logo
Russian 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit on 'megathrust fault'

Russian 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit on 'megathrust fault'

USA Today3 days ago
SINGAPORE - The 8.8 magnitude quake off Russia that triggered tsunami warnings across the Pacific occurred on what is known as a "megathrust fault", where the denser Pacific Plate is sliding underneath the lighter North American Plate, scientists said.
The Pacific Plate has been on the move, making the Kamchatka Peninsula area off Russia's Far East coast, where it struck, especially vulnerable to such tremors - and bigger aftershocks cannot be ruled out, they said.
With its epicentre near the city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, it was the largest earthquake since the devastating Tohoku event in 2011, which caused a tsunami that led to the meltdown of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.
"The Kamchatka seismic zone is one of the most active subduction zones around the Pacific Ring of Fire, and the Pacific Plate is moving westwards at around 80 mm (3 inches) per year," said Roger Musson, honorary research fellow at the British Geological Survey.
"Subduction" events, in which one plate pushes under another, are capable of generating far stronger earthquakes than "strike slips", such as the one that hit Myanmar in March, where plates brush horizontally against one another at different speeds.
The Kamchatka area is particularly vulnerable and experienced a magnitude 9 event in November 1952, wiping out the town of Severo-Kurilsk and causing extensive damage as far away as Hawaii, Musson told Reuters.
Shallow "megathrust" events are more likely to cause tsunamis because they burst through the sea floor and displace huge volumes of water.
Tsunami Risks
With a relatively shallow depth of 20.7 km (13 miles), the earthquake on Wednesday, July 30 was always going to create such tsunami risks, experts said.
"It is an offshore earthquake, and when you have offshore earthquakes, there is the potential for tsunamis," said Adam Pascal, chief scientist at Australia's Seismology Research Centre.
"If you have a relatively shallow earthquake, it is more likely to rupture the surface of the ocean floor," he told Reuters.
"We've seen in some cases you can have large earthquakes like this and not cause a tsunami because they are too deep and the shearing doesn't express itself at the surface."
Tsunami waves of around 1.7 metres (5.5 feet) reached as far as Hawaii, less high than originally expected, but scientists warned that such waves do not have to be especially big to do damage to the relatively low-lying coastlines of Pacific island nations.
Parts of French Polynesia were told to brace for waves as high as 4 metres (13 ft).
The impact of a tsunami depends on its "run-up" as it approaches coastlines, Pascal said.
"If you have a very long, shallow run-up to the coast, a lot of the energy can be dissipated over that run-up, but if it is a very steep shelf before you get to the coast, the wave height can be higher," he said.
Foreshocks and Aftershocks
July 30's quake has already triggered at least 10 aftershocks above magnitude 5, and they could continue for months, said Caroline Orchiston, director of the Centre for Sustainability at the University of Otago in New Zealand.
"This demonstrates that large-magnitude earthquakes generate aftershock sequences that start immediately, and some of these can be damaging in their own right," she said.
The 8.8 magnitude event came less than two weeks after a magnitude 7.4 earthquake in the same area, which has now been identified as a "foreshock."
"Earthquakes by their nature are unpredictable," said Pascal. "There are no precursors that are scientifically consistent in earthquake sequences. Before this morning, those other ones were the main shocks."
Bigger aftershocks cannot entirely be ruled out, he added, but their magnitude and frequency normally tend to decrease over time.
"You can expect large aftershocks to continue for some time, but the frequency of large, damaging events will reduce as time goes on," he said.
"There is always a chance of a larger event, but that larger event will usually occur relatively soon after, within days or weeks."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires
Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires

By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Wildfires that devastated parts of the Los Angeles area in January indirectly led to hundreds of deaths in the ensuing weeks, far exceeding the official toll of 31 fatalities, according to a study released on Wednesday. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, estimated 440 "excess deaths" were attributable to the fires from January 5 to February 1, using models that compared predicted mortality under normal circumstances to actual numbers documented during that period. The additional deaths likely reflect a mix of factors, including increased exposure of people with heart and lung disease to poor air quality from smoke and toxins released by the fires, as well as healthcare delays and disruptions, the study said. The findings "underscore the need to complement direct fatalities estimates with alternative methods to quantify the additional mortality burden of wildfires and of climate-related emergencies more broadly," the researchers wrote. Two wind-driven wildfires that erupted during the first week of January on opposite sides of Los Angeles damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures combined - laying waste to much of the seaside district of Pacific Palisades and the foothill community of Altadena. Together, the blazes scorched 59 square miles (152 sq km), an area larger than Paris. The official tally of people who perished as a direct result of the fires stands at 31, after the most recent set of human remains were unearthed in Altadena in July, six months after the fires. Governor Gavin Newsom in February requested nearly $40 billion in wildfire aid from Congress. Some estimates put economic losses from the fires at more than $250 billion, making the conflagration one of the most costly natural disasters in U.S. history. The JAMA study acknowledged some limitations, saying the data may need to be revised upward in the future and the research did not reflect any fire-attributable deaths beyond Feb. 1.

Three people evacuated from Antarctica base in high-risk rescue involving 24-hours of darkness, sub-zero temperatures
Three people evacuated from Antarctica base in high-risk rescue involving 24-hours of darkness, sub-zero temperatures

New York Post

time5 hours ago

  • New York Post

Three people evacuated from Antarctica base in high-risk rescue involving 24-hours of darkness, sub-zero temperatures

Three people were evacuated from a US research base in Antarctica during a high-risk operation in round-the-clock darkness and sub-zero temperatures, according to authorities. The Royal New Zealand Air Force conducted the perilous operation Tuesday afternoon after the United Nations Science Foundation requested a medical evaluation for three staff members at McMurdo Station, including one who needed urgent medical help, the RNZAF said in a statement Wednesday. 3 Three people were evacuated from a US research base in Antarctica during a high-risk operation in round-the-clock darkness and sub-zero temperatures. via REUTERS Advertisement A crew aboard the C-130J Hercules braved total darkness and bone-chilling temperatures to reach the station overnight, authorities said. Flights conducted in the continent's mid-winter season, which is between March and October, are often the most dangerous due to varying weather conditions and on-ice landings, Air Component Commander Air Commodore Andy Scott said. 'The crew can only attempt the flight after a detailed analysis of the weather and airfield state. The United States Antarctic Program Winter Team must physically create the runway before we can depart by ensuring the ice is groomed and suitable for landing,' Scott said in a statement. Advertisement 3 A crew aboard the C-130J Hercules braved total darkness and bone-chilling temperatures to reach McMurdo Station overnight. AP Although the team determines if the flight and landing can be carried out safely, it can still be 'extremely challenging' to fly using night vision goggles, the commander added. 'This, coupled with there being no airfields available to divert to once the aircraft is past a certain point south, adds to the risk, so these missions are not taken lightly,' Scott said. A doctor was aboard the flight to provide medical assistance to the research staff, whose ailments were not immediately known, according to the RNZAF. Advertisement The plane landed in Christchurch on Wednesday morning after completing the nearly 20-hour harrowing round trip, authorities added. 3 A doctor was aboard the flight to provide medical assistance to the research staff. via REUTERS The US Embassy in New Zealand later expressed its gratitude for the air force crews' courageous mission. 'This mission wasn't just difficult; it was one of the most technically demanding operations an aircrew can face. In extreme conditions, with little margin for error, the RNZAF executed this mid-winter Antarctic medevac flawlessly,' the embassy's Chargé d'Affaires, Melissa Sweeney, said in a statement. Advertisement 'This required absolute precision. It was daring, dangerous, and deeply courageous. This is the kind of mission that tests every ounce of skill and bravery. RNZAF delivered, just as they always do,' Sweeney said.

Kennedy cuts funding for mRNA vaccine research. See how they work and why it matters.
Kennedy cuts funding for mRNA vaccine research. See how they work and why it matters.

USA Today

time7 hours ago

  • USA Today

Kennedy cuts funding for mRNA vaccine research. See how they work and why it matters.

The federal government is cutting $500 million in research money for development of mRNA vaccines, which were widely used against the COVID-19 virus. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a statement Aug. 5 that the multimillion-dollar cuts are being made because 'the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu.' Research that helped develop mRNA vaccines won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2023. Members of the scientific community are criticizing Kennedy for his decision. How do mRNA vaccines work? Messenger RNA vaccines, or mRNA, differ from traditional ones. Instead of growing a virus and weakening it to allow the body to engage its natural defenses, mRNA vaccines use pieces of genetic code to manufacture a protein, a piece of the virus. That causes the body to create its own antibodies against the virus. Pharmaceutical companies Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech created mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 during the coronavirus pandemic. This is how those vaccines worked: Can't see our graphics? Click here to reload the page. It can take years to develop and test traditional vaccines before they can be used. However, mRNA vaccines can be manufactured in just months, according to The New York Times. They can be rapidly restructured to combat viruses as they change. An mRNA vaccine does not interact with or affect our DNA, the CDC says. The body discards the mRNA after it's used. How do traditional vaccines work? The HHS unit Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority helps companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats and had provided billions of dollars for development of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, Reuters reported. HHS said the cancellation includes a contract awarded to Moderna for the late-stage development of its bird flu vaccine for humans and the right to purchase the shots. The health agency said it was also rejecting or canceling multiple pre-award solicitations, including proposals from Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, CSL Seqirus, Gritstone and others, Reuters said. Kennedy is a longtime vaccine skeptic. He has called COVID-19 vaccines the deadliest ever made, and in June he fired 17 members of a CDC panel that made recommendations on vaccine use. It's unclear whether patients should be expecting COVID-19 vaccines this fall, USA TODAY reported CONTRIBUTING Adrianna Rodriguez and Ken Alltucker SOURCE USA TODAY Network reporting and research; Reuters; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store