logo
MSMEs demand supportive compliance frameworks as QCO burden mounts

MSMEs demand supportive compliance frameworks as QCO burden mounts

Time of India30-05-2025
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
New Delhi: As concerns mount regarding the enforcement of mandatory quality control orders (QCOs), small businesses in the country have asserted that compliance frameworks should be designed to support MSMEs rather than stifle their growth while recognising the importance of standardisation for global competitiveness.The India SME Forum organised a high-level dialogue this week under the theme 'Bharat Quality Mission: Enabling MSME s for Global Competitiveness'. The event brought together MSME stakeholders, industry associations, and policymakers to collectively advocate for reforms in the QCO implementation process. Vinod Kumar , President of the India SME Forum, stressed the need for a more balanced and inclusive regulatory approach. He emphasised that nearly 97% of India's enterprises are micro and small businesses, which are disproportionately affected by the current QCO regime.'We have reached a point where domestic manufacturers, especially MSMEs, are under intense regulatory scrutiny for components and inputs, while finished goods continue to enter India with minimal checks at ports,' he said, noting that this asymmetry creates a serious disadvantage for local producers.Kumar pointed out that the abrupt QCO imposition on raw materials and components has disrupted supply chains, increased production costs, and reduced access to essential inputs across sectors like electronics, food processing, and textiles.'Our entrepreneurs want to comply and produce high-quality goods. But without adequate testing infrastructure or access to global-standard labs, compliance becomes both expensive and time-consuming,' he said. In some cases, an MSME in Pune is required to send samples to Bhopal just to test electrical components—such a gap hinders business and growth, he explained.Notably, the Indian government is implementing quality control orders (QCOs) across various industries to enhance product quality and safety. Currently, the government of India does not have a single, unified timeline for enforcing QCOs across all industries. Instead, each QCO is issued by the relevant ministry or regulator for specific products or sectors, and the enforcement date is explicitly stated in each order. For example, the QCO for certain electrical appliances has been extended to March 19, 2026, with further extensions for small and micro enterprises. In the chemicals sector, deadlines have also been adjusted through amendments, sometimes providing up to a six-month extension. Other products, like hinges, have specific implementation dates listed in their respective QCO.ISF President, in his address, also flagged disparities between online and offline sellers, noting that e-commerce sellers often face stricter compliance requirements, while offline sellers can bypass scrutiny. Additionally, widespread lack of awareness and the proliferation of fraudulent certification agents further complicate compliance for honest businesses. 'There are cases where MSMEs have been duped by consultants issuing fake certifications that hold no legal value. A robust mechanism is needed to verify certifications and prevent misuse,' Kumar said.He called for a phased roll-out of QCOs, especially for micro-enterprises and existing inventories, as well as exemptions and financial support for the smallest firms. Aligning Indian standards with globally accepted certifications, he said, would streamline exports and reduce redundant testing.'Compliance should not be a barrier to growth. If an MSME holds a CE mark or equivalent global certification, that should be sufficient. We shouldn't need duplicative and costly processes to meet India-specific requirements,' he added.Citing the Prime Minister's vision of 'Zero Defect, Zero Effect', Kumar emphasised the need for inclusive and pragmatic policymaking that empowers MSMEs rather than constraining them. 'We need a national quality ecosystem that's collaborative, bringing together policymakers, certification bodies, marketplaces, and MSMEs. Our goal is to build a framework that enables, not penalises,' he said.To that end, the India SME Forum plans to run nationwide outreach programmes and certification camps to help 1.2 to 1.5 million MSMEs obtain quality certifications by the end of the year.Keynote speaker Nidhi Khare, Secretary, Department of Consumer Affairs, emphasised the need for a proper understanding of the intent behind QCOs and urged MSMEs to view them constructively. 'There is a need to correctly interpret the purpose of QCOs. Whatever fears MSMEs have must be addressed. Businesses must adapt logically and progressively, and where the government's support is needed to change processes, that will be provided,' she said.Khare also underlined that India's strict stance against substandard imports is attracting capital, technology, and jobs, making it essential for MSMEs to align with quality norms. To support this transition, she said the government is investing Rs 78 crore through BIS to expand testing infrastructure nationwide. 'QCOs are not just regulatory tools; they are enablers of export growth and manufacturing excellence,' she added.Khare highlighted the importance of roadmaps for each sector covered under QCOs and urged industry players to keep the relevant authorities informed of their implementation challenges.Saurabh Arora, President of the state branch of the Indian Pharmaceutical Association, flagged regulatory overlaps affecting the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries. He noted that while the Drugs and Cosmetics Act already mandates robust standards, particularly through the Indian Pharmacopoeia, recent QCOs have created confusion and imposed dual compliance requirements. 'Ingredients regulated under stricter pharmacopoeial standards are now also subject to BIS QCOs with more lenient norms, creating unnecessary complications,' Arora said. A pharmacopoeia is an official, legally binding book that sets standards for the quality, identity, purity, and strength of medicines, including active pharmaceutical ingredients, excipients, and finished pharmaceutical products.Suggesting a solution, Arora called for clearer exemptions for pharma-grade inputs and the creation of category-specific standards for cosmetics. 'Testing a face serum under lotion standards leads to inaccurate results. The government must develop vertical product standards or ensure appropriate horizontal benchmarks,' he said.He further urged recognition of existing pharma-grade standards under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act to avoid dual compliance and called for greater coordination between BIS and sector regulators. 'Compliance must be meaningful. It should support industry growth while maintaining quality and safety,' he stressed.Jaideep N Malaviya, Founder-Secretary General of the Solar Thermal Federation of India, lauded the QCOs introduced for solar water heating systems on April 14, but flagged major implementation issues.He said regional BIS offices remain unaware of updated product structures and testing guidelines. 'There's a disconnect between policy-level updates and on-ground implementation. Portals reflect outdated information, leading to confusion during testing,' he highlighted.Malaviya urged BIS to adopt a supportive approach during the transition period and avoid penalising companies trying to comply. 'Despite QCOs being in effect, most consumers are unaware of the new standards. This information vacuum is exploited by fly-by-night operators selling substandard products,' he said.One of the key sessions featured Ramaswami Lakshman, Director of Emerging Markets, FBA at Amazon. He said digitisation has the power to level the playing field for MSMEs. We are committed to helping Indian sellers, especially from tier II and III cities—navigate compliance, improve quality, and reach customers domestically and globally. Over 12 million MSMEs have already been digitised through our initiatives,' he said, adding programmes, such as the Bharat Quality Mission, are essential for shaping policy frameworks that unlock the potential of small businesses.The event concluded with the submission of a detailed policy recommendation dossier to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs Ministry of MSME , Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), and the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). The key proposals included a phased implementation of QCOs, improved access to testing infrastructure, harmonisation with global certification norms and financial and capacity-building support for small businesses.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's only a matter of time before Trump blinks on tariff: Chris Wood
It's only a matter of time before Trump blinks on tariff: Chris Wood

Time of India

time3 minutes ago

  • Time of India

It's only a matter of time before Trump blinks on tariff: Chris Wood

Christopher Wood suggests buying Indian equities despite US tariffs. He believes Trump will eventually reverse the tariffs. Wood highlights India's geopolitical importance and notes the unusual nature of the tariffs. He mentions India's underperformance in equities and links the second tariff tranche to India's Russian oil purchases. Wood also observes the US Federal Reserve's potential rate cut in September. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mumbai: Jefferies' global head of equity strategy, Christopher Wood, said the Trump administration's imposing a 50% tariff on Indian imports is not a reason to sell Indian equities. Instead, it's a reason to buy them since "it is only a matter of time before Trump backs off the stance, which is not in America's interest.""It is worth noting that the track record makes it clear that it pays to stand up to the Donald," said Wood in his latest 'Greed & Fear' said the Trump administration's decision to impose an additional 25% tariff, taking the total levy to 50%, on Indian goods is "somewhat unusual" given India's relatively small trade surplus with the US and its "very important geopolitical relationship" with second tranche of 25% tariffs appeared linked to New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil."China has been buying much more oil from Russia but has not been sanctioned in the same way," he said. "The singling out of India in this fashion is not what most people would have predicted."According to Wood, Donald Trump has succeeded in bringing China, Russia, India, and Brazil together like never before."Indeed, BRICS as a grouping has been regalvanised."Wood said India's equities had recorded the biggest underperformance relative to other markets in 15 years in the 12 months to July. He attributed the weakness to "very high valuations" and "a heavy schedule of equity issuance."According to him, it is too late to cut India with valuations now back near the 10-year average 63% Price to Earnings (PE) ratio premium over emerging market said the slightly better-than-anticipated July inflation data has marginally lifted expectations of the US Federal Reserve easing. The base case remains for a rate cut by the American central bank in September and for the US dollar to remain in a downtrend."Still, for a data-dependent Fed not willing to project forward, which is more or less where the Powell-led Fed has been of late, there is still an argument to stay on hold since the reality is that reported inflation is still well above the 2% YoY target," he said the prime driver of the Trump administration's criticism of Jerome Powell is not concerns about the state of the economy, but rather to get the cost of debt servicing down.

A paradigm shift: on India and its trade relations
A paradigm shift: on India and its trade relations

The Hindu

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

A paradigm shift: on India and its trade relations

On August 11, the central government implored India's seafood industry, that provides livelihoods to about 28 million people, to 'bravely face' the U.S.'s tariffs of 25% that kicked in on August 7 and which could be raised to 50% on August 27, contingent upon the outcome of trade negotiations. On Wednesday, highly placed sources in the Commerce and Finance Ministries told The Hindu that the government is exploring 'tweaking' the Export Promotion Mission (EPM), that was announced in the 2025 Union Budget, with an outlay of ₹2,250 crore for the current fiscal year. The EPM, a multi-Ministry project to drive access to cheaper export credit, overcome non-trade barriers and insure payments from overseas buyers, focuses on India's micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME). Initially meant to be driven by the Ministries of Commerce, MSME and Finance, discussions are on to include the Textiles and Fisheries Ministries. These two industries, which collectively support about 135 million Indians, form among the largest segment of MSMEs that are likely to face the most impact due to the sanctions. The U.S. typically accounts for roughly a third of India's apparel and seafood exports annually. The government's imploration to also diversify into other markets is a tacit admission that the Bilateral Trade Agreement negotiations with the U.S. are deadlocked, and that the personal equations between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S President Donald Trump have not translated into a win for either side. Bilateral relations have arguably hit a level lower than during the Cold War, as the two nations were not as enmeshed as they are now, economically, culturally and militarily. Trade and service routes and supply chains take decades to build and undoing them overnight is not possible. This has been clear from the European Union's reliance on Russian oil and the global dependence on rare earth elements from China. While consultations have been ongoing between the government and MSME sector stakeholders ever since Mr. Trump announced 'reciprocal tariffs' in April, there is a chorus now for drastic governmental intervention to safeguard the backbone of the economy — it contributes nearly half (45.79% in FY25) of goods exports and employs over 28 crore people. The fisheries sector has sought a 240-day moratorium on pre- and post-shipment credit repayment, while the textiles, apparel and gem and jewellery sectors want interest subvention. The government has, however, ruled out direct subsidies. But unprecedented challenges require novel responses. The government must include in its arsenal a drastic refashioning of near-term trade ties with neighbours, in particular, China, which it had ignored in the hope that the assiduous cultivation of ties with Washington would pay off.

Balancing code and commerce in U.K. trade compact
Balancing code and commerce in U.K. trade compact

The Hindu

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Balancing code and commerce in U.K. trade compact

India's digital trade compact with the United Kingdom breaks new ground. Chapter 12 of the India-U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) sets out a bargain that trades some oversight tools for access, credibility and scale. The trade-off has sparked a policy debate. Supporters call it a strategic step into the global digital economy. Critics call it a retreat from digital sovereignty. Such agreements rarely produce winner-take-all outcomes. They usually end in negotiated compromises. On balance, the gains look real, but they signal a need for guard rails that keep pace with evolving risks. The digital wins The digital wins are clear. The agreement recognises electronic signatures and contracts and commits both sides to work towards mutual recognition. That trims paperwork for software-as-a-service firms and also lowers barriers for small and medium enterprises. Paperless trade and electronic invoicing make cross-border documentation and payments easier. And policy continuity on zero customs duties for electronic transmissions protects a software export pipeline that the Commerce Ministry estimates at $30 billion a year. Cooperation on data innovation can help too. The text encourages pilot projects that use regulatory sandboxes where required. That gives payments and other data-driven firms a way to test and scale tools under supervision, which builds credibility abroad. Beyond the digital chapter, the broader India-U.K. deal is expected to improve day-to-day commerce. Industry expects that as the agreement is implemented, close to 99% of Indian merchandise exports could enter the U.K. duty-free, with textile tariffs falling sharply, including from 12% to zero on key lines, increasing growth prospects in textile export hubs such as Tiruppur (Tamil Nadu) and Ludhiana (Punjab). Analysts also point to more doors opening in British public procurement for Indian IT suppliers. Employers say social-security waivers for short assignments could cut payroll costs by roughly one-fifth. These moves promise a wider and more predictable trade corridor. The digital costs Nevertheless, the possible digital costs deserve attention. Critics have contended that India has stepped back from source-code checks as a default regulatory tool, as there is a ban on code-inspection under the agreement. Regulators can demand access on a case-by-case basis, tied to an investigation or a court process. Government procurement is excluded from the scope of digital trade. Hence any access to source code in products procured by government is not restricted. While the agreement aims to enhance business trust, it does not sacrifice essential interests. A general security exception exists. It preserves national supervision of power grids, or payment systems and other critical infrastructure, even if privately owned. The restriction is only of good governance, ensuring that action is not taken in a manner which would constitute a disguised restriction on trade. Should additional reassurance be required, a practical step could be to accredit trusted labs for reviewing sensitive code, under tight safeguards. On government data, the posture is voluntary. There is no legally binding commitment. India decides what to publish and in what form. When it does open a dataset, it should be machine-readable and easy to reuse. This is not a blank cheque for anyone to demand access. India could also seek clear audit trails for cross-border data intermediaries so that accountability follows the data. There is no 'automatic MFN (most favoured nation)' for cross-border data flows. Instead, the agreement creates a forward review mechanism. If one side later signs a trade pact with tougher data rules, the two sides consult on whether to extend equivalent terms. There is a promise to talk; not an autopilot extension. A formal review is stipulated within five years. As multiple versions of ChatGPT in under three years show that AI is developing rapidly, future pacts should have a review every three years to align rules with risks. Aligning with modern trade norms marks a departure from past Indian practice, but this makes sense for a country that is seeking a larger role in the global digital economy. It reflects India's shift from trade scepticism to strategic engagement. Domestic foundations usually anchor external commitments. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 still needs notification of final rules. For future trade texts to build on that framework, the rules need to institutionalise open consultations before deals are closed so that inputs are sought and concerns surface early and can be addressed in time. Steps to take Digital treaties decide what governments can regulate, what companies can expect, and what citizens can protect. Chapter 12 of the India-U.K. agreement is a milestone in terms of a first step. In future, India should integrate market-openness with regulatory oversight. It could accredit trusted labs to review sensitive code under strict safeguards and also mandate audit trails for cross-border data flows. It could also institutionalise broad-based pre-negotiation consultations and schedule regular three-year reviews of digital treaties. Together, these steps show that sovereignty and global engagement need not pull in opposite directions but, instead, can power the modern Indian economy. Syed Akbaruddin is a former Indian Permanent Representative to the United Nations and, currently, Dean, Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad. Shivangi Pandey is Executive Assistant to the Dean, Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store