SC congresswoman sues 1 of the men she accused of sex crimes, claiming he defamed her in response
A lawsuit filed Monday by U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace claims one of the men she targeted in a shocking speech in Congress defamed her on social media in the weeks afterward.
The 1st District congresswoman accuses Eric Bowman of 'repeatedly and maliciously' damaging her reputation following her hour-long speech in February, for which she's being sued for defamation by one of the other men she named. Bowman has said more lawsuits are likely, but he meant against her.
All four men, who include Mace's ex-fiancé, have vehemently denied her accusations from the U.S. House floor that they committed 'some of the most heinous crimes against women imaginable.'
Bowman, a Sullivans Island software developer, called the lawsuit filed in Charleston County court 'headline theater.'
Mace claims Bowman 'acted with reckless disregard to the truth and with actual malice towards Rep. Mace through his utter disregard of and callousness to her rights as a South Carolinian in purposely making such knowingly false declarations,' the lawsuit reads.
The lawsuit cites Bowman's posts on X, formerly Twitter, between Feb. 27 — 17 days after her speech — and March 17.
In that nearly hour-long speech broadcast live on C-SPAN, Mace accused the men of an array of sexual crimes, including raping and videotaping women without their knowledge.
Mace said she was among the victims. All four men immediately denied her claims.
At the time, the state Law Enforcement Division confirmed it was investigating Mace's ex-fiancé. A spokeswoman said Monday the agency had nothing new to report as the investigation continues.
No charges have been filed.
Bowman and Mace have blasted each other in social media posts since the speech.
The posts that Mace cites in her lawsuit include Bowman's allegations that Mace illegally used her position on the House Veterans' Affair Committee to steer VA contracts to friends and political allies.
'Bowman knew these statements were objectively false when they were made and acted with a reckless disregard for the truth in repeatedly making such statements without support or any attempt to verify the veracity of such statements,' the lawsuit reads.
In addition, it continued, 'Bowman has also spent months smearing Rep. Mace's name and reputation through wide range of vile, contemptible, and repugnant character attacks.'
Responding to the lawsuit, Bowman said his social media activity represents the truth.
'My posts — based on documents, public records, witness testimony, and materials from her own staff— present evidence of hacking, blackmail, misuse of private images, misappropriated tax dollars, and retaliation against rival VA contractors,' he wrote to the SC Daily Gazette in a text.
'Those posts remain publicly available on my X feed (@_ericbowman) for anyone who wants to review them. I acted in good faith and without malice, and I will present this evidence under oath,' he said.
Defamation cases are harder for public figures to prove. Their claims must meet the 'actual malice' standard — that whoever they're suing knew the information was wrong or didn't care and recklessly spread it.
'I'm confident the First Amendment — and the documented facts — will prevail. Nancy Mace can't be trusted,' Bowman's text concluded.
While posts included in the lawsuit stop March 17 — three days after a defamation was filed against her in U.S. District Court in Charleston — Bowman's posts about her continued.
In an April 9 post that tagged Mace, he wrote, 'What if this isn't just politics or drama? What if we're witnessing a real mental breakdown — public, painful, and unchecked?'
Mace announced her lawsuit against him on X: 'Let this be a warning to all. I didn't come to play,' she wrote.
The suit against Bowman comes a month after he was arrested on unrelated charges of stalking and harassment.
He said those April 8 charges came from his estranged wife, who he claimed he has not spoken to since November 2023. He denied the allegations and continued to criticize her on X after he got out of jail, calling the accusations 'weaponized law enforcement.'
Bowman turned himself in at the jail and was released later the same day.
Mace has yet to respond legally to the lawsuit filed in March by Brian Musgrave of Fort Mill.
The case could test the limits of the 'speech or debate' clause of the U.S. Constitution, which shields members of Congress from lawsuits for what is said in either chamber. Musgrave contends her posts after the speech aren't protected.
Rep. Mace sued by 1 of the men she accused of being a sexual predator
Musgrave's suit came two weeks after his lawyers, Eric Bland and Ronnie Richter, warned Mace in a letter to either reveal evidence of the allegations, apologize or prepare to be sued.
Mace has never responded directly to the lawsuit, even to reporters. Instead, she's repeatedly referred questions back to her House speech.
'She has been uncharacteristically quiet (about the lawsuit) for a woman who isn't afraid to get in front of the microphone,' Bland told the SC Daily Gazette on Monday.
The lawsuits loom as Mace mulls a run for governor. Mace hasn't officially announced but it's widely expected that she's going to be part of a crowded field vying for the GOP nomination.
Gov. Henry McMaster, who's already the state's oldest and longest-serving elected governor, can't seek another term.
Others expected to run include Attorney General Alan Wilson and Lt. Gov. Pam Evette.
Mace has taken jabs at both on social media. U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, as well as state Sens. Josh Kimbrell and Sean Bennett are also considering bids.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Jeffries: Noem will be among the first ‘hauled up to Congress' if Democrats retake House
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem would be a top oversight target if Democrats retake the House in the midterms. 'It's my expectation that Kristi Noem will be one of the first people hauled up to Congress shortly after the gavels change hands to get a real understanding for the American people as to this conduct that has taken place: the lack of respect for due process, for the rule of law, the unleashing of masked agents on law-abiding immigrant communities, and the disappearing of people in some instances, to other countries without any real evidence that criminal behavior took place,' Jeffries said in an interview with Tim Miller on The Bulwark's podcast. 'All of this is going to require aggressive oversight activity.' Jeffries nodded to a number of controversial actions taken by the Trump administration, from sending Venezuelan migrants to a notorious megaprison in El Salvador to side-stepping due process with actions such as moving to dismiss immigration court cases as a way to initiate expedited removal proceedings and bypassing review by a judge. Masked agents have also been conducting arrests at courthouses and in immigration enforcement actions across the country. Jeffries added that he supported the deportation of immigrants who have been convicted of violent crimes, 'but not law-abiding immigrant families, including in some instances, U.S. citizen children who've been sent overseas to a place that they've never known.' Jeffries said Reps. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who would lead the House Homeland and Judiciary committees if Democrats flipped the House, would likely play a key role in such efforts. 'We'll figure out what the formulation looks like,' he added. While President Biden was in office, House Republicans impeached then-Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, saying he violated the law, the Secure Fence Act of 2006, by failing to detain every migrant that crossed the border. The Senate swiftly rejected the impeachment.
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Everyone loses in a redistricting war
Gerrymandering, a wonky topic previously discussed mainly among AP history students and political scientists, has recently dominated national news headlines. In the fight for control of Congress after the 2026 midterm elections, governors of several states are opting to hijack the decennial process for partisan advantage, rather than letting voters decide directly who should represent them in Congress. Election analyst and redistricting expert Dave Wasserman recently referred to what's happening as the 'gerrymandering apocalypse.' CNN referred to it as a 'battle royale.' And Gov. Kathy Hochul (D-N.Y.) said, 'we are at war.' It's easy to point fingers at Gov. Greg Abbott (R-Texas) and say 'he started it!' Abbott acquiesced to President Trump's suggestion that the state take up redistricting mid-cycle and draw five additional Republican seats — a seemingly desperate attempt to avoid the ' midterm curse, ' where the incumbent president's party typically loses House seats in a midterm election. But the Archduke Ferdinand in the war on redistricting isn't Texas, it's actually Ohio. There's a famous adage relevant here: 'So goes Ohio, so goes the nation.' And over the past two redistricting cycles, Ohio has gone down a very gerrymandered path that the nation now seems to be following. In matters that extend beyond Ohio and gerrymandering, it is imperative that we pay attention to what is going on in statehouses around the country, ' laboratories of autocracy ' as they are often rightly called, for a glimpse into the corruption that awaits our national politics. Ohio has some of the most gerrymandered maps in the nation. Its state legislature and Republican-dominated redistricting committee gerrymandered maps through a series of secret backroom deals, disregard of multiple court orders, and a deliberate strategy of confusing voters to sabotage attempted reform. They even tried to impeach the Republican chief justice of the Ohio Supreme Court for ruling their rigged maps unconstitutional. But while state politicians were gerrymandering Ohio, unfortunately, few people were paying attention. Despite repeatedly breaking the rules, there was no accountability for the elected officials who took part in the scheme. To the contrary, most who participated were rewarded with electoral districts they were guaranteed to win, and a veto-proof majority in the state legislature. This has allowed Republicans in the state to pass unpopular laws that aren't supported by most voters. Take, for example, Ohio's Heartbeat Law, which outlawed abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. Poll after poll showed that a majority — nearly 60 percent — of Ohioans supported abortion rights, with only 32 percent opposed and 10 percent undecided. These numbers have held relatively steady over several years. However, the 2019 legislative vote passing the bill seemed to reflect the inverse; the Ohio House passed the measure 56-40 and the Ohio Senate 18-12. Although average voters around the country weren't paying attention to what was happening in the Buckeye State, political operatives were. What happened in Ohio is now serving as a playbook for what we are seeing in states like Texas, Missouri and Florida. The governors and state legislatures of these states have indicated that they are willing to cheat to win. The Trump administration has demonstrated its willingness to ignore court orders it does not like. And, if they continue to do so, we will likely have a Congress that continues to pass legislation that is unpopular with voters. Politics is often like physics, in that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Democrats have indicated they are willing to fight back by gerrymandering blue states such as California and New York. Some have praised them for this effort, with one Democratic consultant stating: 'There's anger among Democrats, and they wonder why their elected leaders aren't doing everything they can to fight back. … Kathy Hochul is out there saying, 'I'll do everything I can to fight back — including gerrymandering the s–t out of New York.'' But as the redistricting wars escalate, it is also a reminder that, as in any war, no one actually wins. Regardless of which party controls Congress after the 2026 midterms, voters in both red and blue states will be disenfranchised, in direct violation of the Supreme Court's ' one man, one vote ' edict . Both Democrats in red states and Republicans in blue states will be without any genuine form of representation. And even those who have a congressman of their preferred party affiliation will likely be represented by a more extremist candidate whose policy positions aren't reflective of the people in that district. As noted by The Associated Press, 'gerrymandering, once a feared accusation, has now become a battle cry.' If there's any lesson we can take away from the fight, it's that the lines we need to redraw aren't those separating congressional districts, but the ones we are willing to cross to ensure our side wins at all costs.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Handwritten proof of Holocaust theft should compel Congress to act
In 1944, Hungarian officials sat down with pen and paper and recorded by hand the seizure of 90 Torah scrolls from Jewish families. This was not wartime chaos, but deliberate, state-organized cultural erasure. That document, buried for decades in microfilm archives, was recently made public for the first time through the Holocaust Art Recovery Initiative. It is a single page, handwritten in a steady but chilling script. It doesn't describe battles or casualties. It inventories sacred scrolls stolen from Jews who were soon to be deported. These 90 Torahs were part of a larger pattern of thousands of cultural, artistic and religious items looted by Nazi-allied regimes across Europe. In Hungary alone, tens of thousands of Jewish-owned artworks, books and ceremonial objects were systematically stolen, catalogued and in many cases absorbed into state museum collections. Families were erased. Their heritage was buried — sometimes literally. Today, many of those items remain in public institutions. And in the U.S., survivors and their heirs often face insurmountable legal barriers when trying to recover what was taken. That's why Congress must pass the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act Improvements of 2025, a bipartisan bill introduced in the Senate by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and in the House by Rep. Laurel Lee (R-Fla.). This legislation would strengthen and extend the original HEAR Act, first passed in 2016, which was designed to ensure Holocaust restitution claims could be heard on their merits. That law is set to expire in 2026. Without swift action, survivors and families may permanently lose access to justice. New evidence like the handwritten Torah document reinforces the urgency. This isn't theoretical. It's tangible. And it speaks to a broader truth: The Holocaust wasn't just a genocide of people — it was a systematic looting of culture, identity and memory. The legal fight is not easy. As recent cases like Republic of Hungary v. Simon demonstrate, foreign sovereign immunity laws, expired statutes of limitations and bureaucratic stonewalling have made it nearly impossible for families to recover what was taken. The HEAR Act Improvements of 2025 addresses these very challenges, extending the timeline and reinforcing the right to be heard in U.S. courts. More than 25 national organizations have endorsed the legislation, including the World Jewish Restitution Organization and the Claims Conference. They rightly note that each object stolen represents not just property, but a life interrupted — and a legacy denied. Restitution is not about money. It is about dignity. It is about accountability. And, yes, it is about history. When lawmakers see the original documents — handwritten proof of cultural theft — they begin to understand why this work cannot wait. Congress still has time to do the right thing. But the clock is ticking, and the handwriting is on the page. Jonathan H. Schwartz is a litigation partner at Taft-Detroit and co-founder of the Holocaust Art Recovery Initiative. He also serves as president emeritus of the Jewish Bar Association of Michigan and recently authored an evidence report on Hungarian Holocaust-era art theft.
