Still a chance for NY packaging reduction bill to reach assembly floor
A spokesperson for the leader of the New York State Assembly said it's possible lawmakers in Albany will consider a packaging reduction bill supported by local and statewide environmental advocates before the session ends next week.
Whether there will be enough votes to actually approve the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act remains to be seen.
In response to questions from the Niagara Gazette this week, Thomas O'Neil White, a spokesperson for assembly Majority Leader and Buffalo Democrat Crystal Peoples-Stokes, said the bill is not on the agenda yet, but People-Stokes believes it will make it to the floor for a vote before the end of the session, which is expected to close either Tuesday or Wednesday.
'It depends on what is in the bill as it could change a few times before coming up for a vote,' O'Neil White said.
Supporters of the bill said on Friday that 'possible' consideration was not good enough.
Renae Kimble, president of the Niagara Falls chapter of the NAACP, who joined local and statewide environmental advocates in calling for the bill's passage earlier this week, described the bill on Friday as 'vitally important' to protect the health of every Western New Yorker.
'Given the toxic legacy of Western New York, we need all of the assembly members to lead and support this bill,' Kimble said. 'The bill has already been amended 26 times at the request of various businesses. The Senate has already adjourned meaning there is no time for further amendments, so we need the assembly to vote on the bill, as is, before they also adjourn in the coming days.'
The act would impose a 30% reduction on packaging statewide over the next 12 years and calls for the phasing out of 17 toxic chemicals currently found in various forms of packaging.
Supporters say it would cut plastic waste, improve public health and reduce costs for taxpayers. They also warn that remnants from plastic waste impact health and wellness, resulting in higher costs of care borne by New York residents and local governments. Environmental advocates say plastic waste is particularly harmful to the environment, especially the Great Lakes, including Lake Ontario.
Kimble said the impacts have proven particularly harmful to minorities living in cities like Niagara Falls and Buffalo.
'Black, brown, disabled, and marginalized members of our communities across the state have been subjected to the deadly effects of toxic pollutants due to the disproportionate amount of contaminated packing waste sent to landfills and incinerators in heavily populated Environmental Justice communities,' Kimble said.
Supporters of the bill's passage have also noted that existing state and local policies, such as the State Agency Green Purchasing Executive Order, and retailer programs, such as Walmart, already work to avoid the use of high-hazard toxic chemicals in packaging and products.
Patti Wood, executive director of Grassroots Environmental Education, said the bill builds upon Governor Paterson's 2008 State Agency Green Purchasing Executive Order, which requires state agencies to prioritize the procurement of products. The former governor's order requires the state to reduce or eliminate the health and environmental risks from the use or release of toxic substances, minimize the risks of the discharge of pollutants into the environment and minimize the volume and toxicity of packaging.
'This bill builds on smart green purchasing state and local policies that have been requiring manufacturers to avoid highly toxic chemicals in their products and packaging and 'green the marketplace' since 2008,' Wood said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Fetterman: Military parade comprised of ‘the verbest of us'
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) said that President Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C., commemorating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, is comprised of the 'best of us' and that it should be celebrated regardless of where one might stand on the political spectrum. 'This parade is comprised of our sons, daughters, mothers and fathers—the very best of us,' Fetterman wrote in a Saturday post on social media platform X. 'Regardless of your politics, it's appropriate to celebrate the 250 years of sacrifice, dedication and service.' Fetterman demonstrated rare Democratic support for the parade that is taking place on Trump's 79th birthday. The parade has drawn criticism from Democrats and some Republicans over the expected cost of the festivities, projected to be between $25 and $45 million. 'We're a lion, and a lion doesn't have to tell you it's a lion,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said on Tuesday. 'I would save the money, but if the president wants to have a parade, he's the president, and I'm not.' Most GOP senators said they would skip the parade. Other Republicans in Congress, like Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) and Rep. Maria Salazar (R-Fla.), are in attendance at the military parade, the first one to be held in Washington in 34 years. Fetterman has in recent months broken with his caucus on a few other issues, including on immigration and on his stance regarding Israel's war in the Gaza Strip. The Pennsylvania senator was also the only Democrat to introduce the Laken Riley Act and has criticized the Democratic Party over its response to the protest in Los Angeles against federal immigration raids. 'My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement,' Fetterman wrote on Monday. 'I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that.'
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Gov. Pritzker defends Illinois' sanctuary policies in heated Congressional hearing
Gov. JB Pritzker joined other Democratic governors Thursday in a tense hearing over immigration policies in front of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Why it matters: Illinois' sanctuary state policies are in the crosshairs of the Trump administration, which has threatened to withhold federal funding for the state and the city of Chicago. The big picture: The spotlight on immigration is intensifying as protests continue across U.S. cities, including what could be Chicago's largest single-day anti-Trump demonstration this weekend. What they're saying: " Illinois follows the law, but let me be clear, we expect the federal government to follow the law, too," Pritzker said in his opening remarks. "We will not participate in abuses of power. We will not violate court orders. We will not ignore the Constitution." Context: Pritzker sat on a panel with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul. The hearing was scheduled last month, before widespread protests erupted across U.S. cities, including Chicago. The original topic was states' sanctuary laws that limit how local law enforcement can work with federal immigration officers. But Thursday's question were largely about border security, the mobilization of the National Guard in Los Angeles and whether the Democratic governors are supporting illegal immigration. Zoom in: Republicans took aim at Pritzker, calling Chicago a haven for drugs and crime and pointing to crimes committed in Illinois by undocumented immigrants. In one heated moment, chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) repeatedly interrupted Pritzker while pressing him on a fatal crash involving an undocumented immigrant. Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), who doesn't sit on the Oversight committee but was allowed to speak, said "illegal aliens in our state have overwhelmed local communities and schools causing untold pain and suffering." She continued by asking Pritzker to apologize to family members of the woman who died in the fatal crash, who were present in the chambers. Pritzker was also asked to comment on border czar Tom Homan's perceived threats to arrest local officials who have sanctuary policies. Pritzker replied, "he can try." The other side: Democrat representatives defended Pritzker, including Oversight Committee member Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), who took his time to boast about Illinois' overall achievements. He also noted that it was Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner who first created Illinois' sanctuary laws, which allow state agencies to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers only when they present a federal warrant. " This is Illinois law," Krishnamoorthi said. "Donald Trump may not like state law as we are seeing in California, but what Donald Trump likes is irrelevant. The law is the law." The intrigue: Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) quizzed Pritzker on transgender bathroom policies and Hamas — not immigration.
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
‘Political violence is a sickness': Elected officials worry that attacks will escalate
Republican and Democratic politicians are warning about rising violence targeting elected officials in the aftermath of a series of attacks, including the killing of a state official in Minnesota on Saturday. Within the last year, there have been multiple assassination attempts against President Donald Trump, an arson attack on Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence, and the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington — setting a new cycle of violence in the country. That violence culminated this weekend after two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses were shot in their own homes, leaving two dead and two others seriously wounded. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, formerly the Democratic nominee for vice president, went so far as to direct his public safety department to recommend citizens avoid political events out of fear for their safety. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon warned that the brutality his state witnessed on Saturday was not unique to Minnesota, but rather part of the broader trend of political animosity turning into acts of harm. 'Political violence is a sickness,' Simon, a Democrat, said. 'And unfortunately, it's on the rise. I want to be real clear here, we've had recent examples on both sides of the political spectrum. I am really very worried about where this is all headed.' He added that 'to perpetrate it, to encourage it, to pretend to ignore it, all of those things will only further poison our democracy, and I — all of us — have to work hard now more than ever, to reinforce the idea that we have to settle our political differences lawfully, peacefully and ultimately at the ballot box.' According to lawmakers from across the political spectrum, threats of violence and even murder that were once rare are now commonplace, as tensions amid heightened polarization spill over into charged confrontations. 'We're all getting death threats pretty regularly, and violent threats,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said of his congressional colleagues. 'You go online and you just see all of the vile and hate and vitriol that is pulsing through mostly right wing politics and platforms, but there's some of it on the left too.' And the threats don't just begin and end online. 'People have showed up outside my home,' Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor next year, said. 'We've had swatting attacks, we've had bomb threats. I've experienced all three of those things at my home. When things like this happen, it is a devastating reminder of the reality that we're living in in this moment.' In 2020, several men were accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in order to start a civil war. Two suspects were later convicted on charges related to the incident. President Donald Trump recently floated pardoning the men convicted in the kidnapping plot. Huffman said he and other members of Congress are 'taking all kinds of precautions' to boost their safety that they never before would have thought necessary in the U.S. Federal campaign finance officials signed off last year on allowing members of Congress and candidates to use campaign cash for a wide array of personal security measures due to the threats they now routinely face. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), who has young children, said he, too, had beefed up his security in the past year, because 'people have lost all sense of responsibleness and civility.' Lawler said that the 'volatility' in political discourse has 'gotten so hot that people have lost perspective,' resulting in people 'making decisions that result in bodily harm of elected officials and the general public.' 'I think both parties have to recognize that some of the rhetoric really results in grave consequences,' the New York representative added, referencing the attempts on Trump's life in July and September. 'And how things are described, how people talk about actions being taken by the government, just all of it is destructive towards the public discourse, and frankly, put people's lives in jeopardy. And I hope people wake up to it, because it really is destructive.' Members of Congress and Capitol police have been warning about an increase in threats to federal lawmakers for years. But the spike is particularly acute for state lawmakers, many of whom only work part time and do not have the resources that federal elected officials have. 'If Trump has literally the best security in the world, ostensibly, and can't stop it, how could they feel safe?' said Amanda Litman, the co-founder of the Democratic candidate recruitment group Run for Something. 'And I think the thing we came back to is — we want to be really honest with folks — there's nothing we can do to guarantee safety at all times. All we can do is control what we can control.' But some political experts said that the rise in violence is further inflamed by the rhetoric and actions pushed by the Trump administration and other Republicans. 'I mean, it's not rocket science,' Harvard political scientist Steve Levitsky, who co-authored the book 'How Democracies Die' in 2018, said. 'You condone the January 6 insurrection. You pardon them all, or virtually all of them, including those who physically assaulted police officers, and you treat them as heroes. You send around unmarked cars with masked vigilante like agents, abducting people off the streets. You politicize the armed forces and send them in threatening violence upon peaceful protesters. And you condone the physical assault of a or arrest of a U.S. senator for peaceful expression of his views. … You've created an atmosphere that's not just permissive of political violence, it encourages political violence.' Republican politicians are aware of the problem and say so privately, Levitsky said, but are 'worried' to speak up publicly. Trump said of the shootings on Saturday that 'such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America.' The White House did not immediately respond to Levitsky's criticism. The escalating violence comes amid heightened political tension, including millions of Americans pouring onto the streets to protest on Saturday as a counter to Trump's multi-million dollar military parade and the administration's recent immigration crackdowns. Huffman noted the challenge for Democrats of threading the needle between resistance to the president, who Democrats have characterized as an authoritarian leader, and maintaining non-escalatory, peaceful protests. 'I don't want to pull punches, I don't want to stand down in any way, but I don't want to fan the flames that could lead to violence, and so I just try to strike that difficult balance,' Huffman said. 'We're also fighting for democracy and our rights against an authoritarian president who's trying to be a dictator, and you can't sugarcoat that, it's just reality.' 'So how do you confront that without contributing to this ladder of escalation that could lead to violence?' he asked. 'It's not simple.'
