keeping their fires warm for them on their behalf as they base themselves in the Hauraki-Thames district. A unique tikanga indeed.
The court's decision came last Friday, on the same day we farewelled one of our own, Clay Hawke – a beloved stalwart of our iwi. His tangi was large and filled with aroha. It was there, among our grieving whānau, that our chair, Marama Royal, stood and read the court's summary decision. Despite the sorrow that brought us together, a cheer rippled through the gathering. Not of triumph, but of affirmation. The decision was tika and pono – right and just.
It acknowledged the mana of our ancestors, the work of those who have preserved our tikanga, our knowledge of this whenua and waters, and the immense sacrifice of so many to uphold our place here. It acknowledged my cousin Clay who we had laid to rest.
For me, I hope this decision begins a change. A change that stops incentivising others to claim equal say with those who clearly are the tangata whenua of a rohe, those who have generations of knowledge to inform their understanding, and place as kaitiaki for their rohe.
The value of the whenua where my people live is both a blessing and a curse. No other iwi experiences the incursions and claims into their rohe like my iwi. However, the wealth and power of central Auckland has also allowed my people to regain some resources to help nurture and support our own, to try and undo some of the devastation and exclusion that colonisation unleashed on my iwi, as a consequence of being surrounded by Aotearoa's largest city.
We will work with the council to undo and walk back their adversarial policy, and seek a return to the collegiality that existed with our neighbouring iwi prior to the settlement process for my iwi.
In some cases, this journey of reconnection, of rekindling whanaungatanga, has already begun. The deep adversity endured by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei has honed our patience, our humility, our understanding of the need to fight as hard as we can, but also seek peace and reconnection with those who share our aspirations. We have our investment vehicle, Te Tomokanga ki Tāmaki, so others can access opportunities here through the front door. A number of iwi have already committed to our first development – a twin tower project in the CBD. There will be more for those willing to acknowledge us as the home people.
Thank you to the Environment Court, for bringing this sorry process to an end. Thank you to those among the 19 iwi who did acknowledge our status as tangata whenua. Thank you to my people for being so strong and supportive, it is our unity that is our greatest strength.
To our neighbouring iwi who we faced in court, let us begin the process of understanding and a return to the times of our past. As iwi Māori we have so much more that unites us, than stands us apart.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement
FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement

Scoop

time5 hours ago

  • Scoop

FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement

Press Release – Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency The Treaty came into force in 1988 and has been in effect for 37 years, involving fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the Pacific Island Parties by US purse seine fishing vessels. Over the years, its terms and conditions, and final … 15 August 2025 The Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) has today received the US$60 million payment for 2024, under the Economic Assistance Agreement (EAA) associated with the Treaty on Fisheries with the Government of the United States of America. FFA Director-General Noan David Pakop acknowledged the receipt of the payment, emphasising its importance to the 16 Pacific Island Parties that make up the FFA membership. Earlier this week, the United States Government announced the release of the payment, which will be allocated to the Pacific Island Parties in accordance with the agreed distribution approach. US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau met with Pacific Islands Ambassadors and Representatives based in Washington to confirm the payment and reaffirm the US Government's ongoing support for the EAA. He highlighted the commitment to the annual payment of US$60 million over a 10-year period under the agreement, as well the strong relationship with the Pacific Island States. 'This is a positive and welcome development, and a clear demonstration of the US Government's commitment to the EAA, the Treaty, and its cordial relationship with Pacific Island States,' stated FFA Director-General Noan David Pakop. 'We are confident that this initial payment will pave the way for the approval of the 2025 payment and future payments under the EAA.' The Treaty came into force in 1988 and has been in effect for 37 years, involving fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the Pacific Island Parties by US purse seine fishing vessels. Over the years, its terms and conditions, and final packages have been periodically renegotiated. The latest renegotiation was concluded in June 2024, extending the Treaty for the next 10 years (2023-2033) with revised terms, conditions and a new financial package. The Pacific Island Parties are: Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. About Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA): FFA assists its 17 Members to sustainably manage fishery resources that fall within their 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). FFA provides expertise, technical assistance and other support to its members who make decisions about their tuna resources and participate in regional decision making on tuna management.

FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement
FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement

Scoop

time5 hours ago

  • Scoop

FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement

Press Release – Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency The Treaty came into force in 1988 and has been in effect for 37 years, involving fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the Pacific Island Parties by US purse seine fishing vessels. Over the years, its terms and conditions, and final … 15 August 2025 The Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) has today received the US$60 million payment for 2024, under the Economic Assistance Agreement (EAA) associated with the Treaty on Fisheries with the Government of the United States of America. FFA Director-General Noan David Pakop acknowledged the receipt of the payment, emphasising its importance to the 16 Pacific Island Parties that make up the FFA membership. Earlier this week, the United States Government announced the release of the payment, which will be allocated to the Pacific Island Parties in accordance with the agreed distribution approach. US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau met with Pacific Islands Ambassadors and Representatives based in Washington to confirm the payment and reaffirm the US Government's ongoing support for the EAA. He highlighted the commitment to the annual payment of US$60 million over a 10-year period under the agreement, as well the strong relationship with the Pacific Island States. 'This is a positive and welcome development, and a clear demonstration of the US Government's commitment to the EAA, the Treaty, and its cordial relationship with Pacific Island States,' stated FFA Director-General Noan David Pakop. 'We are confident that this initial payment will pave the way for the approval of the 2025 payment and future payments under the EAA.' The Treaty came into force in 1988 and has been in effect for 37 years, involving fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the Pacific Island Parties by US purse seine fishing vessels. Over the years, its terms and conditions, and final packages have been periodically renegotiated. The latest renegotiation was concluded in June 2024, extending the Treaty for the next 10 years (2023-2033) with revised terms, conditions and a new financial package. The Pacific Island Parties are: Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. About Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA): FFA assists its 17 Members to sustainably manage fishery resources that fall within their 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). FFA provides expertise, technical assistance and other support to its members who make decisions about their tuna resources and participate in regional decision making on tuna management.

Supreme Court gives green light to riverbeds' inclusion in Māori customary marine title orders
Supreme Court gives green light to riverbeds' inclusion in Māori customary marine title orders

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Supreme Court gives green light to riverbeds' inclusion in Māori customary marine title orders

The Supreme Court has found riverbeds can be included in Māori customary marine title orders, if other legal tests are met. That comes from the second part of the Court's judgement on claims to customary rights in the harbours, river mouths, beaches and seascape of the eastern Bay of Plenty. The first judgement released in December 2024 addressed the meaning of section 58 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 (MACA), which sets out the test Māori groups must meet to have their customary rights recognised. It also overturned a previous Court of Appeal decision in 2023 which made it easier to gain customary title. This second judgement resolves the remaining seven issues on the seven separate appeals which were heard together. All this as the government forges ahead with plans to amend the law in question over fears that the 2023 Court of Appeal decision could have made it significantly easier for Māori iwi, hapū and whānau to have their customary rights over parts of the coastline recognised. Navigable rivers In this case one of the orders for customary title included the confluence of the Waiōweka and Ōtara rivers near Opōtiki. "Navigable river" in this case means a river of sufficient width and depth (whether at all times so or not) to be used for the purpose of navigation by boats, barges, punts, or rafts. The court accepted that the relevant portion of the rivers in question is navigable. The definition of "marine and coastal area" in MACA includes the beds of rivers that are part of the coastal marine area as that term is defined in the Resource Management Act 1991. The Attorney-General submitted that previous Acts of Parliament were intended to "vest the full beneficial ownership - akin to freehold title - in navigable riverbeds in the Crown." The court found that previous Acts were not sufficiently clear to extinguish customary rights or title to the beds of navigable rivers. The court concluded that "the beds of navigable rivers form part of the common marine and coastal area as defined in MACA, and recognition orders may extend to them". The court found the impact of these findings on the CMT claims in the Eastern Bay of Plenty, particularly in relation to the confluence of the Waiōweka and Ōtara rivers, can be dealt with by the High Court. Timeline October 2023, just days after the 2023 General Election, a Court of Appeal decision made granting customary marine title easier In November 2023, the coalition agreement between National and NZ First includes a commitment to overturn the Court of Appeal decision September 2024, the Waitangi Tribunal recommends the Crown halt its efforts to amend the Takutai Moana Act That same month the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) (Customary Marine Title) Amendment Bill is introduced to Parliament December 2024, the first Supreme Court judgement overturns the Court of Appeal decision. The government hits pause on the amendment bill August 2025, the government presses ahead with the law change.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store