NHS Fife bid to block livestream of Peggie hearing dismissed
However, it is understood they were told such a move would be contrary to the principle of open justice.
The Employment Tribunal was originally due to finish in February after ten days but has now been adjourned until 16 July, when it is expected to last a further 11 days.
The extension is partly due to NHS Fife failing to hand over documentation it had been ordered to provide by the judge.
Ms Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, is suing the board after she was suspended for raising concerns about a trans woman doctor, Beth Upton, using a female changing room.
On Christmas Eve 2023, she experienced a sudden heavy period and was worried she had bled through her scrubs. When she went to the facility and found Dr Upton already there, she stated that, in her view, the medic was a man and should not be in the room.
Shortly after, Dr Upton made a formal complaint.
Ms Peggie was placed on special leave in late December 2023 and suspended from duty in January 2024, pending an investigation into her 'alleged unwanted behaviours towards another member of NHS Fife staff.'
Her suspension was lifted in April, but she remained subject to disciplinary proceedings. She later launched legal action against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, alleging multiple breaches of the Equality Act 2010.
The livestream of the tribunal attracted large numbers of public observers, but the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) used by HM Courts and Tribunals Service suffered technical issues, particularly under high demand.
Observers were not automatically muted and could keep their cameras on, occasionally appearing on the tribunal's main screen — causing disruption.
Towards the end of the hearing's first phase, CVP access was cut for everyone except the media.
NHS Fife claimed the interruptions caused delays.
Separately, they also accused Tribunal Tweets of making 'a number of inaccuracies,' arguing that their permission to live-tweet — granted on the basis of fair and accurate reporting — should be revoked.
However, it is understood the judge rejected both requests.
On Tribunal Tweets, the court acknowledged that some mistakes had been made, but that they did not consider that the threshold had been reached at which they would need to revoke access.
Tribunal Tweets permission to live-tweet proceedings in Peggie vs NHS Fife & Dr Upton remains in place. The respondents' application was denied. The tribunal is scheduled to resume on 16 July 2025. https://t.co/HqwAECA7ts pic.twitter.com/CI7b1t1z7b — Tribunal Tweets (@tribunaltweets) May 14, 2025
A spokesperson for NHS Fife said: "An approach was made by the tribunal for comment after a member of the public raised concerns about the accuracy of the live-tweeting from the Tribunal Tweets account during the earlier proceedings.
"Our legal representatives subsequently provided feedback to the tribunal and we accept todays decision."
The Scottish Tory equalities spokeswoman Tess White MSP said the decision was "another humiliation for NHS Fife."
She added: "Given the huge public interest in this case, it was appalling the health board was hellbent on keeping the public in the dark from proceedings.
"If it [the case] does press ahead, they must guarantee the public can witness and report on this case without any restrictions being imposed on them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Courier
a day ago
- The Courier
How a Kinross woman's beloved pet dog is inspiring bid to change law
A campaigning mum from Kinross hopes the memory of her much-loved dog will help change the law for people who need 'emotional support animals'. Elizabeth Crammond took up the challenge to change UK equalities law after sadly losing Daisy in March. The Yorkshire terrier, who joined the family in 2009, was a constant companion and helped Elizabeth cope with stressful situations. She has fybromialgia and other debilitating conditions, and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. The presence of her canine companion was a constant source of comfort after her own mother died from cancer in 2011. Daisy, classed as an emotional support animal with a doctor's note to prove it, would still be turned away from places including restaurants and public venues. 'After my mum passed away, Daisy was my emotional support,' Elizabeth told The Courier. 'She was the tiniest thing, she went everywhere with me to the point I lived my life around her. 'I was having a lot of anxiety and panic attacks, and that's where my fybromialgia would come in.' The condition flared up under stress, she says, causing even more anxiety about leaving the house and living a normal life. 'Daisy knew when an attack was coming and she would bring me back into the zone,' Elizabeth said. Daisy would even help support her own little daughter, now four, as she was growing up. Elizabeth, 42, who works in education, realised she would have to change the Equality Act 2010 to put support animals on the same footing as guide dogs. She's doing that by enlisting help from her local MP Pete Wishart and lodging a petition at Westminster to show UK-wide support. Elizabeth says the change of the law will also help people with unseen conditions, avoiding embarrassing situations in public places. Her petition – called Daisy Companion Law – is live on the Commons website.
Daily Mail
6 days ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Hotel chef sacked over blazing row with boyfriend in front of guests because he had slept with one of her friends blames anxiety as she wins £13,000 for wrongful dismissal
A young chef who was sacked from a luxury hotel after a foul-mouthed rant at her 'cheating' boyfriend in front of shocked guests has been awarded more than £13,000 by an employment tribunal. Abbie Garner, 21, triggered a slew of complaints when she accused colleague Dylan Bolt of sleeping with one of her friends, screaming: 'You f****** made me love you, then you cheated on me, you c***.' She was dismissed following a surly appearance at a disciplinary hearing where she turned up late and snapped: 'I have apologised. What else do you want?' But she has won a claim for disability discrimination against The Lifehouse Spa and Hotel in Thorpe-le-Soken, Essex, after arguing her 'inability to control her anger' was because she was suffering from anxiety and depression at the time. The commis chef was told she would receive £13,455 in damages due to her 'unfavourable treatment'. The four-star 12-acre resort, which promises guests 'a world of complete serenity in our adults-only oasis' and charges up to £269 for an exclusive spa day, declined to comment when approached by the Mail. A spokeswoman said: 'This is a personnel-related matter and our company policy means we will not comment on an employee, either current or previous.' Ms Garner's father, David, 51, said: 'You can't see all disabilities. 'I'm not trying to say that the hotel are bad people. They made a common mistake and they have to realise that this is now unacceptable to treat staff or anyone in that manner. There needs to be more understanding.' He added: 'It was a horrible break-up, unfortunately, but as they worked and lived together we tried to support them. But at work we couldn't do anything. 'She's doing well in herself [now]. She's got a new job, totally changed career because she could not handle the stress in a kitchen and the way it was handled. 'She's now working in care, so she's away from the one room hot stress scenario. 'The money won't change anything. She wants to work.' The peace and quiet at the hotel was shattered on August 9, 2023, when Ms Garner, who worked in the hotel's two AA Rosette restaurant, got into an argument with her then-boyfriend at the start of her shift. 'Several of the staff heard [Miss Garner's] voice loudly swearing', the tribunal heard. 'She was arguing with Dylan Bolt, who she had been in a relationship with at the time. Mr Bolt had apparently slept with one of her friends. 'The argument started in a corridor outside the laundry room near the kitchen. This corridor connects to both the spa reception and an outdoor sunbathing area, both of which are used by guests. 'This corridor is open plan, with hard walls and floor – we accept that the sound echoes – and the door to the spa reception is open during the summer months. '[Miss Garner] was heard shouting 'f***' and 'c***' at Mr Bolt by numerous staff and guests, including in the spa reception. 'The argument continued into the outdoor loading bay area next to a sunbathing area used by guests.' A staff member told the hotel's investigation: 'I could hear shouting and swearing. The swearing from the female could be heard in the spa reception areas. 'The female member of staff was saying 'You fucking made me love you, then you cheated on me, you c***'. 'The male member of staff was saying 'I'm not f****** doing this now' and she replied 'F*** off then'. 'She was obviously angry and screaming and shouting but the language used and the shouting was not acceptable.' The argument continued until a restaurant manager, Jean Mercure, intervened, the hearing was told. He took Miss Garner into reception, while the head chef led Mr Bolt into the changing rooms. The next day Sarah Tester, the hotel's finance and operations director, received several complaints about the shouting, with one guest giving negative remarks upon checking out. After the investigation, Miss Garner was asked to attend to a disciplinary hearing on August 15, 2023. But she failed to apologise when she turned up late, admitted she had not fully read her invitation letter and was not accompanied by a representative. She admitted to the shouting and swearing and that it was unacceptable in the workplace but blamed Mr Bolt for her behaviour. At the end of the meeting, she told Ms Tester: 'I have apologised. What else do you want? Ms Tester concluded that Miss Garner had committed serious misconduct and decided to fire her. The decision was then appealed, with Miss Garner stating that her irritability, anger and mood swings arose from her disabilities of depression, anxiety and polycystic ovary syndrome - a condition that affects fertility, metabolism and overall health - which she had previously made the hotel aware of. When her appeal was turned down, she took the hotel's owners, Thorpe Hall Leisure Limited, to the tribunal in east London where she won claims for disability discrimination and a failure to make reasonable adjustments. Employment Judge Catrin Lewis accepted Ms Garner's 'continued employment posed a risk to the respondent's reputation' but added this didn't justify filing to consider whether her conduct was linked to mental health. She said: 'We have found that [Miss Garner's] inability to control her anger and her abruptness in the disciplinary meeting both arose in consequence of her disability. 'It was not disputed that being dismissed amounted to unfavourable treatment. 'We are satisfied that Ms Tester was aware that [her] behaviour was unusual and she was also aware that [she] had recently returned to work after a period of poor mental health and was on anti-depressant medication.' The hotel, which has treatment rooms, a gym, pool, spa and 89 guestrooms, was dubbed the UK's first 'dementia spa' in 2019 after it started offering treatments for people with the condition.
The National
7 days ago
- The National
Citizens Advice Scotland in trans rights row over bathroom change
Citizens Advice Scotland (CAS) staff told staff last month that the charity would be enforcing a policy of 'male only' and 'female only' toilets on the basis of sex assigned at birth, according to an email seen by The Ferret. CAS's chief executive, Derek Mitchell, reportedly said in the email, sent May 6, that the charity was bound by 'legal constraints' following the landmark ruling by the UK Supreme Court in April on how sex should be interpreted under the Equality Act 2010. The ruling stated that, under the Equality Act 2010, the definition of 'woman' refers to 'biological sex', a decision gender critical campaigners claimed had brought 'clarity on the law'. READ MORE: Labour MPs visit Israel on lobbying trip in middle of Gaza genocide However, legal experts have pointed out that the ruling on the definition of 'man' and 'woman' relates to the 2010 Equality Act only, while campaign groups have also raised concerns over the interpretation of the ruling. Mitchell said the decision to enforce male and female-only bathrooms was in response to the ruling and subsequent interim 'guidance' offered by the UK's human rights regulator, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). CAS's chief executive reportedly clarified that a separate single-occupancy bathroom would also be available 'for any colleague'. 'As an employer, CAS is required to comply with the law, and we need to ensure our practices and policies reflect current legal standards,' Mitchell said. 'This is not an expression of any view on the High Court ruling, it is our legal obligation as an employer.' Mitchell reportedly sent a second update two days later acknowledging the upset that had been caused due to the decision, but doubled down on claims that the charity was bound by the law to introduce changes. The decision has left staff at CAS feeling hurt, afraid, disappointed, and concerned by Mitchell's claim that the decision had been taken out of the charity's hands by legal changes, The Ferret reported. A spokesperson for CAS said they recognised 'this issue touches on deeply personal experiences and we will continue to monitor and review our approach should guidance change'. Lawyers and campaigners have said that the EHRC's update was neither intended as formal guidance nor legally binding, and therefore gives employers options on how they proceed. One staff member at CAS claimed neither the trade union nor the equality, diversity and inclusion committee were consulted ahead of the decision, according to The Ferret. Another staff member told The Ferret how CAS had built its workplace culture around inclusion and dignity, and that this policy change was effectively a 'slap in the face'. 'It's almost like it's polluted my work,' said one staff member. 'Because obviously when we consult, we're very respectful of any kind of pronouns. So I would like to think that we would treat our colleagues the same, and that the attitude from management would be the same.' Another said the decision to put this out 'without going through proper channels to make sure that the information that he's putting in there is correct' made them feel 'less safe within the organisation'. The Good Law Project have raised concerns since the ruling by the UK Supreme Court over how it is interpreted and whether or not it will impact other legislation that governs access to toilets and changing rooms in the workplace. Jen Ang, a human rights lawyer and director of legal firm Lawmanity, was shown the leaked emails by The Ferret. She said: 'The Supreme Court decision does not require employers to provide only separate toilets for men and women – it only clarified the meaning of 'sex' for purposes of the Equality Act and in so doing, shifted our understanding of what is required if single sex, mixed sex or only sex facilities are being provided by an employer. 'Employers must consider a range of factors in deciding what toilet facilities to provide, and be prepared to justify their decisions.' She claimed companies or charities that restricted access to some facilities on the basis of a protected characteristic like sex or gender reassignment without being able to justify the decision as a 'proportionate means to a legitimate aim', may be open to legal challenge in the future. READ MORE: Police issue statement after Scottish men killed in Spain shooting 'This is a good reason why organisations should start early with good faith efforts to gather the information they will need to make these decisions,' Ang added. 'By engaging with staff and service users to understand their requirements – and also why clear and practical guidance and support is urgently needed from our UK equalities and human rights regulators, and from our national governments.'
