Support for relief road to ease town traffic
Market town residents have spoken about how their lives have been blighted by traffic, as councillors backed plans to explore the building of a relief road.
Fenland District Council said it would look at ways to make a case for a new road in Whittlesey, near Peterborough, following concerns over increased journeys by lorries on the A605.
One resident, Michael Gibbs, 76, told the BBC that somebody needed to "get a grip" on traffic in and around the town.
The authority said it would look at sourcing £220,000 to make a case for the project, following approval by councillors on Monday.
The relief road would look to reduce congestion in Whittlesey by giving vehicles an alternative to travelling through the town centre.
Resident Mr Gibbs said a 15-minute car journey could sometimes take him 45 minutes, which he called "ridiculous".
"The problem is if you've got an appointment in Peterborough, you don't really know how long it'll take you to get there," he said.
Brian and Jayne Brian-Platt, aged 60 and 59, live in nearby Thorney and welcomed the idea of a relief road.
"We're new to the area and we've noticed how dirty our car gets when we're up and down the High Street to Whittlesey," said Mrs Brian-Platt.
"The heavy vehicles, they just bound along the road so fast."
Mr Brian-Platt said lorry traffic on the roads in Fenland was "unbelievable".
He believed a road "especially made for the heavy traffic" would be a "good idea".
Dee Laws, the Conservative councillor for Whittlesey North West, told councillors on Monday she was "probably a little biased" due to being based in the town, but thought the project was "essential to move forward".
"Increase in traffic is happening daily, especially HGVs," she said.
"If you want growth in the economy to actually open up Fenland, you need to improve the road structure between east and west."
It is thought any relief road would run south of the A605 but not bypass Whittlesey entirely.
In a report, the district council said the road was "currently unfunded" but congestion was a problem in the growing town.
Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk.
Plans to ease traffic in growing market town
Officers pilot home visits in knife amnesty week
New lease of life for former funeral shop
Fenland District Council
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: More people leave than arrive on current youth mobility schemes
On the BBC's Today programme on May 19, from around two hours and 21 minutes, Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the UK's youth mobility arrangements with other countries reduce net migration. Asked 'how do you know there will be fewer people coming here than leaving?' Mr Reynolds said: 'Well, I've got 13 schemes in action already and that's the evidence of them.' He later added: 'I tell you the evidence of the current schemes just so you know is that they're a net negative on immigration.' Around 24,400 youth mobility visas were issued to people wanting to come to the UK in 2024. Although figures are patchy for how many Britons go abroad, data from just three countries – Australia, New Zealand and Canada – suggests that 68,495 British citizens travelled to those countries in 2024 (the Australian data is for the 12 months to the end of June 2024). That would suggest that Mr Reynolds is right. However it does not take into account that Britons going abroad on these temporary visas will sooner or later come back, as will those who come to the UK. It is also not clear that this pattern will repeat in any similar deal with the EU. The UK population is much larger than those of Australia, New Zealand and Canada, so there are more Britons who can go to those countries than can come here. With the EU that is reversed. How many people come to the UK on a youth mobility visa? Government data shows there were 24,437 people who were handed a youth mobility visa last year. Most of these were from one of the 13 countries with which the UK has a reciprocal arrangement. A small handful of visas – 131 in total – were for people from countries other than the 13. The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford has suggested that these are the result of errors in data recording, or due to people having dual nationalities. The top three countries that sent people to the UK on youth mobility visas between January and December 2024 were Australia (9,754 visas), New Zealand (4,304 visas) and Canada (3,060 visas). How many Britons go abroad on youth mobility type schemes? Figures are patchy on how many British people have gone abroad on a youth mobility scheme. The Department for Business and Trade was unable to share data. Australia publishes a twice-yearly report into what it calls its working holiday visa programme. That is the Australian equivalent to the UK's youth mobility scheme. The latest such report covered the 12 months to the end of June 2024. That report showed that Australia issued 48,973 working holiday visas to UK citizens. Data from New Zealand is available on the website of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Using its migration data explorer produces a spreadsheet which shows that there were 9,486 working holiday visas granted by New Zealand to UK citizens in between January and December 2024. Canadian data does not appear to be publicly available, but the figures were provided to the PA news agency by the Canadian Department for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship. The data shows that in 2024 there were 9,972 work permits issued to UK and UK overseas territories citizens under the country's working holiday scheme, and a further 64 people had their permits extended. How do incoming youth mobility visas compare to outgoing? Net migration is a figure which subtracts the number of people coming into the country from the number of people leaving. The data cited above suggests that while 9,754 Australians came to the UK on youth mobility visas, 48,973 Britons went in the opposite direction. It must be noted that the time periods measured here are different, the Australian data is for the 12 months ending June 2024, while the UK data is for the 12 months ending December 2024. Meanwhile the data suggests that 4,304 New Zealanders came to the UK while 9,486 Britons went in the other direction. Data further shows that 3,060 Canadians came to the UK in 2024, while 9,972 Britons went in the other direction. This suggests that for each of these three countries the youth mobility schemes are – as Mr Reynolds suggested – reducing net migration. In fact Australia alone appears to receive twice as many Britons (48,973) as all people who the UK receives from all 13 countries added together (24,437). However, it should be noted that because youth mobility schemes are time-limited, Britons going abroad and people who have come to the UK on such visas will eventually be forced to return. This means the UK's inbound migration figures should take into account not just Australians and Canadians – for example – coming to the UK, but also Britons returning from Australia and Canada after their youth mobility visas expire. If it is assumed that everyone returns then over a longer time frame the youth mobility programmes will have a neutral impact on net immigration because every Briton who leaves the UK will come back and every non-Briton who comes to the UK will leave. This does not take into account the people – both Britons abroad and non-Britons in the UK – who apply for a different visa to stay in their adopted country. Do these conclusions also apply to the EU scheme? The impact on net migration of the potential EU scheme will depend on the details of the agreement between London and Brussels. Madeleine Sumption, director at the Migration Observatory, told the PA news agency that the size of the cap on the programme would be vital for the impact on net migration. She said the fact the UK sends more people to Australia, Canada and New Zealand than it receives from them 'probably results from the fact that the UK has a much larger population than they do, so we just have more young people potentially interested in moving'. With the EU scheme, Ms Sumption said, the population sizes are flipped – that is to say the EU's population is much bigger than the UK, leaving more young people who might be willing to come here. Therefore the smaller the cap on the number of visas is, the more likely both the EU and UK will fill their quotas. If both fill their quotas – and the quotas going both ways are the same – then the impact on net migration will be zero. However if the cap is large then it is more likely that there will not be as many Britons going to Europe as are coming in the opposite direction, which will bring up net migration. But, as with the existing schemes, both Britons in Europe and Europeans in the UK will eventually have to leave unless they find another visa, which over the long run should mean that the programme has a neutral impact on net migration. BBC – Today, 19/05/2025 Migration Observatory – What is the Youth Mobility Scheme and how does it work? (archived) – Entry clearance visas granted outside the UK (archived page and spreadsheet, using tab Data_Vis_D02) Australian Department of Home Affairs – Visitor visa statistics (archived) Australian Department of Home Affairs – Working Holiday Maker visa program report (archived) New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment – Migration data explorer (archived page and downloaded spreadsheet. To download the correct spreadsheet, instructions can be found at (archived): In dataset select 'W1 work decisions', in time period select 'calendar year' and in variables select 'application substream', 'application criteria' and 'decision type') Canadian data provided to PA news agency (archived) Madeleine Sumption profile (archived)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biden's post-presidency: From Social Security talk in Chicago to appearing on 'The View'
Joe Biden ended a half-century career in public office after a rough final year that saw him drop out of the 2024 presidential race amid questions about his age and fitness. Now, he has returned to the national spotlight after it was announced that he was diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier this month. A Biden spokesperson said on May 18 that the former president has been diagnosed with an "aggressive form" of prostate cancer that has spread to the bone. Biden was diagnosed after "experiencing urinary symptoms," and a "nodule" was discovered on his prostate, according to the statement. The former commander-in-chief, who left the White House and headed straight to California for vacation, has stayed low-key for months. The cancer diagnosis came as Biden, 82, was starting to grapple publicly with Donald Trump's presidency, which some Democrats blame on his decision to wait so long to exit the 2024 race. Biden began to reemerge publicly over the last month, giving a speech in Chicago, followed by an appearance on ABC's "The View," and then with an interview with the BBC. Biden said on "The View" that he was "trying to figure out what the most significant and consequential role I can play" post presidency. Now his plans are being upended by a significant health fight. Biden's first speech since leaving the White House came on April 15 in Chicago as Trump approached the 100-day mark of his presidency. The former president criticized his successor's opening policy blitz. "In fewer than 100 days, this new administration has done so much damage and so much destruction,' Biden said at a national conference of Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled in Chicago. "They've taken a hatchet to the Social Security Administration." The remarks came as Democrats were distraught about the opening days of Trump's presidency. Biden's role in the party has been unclear as Democrats look for new, younger voices to take on Trump. Biden finished his one term in the White House with low approval ratings and facing second-guessing from fellow Democrats. He sought to rehabilitate his image in the party, hiring a well-known Democratic operative to help. Biden began making the media rounds, attempting to rehabilitate his reputation, ahead of two highly anticipated books excavating his administration's efforts to downplay concerns about his age and acuity that many believe hobbled Democrats in 2024. Appearing on "The View", Biden rebuffed criticism that he waited too long to drop out of the 2024 race and maintained he would have defeated Trump in a rematch last fall. He also pushed back on those saying he experienced cognitive decline, adding: "They are wrong." And earlier this month, Biden told the BBC that ending his 2024 bid was "the right decision" but "just a difficult decision." "It was hard to say now I'm going to stop," he told the BBC. "Things moved so quickly that it made it difficult to walk away." His May 16 prostate cancer diagnosis came on the same day Axios released recordings of Biden's five-plus hours of interviews with Special Counsel Robert Hur. Hur ultimately decided not to prosecute Biden for improper possession of classified documents and asserted that jurors would have viewed Biden as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Biden dropped out of the 2024 race and turned the Democratic nomination over to former Vice President Kamala Harris after a disastrous debate performance against Trump. The debate heightened concerns about Biden's mental acuity. Since his cancer diagnosis, Biden has received an outpouring of support from across the political spectrum. Trump, Harris, former President Barack Obama, and former President Bill Clinton have all wished Biden well on social media. "Joe is a fighter - and I know he will face this challenge with the same strength, resilience, and optimism that have always defined his life and leadership," Harris wrote. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Phillip Bailey, and Sarah D. Wire, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Joe Biden retreated from the spotlight after leaving the White House
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new ban dodges pitfalls faced by last attempt, experts say
US President Donald Trump has issued a sweeping new travel ban for people from 12 countries, revisiting a hallmark policy of his first term in office. There are some key differences, however. The original travel ban suffered a series of legal defeats. This time, the policy appears to have been designed to avoid the same pitfalls. Its predecessor, which targeted seven predominantly Muslim countries and was dubbed the "Muslim ban" by critics, was ordered just a week after Trump took office in 2017, during his first term in the White House. The ban was amended twice to overcome court challenges, after opponents argued it was unconstitutional and illegal because it discriminated against travellers based on their religion. A scaled-back version was eventually upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018, which this new ban closely resembles. Legal experts told the BBC that it appeared Trump had learned lessons from his first attempt. Christi Jackson, an expert in US immigration law at the London firm Laura Devine Immigration, said the new ban was more legally robust as a result. While the first lacked "clarity", the new restrictions were "wider in scope" and had "clearly defined" exemptions, she said. While there are some similarities in the nations chosen by the 2017 ban and the 2025 ban, Muslim-majority states are not the express target of the latest order. Barbara McQuade, professor of law at the University of Michigan and former US attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, told the BBC World Service's Newshour programme that, on this basis, it seemed likely to win the approval of the Supreme Court, if it was ever referred up to that level. Trump's travel ban: Follow live updates Everything we know about the ban so far Why are these 12 countries on the list? Trump suspends foreign student visas at Harvard The 12 countries subject to the harshest restrictions from 9 June are mainly in the Middle East, Africa and the Caribbean, including Afghanistan, Iran and Somalia. There will be partial restrictions on travellers from another seven countries, including Cuban and Venezuelan nationals. Trump said the strength of the restrictions would be graded against the severity of the perceived threat, including from terrorism. But besides Iran, none of the 12 countries hit by the outright ban are named on the US government's state sponsors of terrorism list. In a video announcing the ban posted on X, Trump cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which a man was accused of throwing Molotov cocktails at demonstrators attending a march for Israeli hostages. The alleged attacker was an Egyptian national. However, Egypt does not appear on either list. Trump also specified high rates of people overstaying their visas as a reason for listing certain countries. However, Steven D Heller, an immigration lawyer based in the US, said there was a "lack of clarity" over what threshold had to be met by a country's overstaying rate in order for that country to be placed on Trump's ban list. That could be the basis for a successful legal challenge, he suggested. "If they're relying on this notion of excessive overstay rates... they have to define what that actually means," he told the BBC. Unlike the first ban, which was to last for only 90 to 120 days, today's order has no end date. It has been met with dismay in the targeted countries. Venezuela has described the Trump administration as "supremacists who think they own the world", though Somalia has pledged to "engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised". The original ban spurred mass protests and sowed chaos at US airports. It was repealed in 2021 by Trump's successor, President Joe Biden, who called the policy "a stain on our national conscience."
