Plastic causing "disease and death from infancy to old age," report warns
The new review of existing evidence, which was carried out by leading health researchers and doctors, was published one day ahead of fresh talks in Geneva aiming at getting the world's first treaty on plastic pollution. The experts called for the delegates from nearly 180 nations expected to attend the gathering to finally agree on a treaty after previous failed attempts.
Comparing plastic to air and lead pollution, the report said the impact on health of plastic pollution could be mitigated by laws and policies.
"Plastics cause disease and death from infancy to old age and are responsible for health-related economic losses exceeding $1.5 trillion annually," it said.
A recent umbrella review of epidemiological research on the health impacts of plastic chemicals showed "consistent evidence for multiple health effects at all stages of human life for many plastic chemicals" and found that infants and young children were especially at risk, the report said. "These effects include impaired reproductive potential (eg, polycystic ovary syndrome and endometriosis), perinatal effects (eg, miscarriage, reduced birthweight, and malformations of the genital organs), diminished cognitive function (eg, intelligence quotient loss), insulin resistance, hypertension and obesity in children, and type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, obesity, and cancer in adults."
"It is incumbent on us to act in response," Philip Landrigan, a doctor and researcher at Boston College, said in a statement responding to the report. "To those meeting in Geneva: please take up the challenge and the opportunity of finding the common ground that will enable meaningful and effective international cooperation in response to this global crisis."
The researchers also warned about tiny pieces of plastic called microplastics that have been found throughout nature - and throughout human bodies. The full effect of microplastics on health are not yet fully known, but researchers have sounded the alarm about the potential impact of this ubiquitous plastic.
The amount of plastic produced by the world has risen from two million tons in 1950 to 475 million tons in 2022, the report said.
The number is projected to triple by 2060, yet currently less than 10 percent of all plastic is recycled, it added.
Plastic is made from fossil fuels, and Landrigan said that the world's plastic "crisis" is connected to its climate crisis.
"There is no understating the magnitude of both the climate crisis and the plastic crisis," Landrigan said.
"They are both causing disease, death and disability today in tens of thousands of people, and these harms will become more severe in the years ahead as the planet continues to warm and plastic production continues to increase," he said.
Black swimmers teach others amid history of aquatic segregation
How safe is our Social Security safety net?
In Gaza, hunger forces impossible choices as Hamas releases propaganda video of hostage
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paleontologists discover ‘unusual' long-necked plesiosaur in Germany
In 1978, paleontologists discovered the remarkable, nearly complete skeleton with even some fossilized tissue surviving, at a quarry in the famous Posidonia Shale fossil bed roughly 18 miles southeast of Stuttgart. Initial analysis clearly indicated the specimen was a plesiosauroid—a family of long-necked marine reptiles that swam Earth's ancient oceans. Researchers soon transferred it to the Stuttgart State Museum of Natural History, but the creature never received a thorough examination. Instead, it remained within the institution's archives for years. After nearly 50 years of storage, paleontologists were finally able to carve out time for a thorough evaluation of the mystery. And according to their analysis published August 4 in the journal Peerj Life & Environment, the bones belong to a previously unknown species: Plesionectes longicollum, or the 'long-necked near-swimmer.' The Loch Ness monster-esque reptile lived around 184 to 175 million years ago during the Lower Jurassic period. 'This specimen has been in collections for decades, but previous studies never fully explored its distinctive anatomy,' study lead author and paleontologist Sven Sachs said in a statement. 'Our detailed examination revealed an unusual combination of skeletal features that clearly distinguish it from all previously known plesiosaurs.' Although experts determined the specimen had yet to reach adulthood by the time it died, its details are so significantly different from other plesiosauroids that it required a new genus and species, including an impressive backbone. The remarkable skeleton measures nearly 10.5 feet long with a 4.1 feet neck composed of at least 43 vertebrae. 'This number is considerably higher than in most other Early Jurassic plesiosauroids,' they wrote in their analysis. While largely well-preserved, the researchers noted the same can't be said for its 'heavily damaged' skull. P. longicollum lived during a 'critical time in Earth's history' known as the early Toarcian period—an era kicked off by a mass extinction known as the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event. At that time, the planet hosted vast, thin ice sheets that stretched into lower latitudes. A major volcanic event is believed to have kickstarted the anoxic event, resulting in global warming from rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. This in turn raised ocean temperatures anywhere between 1.8 to 10.8 degrees Fahrenheit, depending on latitude. At its height, Toarcian surface ocean temperatures averaged 69.8 degrees Fahrenheit. 'This discovery adds another piece to the puzzle of marine ecosystem evolution during a critical time in Earth's history,' study co-author Daniel Madzia explained. P. longicollum is now the sixth plesiosaur species discovered at the Posidonia Shale in Holzmaden—including representatives from all three major plesiosaur lineages. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eating fewer ultra-processed foods could boost weight loss, trial suggests
Eating minimally processed foods and avoiding ultra processed foods (UPFs) could help people lose twice as much weight, a new trial has found. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, researchers suggest. UPFs include the likes of processed meals, ice cream, crisps, some breakfast cereals, biscuits and fizzy drinks. They tend to have high levels of saturated fat, salt and sugar, as well as additives and ingredients that are not used when people cook from scratch, like preservatives, emulsifiers and artificial colours and flavours. The trial, led by experts at University College London (UCL) and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), involved 55 people split into two groups. Half were given an eight-week diet plan comprising minimally processed foods, such as overnight oats and spaghetti bolognese, while the other half were given foods like breakfast oat bars or lasagne ready meals. After completing one diet, the groups then switched. Researchers matched the two diets nutritionally on levels of fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates, salt and fibre using the Eatwell Guide, which outlines recommendations on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. Dr Samuel Dicken, of the UCL Centre for Obesity Research and UCL department of behavioural science and health, said: 'Previous research has linked ultra-processed foods with poor health outcomes. 'But not all ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy based on their nutritional profile.' He said the main aim of the study was to explore the role of food processing and how it impacts weight, blood pressure, body composition and food cravings. Some 50 people completed the trial, with both groups losing weight. However, those on the minimally processed diet lost more weight (2.06%) compared to the UPF diet (1.05% loss). The UPF diet also did not result in significant fat loss, researchers said. Dr Dicken said: 'Though a 2% reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13% weight reduction in men and a 9% reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4% weight reduction in men and 5% in women after the ultra-processed diet. 'Over time this would start to become a big difference.' Those on the trial were also asked to complete questionnaires on food cravings before and after starting the diets. Those eating minimally processed foods had less cravings and were able to resist them better, the study suggests. However, researchers also measured others markers like blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels and cholesterol and found no significant negative impacts of the UPF diet. Professor Chris van Tulleken, of the UCL division of infection and immunity and UCLH, said: 'The global food system at the moment drives diet-related poor health and obesity, particularly because of the wide availability of cheap, unhealthy food. 'This study highlights the importance of ultra-processing in driving health outcomes in addition to the role of nutrients like fat, salt and sugar.' The Eatwell Guide recommends the average woman should consume around 2,000 calories a day, while an average man should consume 2,500. Both diet groups had a calorie deficit, meaning people were eating fewer calories than what they were burning, which helps with weight loss. However, the deficit was higher from minimally processed foods at around 230 calories a day, compared with 120 calories per day from UPFs. Professor Rachel Batterham, senior author of the study from the UCL centre for obesity research, said: 'Despite being widely promoted, less than 1% of the UK population follows all of the recommendations in the Eatwell Guide, and most people stick to fewer than half. 'The normal diets of the trial participants tended to be outside national nutritional guidelines and included an above average proportion of UPF, which may help to explain why switching to a trial diet consisting entirely of UPF, but that was nutritionally balanced, resulted in neutral or slightly favourable changes to some secondary health markers. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, and prioritising high-fibre foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts. 'Choosing less processed options such as whole foods and cooking from scratch, rather than ultra-processed, packaged foods or ready meals, is likely to offer additional benefits in terms of body weight, body composition and overall health.' Commenting on the study, Tracy Parker, nutrition lead at the British Heart Foundation, said: 'These findings support what we have long suspected – that the way food is made might affect our health, not just the nutrients it contains. 'The way this study was designed means it is more reflective of real-world conditions than previous research on ultra-processed foods. 'Unlike earlier observational studies, this was a randomised controlled trial where participants were provided with all their meals, and the diets were carefully matched to meet the Eatwell Guide – this allowed researchers to isolate the effect of food processing itself, making it more likely that the differences seen after eight weeks were due to how the food in their diets was processed, not just what was in it. 'Completely cutting UPFs out of our diets isn't realistic for most of us, but including more minimally processed foods – like fresh or home cooked meals – alongside a balanced diet could offer added benefits too. 'Mediterranean-style diets, which include plenty of minimally or unprocessed foods such as fruit, vegetables, fish, nuts and seeds, beans, lentils and wholegrains, have consistently been shown to reduce our risk of heart attacks and strokes.'
Wall Street Journal
42 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
A Turning Point in Colon Cancer: Young People Are Finding It Earlier
People under age 50 have been appearing increasingly at doctor's offices in the past few decades, complaining of blood in their stool or bowel or of abdominal trouble or unexplained weight loss. The diagnosis: colorectal cancer. And by that time, it was often too late. But that paradigm is finally starting to shift, at least for patients in their 40s.
